| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Sophia Childrens Hospital; and Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Nuclear Medicine, Dijkzigt Hospital, Erasmus University, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: A. M. Boot, Division of Endocrinology, Sophia Childrens Hospital, dr Molewaterplein 60, 3015 GJ Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: boot{at}alkg.azr.nl
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mean lumbar spine BMD SDS was significantly higher than zero at baseline (P < 0.02) and did not differ from normal, after 2 yr of treatment. Mean spinal BMAD SDS and total body BMD SDS were not significantly different from zero at baseline and had not changed significantly after 2 yr of treatment. During therapy, fat mass and percentage body fat SDS increased, whereas lean tissue mass SDS decreased. Mean lumbar spine BMD and BMAD and total body BMD SDS, calculated for bone age, were all lower than zero at baseline (BMD P < 0.001 and BMAD P < 0.05) and also after 2 yr treatment (respectively, P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01). Biochemical bone parameters were significantly higher than prepubertal values at baseline, and they decreased during treatment. In conclusion, patients with central precocious and early puberty had normal BMD for chronological age but low BMD for bone age, after 2 yr of treatment with GnRH. Bone turnover decreased during treatment. Changes in body composition resembled those seen in patients with GH deficiency.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aim of the present study was to investigate BMD, bone metabolism, and body composition of children with central precocious or early puberty (CPP) before and during treatment with GnRH.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At diagnosis all patients had a history of increased growth velocity, girls had breast development Tanner stage 2 or more and boys genital development Tanner stage 2 or more and testis volume 4 mL or more, bone age was advanced more than 1 yr beyond chronological age, and a GnRH-stimulated serum LH concentration greater than 10 IU/L. Thirty-four patients participated in the study. Twenty-three girls and 2 boys had true idiopathic central precocious puberty. Seven girls had idiopathic central early puberty: in 3 girls the appearance of pubertal signs started before the age of 9 yr and in 4 girls before the age of 10 yr. Two girls had organic CPP: one had a meningomyelocele and the other a hydrocephalus with a start of puberty before the age of respectively 9 and 8 yr. Median age at start of treatment was 8.7 yr (range 2.8 to 10.8). All patients received therapy with depot leuprolide-acetate 3.75 mg (Lucrin depot, Abbott, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) given subcutaneously every 4 weeks. During the first month it was given every 2 weeks. Puberty suppression was evaluated by clinical evaluation, repeating GnRH stimulation test after 3 months, by measuring basal serum levels of LH, follicle stimulating hormone and estradiol/testosterone every 6 months, and bone age assessment. All children had complete suppression of plasma concentrations of LH and follicle stimulating hormone during the GnRH test after 3 months of treatment (levels below 5 IU/L). During treatment with GnRH all children except one girl had basal sex steroids concentrations equal or less than prepubertal levels (estradiol below 50 pmol/L, testosterone below 1 nmol/L). In the girl with incomplete suppression the dose of leuprolide-acetate was doubled. In the first year the mean ratio of the change of bone age and change of chronological age was 0.72 and in the second year, 0.47.
Thirty-four patients had baseline and half-year measurements, 33 of them had 1-yr measurements and 16 children (15 girls and 1 boy) had 2-yr follow-up. One girl stopped treatment after 6 months, and one stopped after 1 yr. The other children are still included in this ongoing study. No BMD SD for chronological age could be calculated for 1 girl, 2.8 yr old, because our reference data start from the age of 4 yr. Her data could be used in the evaluation of BMD SD calculated for bone age.
Methods
Anthropometry, BMD, and body composition measurements and assessment of biochemical bone parameters were performed at baseline and during GnRH treatment for 6 months, 1 yr, and 2 yr. Height was measured with a Harpenden stadiometer (Holtain Ltd., Crymmyth, UK). Height was compared with age- and sex-matched reference values (15) and expressed as SD score (SDS). Body mass index was calculated as weight/(height)2 (kg/m2) and compared with age- and sex-matched reference values (16) and expressed as SDS. Pubertal development was determined according to Tanner (17).
BMD (g/cm2) of the lumbar spine and total body was measured
by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Lunar, DPXL/PED, Lunar
Radiation Corporation, Madison, WI). The coefficient of variation has
been reported as 1.04% for lumbar spine and 0.64% for total body
(18). The coefficient of variation (SD) for lumbar spine in
our setting is 1.1 (0.2)%. Ancillary DXA-derived data were used to
calculate lumbar spine volumetric BMD [bone mineral apparent density
(BMAD)] with the model BMAD = BMD x [4/(
x width)],
as validated before (19). BMD and BMAD results were compared with our
age- and sex-matched Dutch reference values (2) and expressed as SDS.
With the total body measurement by DXA, the body composition was
measured as lean tissue mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content. The
coefficients of variation have been reported as 2.2% for fat mass,
1.1% for lean tissue mass, and 0.6% for bone mineral content (18).
Bone mineral content, lean tissue mass, fat mass, and percentage body
fat were compared with our age- and sex-matched Dutch reference values
and expressed as SDS (3).
Bone age was assessed by one investigator using an x-ray of the left hand, according to the Greulich and Pyle method (20), at baseline in 34 patients, after 6 months in 21 patients, after 1 yr in 32 patients, and after 2 yr in 16 patients.
Blood samples were taken for the assessment of calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D, osteocalcin, the carboxyterminal propeptide of type I collagen (PICP), and cross-linked telopeptide of collagen I (ICTP) in the afternoon (between 1330 h and 1600 h). Samples were not collected on 2 patients at baseline and 2 other patients at 1 yr. Osteocalcin was measured by RIA (Incstar Corporation, Stillwater, ), and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D was measured by RIA of Immuno Diagnostic Systems (Boldon, United Kingdom). PICP and ICTP were measured with an RIA kit (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland). Our own reference values for prepubertal healthy children for osteocalcin, PICP, and ICTP (respectively n = 25, n = 82, and n = 88) were used. In the first morning void of urine, the ratio of hydroxyproline/creatinine (OHP/creat) and the ratio of calcium/creatinine (CA/creat) were evaluated. Reference values of Wolthers et al. (21) were used for OHP/creat. LH and FSH were assessed by RIA (Medgenix, Fleurus, Belgium), and estradiol and testosterone were assessed by RIA of Orion Diagnostica.
Statistical analysis
One-sample t tests were performed to compare the mean SDS values with normal. We tested to determine whether the average within-patient change differed from zero (with one-sample t test). Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to test the association between two variables with a normal distribution. Spearmans rank correlation coefficient was used, in case of a nonnormal distribution.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Mean total body bone mineral content SDS, lean tissue mass SDS, fat mass SDS, and percentage body fat SDS were significantly higher than zero at baseline. Total body bone mineral content SDS had increased after 6 months and 1 yr of treatment, compared with baseline. Lean tissue mass SDS decreased significantly during treatment, whereas fat mass SDS and percentage body fat SDS increased.
Mean height SDS and body mass index SDS were higher than zero at baseline. Mean height SDS had decreased after 2 yr of treatment. Body mass index SDS increased during treatment.
The two boys did not have lumbar spine BMD SDS higher than zero at baseline. During treatment, all the variables showed the same pattern as that seen in the girls.
When SDS was calculated for bone age instead of chronological age (SDSBA), mean lumbar spine BMD SDSBA was -0.82 (SD 0.91), mean BMAD SDSBA was -0.46 (SD 1.11), and mean total body BMD SDSBA was -1.07 (SD 1.05) at baseline, all significantly lower than zero (lumbar spine and total body BMD P < 0.001, BMAD P < 0.05). Mean lumbar spine BMD and BMAD SDSBA and total body BMD SDSBA, after 2 yr of treatment, were still significantly lower than zero (lumbar spine BMD P < 0.001, total body BMD P < 0.01, BMAD P < 0.05) and did not differ significantly from baseline.
The results of biochemical markers of bone metabolism are shown in
Table 2
. Mean osteocalcin, PICP, and ICTP
at baseline were significantly higher than those of prepubertal
controls (all P < 0.001). These values and alkaline
phosphatase had decreased after 6 months. Mean PICP and ICTP at 6
months and osteocalcin at 12 months were not significantly different
from those of prepubertal controls. Urine CA/creat had increased after
6 months, and OHP/creat had diminished after 1 yr. Serum calcium and
phosphate were normal at baseline and did not change significantly
during time.
|
The change between baseline and 2-yr treatment of height SDS correlated with the change in lumbar spine BMD SDS (r = 0.57, P < 0.05), the change in lean tissue mass SDS (r = 0.77, P < 0.001), and the change in bone mineral content SDS (r = 0.69, P < 0.01), and not with the change in total body BMD SDS or lumbar spine BMAD SDS. The change in levels of biochemical markers of bone turnover did not correlate with the change of BMD or BMAD SDS or height SDS.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies reported increased lumbar spine (measured with DXA) or radius (measured with single photon absorptiometry) BMD for chronological age, but appropriate for bone age in girls with CPP (10, 11, 12). The higher spinal BMD at baseline is in agreement with our findings, but we found decreased BMD for bone age. The discrepancy may be caused by differences in reference values, differences in assessment of bone age, or differences in timing of start of treatment. In the present study, reference values of a large cohort of healthy children, of the same population and measured on the same DXA apparatus, were used.
Mean spinal BMAD (corrected for estimated bone volume) was not increased. BMD is an areal density and does not adjust for bone size completely. Therefore, the high spinal BMD could be caused by an increase of bone size.
During puberty, estrogens and GH play an important role in bone mineralization and bone metabolism in girls. In early puberty, low levels of estradiol stimulate growth and GH production. A significant increase of GH is seen during early puberty, with maximal levels at stage III in girls (22). Bone modeling of new bone and bone remodeling of existing mineralized tissue are each ongoing processes in growing children. The biochemical markers are not specific for either the process of bone modeling or remodeling (23). Markers of bone metabolism are related to growth velocity and increase maximally during midpuberty (24, 25). From stage III to V (late puberty), estradiol levels increase significantly, GH levels decrease, and markers of bone formation and markers of bone resorption decrease (26). In postmenopausal women and in adults treated with GnRH, the decline of estrogens is associated with an increase of bone turnover, the opposite of what happens during late puberty (13, 14). At baseline, the patients had bone turnover comparable with that of adolescents in early puberty. Bone formation and bone resorption markers were higher than prepubertal values, probably because of the increased growth related to early puberty. The markers of bone turnover decreased to prepubertal levels during treatment. This mainly reflects a decrease in bone modeling.
Increased GH and/or estrogens levels, associated with early puberty, may have caused the increase of lumbar spine BMD at baseline in the girls. Lumbar spine consists of more trabecular bone than bone of the total body, which is for 80% cortical bone (27). Bone turnover is higher in trabecular bone (28), which may explain the differences found between lumbar spine and total body BMD. Also, in postmenopausal women, change in BMD is faster in trabecular bone than in cortical bone (29). The initial increase of lumbar spine BMD and BMAD SDS may be explained by incomplete suppression of puberty during the first months. The decrease in spinal BMD, thereafter, is probably caused by the decline of estrogens and GH. A decrease in nocturnal GH secretion and subnormal response to GH stimulation tests were described after 312 months treatment with GnRH in children with CPP (10, 30, 31, 32). However, no relation was found between the subnormal GH levels and growth velocity during treatment with GnRH (32). The decline of GH may explain the decrease of lean tissue mass SDS and the increase of fat mass and percentage fat SDS. GH is known to have lipolytic and anabolic effects. Children and adults with GH deficiency have decreased lean tissue mass and increased fat mass, which improve during treatment (33, 34, 35, 36).
In conclusion, children with CPP have normal BMD for chronological age but decreased BMD, for bone age, after 2 yr of treatment with GnRH. Puberty is an important period for bone accretion. In patients with CPP, pubertal development is temporarily inhibited by GnRH. It is unknown whether BMD increases normally after cessation of GnRH and whether the patients reach a normal peak bone mass. Long-term longitudinal studies, till peak bone mass is achieved, are needed to evaluate BMD and body composition after cessation of treatment.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 8, 1997.
Revised October 17, 1997.
Accepted October 27, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.-C. Carel and J. Leger Precocious Puberty N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2366 - 2377. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. I. Shulman, G. L. Francis, M. R. Palmert, E. A. Eugster, and for the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society Use of Aromatase Inhibitors in Children and Adolescents With Disorders of Growth and Adolescent Development Pediatrics, April 1, 2008; 121(4): e975 - e983. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Pasquino, I. Pucarelli, F. Accardo, V. Demiraj, M. Segni, and R. Di Nardo Long-Term Observation of 87 Girls with Idiopathic Central Precocious Puberty Treated with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogs: Impact on Adult Height, Body Mass Index, Bone Mineral Content, and Reproductive Function J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 190 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lazar, A. Padoa, and M. Phillip Growth Pattern and Final Height after Cessation of Gonadotropin-Suppressive Therapy in Girls with Central Sexual Precocity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2007; 92(9): 3483 - 3489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, A. D. Rogol, J. C. Lovejoy, M. Sheffield-Moore, N. Mauras, and C. Y. Bowers Endocrine Control of Body Composition in Infancy, Childhood, and Puberty Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2005; 26(1): 114 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Zhou, B. Shah, K. Prasad, and R. David Letrozole Significantly Improves Growth Potential in a Pubertal Boy With Growth Hormone Deficiency Pediatrics, February 1, 2005; 115(2): e245 - e248. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lazar, R. Kauli, A. Pertzelan, and M. Phillip Gonadotropin-Suppressive Therapy in Girls with Early and Fast Puberty Affects the Pace of Puberty but Not Total Pubertal Growth or Final Height J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2090 - 2094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. M. van der Sluis, A. M. Boot, E. P. Krenning, S. L. S. Drop, and S. M. P. F. de Muinck Keizer-Schrama Longitudinal Follow-Up of Bone Density and Body Composition in Children with Precocious or Early Puberty before, during and after Cessation of GnRH Agonist Therapy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 506 - 512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mauras, K. O. OBrien, K. O. Klein, and V. Hayes Estrogen Suppression in Males: Metabolic Effects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2000; 85(7): 2370 - 2377. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Is Obesity an Outcome of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Administration? Analysis of Growth and Body Composition in 110 Patients with Central Precocious Puberty J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4480 - 4488. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Long-Term Outcome after Depot Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Treatment of Central Precocious Puberty: Final Height, Body Proportions, Body Composition, Bone Mineral Density, and Reproductive Function J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4583 - 4590. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |