| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Letters to the Editor |
Haemek Medical Center Afula, Israel Peretz Lavie Technion, Israel Institute of Technology Haifa, Israel
We appreciate the comments (in the Letter to the Editor) of Dr. Rao about our recent study (1). In this study, we used immunohistochemistry and demonstrated the presence of gonadal steroid (AR, ER) and go-nadotropin (LH-R, FSH-R) receptors in human pineal glands obtained at autopsy in prepubertal children and adult males (1). We do not dispute the comments by Dr. Rao, although we believe that the design of the study is correct and does not invalidate the results for a number of reasons. Because immunolocalization of receptor proteins does not directly imply that the entire receptor is present or functioning (2), the implications of our findings are merely speculative. This idea was cautiously mentioned in the conclusion of our manuscript (1). We used the term Positivity Index (PI) to describe the percentage of positively stained cells rather than receptor density. Because this method is a semiquantitative evaluation of positivily stained cells, it may result in a slight underestimation of the number of receptors (ligand free and bound) present in the tissue (3). Although circulating levels of androgens, estrogens, and gonadotropins are very low in prepubertal children, we observed a very high percentage of positively stained cells in two children, and in the other three children the PIs were similar to the values observed in adults. Since the pineal gland in humans and mammals does not contain gonadal steroids or gonadotropins (4, 5), this may suggest that the receptors were ligand free and were associated in a complex with HSP 90 in the cytoplasm (6). In addition, our findings are further supported by the nuclear location of FSH-R and by the observation that positive staining for gonadal steroid and gonadotropin receptors was absent in brain tissue adjacent to the pineal gland. The findings of a significant day/night difference in FSH-R PIs (LH-R and AR also demonstrated higher levels at night, albeit statistically not significant) in the present study (1) and the novel demonstration of significant seasonal variation in gonadotropin receptors in human pineal glands (7) strongly suggest that gonadal steroid hormones and gonadotropin receptors are present in human pinealocytes. This is further supported by the fact that circulating gonadotropin and gonadal steroid hormones do not exhibit an annual or daily cycle (8).
Our recent findings support the idea that in humans gonadal steroid hormones and gonadotropin receptors are present in the pinealocytes from infancy to old age. Gonadotropin receptors exhibited seasonal variation with higher values in the winter. Further studies are needed to more directly test the hypothesis that the presence of these receptors and their ligands is crucial in pineal melatonin secretion.
Footnotes
e Received May 13, 1997. Address correspondence to: Dr. R. Luboshitzky, Endocrine Institute, Haemek Medical Center, Afula, 18101, Israel.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Caglayan, M. Ozata, G. Ozisik, M. Turan, E. Bolu, C. Oktenli, N. Arslan, K. Erbil, D. Gul, and I. C. Ozdemir Plasma Melatonin Concentration before and during Testosterone Replacement in Klinefelter's Syndrome: Relation to Hepatic Indolamine Metabolism and Sympathoadrenal Activity J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 738 - 743. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |