help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shupnik, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laws, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shupnik, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Laws, E. R., Jr.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 11 3965-3972
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Selective Expression of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and ß Isoforms in Human Pituitary Tumors1

Margaret A. Shupnik, Leslie K. Pitt, Ann Y. Soh, Alice Anderson, M. Beatrice Lopes and Edward R. Laws, Jr.

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine (M.A.S., L.K.P., A.Y.S., A.A.); Department of Neuropathology (M.B.L.); and Department of Neurosurgery (E.R.L.), University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Margaret A. Shupnik, Ph.D., Box 578 HSC, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908. E-mail: mas3x{at}virginia.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The physiological effects of estrogen on the pituitary, including cellular proliferation and regulation of hormone synthesis, are mediated by the nuclear estrogen receptor (ER). The ER acts as a dimer to modulate gene transcription and contains specific functional domains encoded in different exons. Two separate, but related, forms of the receptor (ER{alpha} and ERß) exist, with distinct tissue and cell patterns of expression. Additional ER isoforms, generated by alternative messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) exon splicing, have been defined in several tissues and are postulated to play a role in tumorigenesis or in modulating the estrogen response. We examined 71 human pituitary adenomas of varying phenotypes and 6 normal pituitary specimens for ER mRNA forms by RT-PCR and hybridization blotting analysis. All prolactinomas (n = 14) contained ER{alpha}, and several contained ERß (5 of 14) mRNA. In comparison, 6 tumors that expressed PRL and GH expressed ERß (4 of 6) more frequently than ER{alpha} (3 of 6). ERß mRNA was also found more frequently in null cell (8 of 24 ER{alpha} and 14 of 24 ERß) and gonadotrope (13 of 21 ER{alpha} and 18 of 21 ERß) tumors. Additionally, ERß was found in 4 of 6 tumors that contained only GH, although ER{alpha} was not observed in this tumor type. Expression of the two ER forms within a tumor type was overlapping, but some tumors contained only 1 isoform. Expression of ER{alpha} mRNA splice variants also varied with cell type. All normal pituitaries contained ER{alpha} deletions of exon 4, 5, and 7, whereas only 2 of 6 samples contained the exon 2 deletion variant. Although the same ER{alpha} mRNA variants were observed among the various tumor types, the proportion of specific splice variants expressed varied. For example, most ER-positive prolactinomas expressed ER{alpha} variants with deletions of exon 2, 4, or 5, whereas gonadotropin tumors preferentially expressed the ER{alpha} exon 7 deletion variant. A novel ERß mRNA splice variant, missing exon 2, was observed in a majority of all ERß-positive tumors. Immunoblotting analysis of ER{alpha} and ERß proteins supported the mRNA results. Because ER{alpha} and ERß have different biological responses to selective ER modulators, and the ER deletion variants have biological effects distinct from those of the full-length ER, expression of these isoforms may influence the biological properties of these tumors and affect their ability to respond to estrogen and antiestrogen therapies.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE STEROID hormone estrogen has many effects on pituitary function, including regulation of most pituitary hormones, and proliferation of several pituitary cell types (1, 2, 3, 4). Biological effects are mediated by binding of hormone-bound estrogen receptor (ER) dimers to specific estrogen-responsive regions (EREs) in hormone-regulated genes, initiating changes in gene transcription (5). Many biological effects are mediated directly at the level of isolated pituitary cells from several species, and by analogy may occur on pituitary tumors as well. Several clinical observations support this concept, including the preponderance of prolactinomas in women (3:1 female ratio), the stimulatory effect of estradiol (E2) on some prolactinomas, and the predominance of gonadotropin-producing tumors in men (6, 7, 8, 9).

Several groups have used a variety of techniques to detect and localize the ER{alpha} messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) and protein to specific cell types in normal pituitary tissue and in distinct classes of pituitary adenomas (10, 11, 12, 13), which represent clonal expansions of individual cells (14). In general, the highest levels of ER{alpha} mRNA and protein and the highest percentages of ER{alpha}-containing tumors have been among PRL-containing tumors, with or without GH (70–100%), whereas gonadotrope tumors have intermediate levels of protein and a lower (~50%) percentage of ER{alpha}-positive tumors. Null tumors with ER{alpha} were less frequent, and GH tumors were consistently ER{alpha} negative in several studies (10, 11, 12, 13). These results are in agreement with information obtained from normal human pituitary specimens, indicating that most PRL and gonadotrope cells have ER{alpha}, but that GH-containing cells do not (10, 11). These studies do not, however, completely explain the uptake of radioactive E2 into GH-containing cells previously described by some investigators or the effects of E2 on GH secretion (13, 15), and indirect mechanisms of E2 action have been proposed. Alternatively, the demonstration of an ER{alpha}-positive GH-containing tumor by isoelectric focusing (16) and of positive ER{alpha}- and GH-containing cells by in situ hybridization (17) may indicate the rare occurrence of some GH- and ER{alpha}-positive cells.

The identification of ER variants, generated by alternative splicing of the mRNA encoding the protein, in hormone-responsive tissues such as breast tumors and breast cancer cell lines has provided an additional layer of complexity. The ER has a defined domain structure, with a central DNA-binding region, a C-terminal hormone-binding area, and activating functions conferring the ability to stimulate gene transcription located in both N- and C-terminal areas (18) (Fig. 1Go). Removal of individual exons by alternative splicing events can thus have significant impact on receptor function and can affect the ability of the full-length ER to exert its biological effects. For example, elimination of ER{alpha} exon 5 (ER{alpha}{Delta}5) results in a truncated protein lacking much of the hormone-binding domain. In breast cancer cells, this variant protein has constitutive activity independent of E2 or antiestrogen binding and may play a role in cellular growth or the appearance of antiestrogen-resistant cells (19, 20). Other variants, lacking part of the DNA-binding domain in exon 3 (ER{alpha}{Delta}3) or the activation region in the C-terminus (ER{alpha}{Delta}7) have dominant negative effects on full-length receptor activation of gene transcription in transfection studies (21, 22). A recent report demonstrated that the exon 2 deletion variant (ER{alpha}{Delta}2) could amplify the ability of the full-length ER to stimulate gene transcription (23). A previous study scanned a number of pituitary tumors and suggested that the expression of some ER{alpha} splice variants may be pituitary cell type-specific, allowing potential variation in ER activity in prolactinomas and gonadotrope tumors (12).



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the structures of the ER{alpha}- and ERß-coding regions and the locations of the primers (at arrowheads) used for RT-PCR analysis. The exon boundaries are shown for each ER isoform above the respective functional domains for each ER protein.

 
Recently, an additional isoform of the ER, termed ERß, was cloned from rodent and human prostate tissue (24, 25), and mRNA encoding the protein was identified in several tissues, including pituitary (26). ERß binds physiological ligands similarly to the ER (termed ER{alpha}) first identified, but has significant differences in the ability to bind and affect gene transcription in response to specific antiestrogens, selective estrogen receptor modulators, and potential environmental estrogens (27, 28, 29). These data suggest that the expression of the ERß isoform could have significant impact on the ability of a specific cell type or tumor to respond to these clinically relevant compounds. Although ERß mRNA has been detected in rat pituitary (26), pituitary cell type-specific expression has not been examined in rodent or human pituitary.

We examined 71 human pituitary adenomas and 6 normal pituitary samples for the presence of both ER isoforms, ER{alpha} and ERß. We found selective tumor-type expression of three ER{alpha} variants, with most PRL tumors expressing ER variants with activating (ER{Delta}2) or constitutively active (ER{Delta}5) forms, whereas more gonadotropin tumors expressed a dominant negative form (ER{Delta}7) of the ER. Surprisingly, a majority of GH-only tumors were found to contain mRNA for the ERß isoform, suggesting that some subset of these tumors may be hormonally responsive.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Tumor samples

Pituitary macroadenomas were obtained from 71 patients who had transphenoidal surgery. Adenomas were classified according to current clinical morphological classification (30), using both immunohistochemistry and transmission electron microscopy analysis. However, the distinction between male and female type gonadotrope adenomas was not made. Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described (10, 28) and correlated to serum hormone levels. Patients with prolactinomas (n = 14; 11 women and 4 men) ranged in age from 24–67 yr (median, 33 yr). All had elevated serum PRL levels (from 150->2000 µg/L) and had tumor immunohistochemical staining consistent with expression of PRL, but not the gonadotropin subunits, ACTH, or TSH. Six tumors stained for PRL and GH. All patients with PRL-staining tumors (alone or with GH) had received at least 1 trial of bromocryptine therapy. Only 1 patient was receiving bromocryptine therapy at the time of surgery. The tumor from this male patient stained for PRL only and was positive for ER{alpha}, but not ERß, similar to other tumors of this type. Six tumors (2 women and 4 men) were obtained in which exclusive GH immunostaining was observed; 1 patient had the occasional cell that also stained for {alpha}-subunit. These patients ranged in age from 31–60 yr (median, 39 yr), with elevated serum GH (10–57 µg/L) and insulin-like growth factor I levels (529–1179 ng/mL). No patient in this study had been treated with octreotide. Patients with clinically nonfunctioning tumors were separated into 2 groups, null and gonadotrope, on the basis of histology, immunostaining, and serum hormone levels. Patients with gonadotrope tumors (n = 21, 14 men and 7 women) ranged in age from 26–80 yr (median age, 64 yr). Immunohistochemical staining was observed in all tumors with one or more specific antibodies against {alpha}-subunit, LHß, and FSHß, and one tumor had focal staining for TSHß. Patients with null cell tumors (n = 24, 20 men and 4 women) ranged in age from 33–81 yr (median, 44 yr). These tumors had no immunohistochemical staining or focal staining with {alpha}-subunit only. Normal pituitary tissue was obtained from 6 individuals (3 women, aged 26–78 yr, and 3 men, aged 28–70 yr; median age, 46 yr). All tissue was obtained in accordance with the guidelines of the human investigation committee at the University of Virginia.

RNA isolation

As previously described, pituitary specimens were obtained and partitioned immediately after surgical removal for routine histological examination and RNA isolation. Normal pituitary tissue was obtained 5–14 h after death. Tissue was homogenized in guanidinium isothiocyanate, and total RNA was isolated by centrifugation through a cesium chloride gradient (31, 32). RNA integrity was assessed by observation of intact 28S and 18S bands on an ethidium bromide-containing agarose gel as for Northern blot analysis and by PCR analysis of actin mRNA (31, 33). Specimen contamination with normal tissue was minimized by the use of macroadenomas and careful dissection of the tissue. Lack of contamination was additionally verified by confirming the absence of mRNA (by RT-PCR) for TSHß in gonadotrope, null tumors, and PRL- and GH-containing tumors (which should not express TSH); the absence of PRL mRNA in gonadotrope and null tumors; and the absence of the mRNA for the nuclear orphan receptor steroidogenic factor-1 in tumors not of gonadotrope lineage (34).

RT-PCR analysis of ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA isoforms

Total isolated RNA was quantitated by spectrophotometry, and 1–2 µg total RNA were used to prepare complementary DNA (cDNA) by RT. Reagents for the RT and PCR reactions were obtained from Perkin Elmer (Norwalk, CT). Each RT reaction also contained random hexamers as primers for first strand cDNA synthesis, 10 U ribonuclease inhibitor, and 40 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Perkin Elmer) in a 20-µL volume containing 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 5 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 0.25 mmol/spermidine, and 200 µmol/L each of precursor deoxy-NTPs. Reactions were incubated at 25 C for 10 min (annealing), at 42 C for 15 min (elongation), and at 95 C for 5 min (heat inactivation). PCRs were then performed on each RT reaction, using specific oligonucleotide primers as described below and 25 U Taq polymerase. For each ER mRNA variant tested, at least two independent RT reactions for each tumor RNA sample were independently assessed. Whenever possible, the presence of individual variants was also verified by two independent primer sets. All RNA samples were tested for ER variants in the same PCR amplification experiment. PCR amplifications were performed by the addition of specific primers (15 pmol) to the RT reactions along with Taq polymerase and reagents according to manufacturer’s instructions. Amplifications were performed in a thermocycler for 35 cycles, [95 C for 1 min, optimal annealing and elongation temperature (56–60 C) for 1 min), and one cycle at 72 C for 10 min]. Each experiment also contained a positive control, a PCR reaction with a plasmid containing the cDNA sequence for the entire coding regions of the specific ER. In this case, PCR amplification should result in only one product, corresponding to the full-length ER form. Negative controls included reactions with water and other reagents, but no RNA or DNA, to test for reagent contamination and RNA without reverse transcriptase to test for genomic DNA contamination. No product was seen in the negative controls of the experiments described, and only single bands were observed in plasmid-containing positive control reactions.

PCR primers were synthesized to various sites along both upper and lower strands of the coding regions of ER{alpha} and ERß, as shown in Fig. 1Go. Specific primers, their location in the coding region, and specific sequences are as follows. ER{alpha} sequences are assigned nucleotide positions as defined by Chaidrun et al. (12). ER{alpha} upper strand primers included H1 (exon 1, bases 226–246; 5'-ACGGACCATGACCATGACCCT-3'), HFC (exon 2, bases 845–862; 5'-TGCAAGGCCCTTCTTCAAG-3'), HU4 (exon 4, bases 1137–1157; 5'-TAAGAAGAACAGCCTGGCCTTG-3'), H4/5 (exon 4, bases 1184–1202; 5'-GCCTTGTTGGATGCTGAG-3'), H5/5 (exon 5, bases 1329–1346; 5'-GCTTTGTGGATTTGACCC-3'), and H6/5 (exon 6, bases 1481–1501; 5'-TGTGTAGAGGGCATGGTGGAG-3'). ER{alpha} lower strand primers included H3C (exon 3, bases 885–904; 5'-GGTGGCTGGACACATATAGT-3'), HC5 (exon 5, bases 1430–1450; 5'-AGGAGCAAACAGTAGCTTCAC-3'), H6/3 (exon 6, bases 1559–1576; 5'-GAGGCACACAAACTCCTC-3'), H 7/3 (exon 7, bases 1768–1785; 5'-CTCATGTGCCTGAATGTGG-3'), and HJ (exon 8, bases 2002–2020; 5'-TCAGACTGTGGCAGGGAAA-3').

ERß primers were assigned base positions according to the numbering system of Mosselman et al. (25). Exon/intron boundaries were assigned as demonstrated by Enmark et al. (35). Upper strand primers were HB10 (bases 10- 29; 5'-CCTGCTGTGATGAATTACAG-3'), HB862 (bases 862–882; 5'- TGGATGGAGGTGTTAATGATG-3'), and HB1173 (bases 1173–1193; 5'-TGCTTTGGTTTGGGTGATTGC-3'). Lower strand primers were HB559 (bases 541–559; 5'-TTCTCTGTCTCCGCACAAG-3'), HB936 (bases 918–936; 5'-GATCTGGAGCAAAGATGAG-3'), and HB1422 (bases 1402–1422; 5'-TTTGCTTTTACTGTCCTCTGC-3').

Southern blot and hybridization analysis

Products from PCR reactions were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose TBE gel (88 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 50 mmol/L boric acid, and 2 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate) containing ethidium bromide, as previously described (33). PCR product bands were visualized under UV light, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and hybridized with 32P-labeled DNA probes specific for ER-coding sequence. Probes included cDNAs for the entire coding regions of the human ER{alpha} cDNA (10) or ERß cDNA (25) labeled by random priming and incorporation of labeled deoxy-CTP (33) or oligonucleotides corresponding to specific exon sequences, which were end labeled by T4 polynucleotide kinase (36). After hybridization, blots were washed and subjected to autoradiography at -70 C for 2–16 h.

Cloning and DNA sequence analysis of ER variant PCR products

To confirm the identity of the specific ER mRNA splice variants, specific PCR products of the appropriate size were isolated from an agarose gel and cloned into the PCR2.1 cloning vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Plasmids containing the PCR inserts were subjected to DNA sequencing by the dideoxy method of Sanger (37). At least two independent clones were used to confirm sequence identity.

Immunoblot analysis

To determine whether variant ER proteins could be detected in either normal pituitary or pituitary tumors, immunoblot analysis was performed on total cellular protein or nuclear protein as previously described (33, 38). In all cases tested, the use of nuclear proteins gave the same immunopositive protein pattern as whole cell proteins, but with a stronger signal (not shown). Protein samples (35–100 µg as indicated) were boiled for 5 min in buffer containing 50 mmol/L Tris(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane (pH 7.6), 2% (wt/vol) SDS, and 2% ß-mercaptoethanol. Proteins were separated by electrophoresis on 12% polyacrylamide gels containing 1% (wt/vol) SDS and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. ER{alpha} was detected with an antibody (1D5, Dako Corp., Carpinteria, CA) that recognizes amino acids 65–78 in the N-terminal region of human ER{alpha} (39). Primary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:100 and was incubated for 3 h at room temperature. The secondary antibody was peroxidase-conjugated goat antimouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA) and was used at a dilution of 1:40,000 for 1 h at room temperature. The ERß antibody was provided by Dr. Nira Ben-Jonathan, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH) and is a polyclonal antibody to the 18-amino acid N-terminal peptide of ERß, homologous in rat, mouse, and human. Primary antibody was used at a dilution of 1:1000 at room temperature for 1 h, followed by incubation with secondary antibody (peroxidase-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG, Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) at a dilution of 1:500 dilution for 1 h. Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham) was used to detect immunopositive protein bands.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ER{alpha} mRNA variants

Both normal pituitary and pituitary adenoma RNA samples were analyzed for the presence of full-length and variant ER{alpha} mRNA by RT-PCR techniques. Full-length ER{alpha} mRNA was detected in all normal pituitaries, all lactotrope tumors expressing only PRL, and a majority (62%) of gonadotrope tumors (Table 1Go). A lower percentage of null (33%) tumors and tumors expressing both PRL and GH (50%) contained ER{alpha} mRNA. No tumors that expressed only GH contained any ER{alpha} mRNA. Analysis with defined primer pairs also demonstrated the existence of mRNA splice variants in all tumor types. No amplified product for a splice variant mRNA appeared without a corresponding product for full-length mRNA, and not all possible variants were detected. For example, no normal pituitary or pituitary adenoma RNA appeared to express mRNA variants lacking either exon 3 (as tested with primer pairs H1 and HC5, or HF5 and HC5) or exon 6 (tested with primer pairs HU4 and H7/3, H4/5 and HJ, and H5/5 and H7/3).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. RT-PCR analysis of ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA in pituitary adenomas and normal pituitary tissue

 
Although no single ER mRNA variant appeared exclusively in one type of tumor, preferential expression of individual mRNA splice variants in specific tumor types did occur. Figure 2Go depicts RT-PCR analysis for ER{alpha} mRNA variants in several tumors. Overall, the ER{alpha}{Delta}2 variant mRNA, was contained in all prolactinomas (n = 14), but to a lesser extent in gonadotrope (6 of 13) or null cell (4 of 8) tumors. Splice variant products representing the deletion of exon 4 (ER{alpha}{Delta}4) were observed in the majority of all tumors that expressed ER{alpha} regardless of tumor type. Similarly, expression of the ER{alpha}{Delta}5 variant was expressed in all prolactinomas and was present in nearly half of the tumors representing other cell types. In contrast, the ER{alpha}{Delta}7 splice variant was preferentially expressed in gonadotrope (n = 13) and null (n = 7) tumors and appeared in less than half of prolactinomas (6 of 14) or in tumors expressing both PRL and GH (1 of 6). No splice variant appeared without a corresponding full-length ER mRNA, and no ER{alpha} mRNA variants appeared in any tumor that expressed only GH. Incorporation of radioactive nucleotide precursors into amplification products gave identical results as experiments performed with blotting of DNA products (not shown).



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. RT-PCR analysis of ER{alpha} mRNA in pituitary tumors and normal pituitary tissue. Selected RNA samples are shown for each variant, and the positions and sizes (in base pairs) of amplified products represented by full-length (F/L) ER{alpha} mRNA and the specific exon deletion ({Delta}) variant are shown. The pituitary tumor type is shown above each lane, with gonadotrope tumors designated by GO and normal pituitary tissue by PIT. Exon 2 variants are shown with the H1 and H3C primer pair, exon 4 variants with the HFC and HC5 primer pair, exon 5 variants with the H4/5 and H7/3 primer pair, and exon 7 variants with the H5/5 and HJ primer pair.

 
ER{alpha} mRNA splice variants were also expressed in normal pituitary tissue. Deletion variants for exons 4 and 7 appeared in all normal pituitary RNA samples, and exon 5 deletions appeared in four of six samples. In some cases, the intensity of the labeled variant band was low compared to that of the full-length PCR product (not shown). In contrast, only two normal pituitaries expressed the exon 2 deletion splice variant even though it was contained in many pituitary tumors (Table 1Go). No pituitary or tumor RNA samples contained double exon deletions.

ER{alpha} protein

The biological significance of any ER mRNA variant depends on the ability of the mRNA to be translated into a functional protein. Immunoblotting analysis of proteins from one normal pituitary and six pituitary adenomas is depicted in Fig. 3Go. Tumor samples were divided for both protein and RNA analysis, and the ER mRNA variants contained in each sample are shown below each protein lane. ER{alpha} mRNA exon deletion variants are indicated by the number of the exon deleted. For example, in this study the prolactinoma contained mRNA for ER{alpha} (full-length and {Delta}2, {Delta}4, and {Delta}5 variants), but not for ERß. The normal pituitary contained all ER{alpha} and ERß mRNA and splice variants shown in Table 1Go, except for exon 5. The GH and PRL tumor and both gonadotropin (GO) tumors contained mRNA for ER{alpha} and ERß. Both null tumors contained low levels of ER{alpha}, and one of two tumors expressed ERß mRNA.



View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Immunoblot analysis of ER{alpha} protein in pituitary tumors. Protein samples were subjected to electrophoresis, transferred to a nylon membrane, and incubated with antibody 1D5 as described. Immunopositive bands were detected with secondary antibody, enhanced chemiluminescence analysis, and radioautography. Approximately 35–50 µg whole cell protein were used for the normal pituitary (PIT), BT-20 breast cancer cells, and prolactinoma (PRL) samples, and 50 µg nuclear proteins were analyzed from the gonadotrope (GO), null, and PRL/GH tumors. The left and middle panels are from the same gel and represent film exposure times of 2 min (left panel) or more than 1 h (middle panel). The right panel represents a different gel, but contains a protein sample from the same PRL/GH tumor as that in the middle panel. The gel in the right panel was exposed to film for 10 min. Relative migration positions of molecular mass markers are shown. Below each lane are shown the ER isoform and variant mRNA status for each tumor sample. For ER{alpha} mRNA, the specific exon deletion variants are indicated by the number of the exon deleted.

 
An antibody to the N-terminus of the human ER{alpha} (1D5) was used to detect immunopositive protein in the samples. This antibody would be expected to detect full-length ER{alpha} (65–67 Da) as well as the in-phase exon 4 deletion protein (54–56 kDa), and the prematurely truncated proteins corresponding to the exon 5 (40–42 kDa), exon 7 (50–52 kDa), and exon 2 (18–19 kDa) deletion variants. In the ER{alpha}-positive tumors and in normal pituitary, the major immunopositive protein band, in general, corresponded to the full-length ER{alpha}. In four tumors and in normal pituitary, an immunopositive band at approximately 41 kDa was observed, and this may correspond to the ER{alpha}{Delta}5 variant protein. This protein migrated with the same relative mobility as the exon 5 deletion protein in BT-20 breast cancer cells, which have been demonstrated to contain this deletion variant ER{alpha} protein (37). In the normal pituitary and prolactinoma, in which the ER{alpha}{Delta}2 variant mRNA was detected, an immunopositive band at approximately 18–20 kDa was observed. No such protein band was detected in other tumor samples. No immunopositive protein band corresponding to the expected molecular masses for ER{alpha}{Delta}4 or ER{alpha}{Delta}7 was detected in any sample, even though the mRNAs for these variants were detected by RT-PCR. Although the absolute identity of each immunopositive band cannot be made from this study, these data suggest that at least some of the ER{alpha} mRNA variants in both normal pituitary and pituitary tumors can be translated into functional proteins, which could then influence the biological responses of the tissue to estrogen.

ERß mRNA variants

Primers specific for 2 regions of ERß mRNA, spanning both N-terminal- and C-terminal-coding regions of the cDNA, were used to analyze normal pituitary and pituitary adenoma samples in RT-PCR reactions. As the data were essentially the same for both sets of primers, and no splice variants were observed or characterized from the C-terminal set of primers, only the N-terminal results are shown (Fig. 4Go). ERß mRNA was expressed in all normal pituitary RNA samples, but was preferentially expressed in gonadotrope tumors (19 of 21), compared to null tumors (15 of 24) and prolactinomas (6 of 14). Quantitative data cannot be obtained by these methods. However, the intensity of the amplified ERß bands appeared to be greater in many of the gonadotrope tumor samples, suggesting that more ERß mRNA might be contained in those tumors. Of interest, 4 of 6 somatotrope tumors (expressing only GH) contained no ER{alpha} mRNA, but expressed easily detectable levels of ERß mRNA. No striking differences in patient levels of serum PRL, GH, or insulin-like growth factor I were apparent based on receptor status (Table 2Go). In addition, 4 of 6 tumors expressing both GH and PRL expressed ERß. Two of these tumors expressed only ERß, 2 expressed only ER{alpha}, and 2 expressed both ER mRNA isoforms. All gonadotrope tumors and null tumors that expressed ER{alpha} expressed ERß mRNA, and the remaining ER-positive tumors expressed ERß mRNA alone. In contrast, all prolactinomas that expressed ERß (6 of 14) also expressed ER{alpha} mRNA, with the remaining 9 tumors containing only ER{alpha} mRNA.



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. RT-PCR analysis of ERß mRNA in pituitary adenomas, with cell type designations, and normal pituitary (PIT). Amplifications with the N-terminal primer pair (HB10 to HB559) are shown, along with the migration of the amplified product representing full-length ERß (F/L) and the exon 2 deletion ({Delta}2) variant. Below each lane is the status of each sample (+, positive; -, negative) as tested for ER{alpha} mRNA.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. ER mRNA status, and preoperative basal (fasting) serum levels for GH, IGF-I, and PRL for patients with GH tumors

 
One ERß mRNA splice variant was observed (Figs. 4Go and 5Go). In the 5'-region of the cDNA, a variant corresponding to the precise deletion of exon 2, encoding the first zinc finger in the DNA-binding region, was cloned and characterized. The exon 2 deletion variant was observed in all ERß-positive tumors expressing GH and GH plus PRL, in the majority (14 of 19) of gonadotrope tumors, and in half of the ERß-positive null (8 of 15) tumors and prolactinomas (3 of 6). The splice variant results in a mRNA that would encode a truncated protein of 76 amino acids; the coding frame is out of phase and results in an inappropriate threonine (instead of histidine) residue at the end of exon 1 followed by 2 stop codons (Fig. 5Go).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. DNA sequence analysis of the cloned cDNA representing the ERß{Delta}2 variant. The sequence corresponding to the exact splice between exons 1 and 3 along with the corresponding codons for the amino acid sequence are shown. The splice between exons 1 and 3 results in the introduction of a codon for threonine, followed by two successive stop codons (TAA and TGA).

 
ERß protein

Immunoblotting analysis of pituitary tumors was performed for ERß using the identical samples analyzed for ER{alpha} in Fig. 3Go, but with a separate gel and blot. Figure 6Go demonstrates that immunopositive ERß protein (~50–55 kDa) can be detected in several of the samples, including normal pituitary and several gonadotropin tumors, but not in the prolactinoma. This tumor contained detectable ER{alpha} protein (Fig. 3Go) and was positive for ER{alpha}, but not ERß, mRNA. Exposure of the film for longer times did not reveal additional immunopositive proteins (not shown). BT-20 breast cancer cells also were positive for ERß mRNA and protein, as has been recently reported for some breast cancer cell lines (35). For each sample shown, the presence of ER{alpha} or ERß mRNA correlated with the presence or absence of the appropriate receptor protein (Figs. 3Go and 6Go). A smaller immunopositive band was noted in two of the tumor lanes. The identity of the protein is not known, but it cannot correspond to an exon 2 deletion protein, which would migrate below 10,000 Da; no such protein was observed in our samples.



View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunoblot analysis of pituitary adenoma and normal pituitary protein for ERß. Approximately 100 µg total protein were analyzed for total pituitary and prolactinoma samples. For all other tumors, 50 µg nuclear protein were used. All samples were analyzed on the same gel. The same samples were used as those shown in Fig. 3Go, but with a new gel and a new membrane. The relative migration of molecular mass markers is shown. The membrane was exposed to film for 10 min.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our data demonstrate that expression of ER mRNA isoforms, and to some extent splice variant isoforms, occurs preferentially in specific pituitary cell types. ER{alpha} mRNA expression occurs in all prolactinomas, a majority of gonadotrope tumors, and some null tumors, but not in tumors expressing only GH. This agrees with previous data from several laboratories (10, 11, 12, 13) using RT-PCR, nuclease protection, and immunohistochemistry of pituitary tumors that demonstrated preferential expression of ER{alpha} in lactotrope and gonadotrope cells. One group reported a single GH adenoma containing ER{alpha} protein detected by isoelectric focusing (16), although other investigators using similar techniques failed to observe this protein in GH-containing tumors (11). Using in situ hybridization techniques for ER{alpha}, Stefaneaunu et al. (17) found that nearly all types of cells contained ER mRNA. Given some homology between the ER{alpha} and the recently cloned ERß (24, 25), other nuclear receptors or both ER isoforms may have been detected by this technique and could explain these results. For example, we have found that GH-containing tumors express ERß mRNA; we did not test ACTH- or TSH-containing tumors.

We have previously shown by quantitative ribonuclease protection assays that the ER{alpha} mRNA is more abundant in prolactinomas than in gonadotrope or null tumors, and that pituitary tumor expression of the ER{alpha} mRNA is reflected in the proportion of normal pituitary cells expressing the ER{alpha} protein (10). Expression of the mRNA splice variants similarly exhibited some cell type selectivity, in that all or most prolactinomas contained the exon 2 and 5 deletion variants, whereas a higher proportion of gonadotrope tumors contained the exon 7 deletion variant. These results vary somewhat from the report by Chaindrun et al., who found some expression of ER{alpha}{Delta}3 variants, and a higher expression of the ER{alpha}{Delta}7 splice variant mRNA in prolactinomas (12). We have verified expression of these isoforms using two separate sets of primers; thus, the basis for this difference in expression is not apparent, but may reflect different patient populations.

Normal pituitary tissue contains the same ER{alpha} mRNA splice variant forms as pituitary tumors, although the exon 2 deletion is much more prevalent in tumor tissue, particularly in prolactinomas. Because lactotropes represent a large proportion of cells in normal pituitaries, it is more likely that this difference represents enhanced expression in tumor tissue, rather than expression in a small population of cells. No double exon mRNA deletions were observed in normal or tumor tissue, although double exon 3/4 and 5/6 deletions have been observed in rat pituitaries (33).

Variant immunopositive forms of ER{alpha} protein, corresponding to the predicted sizes of proteins translated from the splice variant mRNAs, occur in normal and tumor pituitary tissues, suggesting that variant proteins can occur and modulate the physiological response to estrogen in those cells. Although little information is available on the potential role of such ER protein variants in human pituitary, a large body of data is available from human breast cancer cells and transfected cell lines. Because of the domain structure of the receptors, mRNA deletions can result in ER proteins with dramatically altered functions. Deletion of exon 4 removes a portion of the DNA-binding, hinge, and hormone-binding regions and results in a protein with no discernible biological activity or influence on full-length ER activity (40). This variant, expressed in many tissues, would be neutral for estrogen actions. The ER{alpha}{Delta}7 protein can bind to EREs on DNA but cannot bind hormone and acts in a dominant negative fashion to inhibit the effects of the wild-type ER (22). In contrast, ER{alpha}{Delta}5 mRNA is translated into a truncated protein that binds DNA but cannot bind estrogen and has constitutive, hormone-independent effects on ERE-regulated gene transcription (19, 41). The mRNA and protein have been characterized in human breast cancer tissues and cell lines and are postulated to contribute to estrogen-independent ER-mediated effects on growth and gene expression (20). The ER{alpha}{Delta}5 variant is expressed at high levels in some ER-negative, progesterone receptor-positive tumors. Expression of the variant may explain the phenotype, in that the variant protein may bind to EREs and activate the progesterone receptor without estrogen, thus representing a step in escape from estrogen and antiestrogen responsiveness (19). A recent report (23) describes studies in which the ER{alpha}{Delta}2 variant cDNA, transfected into U-2 human osteosarcoma cells, had little activity alone, but amplified the ability of full-length ER{alpha} to stimulate c-fos reporter gene expression. The mechanism for this effect is unknown, because the expected protein would not bind to DNA or hormone. It is difficult to simply extrapolate data from transfected cell lines to pituitary tissue, particularly given the cell-specific effects of ER proteins and isoforms on different promoters (27, 28, 29, 42). However, it is intriguing that consititutively active (ER{alpha}{Delta}5) or ER-stimulating (ER{alpha}{Delta}2) forms of the receptor are preferentially expressed in prolactinomas, whereas a suppressive form of ER (ER{Delta}7) is preferentially expressed in gonadotrope tumors.

In contrast to the results with ER{alpha}, ERß mRNA is expressed preferentially in gonadotrope tumors, much less frequently in prolactinomas, and in the majority of tumors expressing only GH or GH plus PRL. One exon deletion splice variant was characterized in these studies. ERß{Delta}2 mRNA was expressed in normal pituitary and many tumor types, and would result in a severely truncated protein consisting only of exon 1. The biological activity of such a protein, if any, is difficult to predict, but might correspond to the stimulatory activity described for the ER{alpha}{Delta}2 variant (23). Several ERß mRNA splice variants have been characterized in rat tissues, including the pituitary (43, 44, 45). These include deletions of exon 3, which eliminates the second zinc finger and the ability to bind DNA, and a variant (ERß2), in which insertion of 18 amino acids between exons 5 and 6 results in a protein with altered estrogen binding affinity (43, 44). We have no evidence for either of these variant mRNA forms in any of our tumor samples. Recently, an ERß{Delta}5 variant was reported in breast cancer cells (45), but this variant was not observed in our experiments, using primers that would amplify most of the coding region (not shown).

Previous data from other investigators suggest that ER{alpha} is expressed at much higher levels than ERß in pituitaries of rats (26, 43) and in wild-type or ER{alpha} gene-disrupted mice (46). However, these studies do not distinguish between low levels of expression in many cell types vs. intermediate or high levels of expression in a selected cell population. Given that gonadotropes comprise a small proportion of pituitary cells, low overall ERß expression would still be consistent with expression in a high proportion of gonadotropes. We have shown that a high percentage of lactotrope and gonadotrope cells in normal pituitary expresses the ER{alpha} protein (10). Thus, many of these cells would express both ER isoforms. Because ERß and ER{alpha} can form heterodimers (47), both proteins could influence estrogen action in these cells. The observation that several GH-only and GH plus PRL tumors contain ERß is particularly interesting. GH-only tumors and GH-expressing cells in normal pituitary do not express ER{alpha} mRNA or protein (10, 11, 12, 13), and only half of PRL- and GH-containing tumors or normal cells do. Thus, ERß would be the only or the major mediator of estrogen action in these tumors, and ERß may account for some of the actions of estrogen on GH previously thought to be indirect (48). Because the two ER isoforms have different ligand binding affinities for natural, environmental, and synthetic estrogens (26), differential or exclusive expression of the proteins in different cell types might have physiological or therapeutic significance.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors thank Dr. Mary Lee Vance for careful reading of the manuscript, and Mr. Tony Lim for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by grants from the NIH (RO1-HD-25719 to M.A.S.), the Center for Research in Reproduction (P30-HD-28934), and the Cancer Center at the University of Virginia (NCI P30-CA-44589). Back

Received May 12, 1998.

Revised July 20, 1998.

Accepted July 28, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Veldhuis JD, Samojlik E, Evans WS, et al. 1986 Endocrine impact of pure estradiol replacement in postmenopausal women: alterations in anterior pituitary hormone release and circulating sex steroid hormone concentrations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 155:332–339.
  2. Shupnik MA, Gharib SD, Chin WW. 1989 Divergent effects of estradiol on gonadotropin gene transcription in pituitary fragments. Mol Endocrinol. 3:474–480.[Abstract]
  3. Lieberman ME, Maurer RA, Claude P, Wiklund J, Wertz N, Gorski J. 1980 Regulation of pituitary growth and prolactin gene expression by estrogen, hormones, and cancer. In: Leavitt WW, ed. Hormones and cancer. New York: Plenum Press; 151–163.
  4. Ho KY, Thorner MO, Krieg Jr RJ, et al. 1988 Effects of gonadal steroid on somatotroph function in the rat: analysis by reverse hemolytic plaque assay. Endocrinology. 123:1405–1411.[Abstract]
  5. Kumar V, Chambon P. 1988 The estrogen receptor binds tightly to its responsive element as a ligand-induced homodimer. Cell. 56:335–344.
  6. Lloyd RV. 1983 Estrogen-induced hyperplasia and neoplasia in the rat anterior pituitary gland. Am J Pathol. 113:198–206.[Abstract]
  7. Holmgren U, Bergstrand G, Hagenfeldt K, Werner S. 1986 Women with prolactinoma–effect of pregnancy and lactation on serum prolactin and on tumor growth. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 111:452–459.[Medline]
  8. Snyder PJ. 1985 Gonadotroph adenomas of the pituitary. Endocr Rev. 6:552–563.[Abstract]
  9. Horvath E, Kovaks K. 1984 Gonadotroph adeomas of the human pituitary: sex-related fine-structural dichotomy. Am J Pathol. 117:429–440.[Abstract]
  10. Friend KE, Chiou YK, Lopes MBS, Laws Jr ER, Hughes KM, Shupnik MA. 1994 Estrogen receptor expression in human pituitary: correlation with immunohistochemistry in normal tissue, and immunohistochemistry and morphology in macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:1497–1504.[Abstract]
  11. Zafar M, Ezzat S, Raymyar L, Pan N, Smyth HS, Asa SL. 1995 Cell-specific expression of estrogen receptor in the human pituitary and its adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3621–3627.[Abstract]
  12. Chaidarun SS, Klibanski A, Alexander JM. 1997 Tumor-specific expression of alternatively spliced estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid variants in human pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:1058–1065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Pinchon MF, Bression D, Peillon F, Milgrom E. 1980 Estrogen receptors in human pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 51:897–902.[Abstract]
  14. Alexander JM, Biller BM, Bikkal H, Zervas NT, Arnold A, Klibanski A. 1990 Clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are monoclonal in origin. J Clin Invest. 86:336–340.
  15. Friend KE, Hartman ML, Pezzoli SS, Clasey JL, Thorner MO. 1996 Both oral and transdermal estrogen increase growth hormone release in postmenopausal women: a clinical research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2250–2256.[Abstract]
  16. Ironside JW, Dangerfield VJM, Timperley WR, Underwood JCE. 1986 Steroid hormone receptors in pituitary adenomas: a biochemical, immunohistochemical and morphometric study on cryostat sections. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 12:539–546.[Medline]
  17. Stefaneanu L, Kovacs K, Horvath E, et al. 1994 In situ hybridization study of estrogen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid in human adenohypophysial cells and pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:83–88.[Abstract]
  18. Parker MG, Arbuckle N, Dauvois S, Danielian P, White R. 1993 Structure and function of the estrogen receptor. Ann NY Acad Sci. 684:119–126.[Abstract]
  19. Fuqua SAW, Fitzgerald SD, Chammness GC, et al. 1991 Variant human breast tumor estrogen receptor with constitutive transcriptional activity. Cancer Res. 51:105–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Klotz DM, Castles CG, Fuqua SA, Spriggs KL, Hill SM. 1995 Differential expression of wild-type and variant ER mRNAs by stocks of MCF7 breast cancer cells may account for differences in estrogen responsiveness. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 210:609–615.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Wang Y, Miksicek RJ. 1991 Identification of a dominant negative form of the human estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 5:1707–1715.[Abstract]
  22. Fuqua SAW, Fitzgerald SD, Allred DC, et al. 1992 Inhibition of estrogen receptor action by a naturally occurring variant in human breast tumors. Cancer Res. 52:483–486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chaidrun SS, Alexander JM. Tumor-specific estrogen receptor splice variants constitutively activate c-fos gene expression and increase cellular proliferation [Abstract OR9–1]. Proc of the 79th Annual Meet of The Endocrine Soc. 1997.
  24. Kuiper GG, Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko M, Nilsson S, Gustaffson JA. 1996 Cloning of a novel receptor expressed in rat prostate and ovary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 93:5925–5930.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Mosselman S, Polman J, Dijkema R. 1996 ERß: identification and characterization of a novel estrogen receptor. FEBS Lett. 392:49–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Kuiper GG, Carlsson B, Grandien K, et al. 1997 Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of the estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Endocrinology. 138:863–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tremblay GB, Tremblay A, Copeland NG, et al. 1997 Cloning, chromosomal localization, and functional analysis of the murine estrogen receptor ß. Mol Endocrinol. 11:353–365.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Paech K, Webb P, Kuiper GGJM, et al. 1997 Differential ligand activation of estrogen receptors ER {alpha} and ER ß at AP1 sites. Science. 277:1508–1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Tremblay A, Tremblay GM, Labrie C, Labrie F, Giguere V. 1998 EM-800, a novel antiestrogen acts as a pure antagonist of the transcriptional functions of estrogen receptors {alpha} and ß. Endocrinology. 139:111–118.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Horvath E, Kovacs K. 1991 The adenohypophysis. In: Kovacs K, Asa SL, eds. Functional endocrine pathology. Boston: Blackwell; 245–281.
  31. Friend KE, Chiou Y-K, Laws Jr ER, Lopes MBS, Shupnik MA. 1993 Pit-1 messenger ribonucleic acid is differentially expressed in human pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 77:1281–1286.[Abstract]
  32. Chirgwin JM, Przybla AE, MacDonald RJ, Rutter WJ. 1979 Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease. Biochemistry. 18:5294–5298.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Friend KE, Resnick EM, Ang LW, Shupnik MA. 1997 Specific modulation of estrogen receptor mRNA isoforms in rat pituitary throughout the estrous cycle and in response to steroid hormones. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 131:147–155.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Asa SL, Bamberger AM, Cao B, Wong M, Parker KL, Ezzat S. 1996 The transcription activator steroidogenic factor-1 is preferentially expressed in the human pituitary gonadotroph. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2165–2170.[Abstract]
  35. Enmark E, Pelto-Huikko E, Grandien K, et al. 1997 Human estrogen receptor ß-gene structure, chromosomal localization, and expression pattern. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 82:4258–4265.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Friend KE, Ang LW, Shupnik MA. 1995 Estrogen regulates the expression of several different isoforms of estrogen receptor mRNA in rat pituitary. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 92:4367–4371.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. 1977 DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 74:5463–5467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Shupnik MA, Rosenzweig BA. 1991 Identification of an estrogen-response element in the rat LHß gene: DNA-estrogen receptor interactions and functional analysis. J Biol Chem. 266:17084–17091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Mauri FA, Veronese S, Frigo B, et al. 1994 ER1D5 and H222 (ER-ICA) antibodies to human estrogen receptor protein in breast carcinomas. Results of a multicenter comparative study. Appl Immunohistochem. 2:157–163.
  40. Koehorst SA, Cox JJ, Donker GH, et al. 1994 Functional analysis of an alternatively spliced estrogen receptor lacking exon 4 isolated from MCF-7 breast cancer cells and meningioma tissue. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 101:237–245.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Castles CG, Fuqua SAW, Klotz DM, Hill SM. 1993 Expression of a constitutively active estrogen receptor variant in the estrogen receptor-negative BT-20 breast cancer cell line. Cancer Res. 53:5934–5939.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Berry M, Metzger D, Chambon P. 1990 Role of the two activating domains of the oestrogen receptor in the cell-type and promoter-context dependent agonistic activity of the anti-oestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen. EMBO J. 9:2811–2818.[Medline]
  43. Petersen DN, Tkalcevic GT, Koza-Taylor PH, Turi TG, Brown TA. 1998 Identification of estrogen receptor ß2, a functional variant of estrogen receptor ß expressed in normal rat tissues. Endocrinology. 139:1082–1092.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Chu S, Fuller PJ. 1997 Identification of a splice variant of the rat estrogen receptor ß gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 132:195–199.[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Vladusic EA, Hornby AE, Guerravladusic FK, Lupu R. 1998 Expression of estrogen receptor ß messenger RNA variant in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 58:210–214.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Couse JF, Lindzey J, Grandien K, Gustaffson J-A, Korach KS. 1997 Tissue distribution and quantitative analysis of estrogen receptor-{alpha} (ER{alpha}) and estrogen receptor-ß (ERß) messenger ribonucleic acid in the wild-type and ER{alpha}-knockout mouse. Endocrinology. 138:4613–4621.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Pettersson K, Grandien K, Kuiper GJM, Gustafsson J-A. 1997 Mouse estrogen receptor ß forms estrogen response element-binding heterodimers with estrogen receptor {alpha}. Mol Endocrinol. 11:1486–1496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ho KY, Evans WS, Blizzard RM, et al. 1987 Effects of age and sex on the 24-hour profile of growth hormone secretion in man: importance of endogenous estradiol concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 64:51–58.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. Montani, M. Penza, M. Jeremic, G. Biasiotto, G. La Sala, M. De Felici, P. Ciana, A. Maggi, and D. Di Lorenzo
Genistein is an Efficient Estrogen in the Whole-Body throughout Mouse Development
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2008; 103(1): 57 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Cosma, J. Bailey, J. M. Miles, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis
Pituitary and/or Peripheral Estrogen-Receptor {alpha} Regulates Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Secretion, Whereas Central Estrogenic Pathways Direct Growth Hormone and Prolactin Secretion in Postmenopausal Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2008; 93(3): 951 - 958.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee
What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans?
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, D. M. Keenan, and C. Y. Bowers
Peripheral estrogen receptor-{alpha} selectively modulates the waveform of GH secretory bursts in healthy women
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): R1514 - R1521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. A. Arreguin-Arevalo, T. L. Davis, and T. M. Nett
Differential Modulation of Gonadotropin Secretion by Selective Estrogen Receptor 1 and Estrogen Receptor 2 Agonists in Ovariectomized Ewes
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2007; 77(2): 320 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
U. Ohnemus, M. Uenalan, J. Inzunza, J.-A. Gustafsson, and R. Paus
The Hair Follicle as an Estrogen Target and Source
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2006; 27(6): 677 - 706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. M.A. Dreijerink, K. W. Mulder, G. S. Winkler, J. W.M. Hoppener, C. J.M. Lips, and H.Th. M. Timmers
Menin Links Estrogen Receptor Activation to Histone H3K4 Trimethylation.
Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4929 - 4935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. D. Veldhuis, J. N. Roemmich, E. J. Richmond, and C. Y. Bowers
Somatotropic and Gonadotropic Axes Linkages in Infancy, Childhood, and the Puberty-Adult Transition
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2006; 27(2): 101 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J EndocrinolHome page
E. J. Lee and J L. Jameson
Gene therapy of pituitary diseases
J. Endocrinol., June 1, 2005; 185(3): 353 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page