help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollowell, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollowell, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 83, No. 10 3401-3408
Copyright © 1998 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Iodine Nutrition in the United States. Trends and Public Health Implications: Iodine Excretion Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys I and III (1971–1974 and 1988–1994)

Joseph G. Hollowell, Norman W. Staehling, W. Harry Hannon, Dana W. Flanders, Elaine W. Gunter, Glen F. Maberly, Lewis E. Braverman, Sam Pino, Dayton T. Miller, Paul L. Garbe, David M. DeLozier1 and Richard J. Jackson1

Centers for Disease Control (J.G.H., N.W.S., P.L.G.), National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, Atlanta, Georgia 30341; National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Environmental Health Laboratory Science, Centers for Disease Control (W.H.H., E.W.G., D.T.M.), Atlanta, Georgia 30341; Emory University School of Public Health (D.W.F., G.F.M.), Atlanta, Georgia 30322; and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (L.E.B., S.P.), Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Joseph G. Hollowell, M.D., M.P.H., Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, MS F-28, Atlanta, Georgia 30341. E-mail address: jgh1{at}cdc.gov


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Iodine deficiency in a population causes increased prevalence of goiter and, more importantly, may increase the risk for intellectual deficiency in that population. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys [NHANES I (1971–1974) and (NHANES III (1988–1994)] measured urinary iodine (UI) concentrations. UI concentrations are an indicator of the adequacy of iodine intake for a population. The median UI concentrations in iodine-sufficient populations should be greater than 10 µg/dL, and no more than 20% of the population should have UI concentrations less than 5 µg/dL. Median UI concentrations from both NHANES I and NHANES III indicate adequate iodine intake for the overall U.S. population, but the median concentration decreased more than 50% between 1971–1974 (32.0 ± 0.6 µg/dL) and 1988–1994 (14.5 ± 0.3 µg/dL). Low UI concentrations (<5 µg/dL) were found in 11.7% of the 1988–1994 population, a 4.5-fold increase over the proportion in the 1971–1974 population. The percentage of people excreting low concentrations of iodine (UI, <5 µg/dL) increased in all age groups. In pregnant women, 6.7%, and in women of child-bearing age, 14.9% had UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL. The findings in 1988–1994, although not indicative of iodine deficiency in the overall U.S. population, define a trend that must be monitored.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
IODINE deficiency is the world’s leading cause of intellectual deficiency. Although cretinism, hearing loss, goiter, and severe neurological damage are usually associated with severe iodine deficiency, mild to moderate intellectual impairment exceeds the more severe outcomes in total numbers, significance for the community, and social impact on a population. The importance of iodine deficiency was addressed by the Rome Conference on Nutrition and by national leaders attending the 1990 World Summit for Children, which called for the virtual elimination of iodine deficiency by the year 2000 (1). Iodine deficiency leads to impaired production of T4 and T3, hormones that are essential for pre- and postnatal brain development and that require iodine for their synthesis. The greatest impact of iodine deficiency on cognitive and neurological function occurs during gestation and early infancy (2). The population risk for iodine deficiency has been defined and can be assessed on the basis of many measures, including urinary iodine (UI) concentration. Iodine intake and excretion are in a steady state with renal excretion, approximating the amount of iodine ingested and absorbed (3). According to the WHO, the median UI concentration in iodine-sufficient populations should be greater than 10 µg/dL, and no more than 20% of the population should have UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL (4). A UI concentration adjusted for creatinine concentration (I/Cr) of less than 50 µg iodine/g creatinine also indicates possible iodine deficiency (5).

This study complements previous qualitative dietary intake studies (6, 7, 8) by analyzing the concentration of UI in the population of the United States from data collected by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). We have now compared data from NHANES III (1988–1994) with those from NHANES I (1971–1974), paying particular attention to the groups excreting UI concentrations less than 5.0 µg/dL. This report identifies trends in iodine nutrition and provides a basis for ensuring, or planning for, iodine adequacy in the United States in the 21st century.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The NHANES surveys were designed to give national normative estimates of the health and nutritional status of the U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population. NHANES I, conducted from 1971–1974, was a survey of U.S. residents of the coterminous United States, aged 1–74 yr, excluding people residing on Indian reservations. A sample of approximately 32,000 people was studied (9). NHANES III was conducted from 1988–1994. A sample of the population 2 months or older was selected, 33,994 individuals (86%) were interviewed, and 30,818 were examined. This survey represented, but did not include, all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The general structure of the sample design for the two studies is the same: a stratified, multistage probability design. Biological samples were collected from participants for a large number of biochemical indicators of health status. The detailed demography and sampling scheme was described previously (10, 11). Among those samples were urine samples collected at the time survey participants visited the mobile examination center. Ten-milliliter aliquots of urine were prepared, frozen (-20 C), and shipped on dry ice to the analytical laboratories for testing (12). Both surveys contained information on UI and creatinine concentrations in individuals 6 yr and older. Spot urine samples were collected from fasting participants because collection of 24-h urine samples was not feasible for survey purposes. Urinary creatinine was also measured to correct for urinary dilution that could affect the concentration of iodine. Examinees aged 12 yr and older were instructed to fast for 10–16 h before the morning examination or for 6 h before the afternoon or evening examination. The duration of the fast was recorded (12).

For both surveys information was collected on income levels, metropolitan/nonmetropolitan residency, and race, categorized as white, black, and remaining races. In NHANES III, ethnicity was added and included white non-Hispanic, black non-Hispanic, Mexican-American, and remaining ethnic groups. The regions identified in NHANES III were northeast, midwest, south (including Texas), and west. Because the regions identified in NHANES I contained different states than those in NHANES III, we did not analyze NHANES I data for regional differences or compare regional data between the surveys.

Laboratory methods

Iodine. In both NHANES I and NHANES III, UI concentrations were determined using the Sandell-Koltoff reaction as modified by Benotti et al. (13, 14). UI concentrations in NHANES I were determined by the NHANES Laboratory, Centers for Disease Control (CDC; Atlanta, GA), on samples from 18,617 people. (13) In NHANES III, UI concentrations were determined by the Iodine Research Laboratory, University of Massachusetts Medical Center (Worcester, MA), on samples from 22,070 people. The UI detection limit for the method used by both laboratories was 0.2 µg/dL. In NHANES I, iodine standards were prepared from analytical grade potassium iodide (KI), consisted of 10 levels of KI covering the range of 0.1–1.0 µg/mL, and were analyzed in duplicate with every 80–120 urine samples. In NHANES III, iodine standards were prepared from analytical grade potassium iodate (KIO3), consisted of 4 levels of KIO3 covering the range 0.0–0.3 µg/mL iodine, and were analyzed in duplicate with every 10 urine samples. Calibration procedures were similar for both laboratories. UI concentrations are calculated from the slope and y-intercept of the standard curve. A quality control sample was digested and analyzed with every 10 urine samples. Samples were repeated for values below 0.1 µg/mL by using a larger sample size and for those above the highest standard by diluting the sample. The coefficient of variance for UI determination ranged from 3.8–11.0% in NHANES I and from 2.7–7.0% for NHANES III.

Creatinine. Urinary creatinine in both surveys was measured by the Jaffé alkaline picrate method, so that iodine concentration adjusted for creatinine concentration (I/Cr) could be calculated. Concentrations of creatinine standards of 50, 100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg/dL were analyzed in duplicate with every 60 urine samples. Urinary creatinine concentrations were calculated from the slope and y-intercept of the standard curve. Quality control samples were analyzed with every 20 urine samples. Repeat limits were below 10 and above 300 mg/dL. The creatinine detection limit for this method was 1 mg/dL. The coefficient of variance for urinary creatinine determination ranged from 2.9–4.7% in NHANES I and from 1.5–7.7% for NHANES III (12, 13).

Statistical analyses

We analyzed data with SUDAAN to account for the complex sample survey design using sample weights. When we compared regions and race in NHANES III, we standardized for age and sex using the distribution of the entire population. When we studied changes between the surveys, we standardized for age and sex in accordance with the population of NHANES III. To study characteristics of subjects with UI concentrations below 5.0 µg/dL, we calculated prevalences, prevalence differences, and prevalence ratios. In accord with WHO recommendations, we compared medians and proportions excreting UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL or I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g because the data were severely skewed to high values, perhaps due to exposure to iodine-rich substances such as medications or x-ray contrast agents.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The characteristics of the study population and of the population represented by the individuals providing UI samples in NHANES I and NHANES III, shown in Table 1Go, indicate a larger overall sample and less extensive oversampling of females in NHANES III compared to NHANES I. Non-Hispanic blacks, Mexican-Americans, and children were over sampled in NHANES III. The age distributions were otherwise similar.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the populations with urinary iodine measured in 1971–1974 (NHANES I) and 1988–1994 (NHANES III) in the U.S., ages 6–74 yr

 
Recent patterns (1988–1994)

In 1988–1994, the median UI concentrations for the entire population was 14.5 µg/dL. The average concentrations of UI and I/Cr in younger people were greater than those in older people. As shown in Table 2Go, males had higher median UI concentrations than females (16.0 vs. 13.0 µg/dL; <0.00001). UI concentrations also varied by race, poverty level, and region of the country (Table 3Go). The difference in iodine concentration between residents of metropolitan areas and residents of nonmetropolitan areas was small and lacked statistical significance (P = 0.32). Of the entire population, 11.7% had UI concentrations less than 5.0 µg/dL (Fig. 1Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. UI and I/Cr concentrations in 1971–74 (NHANES I) and in 1988–94 (NHANES III), in the U.S., by age and gender

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Median UI and I/Cr concentrations and percentage of individuals with UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL or I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g, by gender, race, economic status, population density, region, and survey, in the U.S.: NHANES I and NHANES III

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of UI concentrations, NHANES I and NHANES III. The population in 1971–1974 had greater UI concentrations than in 1988–1994. Note the numbers of individuals in both time periods with very high concentrations of iodine. To display UI and I/Cr together in this figure, UI is expressed as micrograms per L in this figure instead of micrograms per dL as seen in the text and tables.

 
In the 1988–1994 survey, the percentage of people with UI concentrations less than 5.0 µg/dL was greater among those above the poverty level than among those below (P = 0.00016), greater among whites than blacks (P < 0.00001), and greater among people in the northeast (P = 0.04) and midwest (P = 0.01) than among those in the south.

Time trends

As shown in Fig. 1Go, UI concentrations for the U.S. population were, overall, substantially lower in 1988–1994 than in 1971–1974. The median UI concentration fell from 32.0 µg/dL in 1971–1974 to 14.5 µg/dL in 1988–1994 (P < 0.0001). When categorized by participants’ race, metropolitan/nonmetropolitan residence, poverty status, or region of the country, the median UI concentrations in 1988–1994 were about half those found in 1971–1974 (Table 3Go). The proportion of the population with UI concentrations below 5.0 µg/dL was 4.5 times higher in 1988–1994 than in 1971–1974, (P < 0.0001). This increase in the proportion of people with low levels was seen for all demographic categories (Table 3Go) and for all age groups (Fig. 2Go). In 1988–1994, 8.1% of males and 15.1% of females had UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL. As shown in Fig. 2Go, the highest prevalence of low concentrations was in the 40- to 49-yr-old age group (23.1% of women and 12.7% of men). Among white non-Hispanics, the percentage with UI concentrations below 5.0 µg/dL was even higher in women of this age group (25.5%).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Percentage of the population with low UI concentration. The percentage with low concentrations of iodine is greater in 1988–1994 than in 1971–1974. The prevalence of low iodine values was highest among people 40–60 yr old.

 
The percentage of women of child-bearing years (15–44 yr) with UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL increased 3.8 times between the two study periods, and the percentage of pregnant women with UI concentrations below 5.0 µg/dL increased 6.9 times (Table 4Go).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Median concentrations of UI in women of child-bearing age (15–44 yr) in 1971–1974 and in 1988–1994, and percentage who had UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL or I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g creatinine in the U.S. by known pregnancy status

 
In estimating excessive iodine intake, 27.8% of the 1971–1974 population exceeded the UI concentration of 50 µg/dL, and 5.3% exceeded 100 µg/dL. In 1988–1994, 5.3% of the population exceeded UI concentrations of 50 µg/dL, and 1.3% exceeded 100 µg/dL.

When adjusted for creatinine concentration, the median I/Cr ratio in NHANES III (124.6 µg/g creatinine) was lower (P < 0.0001) than that in NHANES I (293.3 µg/g creatinine). The total population with I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g had increased 10-fold. The number of women of child-bearing age with I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g had increased 9-fold, and the percentage of pregnant women with these low levels had also increased. When comparing the I/Cr ratios, adult men, aged 20–64 yr, had lower values than women of those ages. Male children excreted higher concentrations of iodine in urine than female children for both I/Cr and UI concentrations (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Adjustment of UI concentration. Overall median values of UI are higher in males than in females of all ages. Among children, I/Cr concentrations are higher in males, but in adults, I/Cr concentrations are higher in females.

 
We compared UI excretion patterns in the first 3 yr (1988–1991) with those in the last 3 yr (1991–1994) of NHANES III to determine whether a trend in UI concentrations could be detected within the 6 yr of the 1988–1994 survey. The median UI concentrations and the proportions of individuals with UI below 5 µg/dL from 1988–1991 were not significantly different from those between 1991–1994 (P > 0.8).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The authors of the Total Diet Studies (6), which are conducted yearly by the U.S. FDA to provide estimates of the intakes of nutrients by selected age-sex groups as well as the quality of the food supply for the U.S. population, concluded that the iodine intake for the U.S. population is adequate (7, 8). The median UI concentration in both NHANES studies exceeded the WHO definition as adequate for a population (4) and thus has provided quantitative support of the Total Diet Study. Even though there is overall adequate iodine intake in the U.S. population, the sizable decrease in UI concentrations between the two NHANES study periods (1971–1974 and 1988–1994) and the relatively large percentage of individuals with UI concentrations below 5 µg/dL found in the 1988–1994 study are grounds for some concern.

The increased proportion of women of child-bearing age and pregnant women who are in the iodine deficiency range is particularly important because iodine deficiency in fetuses and infants can lead to irreversible intellectual deficits with great impact on populations (15). Although the overall median intake of iodine in the United States is within acceptable limits, particular groups, namely women aged 40–49 and 50–59 yr and other women of child-bearing age, may be at risk for iodine deficiency. In Belgium, Glinoer et al. reported that the addition of 100 µg iodine daily to the diet of pregnant women significantly decreased maternal TSH and thyroglobulin concentrations and thyroid volume. In the newborn, serum thyroglobulin concentrations and thyroid volume also decreased (16). Such findings emphasize the importance of adequate iodine nutrition.

Although the laboratory analyses for iodine were conducted in different laboratories 14–20 yr apart, the methods used were identical. Analytic grade potassium iodide in 1971–1974 and analytic grade potassium iodate in 1988–1994 were used to prepare standard iodine concentrations, and quality assurance and controls for both laboratories and time periods were considered entirely satisfactory by the NHANES study groups. Reassuringly, in another study, May et al. (17) showed close agreement among six different methods used in six laboratories for the iodine range studied, with no method showing a bias or inconsistency serious enough to alter the public health interpretation of their dataset, and showed a high correlation (>=0.9), indicating good intermethod comparison for individual samples. Thus, we found no supportive data that the use of different laboratories or the time between studies explains the differences in observed UI concentrations.

Daily iodine intake is most closely estimated by the amount of iodine excreted in the urine in 24 h. To compensate for the lack of a 24-h urine collection, in populations with adequate nutrition, the creatinine concentration has been used to adjust for factors that may affect the concentrations of the substances being measured during the collection period. Although used widely, the I/Cr ratio adds little and may be misleading with regard to iodine excretion in developing countries where nutrition is poor, thereby affecting creatinine excretion (18). The usefulness of the I/Cr ratio in the United States for population iodine studies has been questioned. Thomson et al. compared UI results from spot samples with those from 24-h collections samples from 62 adults and determined that "... fasting urine samples, but not casual urines, may give a reasonable estimate of urinary output of iodine ... on a population basis... . " (19). In both NHANES studies, urine was collected after a period of fasting, and similar protocols were used; thus, the urine collection procedures used should not have contributed to the differences observed.

We included I/Cr data in our analyses, primarily for comparison with the results from previous Canadian and US studies. The 1971–1974 (NHANES I) values were similar to the findings of the Canadian national study of 1969–1972 (20), which reported that less than 1% of the population had I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g. In the Canadian study, no pregnant women and less than 0.2% of women of child-bearing age had I/Cr concentrations below 50 µg/g. Metropolitan, urban, and rural populations did not differ in I/Cr concentration. Most individuals of both sexes had I/Cr concentrations between 100–550 µg/g. Slightly lower values were found in males 20–39 yr old and males over 60 yr of age (20). In the U.S., Trowbridge et al. in a 1972 study of 7,785 children aged 9 to 16 yr (21) and in the Ten-State Nutrition Survey from 1968–1970 of 16,799 subjects aged 2 yr and older (22) found I/Cr values to be in the range of those found during the same approximate time period in NHANES I.

In Switzerland (23), where iodine prophylaxis has been practiced for a number of years and iodine intake is thought to be adequate, studies showed evidence of iodine deficiency and prompted health officials to increase the iodine content of salt; to reestablish health education programs focusing on the use of sea products, milk, and iodized salt; and to improve the monitoring programs for iodized salt (24). Iodine deficiency was also found in other continental European countries (25). Iodine deficiency, which was severe in some locations, may have contributed to the increased incidence of thyroid cancer among children exposed to fallout of 131I from the Chernobyl, Ukraine nuclear disaster in 1986, as thyroid radioactive iodine uptake is increased in areas of iodine deficiency (26).

In the United States iodized salt was introduced to prevent goiters in the upper Midwest in 1922. As the voluntary use of iodized salt spread rapidly throughout the country (27, 28) and as iodine was added to processed foods and milk products (29), the prevalence of goiter declined (30). Within 50 yr the country had excessive iodine intake to the extent that other forms of thyroid problems, namely iodine-induced hypothyroidism, autoimmune thyroiditis, and hyperthyroidism, had become of more concern than deficiency disorders (31). The 1982–1991 surveys from Total Diet Study may explain the decrease in UI concentration. The authors of that study argue that the apparent decline in iodine intake from 1982–1991 did not represent a trend, but was probably due to higher iodine intake during 1982–1984 than during the remaining 7 yr (8). The decrease since 1984 was thought to be due to the dairy industry’s effort to reduce iodine in milk and to the replacement of iodine by bromine salts as the dough conditioner in commercial bread production (7).

We need to know whether the decrease in UI concentrations seen between 1971–1974 and 1988–1994 can be explained entirely by the 1982–1984 changes seen in food production or whether additional factors or trends not measured by the Total Diet Study are involved, such as the use of iodized table salt or prepared "fast foods." Although the total consumption of iodized salt remains at about 50–60% of all salt consumed (Hanneman, R. L., Salt Institute, Alexandria, VA; personal communication), the extent to which voluntary reduction in added salt use by segments of the population concerned about sodium intake and hypertension has contributed to lower UI concentrations is unknown.

In 1971–1974, 27.8% of the population had excessive UI concentrations (>50 µg/dL), and the decline of those with excessive UI to 5.3% in 1988–1994 may be seen as beneficial in possibly reducing diseases due to iodine excess such as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and perhaps Graves’ disease (31). Should the intake of iodine continue to decrease in the United States, in addition to a further change in the pattern of thyroid diseases, a portion of the population could become iodine deficient, resulting in the following consequences: 1) a reduction in the intellectual capacity of children born to mothers receiving insufficient amounts of iodine while pregnant, and 2) a rise in the prevalence of simple iodine deficiency goiter and nodular goiter. Whether the reduced UI seen in 1988–1994 can be directly correlated to measurable changes in thyroid function in the population is not known at this time because the results of thyroid function tests and thyroid antibodies in the 1988–1994 study are not available as yet, and comparison with results in 1971–1974 is not possible because TSH and antibodies were not measured in NHANES I. We know of no population-based study in the United States, such as transient neonatal hypothyroidism or recent goiter surveys, that have shown changes that resulted from decreased iodine intake. It will be important to know what UI concentrations in a population will predict thyroid dysfunction.

Clearly, the iodine intake in the United States has decreased over the past 20 yr. Awareness of a possible continuing decline in iodine intake in this population can be achieved by monitoring the food supply, especially the intake of iodine in women of child-bearing age. This monitoring can be performed by continuing the measurement of iodine in the Total Diet Study and by including UI in the next NHANES survey, which is about to begin. Surveillance of thyroid diseases should be emphasized, but we should not wait for the prevalence of goiter to increase or for changes in thyroid disease patterns to occur due to decreased iodine intake. Should surveillance indicate a further decrease in iodine intake, measures may be required to increase the amount of iodine consumed by the U.S. population to prevent the possibility of the reemergence of iodine deficiency in the United States.


    Acknowledgments
 
The authors recognize and thank Dr. Samuel P. Caudill, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC, for reviewing and assisting in validating the analytic processes. We thank the professionals who developed and conducted the HANES surveys as well as those generating data used for this study. We are grateful to Richard Hanneman, Salt Institute (Alexandria, VA), for information on salt use and the iodine content of salt. We appreciate the thoughtful comments of Dr. Kevin Sullivan, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Dr. Barbara Bowman, Division of Nutrition, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; Dr. Scott Grosse, National Center for Environmental Health, CDC; Dr. Geraldine McQuillan, the National Center for Health Statistics, CDC; and Dr. Elizabeth Yetley, FDA.


    Footnotes
 
1 Research Fellow of the Oakridge Institute for Science and Education through a cooperative agreement among the National Center for Environmental Health and the U.S. Department of Energy (D.M.D.), the Centers for Disease Control (R.J.J.), and the National Center for Environmental Health. Back

Received March 23, 1998.

Revised June 23, 1998.

Accepted July 1, 1998.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. UNICEF. 1995 The state of the world’s children. London: Oxford University Press; 12–16.
  2. Hollowell JG, Hannon WH. 1997 Iodine deficiency: a community teratogen. Teratology. 55:389–405.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Hetzel B, Maberly G. 1986 Iodine. In: Mertz C, ed. Trace elements in human and animal nutrition, vol 2. New York: Academic Press; 139–208.
  4. WHO/UNICEF/ICCIDD. 1994 Indicators for assessing iodine deficiency disorders and their control through salt iodization. Document WHO/NUT. 6:36.
  5. Interdepartmental Committee on Nutrition for National Defense, NIH. 1963 Manual for nutrition surveys. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 249.
  6. Pennington JAT. 1996 Intakes of minerals from diets and foods: is there a need for concern? J Nutr. 126(Suppl 9):2304S–2308S.
  7. Pennington JAT, Schoen SA. 1996 Contributions of food groups to estimated intakes of nutritional elements: results from the FDA Total Diet Studies, 1982–1991. Int J Vit Nutr Res. 66:342–349.
  8. Pennington JAT, Schoen SA. 1996 Total diet study: estimated dietary intakes of nutritional elements, 1982–1991. Int J Vit Nutr Res. 66:350–362.
  9. USPHS, DHEW. 1973 Plan and operation of the health and nutrition examination survey, DHEW Publication (HSM) 73-1310, ser. 1, no. 10a and 10b. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  10. Miller HW. 1973 Plan and operation of the Health and Nutrition Examination, United States, 1971–1973. Vital Health Stat. 1(10a) and (10b).
  11. National Center for Health Statistics. 1985 Plan and operation of the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1982–84. Vital Health Stat. 1(19).
  12. Gunter EW, Lewis BL, Koncikowski SM. 1996 Laboratory methods used for the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III), 1988–1994. Hyattsville: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. ii-1; iv-1; vii-ll-1–9; vii-ii-1–14; viii-ll-1–11.
  13. USPHS, DHEW. 1973 Plan and operation of the health and nutrition examination survey. DHEW Publication (HSM) 73-1310, ser. 1, no. 10a and 10b. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; part 16; 63, 71.
  14. Benotti J, Benotti N, Pino S, Gardyna H. 1965 Determination of total iodine in urine, stool, diets, and tissue. Clin Chem. 11:932–936.[Abstract]
  15. Bleichrodt N, Born MP. 1994 A metaanalysis of research on iodine and its relationship to cognitive development. In: Stanbury JB, ed. The damaged brain of iodine deficiency: cognitive, behavioral, neuromotor, and educative aspects. New York: Cognizant Communication Corp.; 195–200.
  16. Glinoer D, DeMayer P, Delange F, et al. 1995 A randomized trial for the treatment of mild iodine deficiency during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal effects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:258–269.[Abstract]
  17. May SL, May WA, Bourdoux PP, Pino S, Sullivan KM, Maberly GF. 1997 Validation of a simple, manual urinary iodine method for estimating the prevalence of iodine-deficiency disorders, and inter-laboratory comparison with other methods. Am J Clin Nutr. 65:1441–1445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Furnee CA, van der Haar F, West CE, Hautvast JGAJ. 1994 A critical appraisal of goiter assessment and the ratio of urinary iodine to creatinine for evaluating iodine status. Am J Clin Nutr. 59:1415–1447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Thomson CD, Smith TE, Butler FA, Packer MA. 1996 An evaluation of urinary measures of iodine and selenium status. J Trace Element Med Biol. 10:214–222.[Medline]
  20. Bureau of Nutritional Sciences. 1975 Iodine and goiter. Nutrition Canada: The Saskatchewan Survey Report. Ottawa: Department of Health and Welfare; 125–130.
  21. Trowbridge FL, Matovinovic J, McLaren GD, Nichaman MZ. 1975 Iodine and goiter in children. Pediatrics. 56:82–90.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Trowbridge FL, Hand KE, Nichaman MZ. 1975 Findings relating to goiter and iodine in the Ten-State Nutrition Survey. Am J Clin Nutr. 28:712–716.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Burgi H, Supersaxo Z, Selz B. 1990 Iodine deficiency diseases in Switzerland one hundred years after Theordor Kocher’s survey: a historical review with some new goitre prevalence data. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 123:577–590.[Medline]
  24. Delange F. 1994 The disorders induced by iodine deficiency. Thyroid. 4:107–128.[Medline]
  25. Delange F, Burgi H. 1989 Iodine deficiency disorders in Europe. Bull WHO. 67:317–325.[Medline]
  26. Stsjazhko VA, Tsyb AF, Tronko ND, Souchkevitch G, Baverstock KF. 1995 Childhood thyroid cancer since accident at Chernobyl. Br Med J. 310:801.[Free Full Text]
  27. Marine D, Kimball OP. 1922 The prevention of simple goiter. Am J Med Sci. 163:34–39.
  28. Kimball OP. 1949 Endemic goiter–a food deficiency disease. J Am Diet Assoc. 25:112–115.[Medline]
  29. Markel H. 1987 "When it rains it pours:" endemic goiter, iodized salt, and David Murray Cowie, MD. Am J Public Health. 77:219–229.[Free Full Text]
  30. Altland JK, Brush BE. 1952 Goiter prevention in Michigan. Results of thirty years’ voluntary use of iodized salt. J Michigan State Med Soc. 51:985–989.
  31. Braverman LE. 1994 Iodine and the thyroid: 33 years of study. Thyroid. 4:351–356.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. C Gordon, M. C Rose, S. A Skeaff, A. R Gray, K. M. Morgan, and T. Ruffman
Iodine supplementation improves cognition in mildly iodine-deficient children
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2009; 90(5): 1264 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. M. Betz, S. A. Wise, A. M. Leung, E. N. Pearce, and L. E. Braverman
More on Iodine Content of Prenatal Vitamins
N. Engl. J. Med., June 11, 2009; 360(24): 2582 - 2583.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. B. Zimmermann
Iodine Deficiency
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2009; 30(4): 376 - 408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Gowachirapant, P. Winichagoon, L. Wyss, B. Tong, J. Baumgartner, A. Melse-Boonstra, and M. B. Zimmermann
Urinary Iodine Concentrations Indicate Iodine Deficiency in Pregnant Thai Women but Iodine Sufficiency in Their School-Aged Children
J. Nutr., June 1, 2009; 139(6): 1169 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Guan, M. Ji, R. Bao, H. Yu, Y. Wang, P. Hou, Y. Zhang, Z. Shan, W. Teng, and M. Xing
Association of High Iodine Intake with the T1799A BRAF Mutation in Papillary Thyroid Cancer
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2009; 94(5): 1612 - 1617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Stilwell, P. J. Reynolds, V. Parameswaran, L. Blizzard, T. M. Greenaway, and J. R. Burgess
The Influence of Gestational Stage on Urinary Iodine Excretion in Pregnancy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2008; 93(5): 1737 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
Subsection Reports
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8_suppl): s8 - s47.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Abalovich, N. Amino, L. A. Barbour, R. H. Cobin, L. J. De Groot, D. Glinoer, S. J. Mandel, and A. Stagnaro-Green
Management of Thyroid Dysfunction during Pregnancy and Postpartum: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2007; 92(8_suppl): s1 - s47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. N. Pearce, A. M. Leung, B. C. Blount, H. R. Bazrafshan, X. He, S. Pino, L. Valentin-Blasini, and L. E. Braverman
Breast Milk Iodine and Perchlorate Concentrations in Lactating Boston-Area Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2007; 92(5): 1673 - 1677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. E. Haddow, M. R. McClain, G. E. Palomaki, and J. G. Hollowell
Urine Iodine Measurements, Creatinine Adjustment, and Thyroid Deficiency in an Adult United States Population
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 1019 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. N. Pearce, J. G. Hollowell Jr., G. Morreale de Escobar, F. Escobar del Rey, and R. D. Utiger
Iodine Nutrition -- More Is Better
N. Engl. J. Med., October 5, 2006; 355(14): 1500 - 1501.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. E. Braverman, E. N. Pearce, X. He, S. Pino, M. Seeley, B. Beck, B. Magnani, B. C. Blount, and A. Firek
Effects of Six Months of Daily Low-Dose Perchlorate Exposure on Thyroid Function in Healthy Volunteers
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2006; 91(7): 2721 - 2724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. D. Utiger
Iodine nutrition--more is better.
N. Engl. J. Med., June 29, 2006; 354(26): 2819 - 2821.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
American Academy of Pediatrics, S. R. Rose, and the Section on Endocrinology and Committee on, American Thyroid Association, R. S. Brown, and the Public Health Committee, and Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society
Update of newborn screening and therapy for congenital hypothyroidism.
Pediatrics, June 1, 2006; 117(6): 2290 - 2303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. Remer, N. Fonteyn, U. Alexy, and S. Berkemeyer
Longitudinal examination of 24-h urinary iodine excretion in schoolchildren as a sensitive, hydration status-independent research tool for studying iodine status
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 639 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. A. H. Cann
Hypothesis: dietary iodine intake in the etiology of cardiovascular disease.
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 25(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. H. Hoogendoorn, A. R. Hermus, F. de Vegt, H. A. Ross, A. L.M. Verbeek, L. A.L.M. Kiemeney, D. W. Swinkels, F. C.G.J. Sweep, and M. den Heijer
Thyroid Function and Prevalence of Anti-Thyroperoxidase Antibodies in a Population with Borderline Sufficient Iodine Intake: Influences of Age and Sex
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2006; 52(1): 104 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. B Zimmermann, I. Aeberli, T. Torresani, and H. Burgi
Increasing the iodine concentration in the Swiss iodized salt program markedly improved iodine status in pregnant women and children: a 5-y prospective national study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2005; 82(2): 388 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
E. L. Mazzaferri
Empirically Treating High Serum Thyroglobulin Levels
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2005; 46(7): 1079 - 1088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. D. Utiger
The Multiplicity of Thyroid Nodules and Carcinomas
N. Engl. J. Med., June 9, 2005; 352(23): 2376 - 2378.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
L. H Allen
Multiple micronutrients in pregnancy and lactation: an overview
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1206S - 1212S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
J H Lazarus and L D K E Premawardhana
BEST PRACTICE NO 184 Screening for thyroid disease in pregnancy
J. Clin. Pathol., May 1, 2005; 58(5): 449 - 452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. B Zimmermann, Y. Ito, S. Y Hess, K. Fujieda, and L. Molinari
High thyroid volume in children with excess dietary iodine intakes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2005; 81(4): 840 - 844.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. M. Belin, B. C. Astor, N. R. Powe, and P. W. Ladenson
Smoke Exposure Is Associated with a Lower Prevalence of Serum Thyroid Autoantibodies and Thyrotropin Concentration Elevation and a Higher Prevalence of Mild Thyrotropin Concentration Suppression in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6077 - 6086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. J. Mandel
A 64-Year-Old Woman With a Thyroid Nodule
JAMA, December 1, 2004; 292(21): 2632 - 2642.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed.Home page
M S Kibirige, S Hutchison, C J Owen, and H T Delves
Prevalence of maternal dietary iodine insufficiency in the north east of England: implications for the fetus
Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2004; 89(5): F436 - F439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. N. Pearce, S. Pino, X. He, H. R. Bazrafshan, S. L. Lee, and L. E. Braverman
Sources of Dietary Iodine: Bread, Cows' Milk, and Infant Formula in the Boston Area
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3421 - 3424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
K. L. Caldwell, C. B. Maxwell, A. Makhmudov, S. Pino, L. E. Braverman, R. L. Jones, and J. G. Hollowell
Use of Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry to Measure Urinary Iodine in NHANES 2000: Comparison with Previous Method
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2003; 49(6): 1019 - 1021.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. M. Allen, W.-C. Hsueh, M. M. Sabra, T. I. Pollin, P. W. Ladenson, K. D. Silver, B. D. Mitchell, and A. R. Shuldiner
A Genome-Wide Scan for Autoimmune Thyroiditis in the Old Order Amish: Replication of Genetic Linkage on Chromosome 5q11.2-q14.3
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2003; 88(3): 1292 - 1296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
K. Guttikonda, J. R. Burgess, K. Hynes, S. Boyages, K. Byth, and V. Parameswaran
Recurrent Iodine Deficiency in Tasmania, Australia: A Salutary Lesson in Sustainable Iodine Prophylaxis and Its Monitoring
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2002; 87(6): 2809 - 2815.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. T. Dunn
Guarding our Nation's Thyroid Health
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 486 - 488.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. G. Hollowell, N. W. Staehling, W. D. Flanders, W. H. Hannon, E. W. Gunter, C. A. Spencer, and L. E. Braverman
Serum TSH, T4, and Thyroid Antibodies in the United States Population (1988 to 1994): National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III)
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 489 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. A. H. Cann, J. P. van Netten, C. van Netten, F. H. Messerli, and R. E. Schmieder
Iodized Salt and Hypertension
Arch Intern Med, January 14, 2002; 162(1): 104 - 105.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. C. Smallridge and P. W. Ladenson
Hypothyroidism in Pregnancy: Consequences to Neonatal Health
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2001; 86(6): 2349 - 2353.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
G. Morreale de Escobar, M. Jesús Obregón, and F. Escobar del Rey
Is Neuropsychological Development Related to Maternal Hypothyroidism or to Maternal Hypothyroxinemia?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2000; 85(11): 3975 - 3987.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. Herzmann, J. K. Torrens, G. M. de Escobar, F. E. del Rey, M. Fukushi, K. Honma, K. Fujita, J. G. Hollowell, P. L. Garbe, D. T. Miller, et al.
Maternal Thyroid Deficiency during Pregnancy and Subsequent Neuropsychological Development of the Child
N. Engl. J. Med., December 23, 1999; 341(26): 2015 - 2017.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Z. A. Gomo, T. J Allain, J. A Matenga, B. Ndemere, A. Wilson, and P. Urdal
Urinary iodine concentrations and thyroid function in adult Zimbabweans during a period of transition in iodine status
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 1999; 70(5): 888 - 891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
R. D. Utiger
Maternal Hypothyroidism and Fetal Development
N. Engl. J. Med., August 19, 1999; 341(8): 601 - 602.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
J. T. Dunn
What's Happening to Our Iodine?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1998; 83(10): 3398 - 3400.
[Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollowell, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollowell, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, R. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals