help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abosch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abosch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. B.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 10 3411-3418
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Transsphenoidal Microsurgery for Growth Hormone-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: Initial Outcome and Long-Term Results

Aviva Abosch, J. Blake Tyrrell, Kathleen R. Lamborn, Lisa T. Hannegan, Carol B. Applebury and Charles B. Wilson

Departments of Neurological Surgery (A.A., K.R.L., L.T.H., C.B.A., C.B.W.) and Medicine (J.B.T.), School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0112

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Aviva Abosch, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 779 Moffitt Hospital, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143-0112.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Treatment of acromegaly has long been recognized as necessary to relieve symptoms, halt progression of deformities, and decompress the sella turcica. More recently, treatment strategies have focused on decreasing GH levels to a point at which mortality rates normalize, thereby redefining previous concepts of a cure. No surgical series to date has investigated the long-term effect of treatment on mortality rates. We retrospectively reviewed 254 consecutive patients with acromegaly who underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery of GH-secreting adenomas between 1974–1992. Seventy-six percent of these patients had basal GH levels <5 ng/mL within 30 days of surgery, and 24% had persistent disease. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher stage, grade, and preoperative GH levels were all predictive of persistence (P < 0.01). Long-term follow-up was obtained on 129 of the patients in initial remission. Of these, 9 (7%) had disease recurrence and 120 remained in remission. The incidence of major postoperative complications was 8% (2% permanent diabetes insipidus, 2% cerebrospinal fluid leaks requiring surgery, 2% meningitis, and 2% hypopituitarism), with no mortality. In contrast to the 2.4- to 4.8-fold increased mortality among untreated acromegalics, the mortality rate among patients with posttherapy GH levels <5 ng/mL was equivalent to that of age- and sex-matched controls. Aggressive therapy to normalize GH levels should therefore be instituted at diagnosis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ACROMEGALY is an uncommon disease with an annual incidence of 3/million and an estimated prevalence of 40/million population (1). Untreated, acromegaly results in severe cosmetic and orthopedic deformities, as well as a higher mortality rate (2, 3, 4). The increased mortality rate is primarily caused by vascular causes, but respiratory infection and malignancies have also been reported (4, 5).

A variety of surgical approaches and medical therapies have been used to treat acromegaly, since the disease was first described by Pierre Marie in 1886 (6). The necessity of treatment to provide symptomatic relief, halt the progression of deformities, and decompress the sella turcica has long been recognized. More recently, various investigators have attempted to address the increased mortality rate associated with acromegaly (1, 7, 8, 9), and to correlate mortality with posttreatment GH levels (8). The pulsatile nature of daily GH secretion has led to interest in insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) as an index of therapeutic outcome (9), but data correlating IGF-I with mortality is, as yet, lacking.

The clinical behavior of GH-secreting pituitary tumors varies widely, but this variability has not yet provided clues that enable clinicians to predict which patients are likely to have a recurrence despite optimal therapy (5).

Although the remission rate in most surgical series has been considered high (10, 11), over the past decade, the definition of a cure has become increasingly stringent. The rationale for this comes from data suggesting that mortality rates remain higher than those of the normal population until the GH level drops below 2.5 ng/mL (8).

We report here the initial results and long-term outcome of a large series of acromegalic patients who underwent transsphenoidal resection of their GH-secreting pituitary tumors, and compare these results with those of other surgical series. We used univariate and multivariate analyses to determine which patient and/or tumor characteristics are predictive of initial disease remission, persistence, or ultimate recurrence following surgical resection of GH-secreting pituitary tumors. We also compared the long-term mortality rates observed in our series with those expected based on standard mortality tables, as well as with those recently reported in the literature (4, 7, 8).


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study design

We conducted a retrospective review of the hospital and office records of 254 consecutive patients with acromegaly who underwent transsphenoidal microsurgery for a GH-secreting adenoma at the University of California, San Francisco. Operations were performed exclusively by one surgeon (C.B.W.). The records of all patients meeting our study criteria (see below) who were operated on between January 1974 and September 1992 were reviewed. Information on perioperative GH levels was obtained from medical records.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Patients were included in this study if at least 2 yr had elapsed since the time of surgery to ensure a minimum of 2 yr of follow-up. The diagnosis of a GH-secreting adenoma was confirmed by the patient’s history, a physical examination to document excessive acral growth and characteristic coarsening of facial features, radiographic imaging (pneumoencephalography, computerized tomography, and, since 1985, magnetic resonance imaging), and histopathology. Surgical specimens since 1987 were routinely processed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies to GH.

Patients were excluded from the study if they were younger than 18 yr of age at the time of surgery, had undergone previous surgery for acromegaly, or if the diagnosis could not be verified by a preoperative GH level of >10 ng/mL or postoperative pathological confirmation consistent with a GH-secreting adenoma. Patients were also excluded if a postoperative GH level was not available. Older age and general medical status were not contraindications for transsphenoidal surgery so long as the patient was deemed able to tolerate general anesthesia. In fact, no patients diagnosed with acromegaly were rejected for surgery.

Clinical evaluation

Immediately before surgery, all patients were interviewed to obtain the details of their illness, and underwent a complete physical and neurological examination. Endocrinological evaluation of patients included pre- and postoperative determinations of basal (fasting) serum GH levels.

Neuroradiological evaluation

The method of preoperative radiographic diagnosis of pituitary tumors evolved over the 18-yr study period. Initial radiographic evaluation consisted of pneumoencephalography, which was superseded first by computerized tomography, and finally by magnetic resonance imaging in sagittal and coronal planes, with and without gadolinium enhancement.

Surgical procedure

All operations were performed by one surgeon (C.B.W.). With the aid of an intraoperative image intensifier, a sublabial transsphenoidal approach to the sella was used, as has been described previously (12). Once general endotracheal anesthesia was induced, lumbar subarachnoid drainage (LSAD) catheters were placed in most patients. Placement of LSADs allowed for the injection of saline into the subarachnoid space, to encourage descent of the tumor into the operative field. The exact strategy for each surgical resection was determined by the surgeon at the time of operation, and was based on tumor size, consistency, shape, and location. In each case, the goal was the selective removal of all tumor tissue, while sparing normal gland. Hydrocortisone was administered at the time of surgery, and the dose was tapered over 5 days postoperatively.

All patients underwent a postoperative examination before being discharged from the hospital, and had a follow-up examination or telephone interview 6 weeks after surgery. Patients who developed complications related to the surgery were evaluated at the onset of symptoms, with follow-up evaluations as mandated by the specific problem.

Classification of tumors

Tumors were classified based on neuroradiographic and intraoperative findings of the degree of sellar destruction (grade) and suprasellar extension (stage), according to the grading system developed by Hardy (12) and modified by Wilson (13) (Table 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Radiographic and intraoperative classification of pituitary adenomas1

 
Follow-up

Interim clinical follow-up and GH data were obtained through the retrospective review of University of California, San Francisco hospital and departmental records. We also attempted to contact all patients living in the United States to obtain current clinical information by telephone interview and by laboratory testing. If a current address was not available, we attempted to locate the patient through relatives and referring physicians. Information was obtained regarding the clinical status of all patients contacted, including the presence or absence of acromegalic symptoms (e.g. headache, progression of deformities, visual field impairment, impotence, amenorrhea, osteoarthritis, and excessive sweating), current medical therapy, and any intervening therapies, such as another operation or radiation treatment. At the time of contact, patients were asked to arrange for a GH level determination at a central laboratory. If this was not possible, patients were asked to provide any available recent GH levels. Long-term follow-up consisted of GH levels being obtained or evidence of recurrence after the initial 30-day postoperative period. All patients were asked if they had taken hormone replacement medications, and if they had experienced symptoms of anterior pituitary dysfunction at any point following surgery.

Data collection

Data were recorded on a standard questionnaire form and entered into a computer database. Each questionnaire was reviewed for completeness and accuracy by one of two nurses (L.T.H. or C.B.A.) and one physician (J.B.T.).

Postoperative GH levels and pituitary function

Basal GH levels were measured before surgery and during the first 30 days after surgery. Follow-up GH assays were performed at a central lab whenever possible to minimize interlab variability (14). This entailed collection of serum specimens at local laboratories, which were then shipped on dry ice to a central lab for analysis.

Because there is no consensus about the optimal method for assessing cure in acromegalic patients, a subset of patients in the latter years of this study underwent oral glucose tolerance testing (OGTT), IGF-I, and basal GH level analysis at a central laboratory at the time of their long-term follow-up. We compared the follow-up basal GH levels with those obtained by OGTT, and compared each of these values with IGF-I levels. OGTT-derived GH levels <2 ng/mL were considered normal (15). Normal values for IGF-I are dependent on age and sex, and are not included here.

Postoperative sodium levels were also checked once on all patients, and until serum sodium levels reached normal in those patients with transient postoperative hyponatremia.

Definitions

Postoperative remission was defined as a GH level that was <=5 ng/mL within the first 30 days following surgery, and with no subsequent GH levels that were greater than 5 ng/mL during this same interval. Patients for whom no immediate postoperative GH levels were available, but who on follow-up had normal GH levels, no clinical symptoms of acromegaly, and no subsequent therapy, were also considered to be in remission. Those patients who had a single GH level greater than 5 ng/mL but who, on follow-up, had normal levels without intervening therapy and no clinical symptoms, where also considered to be in remission. Patients not meeting these criteria were considered to have persistent disease. A recurrence was defined as an initial remission followed by a rise in GH levels, recurrent symptoms, or further therapy (Fig. 1Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Long-term follow-up of 193 patients in initial remission. GH levels were unavailable for 51 patients, 120 patients remained in remission, and 13 who underwent prophylactic postoperative irradiation (XRT) were excluded from outcome analysis. Subsequent treatment of 9 patients with disease recurrence is outlined.

 
Major complications were defined as death, significant hemorrhage, serious visual impairment, permanent hypopituitarism, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak requiring surgical repair, and meningitis. Minor complications were defined as simple CSF leaks not requiring surgical repair and transient hyponatremia or diabetes insipidus.

Statistical analysis

Logistic regression was used to analyze predictors of persistence. A backward, stepwise regression procedure was used for multivariate analyses. Results were considered statistically significant if the two-tailed P value was <0.05. For the purpose of statistical modeling, the logarithm of the maximum preoperative GH level was used to prevent overweighting of the few extremely high values.

Expected mortality rates by age and sex, divided into 5-yr age groups, were obtained from the U.S. Bureau of Census (16) and compared with those observed in this study. The expected mortality rates for patients in this study were determined based on person years of follow-up for each sex and age group. The difference between observed and expected rates was tested using the exact probabilities of the Poisson distribution (17).

Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to generate survival curves for the patients in remission, and for those with persistent disease (18), based on the initial postoperative outcome. Expected survival curves were generated based on standard life-table methods using 5-yr intervals.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient population

The median age of our patients was 40 yr (range, 18–76 yr). There were 149 (59%) male and 105 (41%) female patients. The median duration of symptoms before surgery was 18 months (range, 1–480 months); radiation therapy had been administered to 14 patients before surgery, but had ultimately failed to control their disease. Bromocriptine or somatostatin analogs had been given to 37 patients before surgery (Table 2Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Characteristics of study population

 
The majority (77%) of patients had tumors that were confined to the sella, without extensive bony erosion, suprasellar extension, or invasion of the cavernous sinus (Grade I or II, Stage 0; Table 1Go). Only one patient had intradural, intracranial disease extension (Stage D), 42 (17%) had intracavernous disease extension (Stage E), and 22 (9%) had diffuse destruction of the sellar floor (Grade IV).

Morbidity and mortality from surgical procedure

A summary of postoperative complications is provided in Table 3Go. The major postoperative complication rate was 8%, including 15 (6%) cases of hyponatremia, 5 (2%) cases of CSF leak, 6 (2%) cases of meningitis (all of which resolved promptly with intravenous antibiotics), and 4 (2%) cases of hypopituitarism. There was a 28% rate of minor complications. There were no known cases of clinically significant hemorrhage in the postoperative period or deaths linked to surgery.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Summary of postoperative complications, rates, and management in patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas

 
Initial outcome

Of the 254 patients with acromegaly who underwent transsphenoidal microsurgical resection of pituitary adenomas during the study period, 76% were found to be in remission postoperatively, and 24% had persistent disease.

Predictors of outcome

Univariate analysis revealed that younger age, larger tumor size, higher stage and grade, and preoperative GH level were each predictive (P = 0.01) of disease persistence. Considering size alone, 75% of microadenomas (diameter <1 cm) and 71% of macroadenomas went into remission following surgery. In the multivariate analysis, tumor size and patient age were no longer predictive of persistence, but higher stage, higher grade, and higher preoperative GH level all remained so (P < 0.01). Thus, 73% of Grade IV tumors and 48% of Stage E tumors persisted, whereas only 24% of Grade I and 30% of Stage 0 tumors persisted (Table 4Go). For those patients in remission postoperatively, 59% had a preoperative GH level of <30 ng/mL, whereas 36% had a preoperative GH level of >=30 ng/mL (Table 5Go). Not surprisingly, 60% of patients with Grade IV (diffuse destruction of the sellar floor or distant spread) tumors had preoperative GH levels greater than 30 ng/mL. For patients with persistent disease after surgery, 30% had a preoperative GH level of <30 ng/mL, whereas 69% had a preoperative GH level of >=30 ng/mL.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Percentage of patients (n = 61) with persistent disease according to tumor grade and stage

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Initial outcome according to preoperative GH level

 
No statistically significant relationship was found between disease persistence and sex, prior radiation, prior medical therapy, or symptom duration. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate whether or not outcome (persistence or remission) could be correlated with timing within the study interval. Cases of persistence were evenly distributed over the study years, arguing against the possibility that facility with the surgical technique or improvements in radiographic imaging factored into the occurrence of disease persistence.

Follow-up on patients with persistent disease

Of the 61 patients with persistent disease after surgery, 22 received radiation as their only additional therapy (Fig. 2Go). Of these, 19 were in remission by GH criteria at follow-up, and 3 were in clinical remission but no GH levels were obtained. Three patients with persistent disease underwent a second transsphenoidal operation. In these cases, the surgeon judged the second procedure likely either to result in remission, or to induce temporary remission before radiation treatment. Thus, 1 patient underwent a second transsphenoidal operation, after which GH levels returned to normal. Two other patients underwent repeat transsphenoidal operations followed by radiation therapy, after which GH levels returned to normal. Of the patients who received postoperative medical therapy, 2 were placed on bromocriptine, with 1 patient in remission and 1 patient not in remission at follow-up. Five patients were treated with postoperative octreotide, with 4 patients in remission and 1 patient not in remission at follow-up. Of the 9 patients who did not receive further therapy after surgery, all had persistent disease by GH levels at follow-up. Of the patients with persistent disease, a total of 11 patients were lost to follow-up and 9 patients had died by the time of follow-up.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Subsequent treatment and outcome for 61 patients with persistent disease after surgery. XRT, radiation therapy; T/S, transsphenoidal resection; FU, follow-up.

 
Long-term results

Of the 193 patients in initial remission, 13 underwent prophylactic postoperative irradiation for known residual tumor that was either inaccessible or adherent to surrounding structures. These 13 patients were excluded from further long-term remission analysis so as not to confound the analysis of results based solely on initial surgical outcome. These 13 patients were, however, included with the other remissions for the purposes of mortality analysis. Follow-up GH levels were unavailable on 51 of the 193 patients. This left 120 patients who remained in remission by GH criteria at long-term follow-up. Of note, 101 of these 120 patients had follow-up GH levels <2.5 ng/mL.

Nine of the 193 patients sustained disease recurrences. Five of these 9 patients then underwent further therapy, with 1 in clinical remission (no GH level available) and 1 not in remission after irradiation and treatment with somatostatin and parlodel. One patient went into remission after irradiation and parlodel treatment alone, and 2 patients remain on somatostatin therapy, with GH levels <5 ng/mL (Fig. 1Go).

The median time until recurrence was 3.3 yr. A median of 95 months of follow-up was obtained for patients who had not received prophylactic radiation after surgery, and who remained in remission for the duration of follow-up (range = 1.5–251 months). Tumor size, stage, grade, and preoperative GH levels could not, however, be linked in a statistically meaningful way to disease recurrence, because the number of recurrences was too small (9/128).

OGTT and IGF-I levels

Of the patients with central laboratory values at follow-up who were in clinical remission and had basal GH levels <2.5 ng/mL (n = 97), 13% nonetheless had elevated IGF-I levels. Conversely, 5 patients with normal IGF-I levels at follow-up had elevated basal GH levels. Of the patients who were in clinical remission and had OGTT levels <=2 ng/mL (n = 96), 10% had elevated IGF-I levels. These patients did not receive additional treatment for their abnormal IGF-I levels.

Mortality rates

Of the 193 patients in initial remission following surgery, 18 were out of the country, and 11 were lost to follow-up, leaving 164 (94%) for whom follow-up data were obtained. Twenty of these patients had died, yielding a cumulative observed mortality rate for these patients (Fig. 3AGo, solid line) that did not differ significantly from the expected rate.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier analysis of observed mortality rates (solid lines) among patients in remission (A) or with persistent disease following transsphenoidal microsurgery for acromegaly (B). Dotted lines indicate expected mortality rates among age-matched controls. P (y-axis) indicates proportion of patients dying. Years elapsed since surgery is indicated on x-axis. Each tick mark indicates a patient who died or was lost to follow-up. Each step represents a patient’s death.

 
Of the 61 patients with persistent disease after surgery, 4 were lost to follow-up and 7 were out of the country by the time of follow-up. Of the remaining 50 patients (93% of patients with persistent disease), 9 had died, yielding a statistically significant (P < 0.01) increase in the observed mortality rate compared with the general population (Fig. 3BGo). When these results were analyzed according to sex (Table 6Go), the observed mortality rate relative to the expected rate in men was 4.0 vs. 1.8, indicating a trend towards increased mortality for male patients with persistent disease. However, in female patients with persistent disease, the increase in the observed rate relative to the expected rate (5.0 vs. 1.1) was statistically significant (Table 6Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Comparison between observed and expected mortality rates for all age groups, stratified according to sex, and presence or absence of persistent disease

 
The cause of death was unavailable for the majority of patients. Among the patients with known causes of death, four died of malignancies (prostate, breast, fibrosarcoma, and gastric cancer), and two of cardiovascular causes. Information about the prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, and preexisting cardiac or vascular disease in these patients was unavailable.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Changes in definition of cure

The definition of a biochemical cure of acromegaly has been the subject of much controversy (9). Given that disease recurs in some patients, albeit a small percentage of them, a successful outcome after treatment is perhaps better described as remission. Throughout the 1970s and 1980s, a posttherapeutic GH level <5 ng/mL was felt to be consistent with disease cure (11, 19, 20). According to this definition, 76% of our patients would be considered to have an initial biochemical remission. This rate compares favorably with those of other series of acromegalic patients undergoing surgical treatment for their disease (see Table 7Go), which range from 53% (12) to 81% (21). The major complication rate of 8% in our study is nearly the same as the cumulative complication rate of 7% reported by Ross and Wilson (11) in their review of the literature.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Initial and long-term results of treatment for acromegaly in published surgical series

 
Beginning in the mid 1990s, a more stringent definition of cure has been used because analyses of long-term outcome have shown that mortality rates among treated acromegalics do not reach those of the normal population until GH levels drop below 2.5 ng/mL (8). According to this more stringent definition, 43% of the 100 patients in the series reported by Sheaves and colleagues (22) had initial remission. Of the 32 patients with this initial outcome who were treated by surgery alone, only 3% had a recurrence during a mean follow-up of period of 3.8 yr. This change in the definition of a cure, and the widespread availability of more sensitive GH assays, coincided with the end of our study period, making it difficult to ascertain the precise number of patients in our series whose GH levels dropped below 2.5 ng/mL in response to therapy. Nonetheless, at least 101 of our patients who remained in remission at long-term follow-up met this new definition of biochemical remission. However, it must be noted that hypopituitarism is associated with premature arterial degeneration, with its attendant increase in mortality (23). Therefore, an important goal of therapy is to aim for a GH level that halts the morbidity and increased mortality associated with acromegaly without incurring the problems associated with hypopituitarism.

Disease persistence

Previous attempts to correlate patient or tumor characteristics with clinical outcome have suggested that higher preoperative basal GH levels and larger tumor size are predictive of disease persistence after surgery (22). Other investigators have noted a correlation between younger patient age and higher pretherapy GH levels (24). Of the various patient and tumor characteristics investigated in our study, larger tumor size, higher stage and grade, and higher preoperative GH levels were all predictive of disease persistence, whereas sex, prior therapy, and symptom duration were not.

Bates and colleagues (8) found a highly significant correlation (P < 0.01) between pretreatment GH and posttreatment levels, suggesting that those patients with lower posttreatment GH levels tended to be those who had lower pretreatment levels. We have found a similar correlation, which implies that patients with a postoperative GH level <5 ng/mL may represent a subgroup of acromegalic patients with milder disease or with less invasive tumors.

Disease recurrence

The reported rates of disease recurrence after successful transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly are low, ranging from 0–7% (11, 22, 25). However, many of the large surgical series have not reported long-term follow-up on GH levels; therefore, the rate of recurrence after surgery may be underestimated. The small number of recurrences in our study (9/128; 7%) precluded drawing conclusions about the predictive value of the patient and tumor characteristics studied. A better understanding of which patients are likely to suffer disease recurrence is needed so as to anticipate the therapeutic needs of this subset.

Overexpression of the GHRH gene has recently been linked to neoplastic progression and clinical aggressiveness of GH-secreting adenomas (5). It is conceivable that advances in our understanding of the molecular genetics of pituitary adenomas will enable us to determine which groups of patients will not be cured by surgery, either initially or in the long term, and to develop new treatment modalities.

Mortality rates among patients with disease persistence and remission

Acromegaly is associated with changes in lipoprotein metabolism, high fibrinogen levels (26), and an increase in mortality rates caused by cardiovascular events, stroke, and malignancies. Interventions that lower GH levels enough to alleviate or eliminate symptoms and reverse cosmetic deformities do not necessarily lower this increased mortality rate (4, 7).

Bates and colleagues (8) demonstrated in their retrospective analysis of 79 patients that mortality rates of acromegalic patients decreased to those of age- and sex-matched controls if posttherapy GH levels <2.5 ng/mL could be achieved. In their study, GH levels measured five times during waking hours were averaged, and the lowest average GH value obtained at any point during the follow-up period was used as the GH result. GH values >2.5 ng/mL but <5 ng/mL, however, did not result in mortality rates reaching those of the controls. In contrast to our study, most of the patients in the Bates study were treated with external beam radiotherapy with or without bromocriptine (n = 50). A smaller number of patients (n = 11) underwent surgical hypophysectomy for their disease, but all of these required additional treatment in the form of irradiation (n = 4) or bromocriptine (n = 7). Another difference is that we used a single, basal GH level, obtained during a discrete, 30-day postoperative period, as our GH result.

Given the differences in methods of GH assessment, treatment modalities, and outcome between the Bates study and our own, it was unclear whether the same stratification of mortality rate by posttherapy GH levels would hold true. However, comparison of mortality data in our study between the group of patients with GH <2.5 ng/mL (n = 105) and the group with GH >=2.5 ng/mL but <=5 ng/mL (n = 51), did not indicate any survival benefit for the former group.

Our study is the first surgical study to assess long-term mortality rates among postoperative acromegalic patients. The mortality rate for those patients in remission (GH <=5 ng/mL) after surgery did not differ significantly from the expected rate over time. Although GH assays during the early years of this study did not permit quantification of levels below 5 ng/mL, 119 of the patients in immediate postoperative remission and 101 patients in long-term remission by study criteria had GH levels that were <2.5 ng/mL.

GH levels and IGF-I

The optimal method for evaluating GH secretion is controversial (16, 20, 27, 28). Various investigators have advocated the use of fasting GH levels, mean GH values of a series collected over 24 h, GH nadir during the first 2 h following OGTT, or IGF-I levels to assess the outcome of treatment in acromegaly (9). Although we used single basal GH levels in our analysis, a mean GH value calculated from multiple samplings throughout a 24-h period is arguably more representative of disease status. Alternatively, IGF-I levels might be considered a truer reflection of disease status, because IGF-I synthesis is controlled by GH, but its serum concentration fluctuates far less (9, 29). As others have found (22), however, we too noted patients in whom IGF-I levels were well within the normal range, yet GH levels remained elevated. Clearly, a better understanding is needed of the functional relationship between the IGFs and GH secretion in acromegaly. Jenkins and colleagues (30) found a high correlation between basal GH levels and both IGF-I and the OGTT-derived GH nadir in their treated patients, which supports the validity of basal GH levels in assessing treatment outcome.

When we compared GH results obtained by OGTT with those obtained as basal levels, 97% of our patients who had basal GH levels <2.5 ng/mL also had OGTT-derived GH levels <2 ng/mL. This finding indicates that outcome assessment based on fasting, basal GH levels correlates well with GH levels determined by OGTT. In our study, neither GH determination by OGTT nor IGF-1 levels enhanced the information provided by basal GH testing.

Recommendations for clinical practice

In addition to deaths from vascular causes, patients with active acromegaly are at higher risk of developing extrapituitary neoplasms such as colorectal cancer (31) and melanocytic tumors of the eye choroid (32). Our finding that mortality rates among acromegalic patients in clinical remission following transsphenoidal surgery decreased to those of the normal population argues for prompt therapy aimed at lowering GH levels to below 5 ng/mL (or 10 mU/L). The high percentage (69%) of patients with disease persistence who had preoperative GH levels >=30 ng/mL indicates that clinicians should be ready to use additional modes of therapy for these patients, as indicated by clinical outcome and laboratory follow-up.

In our study, a small subset of patients had normal GH levels at follow-up and clinical remission, but nonetheless had elevated IGF-I levels. We do not currently recommend further treatment for these patients. As the clinical significance of an elevated IGF-I level when the GH level is normal is unknown, neither the risk nor expense of further medical, radiation, or surgical treatment seems warranted.

Despite advances in radiotherapy and medical therapy for acromegaly, transsphenoidal microsurgery remains the most effective initial treatment for GH-secreting pituitary tumors (33, 34). In addition to providing immediate relief from the symptoms of a sellar mass, surgery also provides the most immediate and complete restitution of normal GH levels (35). There are currently no known medical therapies that provide this degree of biochemical control for most patients (36, 37), although relief of clinical symptoms can be rather substantial with octreotide therapy (25). Thus, from the standpoint of safe and immediate relief of clinical symptoms and of normalization of mortality risks, transsphenoidal surgery remains the optimal treatment for acromegaly.

Received March 9, 1998.

Revised May 28, 1998.

Accepted June 3, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Bates AS, Van’t Hoff W, Jones JM, Clayton RN. 1993 An audit of outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Q J Med. 86:293–299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Wright AD, Hill DM, Lowy C, Fraser TR. 1970 Mortality in acromegaly. Q J Med. 39:1–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Nabarro JDN. 1987 Acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 26:481–512.[Medline]
  4. Bengtsson B-A, Edén S, Ernest I, Odén A, Sjögren B. 1988 Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. Acta Med Scand. 223:327–335.[Medline]
  5. Thapar K, Kovacs K, Stefaneanu L, et al. 1997 Overexpression of the growth-hormone-releasing hormone gene in acromegaly-associated pituitary tumors. An event associated with neoplastic progression and aggressive behavior. Am J Pathol. 151:769–784.[Abstract]
  6. Marie P. 1886 Sur deux cas d’acromégalie. Hypertrophie singulière noncongénitale des extremités supérieures, inférieures et céphalique. Rev Mens de Med. 6:297. Translation: London: New Sydenham Society, 1891.
  7. Rajasoorya C, Holdaway IM, Wrightson P, Scott DJ, Ibbertson HK. 1994 Determinants of clinical outcome and survival in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 41:95–102.[Medline]
  8. Bates AS, Van’t Hoff W, Jones JM, Clayton RN. 1995b Does treatment of acromegaly affect life expectancy? Metabolism. 44[Suppl 1]:1–5.
  9. Ho KKY, Weissberger AJ. 1994 Characterization of 24-hour growth hormone secretion in acromegaly: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 41:75–83.[Medline]
  10. Baskin DS, Boggan JE, Wilson CB. 1982 Transsphenoidal microsurgical removal of growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. A review of 137 cases. J Neurosurg. 56:634–641.[Medline]
  11. Ross DA, Wilson CB. 1988 Results of transsphenoidal microsurgery for GH-secreting pituitary adenoma in a series of 214 patients. J Neurosurg. 68:854–867.[Medline]
  12. Hardy J. 1971 Transsphenoidal hypophysectomy: neurosurgical techniques. J Neurosurg. 34:582–594.[Medline]
  13. Wilson CB. 1979 Neurosurgical management of large and invasive pituitary tumors. In Tindall GT, Collins WF, eds. Clinical management of pituitary disorders. New York: Raven Press; 335–342.
  14. Barth JH, Smith JH, Clarkson P. 1997 Interassay differences in GH measurement in acromegaly. Annals Clin Biochem. 34:156–159.
  15. Melmed S, Ho K, Klibanski A, Reichlin S, Thorner M. 1995 Recent advances in pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3395–3402.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. US Bureau of Census. 1992 Deaths and death rates by age, race, and sex. Monthly Vital Statistics Report. Vol. 43, No. 6. March 22, 1995. United States.
  17. Breslow NE, Day NE. 1987 Statistical methods in cancer research: the design and analysis of cohort studies. London: Oxford University Press; vol 2:131.
  18. Kaplan EL, Meier P. 1958 Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Ass. 53:457–481.[CrossRef]
  19. Laws ER, Piepgras DG, Randall RV, Abboud CF. 1979 Neurosurgical management of acromegaly. Results in 82 patients treated between 1972 and 1977. J Neurosurg. 50:454–461.[Medline]
  20. Lindholm J, Giwercman B, Giwercman A, Astrup J, Bjerre P, Skakkebæk NE. 1987 Investigation of the criteria for assessing the outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 27:553–562.[Medline]
  21. Tindall GT, Oyesiku NM, Watts NB, Clark RV, Christy JH, Adams DA. 1993 Transsphenoidal adenectomy for growth-hormone secreting pituitary adenomas in acromegaly: outcome analysis and determinants of failure. J Neurosurg. 78:205–215.[Medline]
  22. Sheaves R, Jenkins P, Blackburn P, et al. 1996 Outcome of transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly using strict criteria for surgical cure. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 45:407–413.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Markussis V, Beshyah SA, Fisher C, Sharp P, Micolaides AN, Johnston DG. 1992 Detection of premature atherosclerosis by high-resolution ultrasonography in symptom-free hypopituitary adults. Lancet. 340:1188–1192.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Ezzat S, Forster MJ, Berchtold P, Redelmeier DA, Boerlin V, Harris AG. 1994 Acromegaly: clinical and biochemical features in 500 patients. Medicine. 73:233–240.[Medline]
  25. Falbusch R, Honegger J, Buchfelder M. 1996 Acromegaly–the place of the neurosurgeon. Metabolism. 45[Suppl 1]:65–66.
  26. Landin-Wilhelmsen K, Tengborn L, Wilhelmsen L, Bengtsson BA. 1997 Elevated fibrinogen levels decrease following treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 46:69–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Stoffel-Wagner B, Springer W, Bidlingmaier F, Klingmuller D. 1997 A comparison of different methods for diagnosing acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 46:531–537.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Paramo C, Andrade O MA, Fluiters E, Luna R, de la Fuente J, Garcia-Mayor RV. 1997 Comparative study of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) level and IGF-I/IGFBP-3 ratio measurements and their relationship with an index of clinical activity in the management of patients with acromegaly. Metabolism. 46:494–498.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Bates AS, Evans AJ, Jones P, Clayton RN. 1995 Assessment of GH status in acromegaly using serum growth hormone, serum insulin-like growth factor-I and urinary growth hormone excretion. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 42:417–423.[Medline]
  30. Jenkins D, O’Brian I, Johnson A, Shakespear R, Sheppard MC, Stewart PM. 1995 The Birmingham pituitary database: auditing the outcome of treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 43:517–522.[Medline]
  31. Jenkins PJ, Fairclough PD, Richards T, et al. 1997 Acromegaly, colonic polyps and carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 47:17–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Corcuff JB, Ogor C, Kerlan V, Rougier MB, Bercovichi M, Roger P. 1997 Ocular naevus and melanoma in acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 47:119–121.[CrossRef][Medline]
  33. Jackson SN, Fowler J, Howlett TA. 1997 Cabergoline treatment of acromegaly: a preliminary dose finding study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 46:745–749.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Long H, Beauregard H, Somma M, Comtois R, Serri O, Hardy J. 1996 Surgical outcome after repeated transsphenoidal surgery in acromegaly. J Neurosurg. 85:239–247.[Medline]
  35. Barkan AL. 1989 Acromegaly; diagnosis and therapy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 18:277–310.[Medline]
  36. Wass JAH, Laws ER, Randall RV, et al. 1986 The treatment of acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol Metab. 15:683–707.[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Melmed S, Dowling RH, Frohman L, et al. 1994 Consensus Statement: benefits vs. risks of medical therapy for acromegaly. Am J Med. 97:468–473.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Hardy J, Somma M, Vezina JL. 1973 Acromégalie-gigantisme: traitement chirurgical par exérése transsphénoidale de l’adénome hypophysaire. Neurochirurgie. 19[Suppl 2]:21–30.
  39. Williams RA, Jacobs HS, Kurtz AB, et al. 1975 The treatment of acromegaly with special reference to transsphenoidal hypophysectomy. Q J Med. 44:79–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Lüdecke D, Kautzky R, Saeger W, Schrader D. 1976 Selective removal of hypersecreting pituitary adenomas? An analysis of endocrine function, operative and microscopical findings in 101 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 35:27–42.[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Falbusch R, Honneger H, Buchfelder M. 1992 Surgical management of acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 21:669–691.[Medline]
  42. Davis DH, Laws ER, Ilstrup DM, et al. 1993 Results of surgical treatment for growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas. J Neurosurg. 79:70–75.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S Petersenn, M Buchfelder, M Reincke, C M Strasburger, H Franz, R Lohmann, H-J Quabbe, U Plockinger, and the Participants of the German Acromegaly Register
Results of surgical and somatostatin analog therapies and their combination in acromegaly: a retrospective analysis of the German Acromegaly Register
Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2008; 159(5): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
I M Holdaway, M J Bolland, and G D Gamble
A meta-analysis of the effect of lowering serum levels of GH and IGF-I on mortality in acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2008; 159(2): 89 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Vazquez-Martinez, A. J. Martinez-Fuentes, M. R. Pulido, L. Jimenez-Reina, A. Quintero, A. Leal-Cerro, A. Soto, S. M. Webb, N. Sucunza, F. Bartumeus, et al.
Rab18 Is Reduced in Pituitary Tumors Causing Acromegaly and Its Overexpression Reverts Growth Hormone Hypersecretion
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2269 - 2276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. Alexopoulou, M. Bex, R. Abs, G. T'Sjoen, B. Velkeniers, and D. Maiter
Divergence between Growth Hormone and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Concentrations in the Follow-Up of Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1324 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
O. M. Dekkers, N. R. Biermasz, A. M. Pereira, J. A. Romijn, and J. P. Vandenbroucke
Mortality in Acromegaly: A Metaanalysis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2008; 93(1): 61 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
L. Sze, C. Schmid, K. E Bloch, R. Bernays, and M. Brandle
Effect of transsphenoidal surgery on sleep apnoea in acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2007; 156(3): 321 - 329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S.-C. Hua, Y.-H. Yan, and T.-C. Chang
Associations of remission status and lanreotide treatment with quality of life in patients with treated acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 155(6): 831 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
S Pekic, M Doknic, D Miljic, M Joksimovic, J Glodic, M Djurovic, C Dieguez, F Casanueva, and V Popovic
Ghrelin test for the assessment of GH status in successfully treated patients with acromegaly.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2006; 154(5): 659 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Colao, R. Pivonello, R. S Auriemma, M. C. De Martino, M. Bidlingmaier, F. Briganti, F. Tortora, P. Burman, I. A Kourides, C. J Strasburger, et al.
Efficacy of 12-month treatment with the GH receptor antagonist pegvisomant in patients with acromegaly resistant to long-term, high-dose somatostatin analog treatment: effect on IGF-I levels, tumor mass, hypertension and glucose tolerance.
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2006; 154(3): 467 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Bhayana, G. L. Booth, S. L. Asa, K. Kovacs, and S. Ezzat
The Implication of Somatotroph Adenoma Phenotype to Somatostatin Analog Responsiveness in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2005; 90(11): 6290 - 6295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
G M Besser, P Burman, and A F Daly
Predictors and rates of treatment-resistant tumor growth in acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2005; 153(2): 187 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Castinetti, D. Taieb, J.-M. Kuhn, P. Chanson, M. Tamura, P. Jaquet, B. Conte-Devolx, J. Regis, H. Dufour, and T. Brue
Outcome of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in 82 Patients with Acromegaly: Correlation with Initial Hypersecretion
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4483 - 4488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. Kauppinen-Makelin, T. Sane, A. Reunanen, M. J. Valimaki, L. Niskanen, H. Markkanen, E. Loyttyniemi, T. Ebeling, P. Jaatinen, H. Laine, et al.
A Nationwide Survey of Mortality in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2005; 90(7): 4081 - 4086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
D. Selvarajah, J. Webster, R. Ross, and J. Newell-Price
Effectiveness of adding dopamine agonist therapy to long-acting somatostatin analogues in the management of acromegaly
Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2005; 152(4): 569 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. J. Puder, S. Nilavar, K. D. Post, and P. U. Freda
Relationship between Disease-Related Morbidity and Biochemical Markers of Activity in Patients with Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 1972 - 1978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
P. Nomikos, M. Buchfelder, and R. Fahlbusch
The outcome of surgery in 668 patients with acromegaly using current criteria of biochemical 'cure'
Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2005; 152(3): 379 - 387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
I. E Bonapart, R. van Domburg, S. M T H ten Have, W. W de Herder, R. A M Erdman, J. A M J L Janssen, and A. J. van der Lely
The 'bio-assay' quality of life might be a better marker of disease activity in acromegalic patients than serum total IGF-I concentrations
Eur. J. Endocrinol., February 1, 2005; 152(2): 217 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. D. Hammer, J. B. Tyrrell, K. R. Lamborn, C. B. Applebury, E. T. Hannegan, S. Bell, R. Rahl, A. Lu, and C. B. Wilson
Transsphenoidal Microsurgery for Cushing's Disease: Initial Outcome and Long-Term Results
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6348 - 6357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. R. Clemmons and C. Strasburger
Monitoring the Response to Treatment in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5289 - 5291.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. R. Biermasz, F. W. Dekker, A. M. Pereira, S. W. van Thiel, P. J. Schutte, H. van Dulken, J. A. Romijn, and F. Roelfsema
Determinants of Survival in Treated Acromegaly in a Single Center: Predictive Value of Serial Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Measurements
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2789 - 2796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. Schmid, P. Wiesli, R. Bernays, K. Bloch, J. Zapf, C. Zwimpfer, C. Ghirlanda, and M. Brandle
Decrease in sE-Selectin after Pituitary Surgery in Patients with Acromegaly
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 650 - 652.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. Colao, D. Ferone, P. Marzullo, and G. Lombardi
Systemic Complications of Acromegaly: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Management
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2004; 25(1): 102 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. U. Freda, A. T. Nuruzzaman, C. M. Reyes, R. E. Sundeen, and K. D. Post
Significance of "Abnormal" Nadir Growth Hormone Levels after Oral Glucose in Postoperative Patients with Acromegaly in Remission with Normal Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Levels
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 495 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. M. Holdaway, R. C. Rajasoorya, and G. D. Gamble
Factors Influencing Mortality in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 667 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. R. Biermasz, A. M. Pereira, M. Frolich, J. A. Romijn, J. D. Veldhuis, and F. Roelfsema
Octreotide represses secretory-burst mass and nonpulsatile secretion but does not restore event frequency or orderly GH secretion in acromegaly
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, January 1, 2004; 286(1): E25 - E30.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. G. Barker II, A. Klibanski, and B. Swearingen
Transsphenoidal Surgery for Pituitary Tumors in the United States, 1996-2000: Mortality, Morbidity, and the Effects of Hospital and Surgeon Volume
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4709 - 4719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. R. Clemmons, K. Chihara, P. U. Freda, K. K. Y. Ho, A. Klibanski, S. Melmed, S. M. Shalet, C. J. Strasburger, P. J. Trainer, and M. O. Thorner
Optimizing Control of Acromegaly: Integrating a Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist into the Treatment Algorithm
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4759 - 4767.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
Z.'e. Hochberg, K. Pacak, and G. P. Chrousos
Endocrine Withdrawal Syndromes
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2003; 24(4): 523 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. De, D. A. Rees, N. Davies, R. John, J. Neal, R. G. Mills, J. Vafidis, J. S. Davies, and M. F. Scanlon
Transsphenoidal Surgery for Acromegaly in Wales: Results Based on Stringent Criteria of Remission
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2003; 88(8): 3567 - 3572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
J. J. Kopchick, C. Parkinson, E. C. Stevens, and P. J. Trainer
Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonists: Discovery, Development, and Use in Patients with Acromegaly
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2002; 23(5): 623 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed, F. F. Casanueva, F. Cavagnini, P. Chanson, L. Frohman, A. Grossman, K. Ho, D. Kleinberg, S. Lamberts, E. Laws, et al.
Guidelines for Acromegaly Management
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2002; 87(9): 4054 - 4058.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. C. F. Costa, A. Rossi, C. E. Martinelli Jr., H. R. Machado, and A. C. Moreira
Assessment of Disease Activity in Treated Acromegalic Patients Using a Sensitive GH Assay: Should We Achieve Strict Normal GH Levels for a Biochemical Cure?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3142 - 3147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Parkinson, W. D. J. Ryder, and P. J. Trainer
The Relationship between Serum GH and Serum IGF-I in Acromegaly Is Gender-Specific
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5240 - 5244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. Kreutzer, M. L. Vance, M. B. S. Lopes, and E. R. Laws Jr.
Surgical Management of GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas: An Outcome Study Using Modern Remission Criteria
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2001; 86(9): 4072 - 4077.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVE: Acromegaly and Cancer: Not a Problem?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2001; 86(7): 2929 - 2934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. A. Kaltsas, A. M. Isidori, D. Florakis, P. J. Trainer, C. Camacho-Hubner, F. Afshar, I. Sabin, J. P. Jenkins, S. L. Chew, J. P. Monson, et al.
Predictors of the Outcome of Surgical Treatment in Acromegaly and the Value of the Mean Growth Hormone Day Curve in Assessing Postoperative Disease Activity
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2001; 86(4): 1645 - 1652.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. J. van der Lely, A. F. Muller, J. A. Janssen, R. J. Davis, K. A. Zib, J. A. Scarlett, and S. W. Lamberts
Control of Tumor Size and Disease Activity during Cotreatment with Octreotide and the Growth Hormone Receptor Antagonist Pegvisomant in an Acromegalic Patient
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 478 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. R. Biermasz, H. van Dulken, and F. Roelfsema
Ten-Year Follow-Up Results of Transsphenoidal Microsurgery in Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4596 - 4602.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Barrande, M. Pittino-Lungo, J. Coste, D. Ponvert, X. Bertagna, J. P. Luton, and J. Bertherat
Hormonal and Metabolic Effects of Radiotherapy in Acromegaly: Long-Term Results in 128 Patients Followed in a Single Center
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2000; 85(10): 3779 - 3785.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. R. Biermasz, H. van Dulken, and F. Roelfsema
Long-Term Follow-Up Results of Postoperative Radiotherapy in 36 Patients with Acromegaly
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2000; 85(7): 2476 - 2482.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Giustina, A. Barkan, F. F. Casanueva, F. Cavagnini, L. Frohman, K. Ho, J. Veldhuis, J. Wass, K. von Werder, and S. Melmed
Criteria for Cure of Acromegaly: A Consensus Statement{dagger}
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2000; 85(2): 526 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. R. DRANGE, N. R. FRAM, V. HERMAN-BONERT, and S. MELMED
Pituitary Tumor Registry: A Novel Clinical Resource
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2000; 85(1): 168 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
QJMHome page
N.J.L. Gittoes, M.C. Sheppard, A.P. Johnson, and P.M. Stewart
Outcome of surgery for acromegaly--the experience of a dedicated pituitary surgeon
QJM, December 1, 1999; 92(12): 741 - 745.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. R. Biermasz, H. van Dulken, and F. Roelfsema
Direct Postoperative and Follow-Up Results of Transsphenoidal Surgery in 19 Acromegalic Patients Pretreated with Octreotide Compared to Those in Untreated Matched Controls
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1999; 84(10): 3551 - 3555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R N Clayton, P M Stewart, S M Shalet, and J A H Wass
Pituitary surgery for acromegaly
BMJ, September 4, 1999; 319(7210): 588 - 589.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Melmed
Tight Control of Growth Hormone: An Attainable Outcome for Acromegaly Treatment
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1998; 83(10): 3409 - 3410.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abosch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abosch, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, C. B.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals