help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tremble, J.
Right arrow Articles by Banga, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tremble, J.
Right arrow Articles by Banga, J. P.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 8 2664-2670
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Experimental Studies

Human B Cells Secreting Immunoglobulin G to Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase-65 from a Nondiabetic Patient with Multiple Autoantibodies and Graves’ Disease: A Comparison with Those Present in Type 1 Diabetes1

Jennifer Tremble, Nils G. Morgenthaler2, Arjen Vlug, Alvin C. Powers, Michael R. Christie, Werner A. Scherbaum and J. Paul Banga

Department of Medicine, King’s College School of Medicine, London, United Kingdom SE5 9PJ; Central Laboratory of The Netherlands Red Cross Blood Transfusion Service (A.V.), Amsterdam, The Netherlands; the Division of Endocrinology, Vanderbilt University, Department of Veterans Affairs (A.C.P.), Nashville, Tennessee 37232-6303, and the Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Leipzig (W.A.S.), Leipzig, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. J. P. Banga, Department of Medicine, King’s College School of Medicine, Bessemer Road, London, United Kingdom SE5 9PJ.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase-65 (GAD65) are present in a number of autoimmune disorders, such as insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM), stiff man syndrome, and polyendocrine autoimmune disease. Antibodies to GAD in IDDM patients usually recognize conformation-dependent regions on GAD65 and rarely bind to the second isoform, glutamic acid decarboxylase-67 (GAD67). In contrast, those present in stiff man syndrome and polyendocrine disease commonly target the second isoform (GAD67) and include antibodies that are less dependent on the conformation of the molecule. By immortalizing peripheral blood B cells with Epstein-Barr virus, we have generated three human IgG autoantibodies, termed b35, b78, and b96, to GAD65 from one patient with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs and Graves’ disease. All three autoantibodies are of the IgG1 isotype, with islet cell activity, and do not react with GAD67. The regions on GAD65 recognized by the three autoantibodies have been investigated by immunoprecipitation with a series of chimeras, by binding to denatured and reduced antigens, and using protein footprinting techniques. Using chimeric GAD proteins, we have shown that b35 targets the IDDM-E1 region of GAD65 (amino acids 240–435) whereas both b78 and b96 target the IDDM-E2 region of GAD65 (amino acids 451–570). Furthermore, examination of binding to recombinant GAD65 and GAD67 by Western blotting revealed some differences in epitope recognition, where only b78 bound denatured and reduced GAD65. However, b35, b78, and b96 autoantibodies had different footprinting patterns after trypsin treatment of immune complexes with GAD65, again indicating different epitope recognition.

Our results indicate that antibodies to GAD65 present in nondiabetic patients with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs show similarities to those in IDDM (by targeting IDDM-E1 and IDDM-E2 regions of GAD65) as well as subtle differences in epitope recognition (such as binding to denatured and reduced GAD65 and by protein footprinting). Thus, the GAD65 epitopes recognized by autoantibodies in different autoimmune diseases may overlap and be more heterogeneous than previously recognized.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
AUTOANTIBODIES to the 65-kDa isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) are present in autoimmune disorders such as insulin-dependent (type 1) diabetes mellitus (IDDM), stiff man syndrome (SMS), and polyendocrine autoimmune disease (1). Autoantibodies to GAD65 are important markers for disease activity because they are present in 60–70% of individuals with newly diagnosed IDDM as well as in a similar proportion of first degree relatives of patients who subsequently develop IDDM (2, 3, 4). In combination with other autoantibodies, such as those to insulin and the protein tyrosine phosphatase (IA-2), progression to disease and insulin dependency can be predicted accurately with these islet cell autoantibodies (5, 6). In contrast, autoantibodies to the 67-kDa isoform of GAD (GAD67) are found in only 15% of recent-onset IDDM patients (2), and most of this binding can be blocked with GAD65, indicating shared epitopes between the two isoforms of GAD (7, 8).

Differences in antibody recognition of GAD between different patient groups have been demonstrated with a variety of approaches, including denaturation in SDS and Western blotting (9, 10, 11, 12, 13), deletion mutants of GAD65 (8, 14), and chimeric proteins of GAD65 and GAD67 (15). One of these studies has led to the recognition of two distinct conformation-dependent epitopes, termed IDDM-E1 (amino acids 240–435) and IDDM-E2 (amino acids 451–570), recognized by autoantibodies in IDDM patients (16). Although the GAD65 autoantibodies in IDDM are usually low titer, patients with SMS and polyendocrine autoimmune disease are characterized by very high levels of antibodies to GAD without necessarily the development of diabetes (16, 17, 18). There are other differences in the spectrum of autoantibodies to GAD in IDDM and other autoimmune disease patients. Serum antibodies in SMS and polyendocrine autoimmune disease recognize denatured GAD in Western blots, whereas the autoantibodies in IDDM are dependent upon the conformation of the molecule (reviewed in 1 . Like autoantibodies to a number of other enzyme autoantigens in organ-specific autoimmune diseases (19), all patients with SMS and a proportion of antibodies in polyendocrine autoimmune disease patients inhibit the enzymatic activity of GAD, suggesting that the epitopes recognized are at or near the catalytic site (20). Although a large number of studies have focused on the recognition of GAD epitopes in IDDM and SMS patients (10, 11, 12), there has been little progress on identifying epitope specificity in other autoimmune endocrinopathies (20, 21, 22).

Recently, Richter and colleagues reported the first isolation of human IgG monoclonal antibodies (hmAbs) to GAD65 from patients with new-onset IDDM as well as patients with IDDM and another organ-specific autoimmune disease, Graves’ disease (23, 24). The IgG hmAbs, designated MICA1 to MICA10, all have islet cell activity and are specific for GAD65. Using a combination of approaches, including GAD65 deletion mutants, GAD65/GAD67 chimeras, and blocking studies, five distinct conformational epitopes were revealed, which included the middle and C-terminal regions together with the large region encompassed by residues 39–585 of GAD65 (23, 24). Furthermore, one of the hmAbs, MICA2, which showed binding to GAD65 by Western blot analysis was dependent on binding to an SDS-resistant, miniconformational epitope residing in amino acids 506–531 (25). Other human IgG hmAbs to GAD65 from an established IDDM patient have been described, although the precise epitopes remain to be characterized (26).

The exact determination of the autoantigenic epitopes on GAD65 in autoimmune diseases such as IDDM (and SMS) may allow the disease-specific epitopes to be elucidated. Furthermore, antibodies to different regions of autoantigens may be relevant in determining the spectrum of peptides available to autoreactive T cells (27) that play a pivotal role in IDDM. In this study, we describe IgG antibodies to GAD65 from a nondiabetic patient with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs and Graves’ disease (28) who has autoantibodies with similar specificities, but also differences, as those present in IDDM patients.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Establishment of B cell lines secreting IgG antibody to GAD65

Venous blood was obtained with informed consent from a nondiabetic, 28-yr-old man (PV) who had been treated with radioiodine for Graves’ disease complicated by ophthalmopathy and pretibial myxoedema. He was positive for multiple autoantibodies, including TSH receptor (TSH binding inhibitory activity), thyroid peroxidase, gastric parietal cells, and islet cell autoantibody (ICA), and was strongly positive for GAD65 and GAD67 autoantibodies.

Peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated from 50 mL blood by density gradient centrifugation on Ficoll-Hypaque. The mononuclear cells were immortalized with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) supernatant (23, 29). Briefly, cells were infected by overnight culture with infectious EBV supernatant from the B-95 marmoset cell line, and the IgG-secreting B cells were isolated by magnetic separation on Dynal beads (Wirral, Merseyside, United Kingdom) coated with antihuman IgG. On this occasion, 50 mL blood yielded 0.5 x 106 IgG-positive B cells. These were plated on a feeder monolayer of irradiated mononuclear cells in complete medium (RPMI 1640 containing 15% FCS, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 2 mmol/L oxaloacetate, and 10 IU insulin) in 96-well plates, with 4 plates each at concentrations of 250 or 500 cells/well (cpw) and with two plates at 1000 cpw. Two or 3 weeks later, the wells containing acidified medium were screened for antibodies to GAD65 by radioligand binding assay (see below). Pools of supernatants from 8 wells were initially screened, which led to the identification of 9 positive pools; screening of individual wells from the positive pools identified 27 positive wells. After further culture and expansion for 4–6 weeks of the individual wells, 7 wells continued to be positive for antibody; these were expanded into 24-well Costar plates (Cambridge, MA) and subsequently into T25 flasks. Three wells, designated b35, b78, and b96, continued to be positive for antibody to GAD65, and cells from the wells were cloned and expanded by limiting dilution (29).

Immunoprecipitation with in vitro translated GAD65 and GAD65/67 chimeras

Screening for antibody to GAD65 was performed by radioligand binding assay using human (h) GAD65 complementary DNA (cDNA) cloned in the vector pB1882 (a gift from Dr. Thomas Dyrberg) (30). Samples that precipitated mean ± 3 SD greater radioactivity than the counts per min in negative controls (culture medium alone) were taken as positive for subsequent expansion and cloning of the cell lines.

GAD65/GAD67 chimeric proteins

The following nomenclature for GAD chimera was used: GAD65 or GAD67 (amino acid number of that GAD species present in the GAD chimera)/GAD65 or GAD67 (amino acid number of that GAD species present in the GAD chimera). The GAD65 protein has 585 amino acids and the GAD67 protein has 594 amino acids. Chimeric GAD proteins were prepared from chimeric GAD cDNAs as previously described (15). Three chimeric proteins were used: 1) GAD65/67/67 = GAD65-(1–195)/GAD67-(205–594); 2) GAD67/65/67 = GAD67-(1–230)/GAD65-(221–442)/GAD67-(452–594) (this contains IDDM-E1); and 3) GAD67/67/65 = GAD67-(1–441)/GAD65-(443–585) (this contains IDDM-E2). For immunoprecipitations, tissue culture supernate diluted 1:5,000 to 1:10,000 or control medium was used, and immunoprecipitations were performed as previously described (15).

Recombinant insect cell-expressed GAD and Western blotting

Recombinant hGAD65 and hGAD67 were expressed in insect cells and used to determine binding of the IgG mAbs by Western blotting. Recombinant hGAD65 baculovirus supernatant was a gift from Dr. Thomas Dyrberg (31). hGAD67 cDNA was cloned by PCR from total human islet cDNA in our laboratory, sequenced, and subcloned into pVL1393 transfer vector. A plasmid with cDNA in the correct orientation was used to obtain recombinant baculovirus by cotransfection with linearized BaculoGold baculovirus DNA (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) using lipofectin (Banga, J. P., and W. A. Scherbaum, unpublished observations). The expression of hGAD67 was carried out by infecting Sf9 monolayer cultures in TC100 medium containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS with 5–10 plaque-forming units/cell of cloned virus; sodium glutamate (2 mmol) was added every day (31), and the cells were harvested 72 h postinfection, pelleted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -70 C. Cell extracts were used in Western blotting after SDS-PAGE (11). After transfer to nitrocellulose membrane, the filters were blocked with 5% fat-free milk powder in Tris-borate-saline buffer containing 0.05% Tween-20 (TBST/milk) and blotted with antibody supernatants (1:100 in TBST/milk) for 2 h at room temperature; after washing, the filters were probed with alkaline phosphatase-labeled antihuman IgG in TBST/milk for 2 h at room temperature. The washed filters were developed with tetrazolium blue.

Protein footprinting

In vitro translated [35S]methionine-labeled GAD65 complexed with 100 µl undiluted supernatant containing human IgG antibody or with 10 µL undiluted or diluted serum (to give equivalent amounts of labeled GAD65 in the immunoprecipitate) and protein A-Sepharose were treated with different concentrations of trypsin at 1, 0.5, and 0.1 mg/mL/sample. After incubation at 37 C for 20 min, the samples were washed, resuspended in 30 µL loading buffer and analyzed in 15% acrylamide gels. The gels were processed for fluorography and autoradiographed for 2 weeks.

ICA

Undiluted serum or culture supernatant was screened for ICA by indirect immunofluorescence on unfixed sections of blood group O human pancreas (32).

Determination of IgG subclass

Total IgG and the IgG subclasses in the tissue culture supernatant were determined by nephelometry (33). When the concentration of IgG was below the sensitivity of nephelometric measurement (<10 ng/mL), the more sensitive method of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used (34).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
From patient PV, we obtained 5 x 105 IgG-secreting B cells by magnetic bead selection after infection with EBV; these were plated into 10 96-well microtiter plates. After 2 weeks of culture, the individual wells begin to acidify, indicating growth of cells, which were tested for antibody to GAD65 by immunoprecipitation with [35S]methionine-labeled, translated GAD65. Pools of 8 wells were tested, and 9 pools were positive. When the individual wells from the 9 pools were tested, 27 positive wells were identified for antibody to GAD65. Upon further culture for 1 week and retesting, 7 wells continued to be positive. The positive wells were expanded 4–5 weeks later and showed three wells (b35, b78, and b96) to be positive. The b78 and b96 lines were cloned at 100, 50, 25, and 10 cpw each into 3 plates. From b96, 11 positive wells were obtained from 50- and 25-cpw plates, but only 1 b96.73 survived further expansion. For b78, all wells tested were positive; 16 wells were selected for further expansion, and stocks were frozen. The b35 cells failed to survive the cloning procedure; however, the IgG-containing supernatant was used for the studies described below. The IgG-secreting clone b80, negative for GAD65 and GAD67, was used as the control antibody.

Both b78 and b96 IgG were positive by indirect immunofluorescence for islet cell staining of pancreatic sections (Fig. 1Go, a and b). The antibodies did not bind sections of stomach, thyroid, adrenal gland, or liver tissue (not shown). All three antibodies were IgG1, where an antibody level of 15 µg/mL was present in 14-day cultures (not shown).



View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunofluorescence analysis of ICA on sections of blood group O human pancreas with b78 (a) and b96 (b). Magnification, x250.

 
Antibodies in serum from patient PV, from whom GAD-secreting cell lines were established, immunoprecipitated both hGAD65 and hGAD67. However, the b78 and b96 IgG specifically immunoprecipitated hGAD65 and not hGAD67 (Fig. 2aGo). The regions on GAD65 recognized were investigated by immunoprecipitation with a series of chimeras of hGAD65/rat GAD67 (15). The b35 mAb immunoprecipitated GAD67-(1–230)/GAD65-(221–442)/GAD67-(452–594), which contains the IDDM-E1 region (15) (Fig. 2bGo). Interestingly, both b78 and b96 bound GAD67-(1–451)/GAD65-(443–585), which contains the IDDM-E2 region, and did not react with the IDDM-E1 region (Fig. 2bGo). None of the mAbs targeted the amino-terminus of GAD65.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. a, Immunoprecipitation of [35S]methionine-labeled human GAD65 and GAD67 with serum and human IgG mAbs. Immunoprecipitation was performed with normal healthy serum (NHS), new-onset IDDM serum, and serum from a patient (PV) with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs and Graves’ disease. The results for human IgG mAb b78 and b96 are shown; b80 is a control culture supernatant from another B cell line. {blacksquare}, GAD65; {square}, GAD67. b, Immunoprecipitation of human IgG mAbs with [35S]methionine-labeled chimeric GAD proteins. Immunoprecipitation was performed with either human IgG mAbs b35, b78, and b96 or control medium (15). The nomenclature for the three chimeric proteins is: 1) GAD65/67/67 = GAD65-(1–195)/GAD67-(205–594); 2) GAD67/65/67 = GAD67-(1–230)/GAD65-(221–442)/GAD67-(452–594); and 3) GAD67/67/65 = GAD67-(1–441)/GAD65-(443–585). The amount of GAD protein immunoprecipitated (counts per min) is the mean of duplicate determinations. {blacksquare}, Plus mAb; {square}, control medium.

 
Analysis of binding to denatured and reduced GAD65 by Western blotting on lysates of insect cells expressing recombinant hGAD65 or hGAD67 showed that b78 recognized denatured hGAD65, whereas b96 did not show any binding (Fig. 3Go). This indicates that although both b78 and b96 target the large IDDM-E2 region of GAD65, the epitopes targeted by the antibodies differ. Neither of the two IgG showed binding to hGAD67 under these conditions (Fig. 3Go).



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Western blot analysis of recombinant insect GAD proteins with human IgG mAbs. A, b78; B, b96. Sf9 insect cell lysate from baculovirus-infected cells expressing: lane a, control wild-type virus expressing polyhedrin; lane b, human GAD67; and lane c, human GAD65. The mAb b78 in A shows binding to GAD65 comigrating at 64 kDa (arrow).

 
Further evidence of the recognition of different regions on GAD65 was obtained by protein footprinting, where the antibodies protected different regions of the protein from trypsin digestion. Initially, protein footprinting was examined with GAD65 antibody-positive serum from IDDM patients (n = 5), patients with multiple autoantibodies (n = 7), and SMS patients (n = 3). Differences in the trypsinized fragments were clearly apparent, with the anti-GAD65 antibodies in serum from SMS patients and patients with multiple autoantibodies showing similar patterns as those present in IDDM serum (Fig. 4aGo). Thus, anti-GAD65 antibodies in patients with SMS and multiple autoantibodies lead to the protection of three high molecular mass bands in the 42- to 50-kDa region (arrowed in Fig. 4aGo) that were not protected in four of the five antibodies present in IDDM sera. Antibodies in one IDDM patient (patient 4, Fig. 4aGo) showed a similar pattern as the SMS and multiple autoantibody-containing sera by protecting the three large fragments, probably due to the presence of antibodies to GAD67, which are occasionally present in IDDM patients.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Protein footprinting with [35S]methionine-labeled human GAD65 to identify different autoantibody epitopes, analyzed in a 15% polyacrylamide gel. a, Footprinting with serum containing autoantibodies to GAD65 from IDDM (no. 1–5), patients with autoimmune endocrinopathies containing multiple autoantibodies (labeled GAD-Ab +ve autoimmune; no. 1–7), and SMS patients (no. 1–3). For footprinting, the immune complexes were incubated with trypsin (0.1 mg/mL) at 30 C for 20 min. The three high molecular mass fragments of 42–50 kDa that are protected by serum from all multiple autoantibodies patients, the SMS patient, and one IDDM patient (lane 4) are indicated by arrows. The molecular masses are indicated by the open triangles. b, Footprinting with mAbs to GAD65. Human IgG mAbs: lane 1, b78; lane 2, b96; and lane 3, b35. The murine mAb, GAD6 footprint is also shown. For footprinting, the immune complexes were incubated with trypsin (0.5 mg/mL) at 30 C for 20 min. For comparison, the protein footprint with serum from patient PV from whom the hmAbs were initially generated is also shown. The three high molecular mass protected fragments of 42–50 kDa in PV serum are indicated by arrows. The different footprints with the mAbs indicate different antibody epitopes on GAD65; note the similarity in the footprint pattern of GAD6 and b78 (in lane 1). The molecular masses are indicated by the open triangles.

 
Examination of the protein footprinting with mAbs b35, b78, and b96 showed that the patterns of protected trypsinized fragments were different (Fig. 4bGo). mAb b78 (Fig. 4bGo, lane 1) showed only one of the three large protected fragments, whereas b96 and b35 mAb did not protect any of these three large fragments (Fig. 4bGo, lanes 2 and 3, arrowed). Furthermore, the footprint patterns of b78 and b96 were strikingly different; almost all of the smaller (below the three large fragments) protected footprint bands observed in the PV serum (Fig. 4bGo, arrowed) were present in b35, b78, or b96, showing that each of these antibodies contributes to the total number of bands observed in the PV serum footprint (Fig. 4bGo). Interestingly, the footprint pattern of the murine mAb to GAD65, GAD6, was similar to that of the b78 hmAb (Fig. 4bGo).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We describe the properties of three human IgG antibodies to GAD65 that have been established from a patient with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs and with Graves’ disease who was nondiabetic and had antibodies to pancreatic islet cells and high levels of antibody to GAD65 and GAD67. Two of the B cells, b78 and b96, are stable cell lines; however, the b35 cell line was lost in the expansion and cloning stages, but sufficient antibody was available to allow a dissection of the GAD epitopes compared to those recognized in IDDM (14, 23, 24, 25, 26).

The IgG antibodies b35, b78, and b96 to GAD65 that were generated belong to the {gamma}1 subclass of IgG, the major subclass of ICA present in IDDM patients (35). All three antibodies were specific for GAD65, and none showed binding to GAD67. Examination of the regions on GAD5 recognized by the hmAbs showed that b35 recognized the central (IDDM-E1) region, whereas b78 and b96 recognized the carboxyl (IDDM-E2) region of the molecule. Thus, the repertoire of the three hmAbs to GAD65 generated from a patient with polyendocrine autoimmune disease mirrors the repertoire present in IDDM patients (8, 15). Differences in the antibodies directed to the IDDM-E2 region of GAD65 were apparent; b78, but not b96, recognized denatured and reduced GAD65 in Western blot analysis, and they demonstrated different protein footprinting patterns. It is interesting that b78 shows a similar footprint pattern as the murine mAb, GAD6, which recognizes a linear epitope in region 529–589 of GAD65 (8); recent data also indicate that the GAD6 epitope is in IDDM-E2, but the epitope is not identical to b78 (Powers, A. C., and K. Daw, unpublished).

Although sera from polyendocrine autoimmune disease and SMS patients also exhibit autoantibodies to GAD, their reactivities are different. For example, serum from SMS individuals has a selected pattern of immunofluorescence staining on pancreas sections, where the ICA activity can be abolished by incubation with GAD proteins; in contrast, serum from new-onset IDDM patients exhibit additional ICA-reactive autoantibodies (36, 37). In comparing the serum anti-GAD65 antibodies in IDDM and SMS patients, it has become clear that SMS sera have higher titers of antibody to GAD65 (18) than IDDM sera and contain antibodies that recognize denatured and reduced GAD65 in Western blots as well as those that react with GAD67 (10, 12, 13). Epitope mapping studies with SMS sera have localized linear epitopes to residues 1–8 (12), 354–368, and 390–402 (13) and to two carboxyl-terminal regions containing residues 475–484 and 571–585 (10). However, recently some antibodies to GAD65 in SMS patients have also been shown to be conformation dependent (10, 38) and thus are similar in some respects to those present in IDDM. Studies of the regions on GAD65 recognized by anti-GAD65 antibodies in polyendocrine autoimmune disease have not been analyzed as extensively as those in SMS and IDDM sera. In one study, antibodies to GAD65 in seven patients with polyendocrine autoimmune disease were reported to inhibit the enzymatic activity of the GAD enzyme, in contrast to a proportion of SMS and no IDDM sera showing this inhibitory activity (20). The study reported herein with the hmAbs to GAD65 shows that patients with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs and Graves’ disease also have antibodies to GAD65 that overlap with those present in IDDM and SMS patients.

The b78 and b96 mAbs show binding to pancreatic islet cells and are similar in this respect to the other reported GAD65 mAbs with ICA activity (23, 24, 26). It is difficult to compare the epitope specificities of the b35, b78, and b96 antibodies to the specificities reported for the MICA antibodies (14, 24, 26) because different methods have been employed for this purpose. Thus, it is not known whether the hmAbs MICA1 and -3 and MICA7, recognizing two conformation-specific epitopes in the C-terminal region (amino acids 450–570) of GAD65, are similar to the IDDM-E2 region; similarly, MICA4 and -6 and MICA10, which recognize another set of two conformation-specific epitopes in the middle region (amino acids 245–449) of GAD65, are similar to the IDDM-E1 region (24). On the same note, binding of the low abundance MICA2 to denatured GAD65 and directed to a SDS-resistant miniconformational region within residues 506–531 of GAD65 (25) may be similar to the binding of b78 antibodies, which also recognizes a SDS-resistant epitope within the IDDM-E2 region of GAD65.

Taken together, our results indicate that b35, b78, and b96 show similarities by targeting specifically GAD65 and recognizing either the IDDM-E1 or the IDDM-E2 region of the molecule. However, the epitopes recognized by the IDDM-E2-specific antibodies b78 and b96 are different, as b78 shows binding to GAD65 by Western blotting. Further confirmation of the recognition of distinct epitopes on GAD65 by the three antibodies was obtained by protein-footprinting patterns. Although antibodies to GAD65 may not play a pathogenic role in the autoimmune islet ß-cell destruction in type 1 diabetes, it is possible that such antibodies may play a significant role in the processing and presentation of T cell epitopes to pathogenic T cells. Professional antigen-presenting cells, such as B cells, are potent presenters by virtue of their ability to capture low abundance antigens by their surface Ig and are rich in the human leukocyte antigen-DM-containing endosomal compartments where the processing and loading of peptides to major histocompatibility complex class II antigens takes place. Thus, antibody binding to an antigen has previously been shown to influence the generation of T cell epitopes, leading to either enhanced or suppressed immune response (27). Using a variety of different epitope-specific, GAD65-specific, B cells generated from patients with autoimmune endocrinopathies, including IDDM, may allow studies of the processing of GAD65 that leads to the recruitment of autoreactive T cells responsible for islet ß-cell destruction.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank Prof. G. F. Bottazzo for serum from patients with multiple autoantibodies to endocrine organs. Our thanks also go to Prof. D. Vergani and Mr. H. Jones for the immunofluorescence of pancreatic sections, and Dr. Tim Tree for help with the immunoprecipitation experiments.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by a grant from the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International (to W.A.S. and J.P.B.), The Smith and Nephew Foundation (to J.T.), and a Merit Review Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs Research Service and the Vanderbilt Diabetes Research and Training Center (NIH Grant DK-20593; to A.C.P.). Back

2 Present address: Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Leipzig, Philip Rosenthal Strasse 27, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany. Back

Received December 11, 1996.

Revised March 7, 1997.

Revised May 6, 1997.

Accepted May 15, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Christie MR. 1996 Antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in the prediction of insulin dependent diabetes. In: Palmer J, ed. Diabetes; prediction, prevention and genetic councelling. Chichester: Wiley and Sons; 77–96.
  2. Seissler J, Amann J, Mauch L, et al. 1993 Prevalence of autoantibodies to the 65- and 67-kD isoforms of glutamate decarboxylase in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 92:1394–1399.
  3. Velloso LA, Kampe O, Hallberg A, Christmanson L, Betsholtz C, Karlsson FA. 1993 Demonstration of GAD65 as the main immunogenic isoform of glutamate decarboxylase in type 1 diabetes and determination of autoantibodies using a radioligand produced by eucaryotic expression. J Clin Invest. 92:2084–2090.
  4. Grubin CE, Daniels T, Toivola B, et al.. 1994 A novel radioligand binding assay to determine the diagnostic accuracy of isoform-specific glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies in childhood IDDM. Diabetologia. 37:344–350.[Medline]
  5. Bingley PJ, Christie MR, Bonifacio E, et al. 1994 Combined analysis of autoantibody improves prediction of IDDM in islet cell antibody positive relatives. Diabetes. 43:1304–1310.[Abstract]
  6. Seissler J, Morgenthaler N, Achenbach P, et al. 1996 Combined screening for autoantibodies to IA-2 and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in first degree relatives odf patients with IDDM. Diabetologia. 39:1351–1356.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Falorni A, Grubin C, Takei I, et al. 1994 Radioimmunoassay detects the frequent occurance of autoantibodies to the Mr 65,000 isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase in Japanese insulin-dependent diabetes. Autoimmunity. 19:113–125.[Medline]
  8. Ujihara N, Daw K, Gianani R, Boel E, Yu L, Powers AC. 1994 Identification of glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody heterogeneity and epitope regions in type I diabetes. Diabetes. 43:968–975.[Abstract]
  9. Solimena M, Folli F, Denis-Donini S, et al. 1988 1988 Autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase in a patient with stiff man syndrome, epilepsy and type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 318:1012–1020.[Abstract]
  10. Butler MH, Solimena M, Dirkx R, Hayday A, De Camilli P. 1993 Identification of a dominant epitope of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD-65) recognized by autoantibodies in stiff-man syndrome. J Exp Med. 178:2097–2106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mauch L, Abney CC, Berg H, Scherbaum WA, Liedvogel B, Northemann W. 1993 Characterisation of a linear epitope within the human pancreatic 64kD glutamic acid decarboxylase and its autoimmune recognition by sera from insulin dependent diabetes mellitus patients. Eur J Biochem. 212:597–603.[Medline]
  12. Kim J, Namchuck M, Bugawan T, et al. 1994 Higher autoantibody levels and recognition of a linear NH2-terminal epitope in the autoantigen GAD65 distinguish stiff-man syndrome from insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Exp Med. 180:595–606.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Li L, Hagopian WA, Brashear R, Daniels T, Lernmark A. 1994 Identification of autoantibody epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase in stiff man syndrome patients. J Immunol. 152:930–934.[Abstract]
  14. Richter W, Shi Y, Baekkeskov S. 1993 Autoreactive epitopes defined by diabetes-associated human monoclonal antibodies are localized in the middle and C-terminal domains of the smaller form of glutamate decarboxylase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 90:2832–2836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Daw K, Powers AC. 1995 Two distinct glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibody specificities in IDDM target different epitopes. Diabetes. 44:216–220.[Abstract]
  16. Falorni A, Ackefors M, Carlberg C, et al. 1996 Diagnostic sensitivity of immunodominant epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) autoantibodies in childhood IDDM. Diabetologia. 39:1091–1098.[Medline]
  17. Christie MR, Genovese S, Cassidy D, et al. 1994 Antibodies to islet 37k antigen, but not to glutamate decarboxylase, discriminate rapid progression to IDDM in endocrine autoimmunity. Diabetes. 43:1254–1259.[Abstract]
  18. Solimena M, Folli F, Aparisi R, Pozza G, De Camilli P. 1990 Autoantibodies to GABA-ergic neurons and pancreatic beta cells in stiff-man syndrome. N Engl J Med. 322:1555–1560.[Abstract]
  19. Banga JP, McGregor AM. 1991 Enzymes as targets for autoantibodies in human autoimmune disease: relevance to pathogenesis. Autoimmunity. 9:177–182.[Medline]
  20. Bjork E, Velloso LA, Kampe O, Karlsson A. 1994 GAD autoantibodies in IDDM, stiff man syndrome and autoimmune polyendocrine syndrom type 1 recognise different epitopes. Diabetes. 43:161–165.[Abstract]
  21. Velloso LA, Winqvist O, Gustafsson J, Kampe O, Karlsson FA. 1994 Autoantibodies against a novel 51kD islet antigen and glutamate decarboxylase isoforms in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. Diabetologia. 37:61–69.[Medline]
  22. Tuomi T, Bjorses P, Falorni A, et al. 1996 antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and insulin dependent diabetes in patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1488–1494.[Abstract]
  23. Richter W, Endl J, Eiermann TH, et al. 1992 Human monoclonal islet cell antibodies from a patient with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus reveal glutamate decarboxylase as the target antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 89:8467–8471.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Syren K, Lindsay L, Stoehrer B, et al. 1996 Immune reactivity of diabetes-associated human monoclonal autoantibodies defines multiple epitopes and detects two domain boundaries in glutamate decarboxylase. J Immunol. 157:5208–5214.[Abstract]
  25. Richter W, Northemann W, Muller M, Boehm BO. 1996 Mapping of an autoreactive epitope within glutamate decarboxylase using a diabetes-associated human monoclonal autoantibody and an epitope cDNA library. Hybridoma. 15:103–108.[Medline]
  26. Madec AM, Rousset F, Ho S, et al. 1996 Four IgG anti-islet human monoclonal antibodies isolated from a type 1 diabetes patient recognise distinct epitopes of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 and are somatically mutated. J Immunol. 156:3541–3549.[Abstract]
  27. Simitsek PD, Campbell DG, Lanzavecchia A, Fairweather N, Watts C. 1995 Modulation of antigen processing by bound antibodies can boost or suppress class II major histocompatibility complex presentation of different T cell determinants. J Exp Med. 181:1957–1963.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Bosi E, Becker F, Bonifacio E, et al. 1991 Progression to type 1 diabetes in autoimmune endocrine patients with islet cell antibodies. Diabetes. 40:977–984.[Abstract]
  29. Morgenthaler NG, Kim MR, Tremble J, et al. 1996 Human IgG autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor from Epstein Barr virus transformed B lymphocytes: characterisation by immunoprecipitation with recombinant antigen and biological activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3155–3161.[Abstract]
  30. Petersen JS, Hejnaes KR, Moody A, et al. 1994 Detection of GAD65 antibodies in diabetes and other autoimmune diseases using simple a radioligand assay. Diabetes. 43:459–467.[Abstract]
  31. Moody AJ, Hejnaes KR, Marshall MO, et al. 1995 Isolation by anion exchange of immunologically and enzymatically active human islet glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells. Diabetologia. 38:14–23.[Medline]
  32. Scherbaum WA, Mirakian R, Pujol-Borrell R, Dean BM, Bottazzo GF. 1986 Immunocytochemistry in the study and diagnosis of organ specific autoimmune disease. In: Polak JM, Van Noorden S, eds. Immunocytochemistry. Modern methods and applications. Bristol: Wright; 456–476.
  33. Vlug A, Nieuwenhuys EJ, van Eijk RVW, Geertzen HGM, van Houte AJ. 1994 Nephelometric measurements of human IgG subclasses and their reference ranges. Ann Biol Clin. 52:561–567.
  34. Bredius RGM, Driedijk PC, Schouten MF, Weening RS, Out TA. 1992 Complement activation by polyclonal immunoglobulin IgG1 and IgG2 antibodies against Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 60:4838–4847.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Dozio N, Belloni C, Girardi A, et al. 1994 Heterogeneous IgG subclass distribution of islet cell autoantibodies. J Autoimmun. 7:45–53.[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Richter W, Seissler J, Northemann W, Wolfahrt S, Meinck HM, Scherbaum WA. 1993 Cytoplasmic islet cell antibodies recognise distinct islet antigens in type 1 diabetes but not in stiff man syndrome. Diabetes. 42:1642–1648.[Abstract]
  37. Hallberg A, Juhlin C, Berne C, Kampe O, Karlsson FA. 1995 Islet cell antibodies: variable immunostaining of pancreatic islet and carcinoid tissue. J Intern Med. 238:207–213.[Medline]
  38. Daw K, Ujihara N, Atkinson M, Powers AC. 1996 Glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies in stiff man syndrome and insulin dependent diabetes mellitus exhibit similarities and differences in epitope recognition. J Immunol. 156:818–825.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DiabetesHome page
G. Fenalti, C. S. Hampe, Y. Arafat, R. H.P. Law, J. P. Banga, I. R. Mackay, J. C. Whisstock, A. M. Buckle, and M. J. Rowley
COOH-Terminal Clustering of Autoantibody and T-Cell Determinants on the Structure of GAD65 Provide Insights Into the Molecular Basis of Autoreactivity
Diabetes, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 1293 - 1301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Oak, L. K. Gilliam, M. Landin-Olsson, C. Torn, I. Kockum, C. R. Pennington, M. J. Rowley, M. R. Christie, J. P. Banga, and C. S. Hampe
The lack of anti-idiotypic antibodies, not the presence of the corresponding autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase, defines type 1 diabetes
PNAS, April 8, 2008; 105(14): 5471 - 5476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. S. Hampe, R. Nalini, M. R. Maldonado, T. R. Hall, G. Garza, D. Iyer, and A. Balasubramanyam
Association of Amino-Terminal-Specific Antiglutamate Decarboxylase (GAD65) Autoantibodies with {beta}-Cell Functional Reserve and a Milder Clinical Phenotype in Patients with GAD65 Antibodies and Ketosis-Prone Diabetes Mellitus
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 462 - 467.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. Raju, J. Foote, J. P. Banga, T. R. Hall, C. J. Padoa, M. C. Dalakas, E. Ortqvist, and C. S. Hampe
Analysis of GAD65 Autoantibodies in Stiff-Person Syndrome Patients
J. Immunol., December 1, 2005; 175(11): 7755 - 7762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
C. J. Padoa, J. P. Banga, A.-M. Madec, M. Ziegler, M. Schlosser, E. Ortqvist, I. Kockum, J. Palmer, O. Rolandsson, K. A. Binder, et al.
Recombinant Fabs of Human Monoclonal Antibodies Specific to the Middle Epitope of GAD65 Inhibit Type 1 Diabetes-Specific GAD65Abs
Diabetes, November 1, 2003; 52(11): 2689 - 2695.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.Home page
M. DATTA, A. SHTAUVERE-BRAMEUS, V. GUPTA, M. K. MANI, and C. B. SANJEEVI
Autoimmune Diabetes in 26 Villages outside Madras
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2002; 958(1): 285 - 288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tremble, J.
Right arrow Articles by Banga, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tremble, J.
Right arrow Articles by Banga, J. P.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals