help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erden, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erden, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S. C.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 2 448-452
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Inhibits Luteinizing Hormone-Stimulated P450c17 Gene Expression and Androgen Production by Isolated Thecal Cells of Human Ovarian Follicles1

H. F. Erden2, I. H. Zwain, H. Asakura3 and S. S. C. Yen4

Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0633

Address all correspondence to: Dr. S. S. C. Yen, Department of Reproductive Medicine, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0633. E-mail: dnye{at}ucsd.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recently, we reported that the thecal compartment of the human ovary contains a CRF system replete with gene expression and protein for corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), CRF-Receptor 1 (CRF-R1), and the blood-derived high affinity CRF-binding protein (CRF-BP). Granulosa cells are devoid of the CRF system. The parallel increases in intensity of CRF, CRF-R1, and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and proteins in thecal cells with follicular maturation suggest that the intraovarian CRF system may play an autocrine role regulating androgen biosynthesis, with a downstream effect on estrogen production by granulosa cells. The functionality of the ovarian CRF system may be conditioned by the relative presence of plasma-derived CRF-BP by virtue of its localization of protein, but not transcript in thecal cells and its ability to compete with CRF for the CRF receptor.

To further these findings, in the present study we have examined the effect of CRF on LH-stimulated 17{alpha}-hydroxylase (P450c17) gene expression and androgen production by isolated thecal cells from human ovarian follicles (11–13 mm). During the 48-h culture, addition of LH (10 ng/mL) to the medium increased by 5- and 6-fold dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione production by thecal cells. Remarkably, the LH-stimulated, but not basal, androgen production was inhibited by CRF in a time- and dose-dependent manner. The half-maximal (ID50) effect dose of CRF occurred at 5 x 10-8 mol/L, and at a maximal concentration of 10-6 mol/L, CRF completely inhibited LH-stimulated androgen production. This inhibitory effect of CRF became evident at 12 h (45%), and by 24 h the effect was more pronounced, with a 70% reduction from baseline. As determined by Northern analyses, CRF dose dependently decreased LH-stimulated P450c17 mRNA levels, with a maximal inhibition of 85% P450c17 gene expression at a CRF concentration of 10-6 mol/L. With the addition of 10-6 mol/L of the antagonist {alpha}-helical CRF-(9–41), the inhibitory effect of CRF was partially reversed for both P450c17 mRNA (75%) and androgen production (50%), indicating the CRF-R1-mediated event.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated a potent inhibitory effect of CRF on LH-stimulated dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione production that appears to be mediated through the reduction of P450c17 gene expression. Thus, the ovarian CRF system may function as autocrine regulators for androgen biosynthesis in the thecal cell compartment to maintain optimal substrate for estrogen biosynthesis by granulosa cells. Further studies to define the role of CRF-BP in the endocrine modulation of the intraovarian CRF system are needed.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IT IS NOW established that the hypothalamic neuropeptide corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and its binding sites are widely distributed in extrahypothalamic areas of the brain, where it coordinates endocrine, behavioral, and autonomic adaptive responses to stress (1, 2). Demonstration of the synthesis and release of CRF in peripheral tissues suggest its participation in regulatory activities outside the brain-pituitary system and that it may function as a paracrine/autocrine regulator of the immune system and reproductive function (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8). In the reproductive system, CRF and related POMC peptides inhibit GnRH neuronal activities (9, 10), an effect that may involve the mediation of interleukin-1 (IL-1) (9). Women with stress-related ovarian dysfunction have evidence of increased CRF secretion (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16). Immunoreactive (Ir-) CRF and its binding sites were detected in thecal and stromal cells in rat and human ovaries and in human follicular fluid (17, 18). In the rat testis, IrCRF and its binding sites were also detected in androgen-producing cells, and CRF inhibits testosterone production by Leydig cells in vitro (19, 20, 21).

These earlier observations suggest that intragonadal CRF may function to regulate androgen biosynthesis. To further this idea, we recently characterized the CRF system, which includes ligand, receptor, CRF-binding protein (CRF-BP), and the androgen steroidogenic enzyme P450c17, in the human ovary using in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry methods (22). The thecal-stromal compartment, but not granulosa cells, of the human ovary contain a CRF system complete with CRF, CRF-Receptor 1 (CRF-R1), and the blood-derived CRF-BP. The parallel increases in the intensity of gene expression and protein for CRF, CRF-R1, and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase with follicular maturation suggest that the intraovarian CRF system may play an autocrine role in thecal cell androgenesis, with a downstream effect on estrogen production by granulosa cells (22). These findings provided the basis for the present study, which sought to determine the effect of CRF on 17{alpha}-hydroxylase gene expression and androgen production by isolated thecal cells from human ovarian follicles. Here we report these findings.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell preparation and culture

Ovaries were collected from 7 women (33–41 yr old) undergoing benign gynecological surgery during the follicular phase. The stage of the menstrual cycle was determined by the recorded last menstrual period. Pathological examination of the ovaries revealed no apparent abnormalities. None of the patients had received any hormone therapy for up to 3 months before surgery. Human ovarian thecal cells were isolated from 15 healthy follicles, 11–13 mm in diameter, with an androstenedione/estradiol ratio of less than 0.9 (range, 0.11–0.9). Follicles with a androstenedione/estradiol ratio greater than 1 were considered atretic and were not used for the study. The study was approved by the committee on investigations involving human subjects at the University of California-San Diego. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Isolation and culture of human thecal cells were performed as previously described by McAllister et al. (23) with minor modification. Briefly, follicular fluid from the dissected follicle was aspirated, and the follicle wall was opened. Granulosa cells were gently removed with a platinum loop. After extensive washing with medium, the theca interna was stripped from the follicle wall. A suspension of thecal cells was obtained after dispersal for 30 min at 37 C with 0.1% collagenase and 0.01% deoxyribonuclease (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in medium containing 1% (wt/vol) BSA. The dispersed thecal cells were further purified using a discontinuous Percoll gradient, as previously described by Magoffin and Erickson (24). Cells were then suspended in DMEM-Ham’s F-12 (1:1) containing 25 mmol/L HEPES, 50 IU/mL penicillin, 50 µg/mL streptomycin, an additional 2 mmol/L L-glutamine, 10% horse serum, 10% FBS, and 0.1% BSA and seeded in 12- or 6-well cell culture plates at a density of 106 or 2 x 106 cells/plate, respectively. After 24-h incubation at 37 C in humidified 5% CO2 incubator, cells were extensively washed to remove serum-supplemented medium and reincubated for 48 h in serum-free DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium containing 25 mmol/L HEPES, 1 mg/mL BSA, 1 µg/mL transferrin, 20 nmol/L selenium, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin. Thecal cells were cultured in the presence and absence of LH (10 ng/mL), CRF (10-8, 10-7, and 10-6 mol/L), and LH plus CRF or CRF antagonist ({alpha}-helical 9–41; 10-6 mol/L). Media of cells cultured in 12-well plates were collected and stored at -20 C until analysis of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and androstenedione concentrations using RIA kits (Diagnostic System Laboratories, Webster, TX). The minimum detection limit of the DHEA and androstenedione assays were 10 and 30 pg/mL, respectively. The intraassay variations were 3%, and 4.2%, and the interassay variations were 6.4% and 7.6%, respectively. The total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from cells cultured in 6-well plates and stored at -70 C until analysis of P450c17 gene expression by Northern blot.

Northern blot analysis

RNA was isolated from thecal cells using procedures provided by the manufacturer (Tel-Test "B," Friendswood, TX). The RNA content was determined by UV spectrophotometry at 254 nm. About 20 µg total RNA from each sample were denatured in 6% formaldehyde and 50% formamide in 1 x MOPS buffer (0.2 mol/L 3-morpholinopropanesulfonic acid, pH 7.0, containing 50 mmol/L sodium acetate and 10 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate) for 15 min at 65 C. Samples were then loaded onto a 1% agarose gel containing 3% formaldehyde and subjected to electrophoresis. RNA was transferred onto a nylon membrane (Nytran) and immobilized by UV cross-linking. The membrane was then prehybridized for 4 h at 42 C in 50% deionized formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1% SDS, 100 µg/mL sheared and denatured salmon sperm DNA, 0.5 µg/mL transfer RNA, and 1 mol/L sodium chloride. P450c17 transcript was detected using a {alpha}--32P-labeled human P450c17 complementary DNA fragment that was radiolabeled by nick translation. The membrane was hybridized with the labeled probe for 24 h at 42 C. The blot was then washed twice with 2 x SSC (30 mmol/L M sodium citrate, pH 7.0, at 22 C containing 0.3 mol/L NaCl) for 5 min at room temperature, twice with 2 x SSC containing 1% SDS for 30 min at 60 C, and twice with 0.1 x SSC for 30 min at room temperature. Audoradiography was performed at -70 C with intensifying screens. Relative changes in P450c17 messenger RNA (mRNA) level with thecal cells treated with and without LH and in the presence and absence of CRF and CRF antagonist were quantified using densitometric scanning of the blot and normalized for loading of total RNA using ß-actin mRNA expression in each treatment group.

Statistical analysis

Means were compared by one-factor ANOVA. Values are given as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effect of CRF on androgen production

During the 48-h culture, the addition of LH (10 ng/mL) to culture medium induced an approximately 6-fold increase (P < 0.001) in DHEA and androstenedione production by thecal cells compared to control values (Fig. 1Go). Remarkably, CRF inhibited LH-stimulated DHEA and androstenedione production in a dose-dependent manner, with half-maximal (ID50) effect at 5 x 10-8 mol/L (P < 0.05). At a maximum concentration of 10-6 mol/L, CRF suppressed LH-stimulated androgen production to a level comparable to the basal value (P < 0.001; Fig. 1Go). Although CRF profoundly attenuated LH-stimulated androstenedione production, it had no effect on basal levels (data not shown). The time course of the inhibitory effect of CRF on LH-stimulated androstenedione production by thecal cells was evident at 12 h of culture (45% inhibition; P < 0.01), and by 24 h, inhibition of LH-stimulated androstenedione production by CRF became more pronounced, with a 70% reduction (P < 0.001) from baseline (Fig. 2Go). The inhibitory effect of CRF on LH-stimulated androgen production appears to be receptor mediated, as it was partially reversed (50%; P < 0.01)) by the addition of the CRF receptor antagonist (10-6 mol/L; {alpha}-helical 9–41; Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Dose-dependent effect of CRF on LH-stimulated DHEA and androstenedione production by thecal cells. Purified thecal cells were cultured for 48 h at 37 C in serum-free DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium with and without LH and in the presence and absence of CRF. Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three replicate cultures. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.005; ****, P < 0.001.

 


View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Time-course effect of CRF on LH-stimulated androstenedione production by thecal cells. Purified thecal cells were cultured at 37 C for the indicated time periods in serum-free DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium with and without LH (10 ng/mL) and in the presence and absence of CRF (10-6 mol/L). Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three replicate cultures. ns, Not significantly different; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.005; ****, P < 0.001.

 


View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The effect of CRF receptor antagonist, {alpha}-helical CRF-(9–41) (ANT), on CRF-suppressed LH-stimulated DHEA and androstenedione production by thecal cells. Purified thecal cells were cultured for 48 h at 37 C in serum-free DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium with and without LH (10 ng/mL) and in the presence and absence of CRF (10-6 mol/L) and {alpha}-helical CRF-(9–41) (10-6 mol/L). Each data point represents the mean ± SD of three replicate cultures. **, P < 0.01; ****, P < 0.001.

 
Effect of CRF on P450c17 gene expression

To determine whether CRF exerts its inhibitory action on LH-stimulated androgen production by affecting gene expression of the key enzyme for androgen biosynthesis, P450c17, Northern blot analysis was performed to quantify changes in the P450c17 mRNA level. Thecal cells were cultured for 48 h with and without LH and in the presence and absence of CRF and CRF antagonist. Relative levels of P450c17 mRNA in each treatment group were quantified using densitometric scanning and normalized for loading of total RNA from thecal cells using ß-actin mRNA expression (Fig. 4Go). CRF decreased the LH-stimulated P450c17 mRNA level in a dose-dependent manner, with a maximum inhibition at a concentration of 10-6 mol/L CRF, which decreased P450c17 gene expression by 85% (P < 0.001) compared to the control value. This CRF-induced inhibition of P450c17 gene expression appears to be receptor mediated because it was partially reversed (75%; P < 0.001) by addition of the {alpha}-helical CRF-(9–41) receptor antagonist to culture medium (Fig. 4Go).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Dose-dependent effect of CRF on LH-stimulated P450c17 gene expression in thecal cells. A, Purified human thecal cells were cultured for 48 h at 37 C in serum-free DMEM-Ham’s F-12 medium with and without LH and in the presence and absence of CRF and {alpha}-helical CRF-(9–41) (ANT). The mRNA level of P450c17 was quantified by Northern blot analysis. B, Quantitation of the relative changes in P450c17 mRNA level in thecal cells as shown in A was assessed by densitometric scanning of the blot and normalized with ß-actin gene expression in each treatment group. Each data point represents the mean from two separate analyses. Lane 1, Basal level (no treatment); lane 2, control (cells treated with 10 ng/mL LH); lane 3, RNA was degraded (as revealed by ribosomal RNA analysis); lane 4, LH plus 10-7 mol/L CRF; lane 5, LH plus 10-6 mol/L CRF; lane 6, LH plus 10-6 mol/L CRF plus 10-6 mol/L ANT.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the present study, we have demonstrated that CRF inhibited LH-stimulated DHEA and androstenedione production by isolated thecal cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. However, it had no effect on basal secretion. The half-maximal (ID50) effect of CRF on androgen production by the thecal cells was 5 x 10-8, and at the maximal concentration of 10-6, CRF completely negated the increment of DHEA and androstenedione levels induced by LH (10 ng/mL). This inhibitory effect on thecal cell androstenedione production was evident at 12 h of culture (45%), and it was more pronounced at 24 h, with a 70% reduction of androstenedione levels.

Northern blot analyses showed that CRF also reduced LH-stimulated P450c17 mRNA levels in a dose-dependent manner, with maximum inhibition occurring at a concentration of 10-6 mol/L CRF, at which point P450c17 gene expression was decreased by 85% compared to the control value. The inhibitory effect of CRF on LH-stimulated of both P450c17 mRNA and androgen production appears to be mediated by CRF-R1, as the addition of 10-6 mol/L {alpha}-helical CRF-(9–41) receptor antagonist partially reversed the inhibition of thecal cell production of DHEA and androstenedione (50%) and P450c17 gene expression (75%). Thus, the inhibitory effect of CRF on androgen production by thecal cells in culture appears to be mediated through the reduction of androgen biosynthetic enzyme P450c17 mRNA. This was further indicated by the parallel decline in mRNA expression for P450c17 and the attenuation of LH-stimulated androgen production by CRF. It is known that LH stimulates androgen production in gonads by affecting several steps in the steroidogenic pathway. The binding of LH to its receptor induces a conformational change in the receptor, leading to G protein binding, and activates adenlylate cyclase and cAMP, which subsequently stimulate steroidogenic enzymes, P450scc and P450c17, and androgen production (25). However, our data cannot exclude the possibility that CRF may also exert its inhibitory action on LH-stimulated androgen production by human thecal cells at P450scc and/or at a step proximal to this enzyme. Further studies are required to address this issue. Although we have previously shown that the transcripts and protein for CRF, CRF-R1, and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase are colocalized in the thecal-stromal compartment (22), consideration should be given that resident ovarian macrophages, a major cellular component of the interstitial compartment, may subserve an additional source of CRF (18) as well as providing IL-1, through which it can inhibit androgen production (26).

The regulation and functional role of the human ovarian CRF system are complicated by the presence of high affinity CRF-BP in human plasma. We have previously shown an intense immunostaining for CRF-BP in the thecal-stromal compartment of mature follicles and in the lumen of capillary vessels, but mRNA encoding CRF-BP was not detected in the human ovary by either in situ hybridization or RT-PCR (22). Thus, the IrCRF-BP found in the thecal-stromal layer is not derived from the ovarian transcript, and in all probability, it originated from the peripheral circulation. CRF-BP was initially isolated from human plasma (27), and its complementary DNA was subsequently cloned from a liver DNA library (28). The binding affinity of CRF-BP to CRF exhibits a Kd an order of magnitude lower than that displayed by the CRF receptors (29). CRF-BP was shown to inhibit CRF-induced ACTH secretion from the pituitary (28) and placental tissue (30) in vitro. Although CRF-BP is expressed in many areas of the rat brain, CRF-BP has not been found in the peripheral plasma of several species studied (2, 29). Thus, CRF-BP in plasma appears to be unique to humans, and women have higher concentrations than men (31). It is likely, therefore, that the circulating CRF-BP may partake an endocrine role in the modulation of the ovarian CRF system by controlling the amount of free CRF available to interact with CRF receptors in the thecal compartment. This quenching effect of circulating CRF-BP on the ovarian CRF system in vivo may dictate the optimal degree of androgenesis by the thecal cell compartment, a proposition that may explain the paradox of an inhibitory effect of CRF on P450c17 mRNA in vitro and the concomitant increases in CRF and P450c17 mRNA in ovarian thecal-stromal cells with follicular maturation in vivo (22).

Recently, an inhibitory effect of CRF on FSH-stimulated estradiol production by human granulosa-luteal cells in vitro has been reported (32). This finding is inconsistent with the absence of CRF and CRF receptor transcript and protein in granulosa cells in vivo (22). The presence of CRF in follicular fluid (18) may reflect a paracrine action of CRF from thecal cells to granulosa cells. Further, CRF action on granulosa cells may be mediated by the IL-1 receptor rather than CRF-R1, as reported by Ghizzoni et al. (33).

In summary, the present in vitro findings together with our recent in vivo data have established the presence of a CRF system replete with ligand and receptor in the thecal-stromal cell compartment, with enhanced expression of both proteins and transcripts in parallel with the steroidogenic enzyme, 17{alpha}-hydroxylase, in the maturing follicle. The inhibitory effect of CRF on LH-stimulated androgen production appears to be mediated through the reduction of 17{alpha}-hydroxylase gene expression. Circulating CRF-BP may function as an extraovarian modulator by virtue of its ability to neutralize CRF action. As such, CRF-BP may be a determinant of the net effect of intraovarian CRF bioactivities. Thus, the ovarian CRF system may be viewed as an autocrine and paracrine regulator of steroidogenesis with an endocrine component of modulation. Additional studies are required to further characterize the functionality of the ovarian CRF system and its aberrations in conditions with excessive androgen production and enhanced P450c17 enzymatic expression, such as polycystic ovary syndrome (34).


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. George P. Chrousos (Developmental Endocrinology Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD) for generously providing plasmid expressing CRF and CRF antibody; Dr. Michael R. Waterman (Department of Biochemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) for P450c17 antibody; and Dr. Walter Miller (University of California, San Francisco) for providing P450c17 complementary DNA probe. We are grateful to Ms. Erlinda Imson and Mr. Jeff Wong for their technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by NICHHD Center Grant HD-12303–19 and NIH Grant R01-HD21198–05. Presented in part at the 79th Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Minneapolis, MN, June 11–14, 1997. Back

2 Former Research Fellow in Reproductive Endocrinology. Back

3 Former Clinical Fellow in Reproductive Endocrinology. Back

4 Investigator with the Clayton Foundation. Back

Received August 4, 1997.

Revised September 23, 1997.

Accepted October 14, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vale W, Rivier C, Brown MR, et al. 1983 Chemical and biological characterization of corticotropin releasing factor. Recent Prog Horm Res. 39:245–270.
  2. Turnbull AV, Rivier C. 1997 Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) and endocrine responses to stress: CRF receptors, binding protein, and related peptides. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 215:1–10.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Antoni FA. 1986 Hypothalamic control of adrenocorticotropin secretion: advances since the discovery of 41-residue corticotropin-releasing factor. Endocr Rev. 7:351–378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Sapolsky R, Rivier C, Yamamoto G, Plotsky P, Vale W. 1987 Interleukin-1 stimulates the secretion of hypothalamic corticotropin releasing factor. Science. 238:522–524.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Usui T, Nakai Y, Tsukada T, Jingami H, Takahashi H, Fukada J. 1988 Expression of adrenocorticotropin-releasing hormone precursor gene in placenta and other nonhypothalamic tissues in man. Mol Endocrinol. 2:871–875.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ekman R, Servenius B, Castro MG, et al. 1993 Biosynthesis of cortcotropin-releasing hormone in human T-lymphocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 44:7–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Stephanou A, Jessop DS, Knight RA, Lightman SL. 1990 Corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity and mRNA in human leukocytes. Brain Behav Immun. 4:67–73.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Karalis K, Sano H, Redwine J, Listwak S, Wilder R, Chrousos GP. 1991 Autocrine or paracrine inflammatory actions of corticotropin-releasing hormone in vivo. Science. 254:421–423.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Rivest S, Rivier C. 1995 The role of corticotropin-releasing factor and interleukin-1 in the regulation of neurons controlling reproductive functions. Endocr Rev. 16:177–199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Williams CL, Nishihara M, Thalabard J-C, Grosser PM, Hotchkiss J, Knobil E. 1990 Corticotropin-releasing factor, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse generator activity in the rhesus monkey: electrophysiological studies. NeuroEndocrinology. 52:133–137.[Medline]
  11. Suh BY, Liu JH, Berga SL, Quigley ME, Laughlin GA, Yen SSC. 1988 Hypercortisolism in patient with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 66:733–739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Berga SL, Mortola JF, Girton L, et al. 1989 Neuroendocrine aberrations in women with functional hypothalamic amenorrhea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 68:301–308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Biller BMK, Federoff HJ, Koenig JI, Klibanski A. 1990 Abnormal cortisol secretion and response to corticotropin-releasing hormone in women with hypothalamic amenorrhea. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:311–317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gold PW, Qwirtsman H, Avgerinos PC, et al. 1986 Abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function in anorexia nervosa. N Engl J Med. 314:1335–1342.[Abstract]
  15. Hotta M, Shibasaki T, Masuda A, et al. 1986 The responses of plasma adrenocorticotropin and cortisol to corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and cerebrospinal fluid immunoreactive CRH in anorexia nervosa patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 63:319–324.
  16. Johnson EO, Kamilaris TC, Chrousos GP, Gold PW. 1992 Mechanisms of stress: a dynamic overview of hormonal and behavioral homeostasis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 16:115–130.[CrossRef][Medline]
  17. Mastorakos G, Webster EL, Friedman TC, Chrousos GP. 1993 Immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing hormone and its binding sites in the rat ovary. J Clin Invest. 92:961–968.
  18. Mastorakos G, Scopa CD, Vryonidou A, et al. 1994 Presence of immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing hormone in normal and polycystic human ovaries. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:1191–1197.[Abstract]
  19. Yoon DJ, Sklar C, David R. 1988 Presence of immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing factor in rat testis. Endocrinology. 122:759–761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ulisse S, Fabbri A, Dufau ML. 1989 Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors and actions in rat Leydig cells. J Biol Chem. 264:2156–2163.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Huang B-M, Stocco DM, Hutson JC, Norman RL. 1995 Corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulates steroidogenesis in mouse Leydig cells. Biol Reprod. 53:620–626.[Abstract]
  22. Asakura H, Zwain IH, Yen SSC. 1997 Expression of genes encoding corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), type-1 CRF receptor (CRF-R1), and CRF-binding protein (CRF-BP) and localization of the gene products in the human ovary. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:2720–2725.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. McAllister JM, Kerin JFP, Trant JM, et al. 1989 Regulation of cholesterol side-chain cleavage and 17{alpha}-hydroxylase/lyase activities in proliferating human theca interna cells in long term monolayer culture. Endocrinology. 125:1959–1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Magoffin DA, Erickson GF. 1988 Purification of ovarian theca-interstitial cells by density gradient centrifugation. Endocrinology. 122:2345–2349.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Catt KL, Dufau ML. 1991 Gonadotropic hormones. Biosynthesis, secretion, receptors and actions. In: Yen SSC, Jaffe RB, eds. Reproductive endocrinology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 65–104.
  26. Hurwitz A, Payne DW, Packman JN, et al. 1991 Cytokine-mediated regulation of ovarian function: interleukin-1inhibits gonadotropin-induced androgen biosynthesis. Endocrinology. 129:1250–1256.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Behan DP, Linton EA, Lowry PJ. 1989 Isolation of the human plasma corticotropin-releasing factor-binding protein. J Endocrinol. 122:23–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Potter E, Behan DP, Fischer WH, Linton EA, Lowry PJ, Vale WW. 1991 Cloning and characterization of the cDNAs for human and rat corticotropin releasing factor-binding proteins. Nature. 349:423–426.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Behan DP, DeSouza EB, Lowry PJ, Potter E, Sawchenko P, Vale WW. 1995 Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) binding protein: a novel regulation of CRF and related peptides. Fronti Neuroendocrinol. 16:362–382.[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Petraglia F, Potter E, Cameron VA, et al. 1993 Corticotropin-releasing factor-binding protein is produced by human placenta and intrauterine tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:919–924.[Abstract]
  31. Trainer PJ, Woods RI, Korbonits M, Stewart PM, Lowry PJ, Grossman AB. The pathophysiology of circulating corticotropin-releasing hormone-binding protein levels in the human. Proc of the 10th Int Congr of Endocrinol. 1996.
  32. Calogero AE, Burrello N, Negri-Cesi P, et al. 1996 Effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone on ovarian estrogen production in vitro. Endocrinology. 137:4161–4166.[Abstract]
  33. Ghizzoni L, Mastorakos G, Vottero A, et al. Corticotropin-releasing hormone-induced inhibition of steroid biosynthesis by cultured granulosa-lutein cells is mediated by interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptors. Proc of the 79th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1997; 1–307.
  34. Rosenfield RL, Barnes RB, Ehrmann DA. 1994 Studies of the nature of 17-hydroxyprogesterone hyperresponsiveness to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist challenge in functional ovarian hyperandrogenism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:1686–1692.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Xu, F. Xu, J. D. Hennebold, T. A. Molskness, and R. L. Stouffer
Expression and Role of the Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone/Urocortin-Receptor-Binding Protein System in the Primate Corpus Luteum during the Menstrual Cycle
Endocrinology, November 1, 2007; 148(11): 5385 - 5395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
G. Mastorakos, E. I Karoutsou, and M. Mizamtsidi
Corticotropin releasing hormone and the immune/inflammatory response
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2006; 155(suppl_1): S77 - S84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Y. Muramatsu, N. Sugino, T. Suzuki, K. Totsune, K. Takahashi, A. Tashiro, M. Hongo, Y. Oki, and H. Sasano
Urocortin and Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor Expression in Normal Cycling Human Ovaries
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 1362 - 1369.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
A. Slominski, J. Wortsman, T. Luger, R. Paus, and S. Solomon
Corticotropin Releasing Hormone and Proopiomelanocortin Involvement in the Cutaneous Response to Stress
Physiol Rev, July 1, 2000; 80(3): 979 - 1020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone: A Potent Androgen Secretagogue in Girls with Hyperandrogenism after Precocious Pubarche
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4602 - 4606.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Ferin
Stress and the Reproductive Cycle
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1999; 84(6): 1768 - 1774.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erden, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erden, H. F.
Right arrow Articles by Yen, S. S. C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals