| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
and Activin A Promote Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-2 and -4 Accumulation by Human Luteinizing Granulosa Cells, and Interferon-
Promotes Their Apoptosis1
Reproductive Endocrinology Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0556
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Robert B. Jaffe, Reproductive Endocrinology Center, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0556.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(IFN
) and activin A, which decrease
progesterone accumulation, on granulosa cell IGFBP production and
apoptosis. Conditioned media from luteinizing granulosa cells cultured
with IFN
or activin A and/or LH were subjected to ligand blotting;
northern blots of total ribonucleic acid (RNA) from these cells were
probed for IGFBP-2 and -4. Apoptosis was measured by in
situ DNA end labeling. LH decreased medium IGFBP-2 to 21% of
the control value. Although IFN
did not alter basal medium
IGFBP-2, in the presence of LH it increased IGFBP-2 3.4-fold, with
parallel changes in messenger RNA levels. Activin A also tended to
increase medium IGFBP-2 in LH-treated cultures. In conditioned medium,
IGFBP-4 was consistently decreased by LH, whereas both IFN
and
activin A increased IGFBP-4 and decreased IGFBP-4 protease activity.
Both LH and IFN
modestly stimulated IGFBP-4 messenger RNA levels.
Follistatin antagonized the action of activin A, but not that of
IFN
. IFN
, but not activin A, increased granulosa cell apoptosis.
In conclusion, IFN
produced by activated lymphocytes may decrease
endogenous IGF activity through stimulation of IGFBPs and may
promote apoptosis of granulosa-lutein cells in vivo and,
thus, luteal regression. Activin A similarly promotes IGFBP
accumulation, but it does not promote apoptosis. (J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 83: 179186, 1998) | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Interferon-
(IFN
) is a cytokine produced by activated T
lymphocytes and natural killer cells that has pleiotropic actions
within the immune system (17). IFN
can also modulate the
differentiated functions of epithelial cells. In cultured GC, IFN
inhibits the production of steroids and gonadotropin-dependent
proteins, including LH receptor and inhibin (18, 19, 20), and induces Fas
(CD95), a cell surface receptor that can transduce an apoptotic signal
(21, 22, 23). In the human ovary, IFN
is present in follicular fluid at
oocyte harvest for in vitro fertilization and is produced by
mononuclear cells in preovulatory follicles and the corpus luteum (24, 25), but its biological role has not been established.
Activins are dimeric proteins produced by GC, which were first isolated as stimulators of pituitary FSH release (26). Activin A, a homodimer of ßA-subunits, can decrease steroidogenesis by luteinized granulosa or luteal cells in vitro (27, 28, 29). When administered systemically to rhesus monkeys, activin A disrupted folliculogenesis (30), and when injected under the ovarian bursa of gonadotropin-primed immature rats, it promoted follicular atresia (31).
Given the evidence that IFN
and activin A, like IGFBPs, inhibit GC
steroidogenesis and may be implicated in GC apoptosis, we hypothesized
that these two proteins might increase GC production of IGFBP-2 and
IGFBP-4, the two IGFBPs that are increased in follicular fluid from
atretic follicles. Upon finding that both IFN
and activin A promote
accumulation by GC of these IGFBPs in vitro, we also
examined their effects on apoptosis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recombinant human (rh-) IFN
and rh-activin A were provided by
the Research Reagents Program, Genentech (South San Francisco, CA). As
IFN
is variably glycosylated, its concentration is stated in mass,
rather than molar, units. Purified porcine follistatin was provided by
Dr. Louis DePaolo, Whittier Institute (La Jolla, CA); its mol wt was
taken as 35 kDa (26). Human LH was provided by the National Pituitary
Agency. Complementary DNA (cDNA) probes for human IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4
were provided by Dr. Shunichi Shimasaki, Whittier Institute, and the
inserts were excised with appropriate restriction enzymes and gel
purified before probe synthesis.
Cell culture
Granulosa cells were obtained at oocyte harvest from women
undergoing in vitro fertilization after treatment with a
GnRH agonist (leuprolide acetate or nafarelin acetate), human
menopausal gonadotropins (Pergonal and/or Metrodin, Serono
Laboratories, Randolph, MA), and hCG and purified as described
previously (7, 29). This purification includes incubation with 0.1%
hyaluronidase in a tissue culture flask for 30 min at 37 C, followed by
centrifugation over 50% Percoll. Institutional review board exemption
was obtained for the use of these otherwise discarded cells. For
studies of IGFBP accumulation in conditioned medium, 25 x
105 viable granulosa cells, as determined by trypan blue
exclusion, were seeded in 1.0 mL defined medium 7F on 24-well plates
precoated with 1 µg/cm2 human plasma fibronectin
(Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Medium 7F consists of high
glucose DMEM-Hams F-12 (1:1; H-21-F-12, Cell Culture Facility,
University of California, San Francisco) supplemented, as previously
described (7), with insulin (2 mg/L), transferrin, sodium selenite,
aprotinin, L-glutamine, penicillin, streptomycin, and
fungizone. Each experiment contained granulosa cells from one or two
patients. The day after plating, media were replaced with 1.0 mL medium
6F (7F medium with insulin omitted) and test substances, including LH,
IFN
, activin A, and follistatin. Conditioned media were harvested
35 days later, clarified by centrifugation, and stored at -70 C for
subsequent ligand blot analysis. For ribonucleic acid (RNA) studies,
48 x 105 granulosa cells were plated on 6-cm plates
in H-21-F-12 supplemented with 10% FCS, L-glutamine,
penicillin, streptomycin, and fungizone. Established 4- to 5-day
cultures were treated with test substances for 2 days before extraction
of total cellular RNA.
Ligand blotting
Conditioned media were concentrated 10- to 20-fold by centrifugation through BSA-pretreated Centricon-10 microconcentrators (10 kDa exclusion; Amicon, Beverly, MA) and subjected to SDS-10% PAGE and ligand blotting as previously described (14, 32). Each lane on a gel contained the entire medium concentrate from one well of a cell culture plate. Media from parallel wells in an experiment were analyzed in parallel lanes on the same blot, along with prestained protein molecular mass markers (14200 kDa; Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), human seminal plasma as a reference for IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 (33), and human midtrimester amniotic fluid as a reference for IGFBP-1 (34). The gels were electroblotted to nitrocellulose filters, and the filters were blocked with 1% BSA and incubated overnight at 4 C with 1 µCi (37 kilobecquerels) [125I] 3-iodotyrosyl-IGF-I (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL; 74 terabecquerels/mmol), then washed and exposed to autoradiography film.
Immunoprecipitation
IGFBPs were identified by immunoprecipitation and subsequent ligand blotting of conditioned media as previously described (14). Rabbit antisera (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) to IGFBP-1 (<0.5% cross-reactivity with IGFBP-2, -3, -4, and -5), IGFBP-2 (<0.5% cross-reactivity with IGFBP-1, -3, -4, and -5), IGFBP-4 (50% cross-reactivity with IGFBP-2 but <1% cross reactivity with IGFBP-1, -3, and -5), and IGFBP-5 (<0.5% cross-reactivity with IGFBP-1 and -4; <0.1% cross-reactivity with IGFBP-2 and -3) were used at 1.54 µL/tube containing a 50-µL suspension of protein A-bearing fixed staphylococci (Pansorbin, Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA).
Immunoblotting
Western blots prepared as described above were incubated with 3% Nonidet P-40 in Tris-buffered 0.15 mol/L NaCl, pH 7.4 (TBS), blocked with 1% BSA in TBS, and then incubated with IGFBP antiserum at a 1:1000 dilution in TBS overnight at 22 C. The blots were washed for 5 min in 0.1% Tween-20 in TBS and incubated for 2 h at 22 C with a 1:1500 dilution of donkey anti-rabbit IgG Fab coupled to horseradish peroxidase. IGFBPs were detected with ECL chemiluminescence reagents (Amersham).
IGFBP-4 protease assay
Conditioned medium samples were incubated at 37 C for 24 h with rh-IGFBP-4 (Austral Biologicals, San Ramon, CA) covalently cross-linked to [125I]IGF-II. The reaction was stopped by adding SDS sample buffer, and the samples were subjected to 12% PAGE. The gel was dried and exposed to film, and levels of the 18-kDa proteolytic fragment were compared among medium samples from cells exposed to various treatments (35).
Northern analysis
Granulosa cell total RNA was extracted by the single step
acid-guanidinium-phenol method (36) and quantified by absorbance at 260
nm (A260). Ratios of A260:A280 were
greater than 1.7. Equal aliquots of total RNA from cultures derived
from a single batch of granulosa cells exposed to different treatments
in parallel were subjected to electrophoresis through 1.2% agarose
gels containing 2 mol/L formaldehyde and capillary transferred to
Nytran (Schleicher and Schuell, Keene, NH) in 0.3 mol/L sodium
citrate-3 mol/L NaCl. UV cross-linked filters (Stratalinker,
Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were prehybridized at 68 C for 20 min in
Quikhyb solution (Stratagene), hybridized for 6090 min at 68 C with
2 x 107 cpm denatured IGFBP cDNA probe synthesized by
random priming using [
-32P]deoxy-CTP (Amersham; 111
terabecquerels/mmol), and purified by ethanol precipitation. After
hybridization, filters were washed and exposed to film. Blots were
stripped and sequentially hybridized with labeled cDNA probes for each
IGFBP and for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; American
Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD), as a control for RNA
loading.
Determination of granulosa cell apoptosis
Granulosa cells were cultured on multiwell glass microscope
slides (LabTek, Nunc, Naperville, IL) in serum-supplemented medium and
treated for 35 days with combinations of LH and IFN
or activin A.
The cells were then fixed with phosphate-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde
or Histochoice (Amresco, Solon, OH). DNA end labeling with
digoxigenin-deoxy-UTP and terminal transferase followed by
immunocytochemical staining with peroxidase-coupled antidigoxigenin
antibody and diaminobenzidine were carried out with the reagents
supplied in the Apoptag kit (Oncor, Gaithersburg, MD) according to the
manufacturers instructions, except that Tris was substituted for
phosphate in the wash buffer. After light counterstaining with
hematoxylin, nuclei that stained brown were scored as positive for
apoptosis, and those that stained blue were scored as negative. At
least 300 cells/treatment condition in at least three x200 microscope
fields were scored, and an apoptotic index was calculated as the
percentage of cells in each treatment condition that were scored
positive.
Progesterone accumulation
Granulosa cells were treated with IFN
and/or LH in 6F medium
for 2 days, and medium progesterone was assayed with a RIA kit from
Diagnostic Systems Laboratories (Webster, TX).
Quantitation of cellular DNA
Cultured cells were frozen at -20 C and later thawed for DNA quantitation with Hoechst 33258 (Hoefer Pharmacia Biotech, San Francisco, CA) (37). Cells were lysed in 1 mol/L NH4OH-0.2% Triton X-100 for 15 min at 37 C and neutralized with an equal volume of 1 mol/L KH2PO4, and the lysate was added to 2 mL 0.2 mol/L NaCl, 0.01 mol/L Tris-Cl, and 1 mmol/L sodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate, pH 7.4, containing 0.1 µg/mL Hoechst 33258. After excitation at 365 nm, fluorescence emission was measured at 460 nm with a DyNA Quant fluorometer (Hoefer Pharmacia) and compared with that of a calf thymus DNA standard. The DNA content of treated wells was compared to that in control untreated wells.
Data analysis
Autoradiograms were analyzed by integrated laser densitometry. For each autoradiogram, ratios of densitometric quantitation of IGFBP-2 results from treatment and control lanes derived from each cell culture experiment were expressed as a percentage, log transformed, and compared to the null hypothesis of no treatment effect by Students t test. As IGFBP-4 bands were frequently too faint for accurate quantitation by densitometry, their relative intensities on a ligand blot were qualitatively scored for each experiment, and the rank scores were compared with Friedmans test and Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc testing. Northern blots for each IGFBP messenger RNA (mRNA) were analyzed by densitometry; data derived from parallel lanes on a blot representing different treatment conditions were normalized to the signal intensity of GAPDH mRNA in the same lane and compared in the same fashion as the IGFBP-2 signal intensities on ligand blots. In studies of apoptosis induction, ratios of the apoptotic index in treated cells to that in control cells in each experiment were log transformed and compared to the null hypothesis of no treatment effect by t test. In studies of progesterone accumulation, the mean DNA-normalized progesterone level in each replicate culture well was compared among treatments by ANOVA and Fishers protected least significant difference test.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ligand blotting of concentrated conditioned medium from human
luteinizing GC revealed a prominent doublet of bands at 3133 kDa, as
reported previously (7). Both bands were specifically
immunoprecipitated with antiserum to IGFBP-2 (Fig. 1A
). These bands, but no smaller ones,
were also apparent on immunoblotting for IGFBP-2 (not shown). In most
experiments, ligand blots of medium also showed a fainter 24-kDa IGFBP,
identified by immunoprecipitation as IGFBP-4 (Fig. 1B
). A 27-kDa IGFBP,
detectable in a minority of experiments, was identified as IGFBP-1
(Fig. 1C
, lanes s and t). A fourth, diffuse IGFBP band, previously
identified as IGFBP-3 (7), was occasionally seen at 3743 kDa (not
shown). Despite the abundant expression of IGFBP-5 mRNA by these GC
(8), three approaches failed to detect IGFBP-5 in GC-conditioned
medium: no bands on ligand blots of conditioned medium comigrated with
purified human IGFBP-5 at 29 kDa; no IGFBP-5 was detected by
immunoprecipitation and ligand blotting of conditioned medium (Fig. 1C
, lane u), and no IGFBP-5 was detected by immunoblotting (not shown). The
IGFBP-5 antiserum did specifically immunoprecipitate purified human
IGFBP-5, as detected by ligand blotting (Fig. 1C
, lanes n and o).
|
, and activin A on IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4
production
LH. LH (1 U/mL) decreased medium IGFBP-2 levels to 21% of the
control value (P < 0.0001; Figs. 2
and 3A
),
as reported previously (7). Similarly, LH decreased GAPDH-normalized
steady state IGFBP-2 mRNA expression (1.3 kilobases) to 40% of the
control value (P < 0.01; Fig. 4
).
|
|
|
IFN
. In basal cultures, IFN
(50 ng/mL) did not
significantly alter medium IGFBP-2 levels (130% of the control value;
P > 0.05). Under LH-stimulated conditions, however,
IFN
increased mean IGFBP-2 levels to 340% of those with LH alone
(P < 0.01). With IFN
and LH, IGFBP-2 was 81% of
that in basal control medium (P > 0.05). A
representative ligand blot is shown in Fig. 2A
, and data from all
experiments are summarized in Fig. 3A
. In basal cultures, IFN
(4050 ng/mL) had no effect on IGFBP-2 mRNA levels, but in
LH-stimulated cultures, it reversed the inhibition of IGFBP-2
expression by LH (IFN
plus LH, 80% of the control value;
P < 0.01 vs. LH alone; Fig. 4
).
IFN
increased medium IGFBP-4 under both basal and LH-stimulated
conditions in four of five experiments; in one experiment, no IGFBP-4
was detected with or without IFN
(Figs. 2A
and 3B
). The
IFN
-induced increase in medium IGFBP-4, estimated to be 5-fold, may
be attributable to the lower IGFBP-4 protease activity found in
IFN
-treated compared with control conditioned medium (Fig. 2D
, compare lanes i and k), in view of the failure of IFN
to decrease
steady state IGFBP-4 mRNA levels (Fig. 4
).
Activin A. In basal cultures, activin A (1.5 nmol/L; 43 ng/mL)
had no significant effect on medium IGFBP-2 levels (120% of control;
P > 0.05). In LH-stimulated cultures, activin A tended
to increase medium IGFBP-2 (63% increase over LH treatment alone;
P = 0.06). Variable results were noted in 10
experiments and are summarized in Fig. 3A
; two ligand blots are shown
in Fig. 2
, B and C. In one experiment, activin A reversed the
inhibition of IGFBP-2 by LH in dose-dependent fashion, with an
ED50 of 0.25 nmol/L (Fig. 5
).
|
, these increases, consistently estimated to be at
least 2-fold, may be attributable to the lower IGFBP-4 protease
activity found in activin-treated compared with control conditioned
medium (Fig. 2D
Modulation by follistatin of activin A, but not IFN
action
Follistatin is a high affinity, neutralizing activin-binding
protein (29, 38). Purified porcine follistatin antagonized the
stimulation of medium IGFBP-2 accumulation by activin A in LH-treated
cultures (Fig. 2C
, compare lanes g and h with c and d). Although the
effects of IFN
on IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4 accumulation are similar
to those of activin A, neutralization of activin by follistatin did not
block the effect of IFN
on medium levels of either IGFBP-2 or
IGFBP-4 (Fig. 2A
, compare lanes g and h with e and f).
IFN
, but not activin A, promotes granulosa cell apoptosis
On seven slides of cultured GC derived from five separate
experiments, IFN
(50 ng/mL) treatment increased the apoptotic index
regardless of concurrent LH stimulation (Fig. 6
). In the absence of LH, IFN
increased the mean apoptotic index 3-fold, from 3.2% to 9.4%
(P < 0.02), whereas in its presence, IFN
increased
this index 2.8-fold, from 2.4% to 6.7% (P < 0.05).
In three parallel experiments, activin A (1.5 nmol/L) failed to alter
the apoptotic index of either unstimulated or LH-stimulated GC (data
not shown).
|
, activin A,
or combinations of LH and either IFN
or activin A had no significant
effect on the cellular DNA content of spent cultures (Table 1
|
on medium progesterone accumulation (Fig. 7
Treatment of GC with IFN
at 1 ng/mL or greater
significantly decreased basal medium progesterone levels, whereas
IFN
at 10 ng/mL or greater significantly decreased medium
progesterone under LH-stimulated conditions.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present studies, LH decreased IGFBP-2 protein accumulation and steady state mRNA expression to a similar degree. These findings suggest that LH regulates IGFBP-2 gene transcription. LH consistently decreased medium IGFBP-4, but it increased its steady state mRNA levels by 50%. The latter finding parallels the slightly greater expression of IGFBP-4 noted by in situ hybridization in dominant compared to small antral follicles (5). Taken together, these findings suggest that gonadotropins stimulate GC production of an IGFBP-4 protease, as may occur in healthy antral follicles (35).
As IFN
can decrease progesterone production by GC and can promote
their expression of the apoptosis-signaling protein Fas (18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23), we
hypothesized that IFN
produced by lymphocytes, which invade the
corpus luteum as the follicular basement membrane disintegrates at
ovulation (42), may stimulate luteal production of IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-4
and may promote luteal regression by apoptosis. In a cell culture
model, we found that IFN
indeed significantly increased medium
IGFBP-2 accumulation in LH-stimulated, but not basal, cultures,
completely reversing the inhibition of IGFBP-2 by LH. Similar to
its effects at the protein level, IFN
increased steady state IGFBP-2
mRNA expression in LH-stimulated GC, suggesting that IFN
can act
on IGFBP-2 gene transcription. IFN
stimulated medium IGFBP-4 levels
in both basal and LH-stimulated cultures, but much weaker effects were
seen on IGFBP-4 mRNA expression and only in basal cultures. Taken
together, these findings suggest that the observed decrease in protease
activity, rather than transcriptional control of gene expression, is
responsible for the increase in medium IGFBP-4 after IFN
treatment.
As activin A can decrease both progesterone production and aromatase
activity in luteinizing GC and may accelerate atresia of antral
follicles (27, 28, 29, 30, 31), we hypothesized that activin produced by GC may
promote accumulation of IGFBPs by these cells and may play a role in
promoting their apoptosis. We found that like IFN
, activin A had no
effect on IGFBP-2 levels in conditioned media in the absence of added
LH, but tended to increase medium IGFBP-2 levels in LH-stimulated
cultures. The failure of the latter effect to reach statistical
significance and the heterogeneity of the observed response to activin
A may reflect the inherent heterogeneity of the granulosa cells used in
these studies, which derive from follicles of varying size and maturity
from women of varying age and infertility diagnosis. These GC have been
reported to show variable rates of apoptosis at the time of harvest
(43). In the experiments in which activin A increased IGFBP-2
accumulation by LH-stimulated GC, such as that illustrated in Fig. 2C
, its action was antagonized by follistatin and was dose dependent, with
an ED50 similar to its affinity constant for type II
activin receptors and its ED50 for inhibition of
progesterone accumulation (29, 44). Unlike IFN
, activin A did not
reverse the effects of LH on IGFBP-2 accumulation. As LH can stimulate
follistatin production by GC (45), the action of activin on
LH-stimulated GC may be muted by LH-stimulated follistatin
production.
Activin A increased medium IGFBP-4 and decreased IGFBP-4 protease
activity under both basal and LH-stimulated conditions. In a previous
study of these GC, activin A did not significantly alter steady state
IGFBP-4 mRNA levels (8). Taken together, these findings support the
concept that activin A, like IFN
, increases medium IGFBP-4 by
decreasing its proteolysis, rather than by transcriptional
regulation.
Although the effects of IFN
on IGFBP-2 and -4 accumulation and
steroidogenesis were similar to those of activin A, IFN
does not
appear to act by stimulating GC activin production, as its effects on
medium IGFBP and progesterone (data not shown) levels were not blocked
by follistatin.
The finding that IFN
increased GC apoptosis in culture, even under
LH-stimulated conditions, suggests a role for this cytokine in human
granulosa-luteal cell apoptosis. IFN
may be an effector of the
increase in apoptosis observed in the midluteal phase human corpus
luteum, a time of ongoing LH stimulation (46). The involvement of a
cytokine in both regulation of the intraovarian IGF system and
apoptosis induction suggests a significant physiological role for
lymphocytes and macrophages in the cyclic processes of follicular
atresia and luteal regression, both of which involve apoptosis of
ovarian cells (13, 46). Our finding that activin A does not promote
apoptosis of human GC, at least in monolayer culture, suggests that the
antisteroidogenic action of activin A on luteal cells does not result
from apoptosis induction and argues against a role of activin in human
luteal regression despite its ability to promote GC apoptosis in antral
follicles in a rodent model (31).
Our studies do not allow a conclusion to be drawn as to whether IGFBPs
mediate the effects of either IFN
or activin A on GC steroidogenesis
or apoptosis. Although added IGF-I (neutralization of IGFBP) failed to
reverse the inhibition of progesterone production by IFN
in a single
experiment and inconsistently reversed the effects of activin A on
progesterone (data not shown), only a study of the effects of direct
addition of pure IGFBPs to cultured GC can answer this question.
Although induction of Fas antigen by IFN
and its activation (21, 22, 23)
may account for the promotion of apoptosis by this cytokine, this
mechanism is unlikely to account for its inhibition of steroidogenesis,
as Fas activation alone fails to lower basal medium progesterone (22)
(our unpublished observations).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Present address: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Stanford
University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, California
94305-5317. ![]()
3 Present address: Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and
Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of
Washington, 4225 Roosevelt Way NE, Suite 305, Seattle, Washington
98105. ![]()
Received February 13, 1997.
Revised September 4, 1997.
Accepted September 16, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Diamanti-Kandarakis and C. Piperi Genetics of polycystic ovary syndrome: searching for the way out of the labyrinth Hum. Reprod. Update, November 1, 2005; 11(6): 631 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O J Ginther, E L Gastal, M O Gastal, and M A Beg In vivo effects of pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, activin-A and vascular endothelial growth factor on other follicular-fluid factors during follicle deviation in mares Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 489 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.M. Rivera and J.E. Fortune Development of Codominant Follicles in Cattle Is Associated with a Follicle-Stimulating Hormone-Dependent Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-4 Protease Biol Reprod, July 1, 2001; 65(1): 112 - 118. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Klein, D. E. Battaglia, T. K. Woodruff, V. Padmanabhan, L. C. Giudice, W. J. Bremner, and M. R. Soules Ovarian Follicular Concentrations of Activin, Follistatin, Inhibin, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I (IGF-I), IGF-II, IGF-Binding Protein-2 (IGFBP-2), IGFBP-3, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Spontaneous Menstrual Cycles of Normal Women of Advanced Reproductive Age J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2000; 85(12): 4520 - 4525. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. José de los Santos, D. J. Anderson, C. Racowsky, and J. A. Hill Presence of Fas-Fas Ligand System and Bcl-2 Gene Products in Cells and Fluids from Gonadotropin-Stimulated Human Ovaries1 Biol Reprod, December 1, 2000; 63(6): 1811 - 1816. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Poretsky, N. A. Cataldo, Z. Rosenwaks, and L. C. Giudice The Insulin-Related Ovarian Regulatory System in Health and Disease Endocr. Rev., August 1, 1999; 20(4): 535 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP |