| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Endocrinology, Hospital Juan Canalejo (F.C., T.F., T.M.) and University of La Coruña (F.C.), and University of Santiago (A.P., R.P., F.F.C., C.D.), La Coruña 15006 and Santiago, Spain
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Fernando Cordido, Servicio de Endocrinología, Hospital Juan Canalejo, Xubias de Arriba 84, 15006 La Coruña, Spain.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eight obese patients with a body mass index of 34.2 ± 1.2; eight obese adults with hypopituitarism, with a body mass index of 35.5 ± 1.9; and six control subjects were studied. All the patients showed an impaired response to an insulin-tolerance test (0.15 U/kg, iv), with a peak GH secretion of less than 3 µg/L. Two tests were carried out. On one day, they were given GHRH (100 µg, iv, 0 min), preceded by placebo; and blood samples were taken every 15 min for 60 min. On the second day, they were given GHRH (100 µg, iv, 0 min), preceded by acipimox (250 mg, orally, at -270 min and -60 min); and blood samples were taken every 15 min for 60 min.
The administration of acipimox induced a FFA reduction during the entire test. Normal control subjects had a mean peak (µg/L) of 23.8 ± 4.8 after GHRH-induced GH secretion; previous acipimox administration increased GHRH-induced GH secretion, with a mean peak of 54.7 ± 14.5. In obese patients, GHRH-induced GH secretion was markedly reduced, with a mean peak (µg/L) of 3.9 ± 1; previous administration of acipimox markedly increased GHRH-mediated GH secretion, with a mean peak of 16.0 ± 3.2 (P < 0.05). In obese adults with hypopituitarism, GHRH-induced GH secretion was markedly reduced, with a mean peak (µg/L) of 2 ± 0.7; previous acipimox administration did not significantly modify GHRH-mediated GH secretion, with a mean peak of 3.3 ± 1.1 (P < 0.05). The GH response of obese patients and obese adults with hypopituitarism was similar after GHRH alone. In contrast, the GH response after GHRH plus acipimox, was markedly decreased in obese adults with hypopituitarism (mean peak, 3.3 ± 1.1), compared with obese patients (mean peak, 16.0 ± 3.2) (P < 0.05) and control subjects (mean peak, 54.7 ± 14.5) (P < 0.01).
In conclusion, GH secretion, after GHRH-plus-acipimox administration, is reduced in obese adults with hypopituitarism patients, when compared with obese normal patients. Testing with GHRH plus acipimox is safe and is free from side effects and could be used for the diagnosis of GHD in adults.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been gradually realized that GH may have important physiological functions in adult man. Several studies have shown that GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is associated with abnormalities in body composition, metabolic derangements, and suboptimal physical performances; these impairments improve with GH replacement therapy (9, 10, 11). In contrast to children, in adults with GHD, there are no auxological data to aid in diagnosis. Assessment of 24-h spontaneous GH secretion have not proved particularly useful, and in the clinical setting, we must therefore rely on pharmacological tests to establish the diagnosis of GHD. In this sense, it was recently recommended that the insulin-tolerance test (ITT) should be the diagnostic test of choice. However, this test may be contraindicated in some patients; and furthermore, in severely obese subjects, the responses to the ITT frequently overlap with those found in nonobese adult patients with GHD. To distinguish obese subjects from GHD patients, it will be necessary to demonstrate that reduced GH responsiveness is reversible in the former but not in the latter group. We studied the potential value of acipimox to distinguish non-GHD obese subjects from GHD obese patients.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of acute pharmacological reduction of plasma FFA on GHRH-mediated GH secretion in obese normal subjects and obese adults with hypopituitarism.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Serum GH was measured by RIA (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA) with a sensitivity of 0.04 µg/L and with intraassay coefficients of variation of 4.2%, 2.9%, and 2.8% for low, medium, and high plasma GH levels, respectively. FFA levels were determined by a enzymatic colorimetric method (NEFA-HA, Wako, Zaragoza, Spain). All samples from a given subject were analyzed in the same assay run. Hormone levels are presented as absolute values or as the mean GH peak. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by a trapezoidal method.
Statistical analysis were performed by Wilcoxon rank sum between related groups and by Mann-Whitney tests between different groups. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Normal control subjects had a mean peak of 23.8 ± 4.8 µg/L after GHRH-induced GH secretion (range, 9.538.4 µg/L). When FFA were reduced by previous acipimox administration, there was an increased GHRH-induced GH secretion, with a mean peak of 54.7 ± 14.5 µg/L (range, 13.7113 µg/L).
In obese subjects, GHRH-induced GH secretion was markedly reduced, with
a mean peak of 3.9 ± 1 µg/L (range, 2.86.2 µg/L). When FFA
were reduced by previous acipimox administration, a markedly increased
GHRH-mediated GH secretion was observed, with a mean peak of 16.0
± 3.2 µg/L (range, 7.436 µg/L; P < 0.05) (Fig. 1
).
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Obesity-related limitation of GH secretion, in response to all stimuli, has attracted considerable study. Although enhancement of GH clearance is a contributing factor (12), the main altered mechanism in obesity is the impaired GH secretion, either stimulated or spontaneous (13). The primary cause of this alteration could be an altered hypothalamus, abnormal pituitary function, or a perturbation of the peripheral signals acting at either the pituitary or hypothalamic level. In obese subjects, both exogenous GHRH- and GHRP (growth hormone releasing peptide)-6-induced GH secretion are blocked, ruling out a secretory deficit of endogenous GHRH or the endogenous ligand for the GHRP-6 receptor as causative factors. On the other hand, pyridostigmine, a drug thought to reduce somatostatinergic tone (14, 15), increases GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in obese subjects (16). This effect of pyridostigmine suggests that an enhanced somatostatinergic tone could partially explain the altered somatotroph function in obese patients, but because the GH responses after pyridostigmine or hypoglycemia are lower than those observed in normal-weight subjects, this higher somatostatinergic tone is unable to fully explain the obesity-altered secretory mechanisms. FFA reduction, with acipimox [a lipid-lowering drug with minimal side-effects (notably, increased pyridostigmine-, GHRH-, and GHRH plus GHRP-6-mediated GH secretion)] restoring the level of this secretion to 5070% of normal (6). These and other results indicate that elevated FFA levels play an important role in causing GH insufficiency in obesity, and they suggest that treatment with inhibitors of lypolisis could be useful in restoring somatotroph function (7, 8, 17).
The approach to the diagnosis of adult GHD must include a high index of suspicion. It should include adults who, in childhood, received GH for pituitary dwarfism and adults with known or suspected pituitary disease (18, 19). Because of its pronounced intraindividual fluctuation determinations of basal plasma concentrations of GH, it is of no value for the diagnosis of GHD, and considerable overlap with healthy control groups precludes determination of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 (20, 21), analysis of GH pulses (22), and/or GH determination in pooled serum samples (22) or in urine (23). Therefore, most investigators agree that stimulation tests are indispensable in defining GHD in adults (20, 21, 22). The ITT is the diagnostic test of choice for adult GHD (24). The criteria for profound GHD is met if the patient is symptomatic of hypoglycemia, the blood glucose is below 2.2 mmol/L, and the peak GH response is less than 3 µg/L (18). It is in these patients (who, for the most part, had peak GH response to ITT of less than 3 µg/L) that beneficial responses with GH treatment have been observed (10, 11, 25). The ITT may not be the best tool for the diagnosis of GHD in adults; its reproducibility has been questioned in normal adults (26). A reference for the ITT will be difficult to establish, and it may be impossible to evaluate the possible influences of sex, age, body composition, and cortisol levels in ITT-stimulated GH levels, because patients find the ITT unpleasant. Furthermore, the ITT is potentially hazardous (27). In contrast to this, no severe side effects and only minor transitory complaints were recorded with the GHRH-plus-acipimox test. Other tests, including GHRH, could be used in the diagnosis of adult GHD. GHRH-stimulated secretion of GH has been found to be reduced in a group of patients with pituitary macroadenomas, and this confirmed partial pituitary insufficiency, compared with a control group. However, in an individual patient, this maneuver, even in the presence of partial pituitary insufficiency, may suggest (but does not prove) additional GHD (28). Obesity is a very important confounding factor, as shown by our study of a markedly decreased GHRH-induced GH secretion in both obese normal patients and obese adults with hypopituitarism. We have shown that, with the addition of acipimox, it is possible to distinguish GHRH-induced GH secretion of obese normal patients from obese adults with hypopituitarism. This study, to our knowledge, is the first report of GH responses to acipimox plus GHRH in obese adults with hypothalamic-pituitary lesions.
The results of this study suggest that patients with hypothalamic-pituitary disease have a markedly significant decreased GH response to GHRH plus acipimox, even when obesity is taken into account. Therefore, it can be concluded that our group of patients with pituitary disease is different from a comparable group of obese adults, in that they displayed a significantly lower mean peak GH level after GHRH-plus-acipimox administration.
In conclusion, this study has demonstrated a significantly blunted peak GH response to GHRH in both obese normal and obese hypopituitary patients. The use of acipimox in conjunction with GHRH in obese hypopituitary patients is an effective, safe, and side-effect-free method for overcoming the inhibition of GH response associated with obesity. Further studies, assessing this test in a large group of patients and controls, are needed, to establish its reliability in the clinical setting.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 16, 1998.
Revised August 21, 1998.
Accepted August 27, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Iwakura, T. Akamizu, H. Ariyasu, T. Irako, K. Hosoda, K. Nakao, and K. Kangawa Effects of ghrelin administration on decreased growth hormone status in obese animals Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2007; 293(3): E819 - E825. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Corneli, C. Di Somma, R. Baldelli, S. Rovere, V. Gasco, C. G. Croce, S. Grottoli, M. Maccario, A. Colao, G. Lombardi, et al. The cut-off limits of the GH response to GH-releasing hormone-arginine test related to body mass index Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 257 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V Haijma, P S. van Dam, W. R de Vries, I. Maitimu-Smeele, C. Dieguez, F. F Casanueva, and H. P F Koppeschaar The GHRH/GHRP-6 test for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in elderly or severely obese men Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 152(4): 575 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. De Marinis, A. Bianchi, A. Mancini, R. Gentilella, M. Perrelli, A. Giampietro, T. Porcelli, L. Tilaro, A. Fusco, D. Valle, et al. Growth Hormone Secretion and Leptin in Morbid Obesity before and after Biliopancreatic Diversion: Relationships with Insulin and Body Composition J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2004; 89(1): 174 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Villa, L. Soranna, A. Mancini, L. De Marinis, D. Valle, S. Mancuso, and A. Lanzone Effect of feeding on growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone in polycystic ovarian syndrome: relation with body weight and hyperinsulinism Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2001; 16(3): 430 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Sytze van Dam, H. E. C. Smid, W. R. de Vries, M. Niesink, E. Bolscher, E. J. Waasdorp, C. Dieguez, F. F. Casanueva, and H. P. F. Koppeschaar Reduction of Free Fatty Acids By Acipimox Enhances the Growth Hormone (GH) Responses to GH-Releasing Peptide 2 in Elderly Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4706 - 4711. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |