| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
From the Clinical Research Centers |
Mount Sinai Medical Center (R.A.P., L.R.K., R.G.), New York, New York 10029; Brigham and Womens Hospital (A.D.), Boston, Massachusetts 00000; Simon Fraser University (D.T.F.), Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada; and Hirano General Hospital (S.S.), Gifu, Japan
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert A. Phillips, M.D., Ph.D., Section of Hypertension, Prevention, and Rehabilitation, Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Box 1085, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, New York 10029. E-mail: robert_phillips{at}smtplink.mssm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We conclude that in nonobese subjects with high normal BP, insulin sensitivity is related to LVM independently of BP and may be an important modulator of LV growth. In addition to a reduction of arterial BP, optimal prevention of LV hypertrophy in hypertensives may require improved insulin sensitivity.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased blood pressure (BP) and other hemodynamic factors are signals for myocardial growth (3). However, for the same level of BP there is wide variation among individuals in both the degree of left ventricular mass and vascular damage. Careful hemodynamic evaluations indicate that differences in BP, stroke index, and contractility account for only about 66% of the variation in LVM in hypertensives (4). This implies that LVM may be partly determined by nonhemodynamic factors (5). For example, genetic (6), acquired (e.g. obesity) (7, 8), and dietary factors, such as alcohol (9) and sodium intake (10), influence mass independently from their effect on BP.
Because myocardial protein degradation is inhibited during hyperinsulinemia in insulin-resistant subjects, it has been suggested that insulin resistance could be a contributing factor to LVM (11). Cross-sectional epidemiological studies have demonstrated that insulin resistance occurs in nonobese, nondiabetic, glucose-tolerant hypertensives (12). To test the hypothesis that insulin resistance might be related to myocardial mass independent of the effect of arterial BP or obesity, we studied a nonobese, glucose-tolerant, and previously untreated population of subjects with high normal or stage I hypertension.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This population is a consecutive sample of all subjects between 1867 yr of age who met criteria and agreed to participate in the protocol. They had all been referred because of a previous diagnosis of high normal or stage I hypertension (13). Before referral, subjects had an office diastolic BP of 90 mm Hg or greater on at least two occasions, but had never been treated. None had a history of glucose intolerance, diabetes mellitus, or any other endocrine disorder. None of the subjects was a trained athlete. Subjects were excluded from this study if they were obese based on criteria used in the National Health and Nutrition Surveys I and II (27.8 kg/m2 for men and 27.3 kg/m2 for women) (14). Causes of secondary hypertension were excluded in all subjects by history and physical exam, and by biochemical testing to exclude elevated levels of plasma catecholamines or PRA. All subjects signed informed consent for the protocol that was approved by the institutional review board of the Mount Sinai Medical Center.
Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)
A standard OGTT was performed in all subjects to assess glucose tolerance. After ingesting a 1.67-mol carbohydrate diet for 3 days and fasting for 1012 h overnight, subjects received a 0.42-mol glucose load. Blood samples were obtained at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min for determination of plasma glucose and insulin levels.
Insulin sensitivity
Within 1 month of the OGTT, insulin action was quantitatively determined using Bergmans minimal model, a method equivalent to the euglycemic glucose clamp for assessment of overall insulin sensitivity (15). In preparation for the tolbutamide-modified, frequently sampled, iv glucose tolerance test (FSIGT), subjects ate a 1.67-mol carbohydrate diet for 3 days and fasted overnight (12 h). After placement of two iv catheters, four basal samples were collected over 15 min, after which glucose (1.7 mmol/kg, iv bolus) was injected over 1 min. Twenty minutes after glucose, tolbutamide was given as a 1.1 mmol iv bolus. Blood specimens (5 cc) were collected at various time points (0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 19, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 90, 100, 120, 160, and 180 min) to allow glucose levels to return to baseline.
The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was calculated by application of the minimal model of glucose kinetics (MINMOD computer program version NUDEMM1, copyright R. N. Bergman) to the dynamics of plasma glucose and insulin during the FSIGT. The adequacy of the minimal model fits was judged by the criteria suggested by Prigeon et al. (16) All reported parameters had a fractional SD below those suggested as upper limits (6.9% for SI).
BP
To accurately characterize BP (17), 24-h BP monitoring was performed using the SpaceLabs 90202 device (SpaceLabs, Redmond, WA). Subjects were monitored on a day chosen for typical weekly activity; most were employed in work outside their home. For calibration, the device was connected to an aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer with a Y-tube. Three consecutive "office BPs" were taken by sphygmomanometer, 23 min apart, in a seated position and were calibrated to the monitor readings. A device was used only if measurements differed by 5 mm Hg or less from the sphygmomanometer. To characterize the pattern of awake and nocturnal BPs, subjects recorded in a diary the time at which they went to sleep and awoke. Ambulatory BP recordings were made every 20 min during waking hours and every 60 min during sleep. After completion of the recording, data were transferred by software to an IBM-compatible computer and processed for deletion of errors and predefined outliers (systolic, <70 or >260; diastolic, <40 or >150; heart rate, <20 or >200). Hand editing for outliers was not performed to avoid bias. Means and SDs were calculated using SpaceLabs PC Interface Software for IBM. The patients nocturnal (sleep) BP was characterized as normal ("dippers") if their sleep pressure was between 10% and 20% lower than awake BP and as abnormal ("nondippers") if sleep pressure was less than 10% lower than awake BP (18).
Echo cardiography
Two-dimensionally guided M-mode echocardiography was performed with an ATL Mark 600 or ATL Ultramark 6 scanner (Advanced Technology Laboratories, Inc., Bothell, WA) using a 2.5- or 3.0-MHz transducer. Studies were either recorded on videotape or directly stored in digital form on floppy disks. Echo cardiographic tracings were coded and interspersed with other ongoing studies to reduce the chance of reader bias. The studies were analyzed with a commercially available digitizer (ColorVue II, Nova MicroSonics, Allendale, NJ) in a random order by two independent observers who were unaware of the subjects insulin resistance and BP status. We have previously shown (19) that this method of blinded and digitized echo cardiographic analysis of LVM is associated with a high degree of interobserver concordance (r = 0.93; P = 0.0001). End-diastolic measurements of LV dimensions were made according to the Penn Convention protocol to measure LVM (20). LVM was calculated by the formula: LVM = 1.04[(IVS + LVID + PWT)3 - (LVID)3] - 13.6. The sum of the interventricular septum and LV posterior wall defined LV wall thickness. To correct for the effect of body size on heart mass (21), LVM was indexed by body height2.
Assays
Insulin was measured by RIA (22). The intraassay coefficient of variation for the insulin assay at 50% binding was 3%. The interassay coefficient of variation was 8%. The assay was parallel over a range of plasma sample volumes, and all fasting insulin levels were run at a sample volume of 200 µL instead of 100 µL and were thus on a reliable portion of the standard curve (23). Plasma glucose was measured by the glucose oxidase technique with a Beckman Coulter, Inc. Glucose Analyzer II (Fullerton, CA).
Statistics
All data are expressed as the mean ± SD. All statistical analyses were performed with programs of the SAS Institute, Inc. (Cary, NC). The relations between the variables were analyzed by simple correlation and by multiple regression analysis using the SAS Proc Reg procedures.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insulin resistance measured by euglycemic clamp has been related to LV wall thickness in a population of mild to moderate hypertensives that included obese subjects (24). Insulin levels and other less specific indexes of insulin resistance have been directly related to LVM in obese normotensives and in studies of hypertensives that have included obese subjects (25, 26, 27, 28). In the Techumseh Blood Pressure Study of normotensive subjects, higher fasting insulin levels were found in men whose LVM was in the upper 10th percentile of the population (29). A study of untreated Japanese men that predominantly included nonobese subjects found a relationship between 24-h excretion of C-peptide and LVM (30). In patients with type 1 diabetes, those with insulin resistance were more likely to have LV hypertrophy than those who were insulin sensitive (31). In a study of patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, the level of fasting glucose was directly related to the LVM (32).
Three studies in hypertensive subjects failed to demonstrate a relationship between insulin levels and LVM. Several features of these studies might account for these negative results. For example, the insulin level or the area under the insulin curve from an OGTT are relatively imprecise measures of insulin sensitivity and presume an adequate ß-cell response to insulin resistance. These surrogate measures of insulin sensitivity were used in each of these negative studies, and this might obscure a relation between insulin resistance and LVM. In two of the studies, patients with moderate and severe hypertension were included; hemodynamic influences on LVM might predominate over nonhemodynamic factors (33, 34). One study included previously treated hypertensives. As antihypertensive treatment often regresses LVM, it would be less likely that a relationship would be found between insulin resistance and LVM in a population of previously treated patients (34).
Among the limitations of the current study is that it shows a relation between insulin resistance and LVM, but it does not demonstrate causality. This association may be due to a hypertropic factor that is common to both borderline hypertension and insulin resistance. One such factor might be increased sympathetic nervous system activity. Hyperinsulinemia is associated with increased norepinephrine levels and increased sympathetic nervous system activity (35, 36). Elevated plasma norepinephrine levels in the absence of hypertension cause left ventricular hypertrophy in dogs (37). Significant increases in LVM occur after several weeks of diet-induced elevated endogenous catecholamine levels in normotensive offspring of hypertensive parents (38). These observations may be explained by the ability of catecholamines to elevate intracellular calcium, which initiates a calcineurin-dependent transcriptional pathway that results in cardiac hypertrophy (39). Insulin resistance is also associated with an elevation of intracellular calcium (40).
Another limitation of this study is the ethnic heterogeneity of the subjects. It is controversial whether all racial and ethnic groups demonstrate a relation between insulin resistance and BP (41, 42). In this study we did not find differences in insulin sensitivity or LVM among the different ethnic groups, but a thorough investigation of this issue would involve a very large sample size for each ethnic group.
The implications of this study derive from epidemiological observations that suggest that insulin resistance/hyperinsulinemia (43, 44) and LVM (1, 45, 46) are predictors of future cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. This study suggests that in nonobese subjects with high normal BP, insulin sensitivity is related to LVM independently of BP. In addition to the reduction of arterial BP, optimal prevention of increased LVM may require improved insulin sensitivity in the hypertensive patient. These data also suggest that the effect of insulin-sensitizing agents on LVM in hypertensive patients may be worthy of detailed study.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Medical Scientist of the Medical Research Council of Canada. ![]()
Received June 11, 1998.
Revised August 19, 1998.
Accepted August 25, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. Cook, A. Varela-Carver, M. Mongillo, C. Kleinert, M. T. Khan, L. Leccisotti, N. Strickland, T. Matsui, S. Das, A. Rosenzweig, et al. Abnormal myocardial insulin signalling in type 2 diabetes and left-ventricular dysfunction Eur. Heart J., October 1, 2009; (2009) ehp396v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, L. H. Lindholm, B. Dahlof, and for the LIFE Study Investigators In-Treatment Resolution or Absence of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Is Associated With Decreased Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Hypertensive Patients: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Study Hypertension, November 1, 2007; 50(5): 984 - 990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.A.M. Majamaa-Voltti, S. Winqvist, A. M. Remes, U. Tolonen, J. Pyhtinen, S. Uimonen, M. Karppa, M. Sorri, K. Peuhkurinen, and K. Majamaa A 3-year clinical follow-up of adult patients with 3243A>G in mitochondrial DNA Neurology, May 23, 2006; 66(10): 1470 - 1475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. Foy, K. L. Foley, R. B. D'Agostino Jr., D. C. Goff Jr., E. Mayer-Davis, and L. E. Wagenknecht Physical Activity, Insulin Sensitivity, and Hypertension among US Adults: Findings from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2006; 163(10): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Okin, R. B. Devereux, E. Gerdts, S. M. Snapinn, K. E. Harris, S. Jern, S. E. Kjeldsen, S. Julius, J. M. Edelman, L. H. Lindholm, et al. Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Regression of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Hypertrophy and the Prediction of Outcome During Antihypertensive Therapy: The Losartan Intervention For Endpoint (LIFE) Reduction in Hypertension Study Circulation, March 28, 2006; 113(12): 1588 - 1596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Burchfiel, T. N. Skelton, M. E. Andrew, R. J. Garrison, D. K. Arnett, D. W. Jones, and H. A. Taylor Jr Metabolic Syndrome and Echocardiographic Left Ventricular Mass in Blacks: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Circulation, August 9, 2005; 112(6): 819 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S.H. Bell Diabetic Cardiomyopathy Diabetes Care, October 1, 2003; 26(10): 2949 - 2951. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.D. Struthers and J. Davies Should we add screening for and treating left ventricular hypertrophy to the management of all patients needing secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease? QJM, June 1, 2003; 96(6): 449 - 452. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Goff Jr, D. J. Zaccaro, S. M. Haffner, and M. F. Saad Insulin Sensitivity and the Risk of Incident Hypertension: Insights from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 805 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ilercil, R. B. Devereux, M. J. Roman, M. Paranicas, M. J. O'Grady, E. T. Lee, T. K. Welty, R. R. Fabsitz, and B. V. Howard Associations of Insulin Levels With Left Ventricular Structure and Function in American Indians : The Strong Heart Study Diabetes, May 1, 2002; 51(5): 1543 - 1547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Q. Galvan, F. Galetta, A. Natali, E. Muscelli, A. M. Sironi, G. Cini, S. Camastra, and E. Ferrannini Insulin Resistance and Hyperinsulinemia : No Independent Relation to Left Ventricular Mass in Humans Circulation, October 31, 2000; 102(18): 2233 - 2238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kuperstein and Z. Sasson Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy on Glucose and Insulin Metabolism and on Left Ventricular Mass : A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of 21 Obese Hypertensives Circulation, October 10, 2000; 102(15): 1802 - 1806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Verdecchia, G. Reboldi, G. Schillaci, C. Borgioni, A. Ciucci, M. P. Telera, F. Santeusanio, C. Porcellati, and P. Brunetti Circulating Insulin and Insulin Growth Factor-1 Are Independent Determinants of Left Ventricular Mass and Geometry in Essential Hypertension Circulation, October 26, 1999; 100(17): 1802 - 1807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |