| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
-Methyl-19-Nortestosterone: A Potential Alternative to Testosterone for Androgen Replacement and Male Contraception1
University of Washington School of Medicine (D.E.C., W.J.B.); Population Center for Research in Reproduction; and the Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Veterans Affairs, Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington 98108; and the Center for Biomedical Research, The Population Council (N.K., C.W.B., K.S.), New York, New York 10021
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: William J. Bremner, M.D., Ph.D., University of Washington School of Medicine, Population Center for Research in Reproduction, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Seattle Veterans Administration Medical Center, 1660 South Columbian Way, Seattle, Washington 98108. E-mail: bremner{at}seattle.va.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-Methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT) is a potent synthetic androgen
that cannot be converted to dihydrotestosterone. In this study we
determined the relative androgenic, antigonadotropic, and anabolic
potencies of testosterone vs. MENT in the nonhuman
primate M. fascicularis. In castrated monkeys,
dose-response relationships were generated for the effects of
testosterone and MENT on gonadotropin levels, prostate growth, body
weight, and lipid metabolism. In a pilot study, four monkeys were
castrated, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to document a
50% loss of prostate volume within 8 weeks, verifying that MRI is a
reliable means to measure prostate size in this species. Two additional
groups of six monkeys each were then castrated and serially
administered four graded dosages of testosterone or MENT via osmotic
minipumps over 20 weeks. Complete suppression of LH was achieved with a
minimum of 0.3 mg/day MENT, compared to 3.0 mg/day testosterone. MENT
supported body weight 10 times more potently than did testosterone.
Baseline prostate volumes were maintained with 0.10.2 mg/day MENT
vs. 0.3 mg/day testosterone. Thus, in monkeys, MENT is
10 times more potent than testosterone with regard to the clinically
desirable end points of gonadotropin suppression and anabolism, but
only twice as potent at stimulating prostate growth. These results
suggest that MENT may have a wider therapeutic index than testosterone
for human androgen replacement and male contraception. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-reductase, which is
most abundant in male accessory sex organs and sexual skin (2, 3).
Approximately 0.3% is aromatized to estradiol, primarily in brain,
liver, and adipose tissue (4, 5). The sum of the actions of
testosterone, DHT, and estradiol determine the overall biological
impact of testosterone. Together, these hormones produce a host of
physiological actions that can be described as androgenic (growth of
accessory sex organs, genital virilization, potency), anabolic
(maintenance of muscle, kidney, salivary gland, and liver growth and
function), antigonadotropic (suppression of LH and FSH secretion), and
behavioral [libido, central nervous system (CNS) gender
imprinting].
In adult men, testosterone itself is thought to be the principal
hormone governing libido, potency, gonadotropin feedback regulation,
and growth and function of nongenital tissues, such as muscle, kidney,
liver, and bone (6, 7, 8, 9, 10). Estradiol influences CNS gender imprinting,
sexual behavior, and gonadotropin regulation and exerts beneficial
effects on serum lipids (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19). In general, the biological actions of
both testosterone and estradiol are desirable in men. Conversely, DHT
has no known unique beneficial function in adult men, but mediates
several untoward actions, including prostate hypertrophy, balding, and
acne (20). Thus, the ideal steroid for therapeutic androgen replacement
would be a potent testosterone agonist that does not undergo
5
-reduction to DHT but can be aromatized to an estrogen. In theory,
7
-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT) should be such a compound (21, 22). This synthetic androgen is more potent in rodents than
testosterone, but resists 5
-reduction. Consequently, it should
accomplish the beneficial physiological effects of testosterone and
estradiol without the deleterious side-effects of DHT.
In the present study, we sought to determine whether such favorable
characteristics of MENT action are indeed manifest in the nonhuman
primate Macaca fascicularis. The reproductive systems of
male monkeys and humans are similar in many ways (23). Specifically, in
both species, prostate anatomy is homologous (24, 25), the prostate is
very sensitive to androgen stimulation and withdrawal (25, 26, 27, 28, 29), DHT is
the dominant intraprostatic androgen (30), and the 5
-reductase
isoenzymes are structurally and functionally comparable (31). Thus,
monkeys are a reasonable model from which to draw probable conclusions
about human physiology with regard to MENT and testosterone
actions.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sixteen adult male monkeys of the species M. fascicularis were obtained from the University of Washington Regional Primate Research Center (Seattle, WA; four castrate controls and six each to receive testosterone or MENT). At the start of the study their ages ranged from 47 yr (castrate controls, 4.8 ± 1.5; testosterone group, 5.1 ± 1.0; MENT group, 5.4 ± 0.8). Body weights ranged from 3.87.3 kg (castrate controls, 5.5 ± 1.4; testosterone group, 4.8 ± 0.6; MENT group, 5.6 ± 1.1). There were no significant differences among the three groups with respect to initial ages or body weights. All animals were housed at a constant temperature (23 ± 2 C) in cages concealed from outside light and were maintained on a 12-h light, 12-h dark cycle (lights on at 0600 h). They were anesthetized with im ketamine injections for all procedures except castrations (bilateral orchidectomies), which were performed under general anesthesia using inhaled fluothane. Blood samples were obtained by femoral venipuncture. All studies were conducted in accordance with the principles and procedures outlined in the Endocrine Society Guidelines for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (32).
Chemicals
All chemicals and solvents were reagent grade. MENT was custom synthesized by SRI International (Menlo Park, CA). Testosterone acetate was purchased from Steraloids, Inc. (Wilton, NH). Both steroids were dissolved in a 45% (wt/vol) solution of 2-hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin (Cyclodextrin Technologies Development, Gainesville, FL). Steroid concentrations varied from 525 mg/mL for testosterone and from 0.54.2 mg/mL for MENT, depending on the dosage being delivered.
Experimental design
In the first stage of the experiment 4 animals designated castrate controls were castrated, and prostate volumes were subsequently assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at biweekly intervals for 8 weeks. Serial 5-mL blood samples were drawn to determine serum testosterone and bioactive LH levels before and after castration. Six such samples were obtained over a 10-day period before castration, and 18 samples were obtained over a 9-week period after castration. In the second stage of the experiment 2 groups of 6 monkeys each were used to establish dose-response relationships for the androgenic, antigonadotropic, and anabolic activities of testosterone vs. MENT. After a 14-day observation period, monkeys were castrated and simultaneously begun on continuous infusions of either testosterone acetate or MENT, delivered via Alzet osmotic pumps implanted subdermally in the back (Alza Pharmaceuticals, Palo Alto, CA). Each androgen was administered in 4 consecutive, decreasing dosages for 4 weeks each (testosterone group, 5.0, 3.0, 1.0, and 0.3 mg/day; MENT group, 1.0, 0.3, 0.1, and 0.03, mg/day). All animals were monitored for 4 additional weeks after the last treatment dose. MRI of the prostate was performed before castration and at the end of each treatment period. For steroid and gonadotropin levels, 5 blood samples (5 mL each) were drawn over a 14-day period before castration, then once at the end of the second week of each treatment period, daily for 3 days at the end of the third and fourth weeks of each treatment period, and finally 3 and 4 weeks after the last treatment. To deliver the appropriate daily androgen doses, osmotic pumps were changed weekly during the first treatment period, biweekly during the second period, and every 4 weeks during the last 2 periods.
Prostate volumes
Prostate volumes were determined using MRI. A General Electric Signa 1.5-Tesla MRI System was employed, with a G.E. Independent Console for image analysis (Milwaukee, WI). Contiguous 3.0-mm thick axial slices with 0.5-mm spacing were obtained through the pelvic region extending from above the seminal vesicles to below the prostate. Depending on its size, the entire prostate could be visualized in five to seven slices. Computer displays of prostate images from each slice were manually outlined, and the surface area contained within this region of interest was measured using G.E. System 5.4 software. Prostate volume in cubic millimeters was then calculated with the following formula: mean prostate surface area/slice (mm2) x number of slices x 3.5 mm/slice. During the same procedure an estimate of seminal vesicle volume was also obtained.
Hormone and lipid assays
Blood samples used in hormone assays were permitted to clot at room temperature for 1 h, then were centrifuged at 1500 x g for 20 min. Serum was separated and stored immediately at -20 C for future study. Plasma was obtained for lipid determinations and stored immediately at -70 C. Serum testosterone levels were measured by RIA with methods previously described (33), using reagents from the WHO Matched Reagent Program. The assay sensitivity was 0.17 nmol/L; the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 8.1% and 4.1%, respectively. Serum MENT levels were assessed with a specific RIA as previously described (34). The lower limit of detectability was 28 pg/mL. Testosterone and DHT cross-react only minimally in this assay. Serum bioactive LH was measured using the method of Dufau (35). This assay quantitates the LH-dependent secretion of testosterone from dispersed mouse Leydig cells in primary culture and has been shown to be suitable for monkey blood. The assay sensitivity was 2.4 mIU/mL. Hormone assay sensitivities were determined by the first point discernible from zero on standard curves. Lipid analyses were performed at the Northwest Lipid Research Laboratories, University of Washington (Seattle, WA). Total plasma cholesterol levels were assessed enzymatically (36) on an Abbott Spectrum multichromatic analyzer (Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) using a procedure standardized to the Center for Disease Controls reference method. The cholesterol concentration in high density lipoprotein (HDL) was measured enzymatically after precipitation with dextran sulfate-magnesium (37), whereas cholesterol in the HDL2 and HDL3 subfractions was assayed after differential precipitation (38). Lipoprotein(a) was measured with a double monoclonal antibody-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described (39).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Both androgens supported prostate growth in a dose-dependent manner,
each stimulating the gland to supranormal size at higher doses (Fig. 4
). The dose of testosterone required to
maintain normal prostate volume was 0.3 mg/day, compared with 0.1
mg/day or slightly higher for MENT. Thus, MENT was only 23 times more
potent than testosterone in terms of stimulating prostate growth, in
contrast to its much greater differential potency for gonadotropin
suppression. Seminal vesicle volumes were affected by both androgens in
a manner parallel to that of prostate volumes (data not shown).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
MENT is believed to be more biopotent overall than testosterone both
because 19-nor-testosterone derivatives in general demonstrate this
property (10) and also because the 7
-methyl group in MENT greatly
enhances its binding affinity for the androgen receptor and increases
subsequent nuclear retention (45). The blunted action of MENT on male
accessory sex glands relative to its action on muscle is probably due
to its resistance to enzymatic conversion to a 5
-dihydrosteroid
(46). Testosterone is converted to DHT by 5
-reductase, which is
especially abundant in accessory sex glands (2). DHT is 35 times more
active than testosterone, probably because of its greater affinity for
the androgen receptor (45). Hence, the action of testosterone is
amplified in male reproductive organs, which explains its potent
capacity to stimulate prostate and seminal vesicle growth. In contrast,
MENT has been shown to resist 5
-reduction in rat prostate and
epididymis despite an abundance of 5
-reductase activity in these
tissues (47). Presumably, the 7
-methyl group sterically hinders
5
-reductase. Consequently, MENTs actions in the male reproductive
tract are not amplified as are those of testosterone. MENT is thus
relatively less potent at stimulating the growth of male accessory sex
glands compared with its ability to suppress gonadotropins and maintain
muscle mass. The hypothesis that testosterone is relatively more potent
at stimulating prostate and seminal vesicle growth because it is
converted in those tissues to DHT has been confirmed empirically in
rats (41). 5
-Reductase inhibitors blunt the effects of testosterone
on reproductive tissues, but have no impact on testosterone action in
muscle, which lacks 5
-reductase activity (3, 6, 48, 49), or any
effect on the actions of MENT in any tissue. The fact that
5
-reductase inhibitors do not modify the action of MENT on male
reproductive tissues is consistent with its lack of 5
-reduction
in those tissues.
All hormonal male contraceptive prototypes include supplemental androgens, which are used either to suppress gonadotropin secretion (and thus spermatogenesis) or to replace endogenous androgens that have been eliminated with inhibitory GnRH analogues or progestins (50). The ideal androgen for this purpose would be more potent at suppressing gonadotropins than at stimulating prostate growth, so that a dose could be used that would accomplish the former outcome but not the latter. In castrated rats, a dose of MENT exists (9 µg/day) that suppresses gonadotropin secretion and maintains normal muscle mass, but does not fully sustain prostate and seminal vesicle weight (41). In contrast, the minimal dose of testosterone that suppresses gonadotropins and maintains muscle mass (90 µg/day) also sustains normal prostrate and seminal vesicle weight. In castrated monkeys, we found that the minimal MENT dose required to suppress LH (0.3 mg/day) maintained approximately normal prostate size. In contrast, the minimal testosterone dose required to suppress LH (3.0 mg/day) stimulated prostate growth to twice normal size. Thus, in both rats and monkeys, MENT can be used to suppress gonadotropins completely without hyperstimulating the prostate. This is not the case for testosterone, which hyperstimulates the prostate in both species at the minimal dose required to suppress gonadotropins. Likewise, studies in normal men administered exogenous testosterone at contraceptive doses have documented mild prostatic enlargement (51, 52). Although these changes were not clinically manifest, the long term impact of such supraphysiological prostate stimulation is unknown. Clearly, MENT offers a wider therapeutic index than testosterone with regard to prostate hypertrophy and, in theory, with regard to stimulating the growth of incipient prostate cancer.
Theoretically, MENT action should also be blunted compared to that of
testosterone in other tissues where 5
-reduction plays a significant
role in androgen action, such as sexual skin. Thus, MENT should be
relatively less likely to cause adverse effects such as androgenic
alopecia and acne. Future studies are required to test this
hypothesis.
It has been widely suspected that exogenous androgens used in hormonal
male contraceptive regimens may raise intratesticular androgen
concentrations sufficiently to stimulate spermatogenesis, attenuating
the antifertility impact of the contraceptive (50, 53, 54, 55). The
following lines of evidence suggest that 5
-reduced metabolites of
testosterone actually mediate this undesirable effect. 1) DHT has been
shown to be involved in the restoration of elongated spermatid
maturation in testosterone-treated rats (56). 2) Men who become only
oligospermic after prolonged testosterone treatment show increased
production of 5
-reduced androgens compared with those who become
azoospermic, implying that DHT formation may maintain low levels of
spermatogenesis in these nonresponders (57). 3) Asian men, who are
rendered azoospermic by androgen-based contraceptives far more reliably
than are Caucasians (58), have significantly lower serum levels of
5
-reduced androgens (59). Thus, a non-5
-reducible androgen such
as MENT offers an alternative to testosterone for male contraceptives
that not only provides a superior side-effect profile, but may also
enhance contraceptive efficacy.
MENT has, in fact, been tested as a component of a male contraceptive regimen in one small study (60). In this trial, rhesus monkeys were rendered profoundly hypogonadal with the GnRH agonist histerilin. After 8 months of treatment, MENT was added to the histerilin treatment and restored ejaculatory ability while maintaining azoospermia for 8 additional months. These findings demonstrate a promising role for MENT as a component of a hormonal male contraceptive.
It has been reported previously that testosterone, even at
physiological levels, lowers serum HDL and HDL2 in men
(61, 62, 63), apparently by inducing hepatic triglyceride lipase activity
(64). Consistent with these reports, we found that castrated monkeys
and those replaced with low doses of either testosterone or MENT had
elevated HDL and HDL2 levels, whereas higher doses of both
androgens suppressed these values. Overall, MENT showed the same
10-fold greater potency than testosterone with regard to its impact
upon lipids as it showed for gonadotropin suppression and support of
body weight. This suggests that 5
-reduction is not involved in
testosterone regulation of lipid metabolism. Importantly, the minimum
doses of both MENT and testosterone required to suppress LH and thus
exert a contraceptive effect (0.3 and 3.0 mg/day, respectively) were
associated with unaltered HDL and increased HDL2.
Although it resists 5
-reduction, MENT does undergo aromatization to
an estrogen (7
-methyl-estradiol) (65). This property may be
important if MENT is to be used for androgen replacement, as estrogenic
metabolites of testosterone have been implicated in gonadotropin
regulation, CNS gender imprinting, and sexual behavior (11, 12, 13, 14, 15).
Indeed, MENT has been shown to sustain male sexual behavior 520 times
more potently than testosterone in castrated rats and hamsters (9, 66).
Interestingly, in castrated mice a MENT dose sufficient to restore
sexual behavior and seminal vesicle weight to the same extent as a
larger dose of testosterone was comparatively less active at promoting
aggressive behavior (44). Furthermore, aromatization of supplemental
androgens reduces the degree to which these agents lower HDL levels, as
this adverse consequence appears to be a pure androgen effect
antagonized by estrogenic metabolites that suppress hepatic
triglyceride lipase activity (16, 17, 18). As testosterone and MENT both
undergo aromatization, it is not surprising that their relative
potencies regarding lipid metabolism are similar to their relative
potencies at all other target organs except those with high
5
-reductase activity.
In addition to their potential utility in hormonal male contraceptives, supplemental androgens are clinically useful in treating male hypogonadism, delayed puberty, certain hematological disorders, hereditary angioneurotic edema, and possibly various muscle-wasting conditions (43, 67). At present, testosterone esters (testosterone enanthate and cypionate) are the most commonly employed compounds (68). Unfortunately, these agents require frequent im injections and are associated with wide fluctuations in plasma testosterone levels (69). To alleviate these problems, slow release androgen formulations are being investigated, including biodegradable testosterone/lactide/glycolide copolymer microcapsules (70) and fused crystalline testosterone pellet implants (71). These preparations can maintain physiological serum androgen levels for 25 months in men after a single administration. Their duration is limited by the potency of the androgen they carry as well as by the mass of drug that can be administered practically. Unfortunately, testosterone esters currently in use are burdened with long side-chains that add undesired bulk. The ideal androgen for any long acting bioimplant would have a small mass and be very potent. MENT is a good candidate for such an agent. Our studies demonstrate that in nonhuman primates, MENT is 10 times more potent than testosterone with respect to gonadotropin regulation and anabolism. It also has a far smaller molecular mass than testosterone esters. The dose of MENT required for androgen replacement is estimated to be 300500 µg/day. This quantity could be delivered subdermally in currently available sustained release formulations that should last for at least 1 yr (21).
If MENT is to be used instead of testosterone for androgen replacement,
an important question that must be addressed is whether there are any
useful physiological functions mediated by 5
-dihydrosteroids that
would not be subserved by an androgen that resists 5
-reduction.
Although the actions of DHT are vital for differentiation of the male
reproductive tract in the fetus (72), there is no known unique
beneficial role for 5
-dihydrosteroids in adults. A powerful
illustration of this fact is the excellent safety profile of the
extensively studied 5
-reductase inhibitor, finasteride.
Phase 3 trials involving hundreds of men studied for up to 3 yr
revealed no major adverse effects of finasteride, except
for slighter higher incidences of impotence (3.3% vs.
1.6%) and decreased libido (3.3% vs. 1.6%), problems that
generally improved with continued treatment (73, 74, 75).
In summary, our results demonstrate that in primates, MENT is far more potent than testosterone with regard to the clinically desirable end points of gonadotropin suppression and anabolism, but has a relatively blunted capacity to support prostate growth. Prior studies in rats have shown that MENT is also far more potent at sustaining male sexual behavior and function. Thus, MENT can be delivered at doses that maintain the beneficial metabolic and behavioral effects of testosterone without hyperstimulating the prostate. Furthermore, as MENT is more biopotent than testosterone and is effective at low doses, it can be administered in more convenient formulations. MENT may therefore be superior to testosterone for androgen replacement in diverse clinical settings. Although a great deal of attention is currently focused upon the development and clinical use of tissue-selective estrogen receptor modulators such as raloxifene and tamoxifen (76), MENT is the first example of an androgen with relative tissue-selective actions.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received June 26, 1998.
Revised August 27, 1998.
Accepted August 31, 1998.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-androstan-17-ol-3-one by rat prostate in
vivo and in vitro. J Biol Chem. 243:20122021.
-reductase
inhibitor. Endocrinology. 109:830836.[Medline]
-reductase deficiency in the rat:
separation of testosterone-mediated and
5
-dihydrotestosterone-mediated effects. Endocrinology. 119:959966.[Abstract]
-methyl-19-nortestosterone, an androgen that does not undergo
5
-reduction. Biol Reprod. 49:577581.[Abstract]
-reduction
involved? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 52:105112.[CrossRef][Medline]
-Methyl-nortestosterone (MENT): the optimal androgen for male
contraception. Ann Med. 25:199205.[Medline]
-Methyl-19-nortestosterone: an ideal androgen for replacement
therapy. Recent Prog Horm Res. 49:373376.
-reductases from cynomolgus monkey: comparisons with human and rat
isoenzymes. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 52:307319.[CrossRef][Medline]
-methyl-19-nortestosterone and investigation of
its pharmacokinetics in animals. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 37:587591.[CrossRef][Medline]
-methyl-19-nortestosterone
is not amplified in male reproductive tract as is that of testosterone. Endocrinology. 130:36773683.[Abstract]
-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT) on sexual and aggressive
behaviors in two inbred strains of male mice. Horm Behav. 30:7484.[CrossRef][Medline]
-methyl-19-nortestosterone by rat liver, prostate,
and epididymis. Endocrinology. 123:21872193.[Abstract]
-reductase activity impairs
the testosterone-dependent restoration of spermiogenesis in adult rats. Endocrinology. 137:27032710.[Abstract]
-reductase activity in
oligozoospermic men administered supraphysiological doses of
testosterone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:902908.[Abstract]
-methyl-19-nortestosterone by human placental
microsomes in vitro. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 48:297304.[CrossRef][Medline]
-Methyl-19-nortestosterone facilitates sexual behavior in the
male Syrian hamster. Horm Behav. 30:131137.[CrossRef][Medline]
-reductase
deficiency. Am J Med. 62:177.
-Reductase
inhibitors/finasteride. Prostate. 6(Suppl):8287.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. J. Walton, N. Kumar, D. T. Baird, H. Ludlow, and R. A. Anderson 7{alpha}-Methyl-19-Nortestosterone (MENT) vs Testosterone in Combination With Etonogestrel Implants for Spermatogenic Suppression in Healthy Men J Androl, September 1, 2007; 28(5): 679 - 688. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Matthiesson and R. I. McLachlan Male hormonal contraception: concept proven, product in sight? Hum. Reprod. Update, July 1, 2006; 12(4): 463 - 482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Attardi, S. A. Hild, and J. R. Reel Dimethandrolone Undecanoate: A New Potent Orally Active Androgen with Progestational Activity Endocrinology, June 1, 2006; 147(6): 3016 - 3026. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Kaufman and A. Vermeulen The Decline of Androgen Levels in Elderly Men and Its Clinical and Therapeutic Implications Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2005; 26(6): 833 - 876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Chen, J. Kim, and J. T. Dalton Discovery and Therapeutic Promise of Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators Mol. Interv., June 1, 2005; 5(3): 173 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. von Eckardstein, G. Noe, V. Brache, E. Nieschlag, H. Croxatto, F. Alvarez, A. Moo-Young, I. Sivin, N. Kumar, M. Small, et al. A Clinical Trial of 7{alpha}-Methyl-19-Nortestosterone Implants for Possible Use as a Long-Acting Contraceptive for Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5232 - 5239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. A. L. Crawford, P. Y. Liu, M. T. Kean, J. F. Bleasel, and D. J. Handelsman Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Androgen Effects on Muscle and Bone in Men Requiring Long-Term Systemic Glucocorticoid Treatment J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2003; 88(7): 3167 - 3176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Anderson, A. M. Wallace, N. Sattar, N. Kumar, and K. Sundaram Evidence for Tissue Selectivity of the Synthetic Androgen 7{alpha}-Methyl-19-Nortestosterone in Hypogonadal Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2784 - 2793. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Raney and J. Methot Recent Advances in Hormonal and Barrier Contraception Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2003; 16(3): 209 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Anderson and D. T. Baird Male Contraception Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2002; 23(6): 735 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Narula, Y.-Q. Gu, L. O'Donnell, P. G. Stanton, D. M. Robertson, R. I. McLachlan, and W. J. Bremner Variability in Sperm Suppression during Testosterone Administration to Adult Monkeys Is Related to Follicle Stimulating Hormone Suppression and Not to Intratesticular Androgens J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3399 - 3406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang and R. S. Swerdloff Should the Nonaromatizable Androgen Dihydrotestosterone Be Considered as an Alternative to Testosterone in the Treatment of the Andropause? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1462 - 1466. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Matsumoto Andropause: Clinical Implications of the Decline in Serum Testosterone Levels With Aging in Men J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., February 1, 2002; 57(2): M76 - 99. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
|