| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Department of Medical Sciences and Advanced Therapies, Section of Endocrinology, University of Ferrara (E.C.d.U., M.R.A., A.R.M., G.T., E.P.), I-44100 Ferrara; and the Department of Pharmacology, University of Milan (S.G.C., A.E.R., E.E.M.), I-20129 Milan, Italy
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ettore C. degli Uberti, M.D., Department of Medical Sciences and Advanced Therapies, Section of Endocrinology, University of Ferrara, Via Savonarola 9, I-44100 Ferrara, Italy.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) GH peak (2 ± 0.7 µg/L) after withdrawal
of SRIH infusion was significantly (P < 0.02)
lower than that in young women (7.3 ± 2 µg/L). In elderly men,
the mean
GH peak (2.9 ± 0.6 µg/L) after withdrawal of SRIH
infusion was lower than that in young men (6.3 ± 1.6 µg/L),
although the difference failed to achieve statistical significance.
Baseline insulin-like growth factor I levels were significantly lower
in elderly compared to young subjects in both men and in women. In
women, both age and basal plasma estradiol and testosterone levels
significantly correlated with
GH peak after SRIH withdrawal (r
= -0.61, r = 0.61, and r = 0.66, respectively), whereas in
men they did not. These findings are compatible with the view that an
age-related decrease in endogenous GHRH function may contribute to the
defective GH secretion of the elderly. Alterations in plasma
concentrations of sex steroids may have important implications in the
observed changes. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Subjects were admitted to the clinical center at least 1 day before the study. The use of alcohol, tea, and caffeine-containing food was prohibited for 10 days before as well as throughout the study. After an overnight fast, an indwelling iv cannula was inserted in both forearms at 0730 h for separate blood sampling and drug administration. An equilibration period of 1 h was allowed before baseline blood samples were obtained. Subjects remained supine and awake in bed throughout the procedures, which were attended by a nurse and a physician. At 4-day intervals, each subject was tested on two separate occasions in a single blind, randomized manner: 1) iv infusion of SRIH (Stilamin, Serono, Milan, Italy) in 50 mL normal saline at a rate of 9 µg/kg·h over 90 min (090 min of the study), and 2) iv infusion of normal saline alone (50 mL saline, from 090 min of the study). Blood samples were drawn at -30 and 0 (time of commencement of saline or SRIH infusion) and 30, 60, 90, 105, 120, 135, 150, 165, and 180 min for GH. Baseline plasma levels of IGF-I, estradiol (E), and testosterone (T) in all subjects were also measured at -30 min. Plasma SRIH was measured before and 30, 60, and 90 min after initiation of SRIH infusion.
Blood collection and processing
Blood samples were collected in tubes containing 1.5 µg/L ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-2Na) for plasma E, T, GH, and IGF-I and in precooled plastic tubes containing EDTA-2Na (1.5 µg/L) and aprotinin (Trasylol, Bayer, Milan, Italy; 1000 kallikrein inhibitor units/mL) for plasma SRIH. They were immediately chilled, centrifuged at 3000 x g for 15 min at 4 C, and stored at -80 C until assayed. All samples for each subject were processed in duplicate in the same assay. For SRIH RIA, octadecylsilylsilica cartridges (Sep-Pak C18, Waters Associates, Milford, MA) were prepared by washing with 5 mL acetonitrile (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) followed by 5 mL water. Weakly bound plasma components were eluted with 5 mL water followed by 5 mL 0.10% trifluoroacetic acid (Aldrich Chemical Co., Milwaukee, MI). SRIH was eluted with 2.0 mL 80:20 (vol/vol) acetonitrile-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The eluate was promptly frozen, lyophilized, and stored at -80 C until subsequent assay. The lyophilized eluates were reconstituted in 2.0 mL phosphate buffer (0.05 mol/L; pH 7.2) containing 0.01 mol/L EDTA and 0.3% BSA. SRIH RIA was performed using radiolabeled SRIH ([3-125I]iodotyrosyl11-Tyr11-somatostatin-14), rabbit antiserum to SRIH (code no. 1611), and standard SRIH (SRIH-14) supplied by Amersham Italia (Milan, Italy). The assay sensitivity was approximately 0.03 µg/L, and the intraassay variation was 8%. To avoid interassay variation, all samples were assayed simultaneously. The MCR of SRIH was calculated from the following equation according to Tait (24): MCR = [infusion rat of SRIH/(steady state level of SRIH - preinfusion level)]. Steady state levels of SRIH were determined 90 min after starting the infusion. GH was measured by immunoradiometric assay with reagents supplied by Nichols Institute Diagnostics (San Juan Capistrano, CA). The lowest detection limit was 0.05 µg/L, with intra- and interassay coefficients of variation of 3.3% and 6.1%, respectively. Plasma IGF-I was determined by RIA, using a commercially available kit (Medgenix Diagnostic, Fleurus, Belgium), after acid-ethanol extraction from EDTA plasma. The inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 9.6% and 6.1%, respectively. E and T were determined by RIAs using material supplied by Diagnostic Products Corp. (Los Angeles, CA). The inter- and intraassay coefficients of variation were 7.4% and 5.8% for E and 5.6% and 5.2% for T, respectively.
Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
To facilitate comparison of the GH secretory profiles after withdrawal
of SRIH infusion, plasma GH responses were expressed either as absolute
values or as peak increment in GH (the peak value detected after
termination of SRIH infusion minus the mean value of the plasma GH
levels obtained during the 90-min period of SRIH infusion in each
subject, i.e.
GH peak). The results were compared within
each group and between groups using an ANOVA. Students paired and
unpaired tests were used to evaluate individual differences between
means. When applicable, a preliminary logarithmic transformation was
used to satisfy the assumption of a normal distribution of variances.
Correlations between
GH peak and age or plasma sex steroid levels
were performed with the linear regression analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GH peak (7.3 ± 2 µg/L; range, 1.618.9
µg/L) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than that
observed with saline (0.95 ± 0.4 µg/L). Withdrawal of SRIH
infusion in elderly women (Fig. 1
GH peak (2
± 0.7 µg/L; range, 0.076.3 µg/L) was significantly
(P < 0.05) higher than that observed with saline
(0.02 ± 0.09 µg/L). The plasma GH responses at 130
(P < 0.05), 165 (P < 0.02), and 180
min to SRIH withdrawal and
GH peak were significantly lower in
elderly women (P < 0.02) than in young women.
Termination of SRIH infusion in young men (Fig. 2
GH peak (6.3 ±
1.6 µg/L; range, 0.814.8 µg/L) was significantly
(P < 0.05) higher than that observed with saline
(0.12 ± 0.1 µg/L). Termination of SRIH infusion in elderly men
(Fig. 2
GH peak after
discontinuation of SRIH infusion (2.9 ± 0.6 µg/L; range,
1.45.1 µg/L) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher
than that observed with saline (0.33 ± 0.2 µg/L). The plasma GH
response to SRIH withdrawal and the
GH peak in elderly men were
lower than those in young men, although the difference failed to
achieve statistical significance (P = 0.15). No
significant sex-related differences in the plasma
GH peaks after
SRIH withdrawal were found within both groups of young and elderly
subjects. In women, the
GH peak after SRIH withdrawal correlated
negatively with age (r = -0.61; P < 0.02) and
positively with basal plasma E and T levels (r = 0.61;
P < 0.02 and r = 0.66; P < 0.01,
respectively). In men, there was no significant correlation between
GH peak after SRIH withdrawal and age, and plasma sex steroid levels.
No sex- or age-related differences in plasma SRIH levels during SRIH
infusion or in the MCR of SRIH were found. No side-effects were
observed during SRIH infusion.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings clearly show that withdrawal of SRIH infusion was capable of inducing a clear-cut increase in plasma GH levels in young subjects. This result is in keeping with earlier reports demonstrating the presence of a post-SRIH rebound release of GH in normal young men (22, 27), but not in patients with isolated GH deficiency (28). The magnitude of the rebound GH rise after SRIH infusion was slightly greater in young women than in young men, although the difference failed to achieve statistical significance. This pattern is reminiscent of the greater GH response to GHRH of young women than young men (10). The higher circulating IGF-I levels and BMI found in men compared to women could contribute to the slight gender-related difference.
An apparent rebound release of GH was still detected after withdrawal
of SRIH infusion in elderly subjects, although it was clearly reduced
compared with that occurring in young subjects. In the elderly women
and men, the
GH peaks after SRIH withdrawal were 78.8% and 53.5%
lower than those observed in the young women and men, respectively.
However, this achieved statistical significance only in women, not in
men (P = 0.15), probably due to the small numbers of
elderly men who were investigated.
Based on the evidence that SRIH withdrawal induces a GHRH-mediated rebound release of GH (20, 27, 28), our findings suggest that in the elderly, SRIH withdrawal evokes a smaller release of GHRH by the hypothalamus, and that a reduced activity of GHRH-secreting neurons may indeed underlie the defective GH secretion of aging. Reversibility of the decline in GH secretion in old dogs after clonidine administration (29) and in old dogs (23) and humans after fasting (30), maneuvers reportedly directed at the GHRH neurons, support this view. The age-related differences in the magnitude of the GH rebound response to SRIH withdrawal could be due to the SRIH pharmacokinetics, but as no sex- or age-related differences in plasma SRIH levels during SRIH infusion or in the MCR of the peptide were found, this seems unlikely.
Plasma E and T concentrations were significantly decreased in the elderly compared with those in the young women, whereas plasma E, but not T, levels were significantly lower in the elderly than in the young men. In addition, the GH peak after withdrawal of SRIH infusion significantly correlated with circulating levels of both E and T in women, but not in men. These results suggest that the age-related decline in the hypothalamic activity, as inferred from the GH response to SRIH withdrawal, could be attributable to changes in plasma concentrations of sex steroids that occur with aging. An important modulatory role of the latter, with respect to the influence of age on the neuroendocrine control of the somatotropic axis, is in keeping with the well recognized interplay between sex hormones and the hypothalamic-GH-IGF-I axis (for a review, see Refs. 4 and 31).
Based on these studies, we suggest that the more consistent decline in hypothalamic GHRH activity observed in elderly women may reflect the reduced estrogen-mediated facilitatory effect in the neuroendocrine control of GHRH function. In addition, we cannot exclude that in elderly men the decrease in circulating levels of E may also be instrumental in the altered GH response to withdrawal of SRIH infusion. This view is in keeping with the conclusions of previous studies showing that in both women and men, variations in endogenous E concentrations largely account for sex- and age-related differences in total and pulsatile GH release.
In conclusion, we found a substantial decrease in the magnitude of the rebound GH response to the termination of SRIH infusion in elderly compared to young subjects. This event was more consistent in women, in whom the magnitude of the GH response to SRIH withdrawal correlated negatively with age and positively with basal plasma E and T levels. These findings are compatible with the view that in humans, a reduced activity of GHRH-secreting neurons may be involved in the declining GH secretion that occurs with advancing age and that alterations in plasma concentrations of sex steroids may have important implications in the observed age-related changes in the hypothalamic activity.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received March 26, 1997.
Revised May 28, 1997.
Accepted June 3, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. G.-S. Frutos, L. Cacicedo, C. Fernandez, D. Vicent, B. Velasco, H. Zapatero, and F. Sanchez-Franco Insights into a role of GH secretagogues in reversing the age-related decline in the GH/IGF-I axis Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2007; 293(5): E1140 - E1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, M. Cosma, D. Erickson, R. Paulo, K. Mielke, L. S. Farhy, and C. Y. Bowers Tripartite Control of Growth Hormone Secretion in Women during Controlled Estradiol Repletion J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2007; 92(6): 2336 - 2345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. T. Patrie, K. T. Brill, J. Y. Weltman, E. E. Mueller, C. Y. Bowers, and A. Weltman Contributions of Gender and Systemic Estradiol and Testosterone Concentrations to Maximal Secretagogue Drive of Burst-Like Growth Hormone Secretion in Healthy Middle-Aged and Older Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6291 - 6296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, J. Y. Weltman, A. L. Weltman, A. Iranmanesh, E. E. Muller, and C. Y. Bowers Age and Secretagogue Type Jointly Determine Dynamic Growth Hormone Responses to Exogenous Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Negative Feedback in Healthy Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2004; 89(11): 5542 - 5548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Racine, K. V. Symons, C. M. Foster, and A. L. Barkan Augmentation of Growth Hormone Secretion after Testosterone Treatment in Boys with Constitutional Delay of Growth and Adolescence: Evidence against an Increase in Hypothalamic Secretion of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3326 - 3331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Veldhuis, S. M. Anderson, J. T. Patrie, and C. Y. Bowers Estradiol Supplementation in Postmenopausal Women Doubles Rebound-Like Release of Growth Hormone (GH) Triggered by Sequential Infusion and Withdrawal of Somatostatin: Evidence that Estrogen Facilitates Endogenous GH-Releasing Hormone Drive J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2004; 89(1): 121 - 127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nakamura, M. Mizuno, H. Katakami, A. C. Gore, and E. Terasawa Aging-Related Changes in in Vivo Release of Growth Hormone-Releasing Hormone and Somatostatin from the Stalk-Median Eminence in Female Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 827 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Woller, G. Everson-Binotto, E. Nichols, A. Acheson, K. L. Keen, C. Y. Bowers, and E. Terasawa Aging-Related Changes in Release of Growth Hormone and Luteinizing Hormone in Female Rhesus Monkeys J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2002; 87(11): 5160 - 5167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Orrego, M. Russell-Aulet, R. Demott-Friberg, and A. L. Barkan Semiquantification of Hypothalamic GH-Releasing Hormone Output in Women: Evidence for Sexual Dimorphism in the Mechanism of the Somatopause J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2001; 86(11): 5485 - 5490. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bondanelli, A. Margutti, M. R. Ambrosio, L. Plaino, L. Cobellis, F. Petraglia, and E. C. degli Uberti Blood Growth Hormone-Binding Protein Levels in Premenopausal and Postmenopausal Women: Roles of Body Weight and Estrogen Levels J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 1973 - 1980. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Evans, S. M. Anderson, L. T. Hull, P. P. Azimi, C. Y. Bowers, and J. D. Veldhuis Continuous 24-Hour Intravenous Infusion of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (GH)-Releasing Hormone-(1-44)-Amide Augments Pulsatile, Entropic, and Daily Rhythmic GH Secretion in Postmenopausal Women Equally in the Estrogen-Withdrawn and Estrogen-Supplemented States J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 700 - 712. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Somatostatin Infusion Withdrawal: Studies in Normal Children and in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4426 - 4430. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Veyrat-Durebex, P. Gaudreau, V. Coxam, N. Gaumet, and J. Alliot Peripheral injection of growth hormone stimulates protein intake in aged male and female Lou rats Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 1999; 276(6): E1105 - E1111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. E. Muller, V. Locatelli, and D. Cocchi Neuroendocrine Control of Growth Hormone Secretion Physiol Rev, April 1, 1999; 79(2): 511 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Giustina and J. D. Veldhuis Pathophysiology of the Neuroregulation of Growth Hormone Secretion in Experimental Animals and the Human Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1998; 19(6): 717 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Wilson Regulation of the Growth Hormone-Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Axis in Developing and Adult Monkeys Is Affected by Estradiol Replacement and Supplementation with Insulin-Like Growth Factor I J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1998; 83(6): 2018 - 2028. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |