| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Original Studies |
Research Center for Endocrinology and Metabolism (G.J., B.Å-B.) and the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (G.G., K.S.S.), Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Gudmundur Johannsson, M.D., Ph.D., Research Center for Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Goteborg, Sweden. E-mail: Gudmundur.Johannsson{at}ss.gu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
rad/s increased, as did the concentric knee
flexor strength at an angular velocity of
/3 rad/s. The increase in
muscle strength was more marked in younger patients and in patients
with lower initial muscle strength than predicted. Quadriceps endurance
decreased, whereas the effect of superimposing single twitches on
isometric contraction and hand-grip strength was unaffected by the GH
treatment. Two years of GH therapy in GH-deficient adults increased and
normalized isokinetic and isometric muscle strength studied in proximal
muscle groups. Hand-grip strength and the degree of lack of maximal
motor unit activation on voluntary isometric knee extensor force did
not change. The dynamic local muscle fatigue index decreased. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The administration of GH to GH-deficient adults for 618 months has been shown to increase the lean body mass, muscle volume, and maximal voluntary isometric muscle strength (2, 3, 4, 5, 6). In hypophysectomized rats, the administration of GH increased and restored the proportion of slow twitch, fatigue-resistant, type 1 muscle fibers (7), but this effect has not been demonstrated in two small studies of GH-deficient adults (8, 9). The contractile properties of the muscle in GH-deficient adults may, however, change in response to GH in a manner that suggests an increase in the proportion of type 1 muscle fibers (3).
The anabolic action of GH is not only restricted to GH deficiency, as GH treatment increased fat-free mass in athletes (10), healthy young untrained men (11), and elderly men (12, 13). Combined with resistance exercise training in young men, GH enhanced the increase in fat-free mass, total body water, and positive whole body protein balance compared with the effect of exercise alone. However, the fractional quadriceps muscle protein synthesis and isometric and concentric knee flexor and knee extensor muscle strength were not enhanced by combining GH treatment and training (11). This indicates that the additional lean tissue in response to GH was not skeletal muscle and that factors other than anabolic ones, stimulated by exercise, may be of more importance to muscle strength in GH-sufficient adults.
Muscle endurance is rarely studied in GH deficiency. Cuneo et al. demonstrated that the shoulder abduction fatigue index, calculated from 10 maximal voluntary shoulder abductions performed within 1 min, was lower than expected in GH-deficient adults and was not affected by 6 months of GH treatment (6). In contrast, general endurance measured by bicycle ergonometry increased in response to GH treatment (14, 15).
Knowledge of the long term effects of GH treatment on muscle function in GH-deficient adults is limited. This information is important, as patients with acromegaly have muscles that appear to be hypertrophied but may be functionally impaired (16), indicating that exposure to overly high levels of GH for a long period of time may have a deleterious effect on muscle function.
The primary objective of this trial was to study the effects of long term GH treatment in GH-deficient adults on isometric and isokinetic muscle strength and local muscle endurance. This was achieved by performing repeated measurements of muscle function for the quadriceps, hamstrings, and hand-grip for a period of 2 yr in a large heterogeneous cohort of GH-deficient adults in terms of age and sex. Results from the GH-deficient patients were compared with muscle function in a reference population. The secondary objective of this trial was to explore possible predictive background factors for the treatment response.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fifty-six adults with known pituitary deficiency and with a mean
age of 45 yr (range, 1974 yr) participated (Table 1
). The diagnosis of GH deficiency was
based on a maximum peak GH response of less than 1.7 µg/L (5 mIU/L)
during insulin-induced hypoglycemia (blood glucose,
2.2 mmol/L). When
required, patients received adequate and stable replacement therapy
with glucocorticoids, thyroid hormone, gonadal steroids, and
desmopressin. The replacement therapy was kept constant during the
entire study period. The patients were not receiving any other
medication that could affect muscle performance.
|
In 1994 and 1995, 144 men and women, aged 4079 yr, selected at random from the population census of the city of Goteborg, were invited to participate in a study measuring muscle function. A physical examination was performed to exclude any orthopedic problems, neurological deficits, and hypertension. At least 1 person of each age was tested. The subjects formed 10-yr cohorts; 4049, 5059, 6069, and 7079 yr for each sex. The numbers of men/women tested were 16/19, 20/15, 18/27, and 15/14 in increasing age.
Comparisons with the reference population were made by applying a predicted value for muscle function to each GH-deficient patient. The predicted value was obtained by calculating a mean value for each muscle test in each 10-yr cohort of men and women in the reference population. Patients younger than 40 yr of age (13 men and 4 women) were given a predicted value from the cohort of healthy controls aged 4049 yr, assuming no major change in muscle strength in previous adult age periods (17). This assumption might, however, overestimate the muscle strength in relation to normal in the young GH-deficient men (18). The predicted/observed percentages for each patient were then calculated. The patients and the reference population were matched in terms of mean body height (1.74 ± 0.01 vs. 1.74 ± 0.09 m) and mean body weight (81.5 ± 2.5 vs. 78.3 ± 1.1 kg).
Study protocol
This study is an ongoing, open label treatment trial of the administration of recombinant human GH in GH-deficient adults. This report has analyzed the effects on consecutive patients treated with recombinant human GH for 2 yr.
During the first 4 weeks of treatment, the daily GH dose was 4.8 µg/kg (0.1 U/kg BW·week), and the target dose thereafter was 12 µg/kg·day (0.25 U/kg BW·week). The dose was reduced in the event of side-effects and on an individual basis if the serum IGF-I concentration was higher than age- and sex-adjusted, population-based reference values (19). As a result, after 2 yr of treatment, the average daily GH dose was reduced from 0.76 ± 0.04 to 0.62 ± 0.03 mg.
The patients were studied as out-patients. At the start and after 6, 12, and 24 months of GH treatment, physical and laboratory examinations were performed, including measurements of muscle function. Body weight was measured in the morning to the nearest 0.1 kg, and body height was measured barefoot to the nearest 0.01 m. No effort was made to influence the patients activity level during the study period.
Informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study was approved by the ethics committee at the University of Goteborg and the Swedish Medical Products Agency (Uppsala, Sweden).
Measurements of muscle function
Knee extensor and flexor strengths for isometric contraction at
a knee angle of
/3 rad (60°) and for isokinetic concentric muscle
action at angular velocities of
/3 rad/s and
rad/s (180°/s)
were measured using a Kin-Com dynamometer (Chattecx Co., Chattanooga,
TN). The subjects were positioned sitting in the test chair with a hip
angle of
/2 rad (90°). The knee joint axis was approximated to the
Kin-Com measuring axis. The lower leg was secured to the Kin-Com shin
pad 3 cm proximal to the insertion of the anterior tibialis muscle with
the ankle joint at
/2 rad. The trunk, hip, and thigh were strapped
down to avoid involuntary movements. Warming-up submaximal exercise was
performed on a bicycle ergometer for 5 min before the muscle tests. The
torque values were recorded with a computerized system using
compensation for the weight of the lower leg and the lever arm. After
submaximal isometric knee extension for further warm-up and
familiarization, three curves were recorded, and the highest peak
torque values are reported. The methodological errors in duplicate
measurements for isometric muscle strength and isokinetic muscle
strength at an angular velocity of
/3 rad/s and
rad/s were 9%,
8%, and 8%, respectively (20). Right and left hand-grip strengths
were measured using an electronic grip force measurement instrument
that measures the maximum momentary force and the mean force over a set
period of 10 s in Newtons (N). The methodological error between
duplicate determinations was 4.49.1% (21). Verbal instructions were
given to encourage maximal force production.
Local muscle endurance in the quadriceps was measured as the percent
reduction (fatigue index) in peak torque between the first and the last
3 knee extensions in a series of 50 maximal voluntary concentric
contractions with an angle of velocity of
rad/s. The subjects were
instructed to perform repeated extensions with maximal effort and to
resume the starting position passively between each contraction. The
methodological error was 1.4% from duplicate determinations (22).
During isometric muscle contractions (the technique was not available for dynamic activity), superimposed single twitch electrical stimulation was given through the percutaneous stimulation of the quadriceps muscle, as described by Rutherford et al. (23) and previously used in our laboratory by Thomeé et al. (24), to estimate the degree of activation of motor units at maximal voluntary contraction. A specially developed electrical stimulator monitored by a PC software program (AB Detektor, Goteborg, Sweden) was used, connected to 5 x 10-cm electrodes placed over the vastus medialis and rectus femoris muscles. Two stimuli, square wave pulses, 0.1 s in duration, were used, with 1 s between each twitch. With the muscles relaxed, the stimuli were first given at increasing voltages up to the maximal stimulation effect, usually obtained at around 150 volts. The maximal level of stimulation was then used by superimposing twitches on approximately 30%, 50%, 70%, and 100% of maximal voluntary isometric activation for 4 s, with an interval of about 1 min between each level. The subjects were asked to keep to the various activation levels as closely as possibly by matching the effect according to the level indicated on the screen. Extrapolations from linear regression analyses were made using the additional torque from the superimposed twitches as a dependent variable to calculate any possible additional torque at true maximal isometric contraction (24).
Body composition
Total body potassium was measured by counting the emission of
1.46 MeV
-radiation from the naturally occurring 40K
isotope in a high sensitive 3
whole body counter with a coefficient
of variation of 2.2% (25). Body cell mass was calculated on the
assumption that there is a constant intracellular potassium/nitrogen
ratio of 3 mmol potassium/g nitrogen and a protein content equal to
25% of the body cell mass (26).
Total body nitrogen was measured by in vivo neutron activation. This method is based on the capture of low energy (thermal) neutrons by N nuclei. A Cf source was used to produce the neutrons. The patients were irradiated from below by a 15 x 50-cm rectangular neutron field. The measurement error was approximately ± 4%.
Biochemical assays
Blood samples were drawn in the morning after an overnight fast. The serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) was determined by a hydrochloric acid-ethanol extraction assay using authentic IGF-I for labeling (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA), with interassay coefficients of variation of 2.5% and 4.2% at serum concentrations of 125 and 345 µg/L, respectively. The detection limit of the assay was 13.5 µg/L.
Statistical methods
All the descriptive statistical results are presented as the mean and SEM or the mean and a 95% confidence interval (CI). A two-stage method was used for statistical analysis (27), which means that the repeated measurements from each patient were reduced to one summary variable, reflecting the individual response to the 2-yr course of GH treatment. The average of the summary variable then reflects the mean change over time for the whole cohort. In the present study, the coefficient of the slope (ßi) for the estimated individual regression line was chosen as the summary variable, using each effect variable as a dependent variable and time as an independent variable. ßi thus reflects the change over time for the ith individual, and the mean ßi reflects the estimated average change over time for the whole study population. Students t test was used to test the effect of treatment and differences between subgroups of patients. Correlations were sought by calculating Pearsons linear correlation coefficient. Significance was obtained if the two-tailed P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The average maximal voluntary isometric knee extensor and maximal
voluntary isometric knee flexor torque at a knee angle of
/3 rad
increased by 7.4 ± 4.6% and 9.8 ± 1.8%, respectively,
during the 2 yr of GH treatment. Concentric knee extensor strength at
an angular velocity of
rad/s increased by 6.5 ± 2.0%, and
concentric knee-flexor strength at angular velocities of
/3 rad/s
and
rad/s increased by 16.2 ± 3.1% and 12.6 ± 3.3%,
respectively. Peak hand-grip strength demonstrated a tendency to
increase, whereas concentric knee extensor strength at an angular
velocity of
/3 rad/s and average hand-grip strength during 10 s
did not increase in response to the 2 yr of GH treatment.
|
/3 rad/s
and left hand-grip (peak and average over 10 s) tended to decrease
transiently from 157, 362, and 310 N, respectively, at baseline to 150
(CI, 146164), 335 (CI, 293372), and 288 (CI, 255321) N,
respectively, at 6 months. At baseline, correlations between individual tests of isometric and isokinetic muscle strength demonstrated regression coefficients of between 0.700.92. However, the response to GH treatment varied between tests and muscle groups, demonstrating regression coefficients of between 0.190.87.
At baseline, positive correlations were found between isometric knee flexor strength and lean body mass (r = 0.82; P < 0.001) and serum IGF-I concentration (r = 0.39; P < 0.01), and inverse correlations were found between isometric knee flexor strength and age (r = -0.31; P < 0.05) and the duration of pituitary deficiency (r = -0.37; P < 0.01). In a standard multiple regression analysis using isometric knee flexor strength as a dependent variable and body cell mass, age, serum IGF-I concentration, and duration of pituitary deficiency as independent variables (r = 0.83; P < 0.001), body cell mass (ß = 0.83; P < 0.001) eliminated the influence of the other factors. During the 2 yr of GH treatment, an inverse correlation was found between the increment in isometric knee flexor strength and age (r = -0.28; P < 0.05), whereas no significant correlations were found between the increment in isometric knee flexor strength and the change in serum IGF-I concentration (r = 0.23; P = 0.1) or the change in body cell mass (r = 0.04; P = 0.8). Both at baseline and during GH treatment, isometric knee extensor strength demonstrated a similar correlation with age, duration of treatment, and serum IGF-I as isometric knee flexor strength (data not shown). However, in contrast with isometric knee flexor strength, a positive correlation was found between the increment in isometric knee extensor strength and the increment in body cell mass (r = 0.31; P < 0.05).
As estimated from the superimposition of single twitches on isometric
contractions in 30 patients, the 2-yr course of GH treatment did not
alter the estimated torque at maximal motor unit activation, which was
113120% of the torque at maximal voluntary contraction, representing
the absence of maximal muscle activation both before and after GH
treatment (Table 3
).
Quadriceps muscle endurance
At baseline, muscle strength values before and after 50 concentric
knee extensions were 113 (CI, 101125) and 71 (CI, 6379) Nm,
respectively, whereas the corresponding values after 2 yr of GH
treatment were 122 (CI, 110134) and 69 (CI, 6177) Nm, respectively.
The fatigue index, expressed as the percent reduction in torque at 50
repeated isokinetic knee extensions, thus increased from 37 ± 2%
to 43 ± 2% in response to the 2 yr of GH treatment (Table 3
).
At baseline, a positive correlation was found between the fatigue index and age (r = 0.53; P < 0.001), whereas no significant correlation was found between muscle endurance and body cell mass (r = -0.22; P = 0.2). During treatment, however, an inverse correlation was obtained between the change in fatigue index and body cell mass (r = -0.31; P < 0.05).
Gender differences
The women were older (50.6 ± 3.0 vs. 41.8 ± 2.4 yr; P < 0.05) and had a longer duration of pituitary deficiency (16 ± 3 vs. 5 ± 1 yr; P < 0.001) than the men. Moreover, the body cell mass (22.4 ± 1.5 vs. 34.7 ± 1.0 kg; P < 0.001), total body nitrogen (1.48 ± 0.14 vs. 2.50 ± 0.14 kg; P < 0.001), and serum IGF-I concentration (74 ± 13 vs. 131 ± 12 µg/L; P < 0.001) were lower in women than in men. As the dose of GH was based on body weight, women received a lower total daily dose of GH than men at the start. However, after 2 yr of treatment and after the adjustment of doses due to side-effects and high serum IGF-I concentrations, the daily dose of GH was similar in women and men (0.65 ± 0.06 vs. 0.60 ± 0.04 mg/day), but the serum IGF-I concentration was still lower in women than in men (262 ± 22 vs. 359 ± 19 µg/kg; P < 0.01).
The baseline isometric and isokinetic muscle strength in all measured muscle groups was lower in women than in men (P < 0.001), whereas the fatigue index was similar (data not shown). During treatment, the men responded with a more marked increment in total body nitrogen (P < 0.05), whereas changes in muscle strength, quadriceps endurance, and measurements from the superimposed electrical stimulation were similar in women and men (data not shown).
Muscle function in comparison with reference population
Before treatment, isometric muscle strength in both the quadriceps
and hamstring muscle groups was lower than that in the reference
population (Fig. 1
). The concentric
muscle strength in the knee extensor and knee flexor at an angular
velocity of
/3 rad/s and the concentric muscle strength in the knee
flexor at an angular velocity of
rad/s was in the lower normal
range, whereas the concentric knee extensor strength at an angular
velocity of
rad/s was within the high normal range (Fig. 2
). The right peak hand-grip strength was
83% (CI, 7887), and the right average 10-s hand-grip strength was
81% (CI, 7586) of the healthy control values. The corresponding
values for the left hand-grip were similar.
|
|
There was an inverse correlation between the ratio of
observed/predicted muscle strength at baseline and the change in muscle
strength in terms of isometric knee extension, isometric knee flexor,
concentric knee flexor at an angular velocity of
/3 rad/s, and
concentric knee extensor at an angular velocity of
rad/s (r =
-0.41, P < 0.01; r = -0.36, P
< 0.01; r = -0.40, P < 0.01; and r =
-0.44, P < 0.001, respectively), indicating a more
marked increase in muscle strength in patients with lower than
predicted muscle function at baseline (Fig. 3
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is convincing evidence that GH and IGF-I have a regulatory effect on muscle morphology, function, and metabolism (28). The IGF-I content of the skeletal muscle at both the protein and messenger ribonucleic acid levels is dependent on GH as well as on other stimuli (29). In rats, high intensity exercise or GH alone has a minimal effect on the mass of unloaded muscle, whereas a combination of the two produces a strong interactive effect (30), implying that the endocrine action of GH/IGF-I and the paracrine/autocrine action of IGF-I, possibly stimulated by the neuromuscular activity loading, are both important for muscle size and function.
In agreement with previous reports (3, 5, 6, 31, 32), this group of GH-deficient adults had reduced isometric muscle strength compared with a group of healthy controls. It has been suggested that this is an effect of reduced muscle cross-sectional area in GH-deficient adults (32). However, Cuneo et al. also found that the peak torque per muscle area in the quadriceps was reduced (1), suggesting that contractile properties and neural activation are responsible for the reduction in muscle strength. Compared with the reference population, the ability of GH-deficient subjects to perform a maximum voluntary isokinetic muscle torque was somewhat better than the isometric performance. Furthermore, in the present study, the distal muscles in the arm in particular displayed low muscle strength compared with controls, whereas another study found that the reduction in hand-grip strength and quadriceps strength was proportional (32). These discrepancies between the studies could be an effect of large individual variations in muscle strength and the small cohort of patients in the previous study.
Like other researchers (4, 5, 6, 31), we found that GH treatment increased the isometric quadriceps strength. The increment in isometric knee-flexor strength was, however, more homogeneous and more marked. The transient decrease in isometric knee extensor strength demonstrated after 6 months of treatment and the absence of a significant increment in hand-grip strength could be an effect of the occurrence of arthralgia, peripheral edema, and carpal tunnel affection in the initial phase of GH treatment using the present initial doses of GH (33).
Two previous studies measuring dynamic muscle strength in GH-deficient
adults were unable to demonstrate changes in isokinetic muscle strength
in the quadriceps and hamstrings after 12 weeks (34) and 6 months (35)
of GH treatment, respectively. We studied the isokinetic muscle
strength at different speeds of movement in both the quadriceps and
hamstring muscles during more prolonged GH treatment. Both concentric
knee extensor and knee flexor strengths at an angular velocity of
rad/s increased in response to GH treatment, whereas concentric knee
extensor muscle strength at an angular velocity of
/3 rad/s did
not.
Muscle strength can be assumed to be closely associated with the muscle cross-sectional area (36), although there are large individual variations (37), which can probably be explained by factors such as variations in neural activation and differences in contractile properties and force transmission. In our study, the increment in body cell mass, which is highly correlated to the thigh muscle cross-sectional area (6), demonstrated a different pattern of change in response to GH than the increment in muscle strength. This could be an effect of changes in the intracellular potassium concentration and/or hydration of body cell mass (38) or could be a true disproportional change in muscle mass and strength. Moreover, the more marked increase in total body nitrogen compared with total body potassium suggests that the anabolic effects are not merely skeletal, but are also an effect of increased extracellular proteins. Our results from superimposed single twitch electrical stimulation do not indicate that the level of activation of motor units at voluntary maximal muscle effort was altered during the period of GH treatment. The fairly slight lack of maximal activation at baseline did not change during GH treatment and would, therefore, not contribute to the recorded change in isometric strength. However, we have not studied motor unit activation at maximal voluntary effort in the dynamic activity. In the present study, a linear regression was used. As recently reported (39), however, the use of a shallow hyperbolic curve for the relationship between the extra force generated by the superimposed twitch and the voluntary muscle force increases the accuracy of the estimation of maximal quadriceps muscle strength, but only slightly. However, any such change in the estimation would not alter the conclusion of no effect of GH treatment on maximal muscle activation.
We have previously demonstrated large individual variations in the response to GH in terms of changes in body composition (40). In the same way as in that study, the young responded best. Those patients who obtained the best anabolic effect demonstrated the most pronounced increase in muscle strength and the smallest reduction in local muscle endurance. Furthermore, the most pronounced effect was obtained in patients with lower baseline muscle strength than that predicted for current age and sex, whereas the effect obtained in subjects with normal baseline muscle strength was less marked. This observation is of importance because the doses used in this cohort of GH-deficient patients did not result in any short term supraphysiological effect on muscle strength. This indicates that GH administration for a short period in healthy adults with normal muscle strength will not result in any further gain in muscle strength (11, 12, 41, 42).
Although muscle mass and peak voluntary muscle torque increased in response to GH treatment, the ability to sustain muscle strength during repeated contraction of the quadriceps muscle decreased. It thus appears that the increase in maximal muscle force production during GH treatment does not result in the maintenance of the capacity to produce force at repeated contractions. This is probably best explained by local changes in the muscle (22, 43) during the 2 yr of GH treatment. A lack of parallel metabolic adaptation in the muscle in terms of muscle glucose storage and utilization, oxidative enzyme activity, and capillarization are all conceivable explanations. If a change in fiber composition had occurred in the direction of a larger proportion of slow twitch, fatigue-resistant, type 1 fibers, as has previously been suggested (3, 7), this might have resulted in improved local muscle endurance (22). The adult patient with previously untreated GH deficiency has adapted to a sedentary lifestyle (44) that might contribute to their low muscle mass and muscle strength. The daily activity was not significantly affected by GH treatment in a 6-month placebo-controlled trial (14), although a self-perceived improvement in energy and general well-being was obtained in response to treatment (45). Reduced local muscle endurance in response to GH treatment contrasts with the increased exercise performance noted in response to GH treatment (15), thereby suggesting that this effect might be the result of increased cardiac performance. The optimal regimen for increasing muscle function in the GH-deficient adult would be GH replacement in combination with exercise, including endurance training, which would improve neural activation and also activate the autocrine/paracrine action of IGF-I in the muscle (30, 46), which might be of more importance than the circulating levels of serum IGF-I for the metabolic adaptation of the muscle.
Two years of GH treatment increased both isometric and isokinetic muscle strength studied in proximal muscle groups in GH-deficient adults. The effect first appeared after 1224 months of treatment, but was sustained over time. The discordance between the increment in body cell mass and muscle strength and the deterioration in quadriceps endurance suggests that factors other than merely anabolic ones are involved in the mechanisms through which GH acts on muscle function. These factors are still unclear, but metabolic studies of the effect of GH on muscle may elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, the long term results in terms of the reaction of muscle function in response to GH are of importance in view of the uncertainty relating to GH doses in GH-deficient adults and the known myopathy observed in long-standing acromegaly.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received January 10, 1997.
Revised May 21, 1997.
Accepted May 29, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Filipsson and G. Johannsson GH replacement in adults: interactions with other pituitary hormone deficiencies and replacement therapies Eur. J. Endocrinol., November 1, 2009; 161(S1): S85 - S95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Klefter and U. Feldt-Rasmussen Is increase in bone mineral content caused by increase in skeletal muscle mass/strength in adult patients with GH-treated GH deficiency? A systematic literature analysis Eur. J. Endocrinol., August 1, 2009; 161(2): 213 - 221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gotherstrom, M. Elbornsson, K. Stibrant-Sunnerhagen, B.-A. Bengtsson, G. Johannsson, and J. Svensson Ten Years of Growth Hormone (GH) Replacement Normalizes Muscle Strength in GH-Deficient Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2009; 94(3): 809 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Gibney, M.-L. Healy, and P. H. Sonksen The Growth Hormone/Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Axis in Exercise and Sport Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2007; 28(6): 603 - 624. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Gotherstrom, B-A Bengtsson, I Bosaeus, G Johannsson, and J Svensson Ten-year GH replacement increases bone mineral density in hypopituitary patients with adult onset GH deficiency Eur. J. Endocrinol., January 1, 2007; 156(1): 55 - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Woodhouse, A. Mukherjee, S. M. Shalet, and S. Ezzat The Influence of Growth Hormone Status on Physical Impairments, Functional Limitations, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults Endocr. Rev., May 1, 2006; 27(3): 287 - 317. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Molitch, D. R. Clemmons, S. Malozowski, G. R. Merriam, S. M. Shalet, M. L. Vance, and for The Endocrine Society's Clinical Guidelines Su Evaluation and Treatment of Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1621 - 1634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Koranyi, I. Bosaeus, M. Alpsten, B.-A. Bengtsson, and G. Johannsson Body composition during GH replacement in adults - methodological variations with respect to gender. Eur. J. Endocrinol., April 1, 2006; 154(4): 545 - 553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bollerslev, J. Hallen, K. J Fougner, A. P. Jorgensen, C. Kristo, H. Fagertun, O. Gudmundsen, P. Burman, and T. Schreiner Low-dose GH improves exercise capacity in adults with GH deficiency: effects of a 22-month placebo-controlled, crossover trial Eur. J. Endocrinol., September 1, 2005; 153(3): 379 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Berggren, C. Ehrnborg, T. Rosen, L. Ellegard, B.-A. Bengtsson, and K. Caidahl Short-Term Administration of Supraphysiological Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (GH) Does Not Increase Maximum Endurance Exercise Capacity in Healthy, Active Young Men and Women with Normal GH-Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Axes J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3268 - 3273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kim, E. Barton, N. Muja, S. Yakar, P. Pennisi, and D. LeRoith Intact Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Receptor Signaling Is Required for Growth Hormone Effects on Skeletal Muscle Growth and Function in Vivo Endocrinology, April 1, 2005; 146(4): 1772 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-C. Leung, G. Johannsson, G. M. Leong, and K. K. Y. Ho Estrogen Regulation of Growth Hormone Action Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2004; 25(5): 693 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Harman and M. R. Blackman Hormones and Supplements: Do They Work?: Use of Growth Hormone for Prevention or Treatment of Effects of Aging J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., July 1, 2004; 59(7): B652 - B658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Albert and A. D. Mooradian Low-Dose Recombinant Human Growth Hormone as Adjuvant Therapy to Lifestyle Modifications in the Management of Obesity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 695 - 701. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Svensson, K. Stibrant Sunnerhagen, and G. Johannsson Five Years of Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy in Adults: Age- and Gender-Related Changes in Isometric and Isokinetic Muscle Strength J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2003; 88(5): 2061 - 2069. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cittadini, L. Ines Comi, S. Longobardi, V. Rocco Petretta, C. Casaburi, L. Passamano, B. Merola, E. Durante-Mangoni, L. Sacca, and L. Politano A preliminary randomized study of growth hormone administration in Becker and Duchenne muscular dystrophies Eur. Heart J., April 1, 2003; 24(7): 664 - 672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. T. Brill, A. L. Weltman, A. Gentili, J. T. Patrie, D. A. Fryburg, J. B. Hanks, R. J. Urban, and J. D. Veldhuis Single and Combined Effects of Growth Hormone and Testosterone Administration on Measures of Body Composition, Physical Performance, Mood, Sexual Function, Bone Turnover, and Muscle Gene Expression in Healthy Older Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2002; 87(12): 5649 - 5657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. N. Butler, M. Fossel, S. M. Harman, C. B. Heward, S. J. Olshansky, T. T. Perls, D. J. Rothman, S. M. Rothman, H. R. Warner, M. D. West, et al. Is There an Antiaging Medicine? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2002; 57(9): B333 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Cook Shouldn't Adults with Growth Hormone Deficiency Be Offered Growth Hormone Replacement Therapy? Ann Intern Med, August 6, 2002; 137(3): 197 - 201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Johannsson, P. Burman, L. Wiren, B. E. Engstrom, A. G. Nilsson, M. Ottosson, B. Jonsson, B.-A. Bengtsson, and F. A. Karlsson Low Dose Dehydroepiandrosterone Affects Behavior in Hypopituitary Androgen-Deficient Women: A Placebo-Controlled Trial J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2002; 87(5): 2046 - 2052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. H. W. Lange, J. L. Andersen, N. Beyer, F. Isaksson, B. Larsson, M. H. Rasmussen, A. Juul, J. Bulow, and M. Kjar GH Administration Changes Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms in Skeletal Muscle But Does Not Augment Muscle Strength or Hypertrophy, Either Alone or Combined with Resistance Exercise Training in Healthy Elderly Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2002; 87(2): 513 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Gotherstrom, J. Svensson, J. Koranyi, M. Alpsten, I. Bosaus, B.-A. Bengtsson, and G. Johannsson A Prospective Study of 5 Years of GH Replacement Therapy in GH-Deficient Adults: Sustained Effects on Body Composition, Bone Mass, and Metabolic Indices J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4657 - 4665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Koranyi, J. Svensson, G. Gotherstrom, K. S. Sunnerhagen, B.-A. Bengtsson, and G. Johannsson Baseline Characteristics and the Effects of Five Years of GH Replacement Therapy in Adults with GH Deficiency of Childhood or Adulthood Onset: A Comparative, Prospective Study J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4693 - 4699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Hulthen, B.-A. Bengtsson, K. S. Sunnerhagen, L. Hallberg, G. Grimby, and G. Johannsson GH Is Needed for the Maturation of Muscle Mass and Strength in Adolescents J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4765 - 4770. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Y. Hayes, R. J. Urban, J. Jiang, T. J. Marcell, K. Helgeson, and N. Mauras Recombinant Human Growth Hormone and Recombinant Human Insulin-Like Growth Factor I Diminish the Catabolic Effects of Hypogonadism in Man: Metabolic and Molecular Effects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 2211 - 2219. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Measures of Submaximal Aerobic Performance Evaluate and Predict Functional Response to Growth Hormone (GH) Treatment in GH-Deficient Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1999; 84(12): 4570 - 4577. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Kraemer, K. Hakkinen, R. U. Newton, B. C. Nindl, J. S. Volek, M. McCormick, L. A. Gotshalk, S. E. Gordon, S. J. Fleck, W. W. Campbell, et al. Effects of heavy-resistance training on hormonal response patterns in younger vs. older men J Appl Physiol, September 1, 1999; 87(3): 982 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Pritzlaff, L. Wideman, J. Y. Weltman, R. D. Abbott, M. E. Gutgesell, M. L. Hartman, J. D. Veldhuis, and A. Weltman Impact of acute exercise intensity on pulsatile growth hormone release in men J Appl Physiol, August 1, 1999; 87(2): 498 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. J. H. Janssen, J. Doornbos, and F. Roelfsema Changes in Muscle Volume, Strength, and Bioenergetics during Recombinant Human Growth Hormone (GH) Therapy in Adults with GH Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1999; 84(1): 279 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Leger, C. Garel, A. Fjellestad-Paulsen, M. Hassan, and P. Czernichow Human Growth Hormone Treatment of Short-Stature Children Born Small for Gestational Age: Effect on Muscle and Adipose Tissue Mass during a 3-Year Treatment Period and after 1 Year's Withdrawal J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1998; 83(10): 3512 - 3516. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sartorio Different Impairment of Muscle Strength in Adults with Childhood-Onset and Acquired GH Deficiency J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 1998; 83(2): 712 - 712. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |