help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woods, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, P. J.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 5 1566-1571
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Experimental Studies

Heterogeneity of the Human Corticotropin-Releasing Factor-Binding Protein

R. J. Woods, C. F. Kemp, J. David and P. J. Lowry

School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading (R.J.W., C.F.K., P.J.L.), Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ; and the Department of Rheumatology, Battle Hospital (J.D.), Reading RG30 IAG, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. R. J. Woods, School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading, United Kingdom RG6 6AJ.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Human corticotropin-releasing factor (hCRF), secreted by the placenta, principally in the third trimester, is specifically bound in the peripheral circulation to a 37-kDa binding protein (CRF-BP). This complex is cleared from the circulation. We postulate that the protein may be returned to the blood in a form that is immunologically altered and not well recognized by the reported RIAs. We report that a stable isoform can result from temporary denaturation of recombinant CRF-BP by 8 mol/L urea. This isoform, urea-treated binding protein, which can bind CRF, has been found to bind to an antibody raised against a synthetic peptide comprising the first 24 amino acid residues of CRF-BP, but not to a second similar N-terminal antibody, although it was closely matched in titer. Urea-treated binding protein also cross-reacts poorly in the RIA with CRF-BP. It is proposed that as a result of in vivo post-ligand binding events, isoforms may be susceptible to cleavage. After affinity purification, which involves denaturation, recombinant CRF-BP was often found to be cleaved after storage in the presence of protease inhibitors.

Here we present evidence for a C-terminally truncated form of the native binding protein in the plasma of subjects suffering from rheumatoid arthritis, which may parallel the in vitro truncation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
CORTICOTROPIN-RELEASING factor (CRF) is a 41-residue peptide first isolated from the ovine hypothalamus (1). CRF is secreted into the hypothalamic-pituitary portal system and acts as the principal factor in the release of corticotropin from the anterior pituitary gland. In humans, the placenta as it grows becomes the richest source of circulating CRF (2, 3), which progressively elevates peripheral levels to rival those found in the blood of the hypothalamic portal system of stressed animals (4). Except for a few weeks before term, human CRF may be bound by a binding protein of 37 kDa (CRF-BP) that is also present in the circulation (5), resulting in neutralization of ACTH-releasing activity of bound CRF. This may help to prevent CRF of placental origin from acting upon the maternal pituitary gland because, despite stress levels of CRF in the bloodstream, ACTH concentrations in late pregnancy remain within the normal range (6). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that both partially purified native and recombinant CRF-BP are able to neutralize the ACTH-releasing activity of hCRF (7, 8).

The catabolism and half-life of circulating CRF-BP and the fate of the complex formed between CRF-BP and CRF (9) are unknown. It is recognized that as a 37-kDa protein, CRF-BP is small enough to pass through the glomerular membranes (10). However, the complex formed between monomeric CRF-BP and CRF is capable of dimerization (9), and with a resultant mass of 80 kDa, its filtration fraction, like that of albumin, would be extremely small. It is unlikely, therefore, that the rapid disappearance of CRF-BP from the plasma after iv bolus injection of CRF (11) occurs via kidney clearance, and we have postulated that it is mediated by other tissue systems. Dimerization may, therefore, facilitate the uptake and clearance of CRF, after which the binding protein moiety would be returned to the blood, possibly in an altered form, or, alternatively, all may be catabolized.

We have observed by RIA that bolus injection of CRF into human subjects results in the 50% reduction of binding protein levels in plasma and simulates the changes in plasma CRF-BP levels that occur in the last few weeks of pregnancy (11). The return to the circulation of CRF-BP, after discharge of hCRF ligand in a form that cross-reacts poorly in the current RIA, may go some way to explain the rapid fall in CRF-BP levels after iv injection of CRF, and the fall that occurs in late pregnancy that accompanies rising concentrations of placental CRF being secreted into the circulation. These negative changes in plasma CRF-BP are reversed after CRF administration is discontinued and after parturition (12, 13).

Interaction with peptide ligands and dimerization both change the conformation of CRF-BP (12), and removal of ligand is known to reverse dimerization (9), but we suspect that the protein may not return to its original conformation. We have investigated the existence of CRF-BP isoforms using denatured recombinant CRF-BP.

A conformational change in CRF-BP may also be involved in generating another form of heterogeneity observed in both recombinant CRF-BP and in the native, circulating form. There are increasing numbers of reports of cleavage of proteins in plasma that result in modification of their bioactivity. PRL (14) and insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins 3 and 4 (IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-4) can undergo cleavage in vivo and in vitro, although the proteases responsible have not yet been isolated (15, 16, 17).

In a preliminary study we have found that the determination of CRF-BP levels in human plasma samples from arthritic patients by RIAs using antibodies that react with different epitopes can lead to different values being obtained for the same plasma. Reported values for circulating CRF-BP differ greatly among laboratories (13, 18, 19); this may be explained by heterogeneity of the protein. We have investigated the possibility that in arthritic subjects, truncation may be a possible explanation.

This report attempts to explain the rapid disappearance of the binding protein after injection of CRF and suggests that intracellular processes designed to remove the ligand may result in temporary denaturation of the protein that is returned to the circulation.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Synthetic peptides

hCRF and CRF-BP-(25–45) were generous gifts from Dr. J. Rivier (The Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA), and CRF-BP-(298–322) was obtained from Prof. T Suda (University of Hirosaki, Hirosaki, Japan).

Antibodies

Polyclonal rabbit antisera, A and B, raised against the N-terminal peptide CRF-BP-(25–45) were gifts from Dr. Vale, and polyclonal rabbit antiserum raised against the C-terminal peptide CRF-BP-(298–322) was a gift from Prof. Suda. All bound 50% radiolabeled recombinant CRF-BP at a dilution of approximately 1:5000.

A third type of polyclonal antiserum (RABPAb) that binds 50% of radiolabeled recombinant binding protein at a concentration of 1:10,000 was raised in rabbits against intact recombinant binding protein as described previously (12). The resulting antiserum did not interact with radiolabeled synthetic peptides CRF-BP-(25–45) and CRF-BP-(298–322). The addition of a second antibody (SARFc) was used to separate bound and free radiolabels. It consisted of 10% (vol/vol) sheep antiserum raised against the Fc region of rabbit IgG prepared in 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffer at pH 7.4 containing 4% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 6000 (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO).

Plasma samples

Blood was collected in ethylenediamine tetraacetate from normal controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ARA criteria 1987) (20). The blood was centrifuged, and plasma was removed and stored at -20 C. All rheumatoid arthritis patients were treated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. There were 13 control subjects (7 women and 6 men) and 11 arthritic subjects (6 women and 5 men). All samples were collected between 1400–1600 h.

Production of recombinant CRF-BP

Chinese hamster ovary cells were transfected with a complementary DNA sequence isolated from a human liver library (21). CRF-BP was then isolated from the culture medium by affinity chromatography (11) and eluted with freshly prepared buffer, pH 10.5, containing 20% acetonitrile and the protease inhibitors, ethylenediamine tetraacetate (10 mmol/L), iodoacetamide (5 mmol/L), pepstatin (1 µmol/L), and phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (1 mmol/L). The pH was adjusted immediately to 8.5 by the addition of 100 µL/mL of 0.5 mol/L orthophosphoric acid, pH 3.5. Acetonitrile was removed under a stream of nitrogen without elevation of pH. These preparations were checked for integrity by SDS-PAGE, carried out under reducing conditions according to the method of Schagger and von Jagow (22), both before and after storage at -20 C.

Preparation of standards containing CRF-BP and urea-treated binding protein (UBP)

Immediately after preparation, intact CRF-BP was diluted about 30-fold in pooled sheep serum to give a concentration of 3.48 mg/L. This stock was divided into aliquots of 250 µL and stored frozen at -20 C.

UBP was prepared by the addition of solid urea to 400 µg purified protein in 1 mL acetonitrile-free, neutralized elution buffer to a final concentration of 8 mol/L and incubation for 0.5 h at 37 C. The incubate was also diluted by the addition of sheep serum to a final concentration of 3.48 µg/L and stored as described above. The final concentration of urea in this stock was 60 mmol/L.

Antibody dilution curves

Serial dilutions of anti-N-terminal antibodies A and B of between 2,000- and 32,000-fold were prepared in assay buffer [0.05 mol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% (wt/vol) BSA], and 200 µL of each were incubated in duplicate at room temperature with 50 µL radioiodinated synthetic peptide, CRF-BP-(25–45) (2 x 104 cpm), or CRF-BP (2 x 104 cpm). Bound labels were precipitated by the addition of 200 µL SARFc reagent, as described above. After 0.5 h, 2 mL saline were added to samples, and all were separated by centrifugation at 5,000g for 25 min. Supernatants were aspirated, and the radioactivity of pellets was determined.

Ligand immunoradiometric assay (LIRMA)

CRF-BP standards were prepared by diluting the stock CRF-BP in the assay buffer described above. To duplicate 100-µL volumes of samples or standards were added 50 µL [125I]hCRF, with an activity of 35 x 106 cpm. All were incubated at room temperature for 0.5 h, after which 50 µL of a 100-fold dilution of anti-CRF-BP antiserum or UBP antiserum in assay buffer were added. After an additional hour, 200 µL SARFc were added, and incubation was continued for 0.5 h. Finally, 2 mL normal saline were added to samples and standards, and all were separated by centrifugation at 5000g for 25 min. Supernatants were aspirated, and the radioactivity of pellets was determined. Concentrations of CRF-BP were automatically computed with reference to the standard curve.

Cross-reaction of UBP with CRF-BP

Cross-reaction of UBP with CRF-BP was determined by RIA, using the rabbit antiserum raised against intact recombinant CRF-BP at a final concentration of 1:12 x 103. Serial dilutions of CRF-BP or UBP standards, ranging from 7.25–464 µg/L, were added in 100 µL assay buffer to 100 µL [125I]CRF-BP (2 x 104 cpm). CRF-BP was radioiodinated by the glucose oxidase-lactose peroxidase method (11). Duplicates of each standard were incubated at 4 C for 16 h with 100 µL antiserum. Assays were separated after the addition of SARFc.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Antibody dilution curves

Figure 1Go shows the interaction of N-terminal antibodies A and B with the synthetic N-terminal peptide against which they were raised and the N-terminus in intact recombinant CRF-BP. Both antibodies, A and B, react with the radiolabeled peptide to the same degree over a range of 2,000- to 32,000-fold dilution.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Precipitation of radioiodinated CRF-BP-(25–45) and intact CRF-BP by the addition of antibodies A and B raised against CRF-BP-(25–45).

 
The affinity of antibody B for the N-terminal region of radiolabeled CRF-BP is significantly lower than that of antibody A, and approximately 50% of radiolabel is bound at each dilution.

Interaction of CRF-BP and UBP with N- and C-terminal antibodies

The properties of the two antibody preparations, A and B, directed against the N-terminus of CRF-BP were compared in the LIRMA with that of an antibody directed against the C-terminus and with that of an antibody (RABPAb) raised against intact recombinant CRF-BP. For these experiments, all antibodies were present at a final dilution of 1:400. The results are summarized in Fig. 2Go. The capacity of RABPAb to bind CRF-BP and its attached ligand, radioiodinated hCRF, was greater than that of the three antipeptide antibodies. The extent to which radiolabeled ligand complex was bound by C-terminal antibody and N-terminal antibody A was similar, but at 116 mg CRF-BP/L, the capacity of the C-terminal antiserum to bind CRF-BP was exceeded, and precipitation of radiolabel began to decline.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Precipitation of radioiodinated CRF bound to CRF-BP by the addition of four anti-CRF-BP antibodies.

 
The N-terminal antibody B had less activity than antibody A, which was consistent with a lower capacity to precipitate radiolabeled CRF-BP, as depicted in Fig. 1Go. Nevertheless, upon addition of SARFc, all antibodies precipitated the complex formed by [125I]CRF and binding protein in a manner directly related to the concentration of CRF-BP.

These experiments were repeated with binding protein that had been exposed to 8 mol/L urea. The results are shown in Fig. 3Go. Once again, RABPAb was the most effective in binding the radioactive complex, but this time a lower percentage of the total radioactive ligand was precipitated. The activity of the C-terminal antibody was similar to that in the previous experiment; that of N-terminal antibody A was slightly reduced. N-Terminal antibody B, however, failed to bind to the UBP-ligand complex to any significant degree.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Precipitation of radioiodinated CRF bound to UBP by the addition of four anti-CRF-BP antibodies.

 
Cross-reaction of RABPAb with UBP in RIA

The polyclonal antiserum, RABP Ab, was used at a 12,000-fold dilution to compare the cross-reactivity of UBP with that of CRF-BP under RIA conditions. At this dilution it cross-reacted poorly, as shown in Fig. 4Go. At 50% of maximum binding of radiolabel, the cross-reaction of UBP was approximately 20% that of CRF-BP.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Cross-reaction of UBP in a RIA using an antibody raised against the whole CRF-BP molecule.

 
Cleavage of CRF-BP in vitro

Heterogeneity resulting from proteolytic cleavage was also observed in a series of highly purified preparations of recombinant CRF-BP. Figure 5Go shows that when examined by SDS-PAGE, in most of the 12 preparations more than 1 protein band was visualized after staining with Coomassie brilliant blue G. Western blotting for cleaved preparations with both N- and C-terminal antibodies showed that a C-terminal fragment of approximately 10 kDa had been excised. Figure 6Go (left) shows the remaining 27-kDa fragment identified by the N-terminal antibody. In Fig. 6Go (right), the C-terminal antibody binds to the intact protein, but the truncated fragment was not identified by this antibody. The C-terminal peptide of 10 kDa was also not apparent on this gel.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Analysis by SDS-PAGE of a series of sequentially purified recombinant CRF-BP samples after storage at 4 C.

 


View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Immunoblot of intact and cleaved CRH-BP samples, using antibodies raised against the N- and C-terminals of the CRF-BP.

 
Cleavage of CRF-BP in vivo

Figure 7Go shows a linear correlation obtained by plotting the concentrations of active binding protein in the plasma of healthy control subjects determined by LIRMA using N- and C-terminal antibodies. Both antibodies give similar values. In contrast, values for plasma samples taken from arthritic patients did not correlate. Results obtained with the C-terminal antibody are consistently lower than those obtained with the N-terminal antibody.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. CRF-BP levels in the plasma of arthritic subjects, measured by LIRMA using N- and C-terminal antibodies.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Both N-terminal antibodies, A and B, reacted similarly with radioiodinated synthetic peptide, yet antibody B reacted less well than antibody A with radiolabeled binding protein. This difference was further evident in the lower affinity of antibody B for CRF-BP that was found in the LIRMA. Even so, at a 2000-fold dilution, half of the radiolabeled binding protein was bound by antibody B. When these antibodies were each applied at a 400-fold dilution in LIRMA experiments, hardly any UBP was bound by antibody B. This indicates a difference not only between the antibodies, but in protein conformation and the availability of the N-terminal epitopes resulting from pretreatment with 8 mol/L urea, which may result in the N-terminal region being hidden from antibody B. In the RIA, dilute antibody raised against intact CRF-BP and not reacting with N- or C-terminal peptides was able to discriminate between CRF-BP and UBP, further demonstrating the existence of the binding protein in more than one conformational state.

Other differences between the CRF-BP and UBP preparations can be discounted. The concentration of both UBP and CRF-BP used in these experiments was nominally the same, and the functional activities of the preparations were similar, as approximately the same amount of radiolabeled CRF was precipitated after reacting with another antibody raised against the same fragment or with the C-terminal antibody. By its reaction with antibodies to both N- and C-terminals, UBP was shown to be intact and not truncated before or after treatment with urea.

The mechanism by which stability of the isoform is maintained is as yet unknown. Although small proteins with several disulfide bonds are reported to renature particularly rapidly (23) after denaturation, there are no theoretical objections to the existence of two or more stable configurations of a complex polymer with similar free energies yet conserved by the barrier imposed by the activation energy necessary to convert one conformation to another. As a consequence, both domains of the protease, carboxypeptidase Y, will not refold completely after denaturation unless the pro-region is still attached (24). Proteins with multiple conformations in the native state, all of which are bioactive, have also been reported. For both Staphylococcal nuclease (25) and octopine dehydrogenase (26), they may undergo interconversion after repeated denaturation. Holoazurins isolated from Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. aeruginosa appear to exist in three conformational states (27).

Proteins renatured at high concentration can achieve stability by aggregation (28), but there is no evidence for aggregation of UBP, and in our experiments this would be unlikely, as BP containing 8 mol/L urea was diluted rapidly in sheep serum by an excess of 30-fold. Gel filtration of UBP on Sephacryl S-200 results in elution of the protein in the same volume as that of the monomeric CRF-BP (results not shown). Furthermore, addition of CRF to UBP results in the formation of a dimer complex that elutes in the same volume as recombinant CRF-BP dimer, thus demonstrating that the functional activity of UBP is retained.

It is possible that the circulating isoforms would not necessarily be similar to UBP; consequently, specific antibodies to detect them in vivo are currently not available to us. The physiological roles of potential isoforms, including the relative affinities of UBP and CRF-BP for various peptide ligands, remain to be investigated.

In patients with arthritis or septicemia, CRF-BP levels are elevated (29). The elevated levels found in these active immune states appear to be caused by increased liver secretion, presumably due to activation of enhancer elements found in the 5'-flanking region of the CRF-BP gene by the transcription factors nuclear factor-{kappa}ß and interferon-1, which are known to be implicated in the acute phase response (21). CRF or CRF immunoreactivity of peripheral origin is reported to be involved in the initiation of the inflammatory cascade, and CRF receptors are present on human lymphocytes and monocytes (30) as well as on mouse spleen macrophages (31). Changes in the levels of CRF-BP will, therefore, influence free CRF levels, and many of the reported actions of CRF may be mediated and modulated through endogenous CRF-BP. Heterogeneity of the binding protein as a result of inflammatory disease might, therefore, influence the binding and availability of CRF or other ligands of the type we detected in synovial fluid (29). A second form of heterogeneity was indeed observed that appears to be attributed to truncation of the protein, probably toward the C-terminus. Truncation was also observed to occur in stored preparations of CRF-BP and is believed to result from an autocatalytic cleavage of the binding protein (32). It remains to be established whether the cleavage site is identical for both native and recombinant proteins, but the possibility is established that, like IGFBP-3 and IGFBP-4, modifications of physiological significance may occur (15, 16, 17). Two forms of CRF-BP, resulting from N-terminal cleavage of the 25–45 peptide region, have been identified in sheep brain (33). These, too, may affect conformation.

The existence of isoforms and heterogeneity shown by this study serves to illustrate the additional degree of control over hormonal ligand concentrations that may result from the presence of a binding protein and adds a word of caution for the interpretation of RIAs that use antisera raised against synthetic peptide fragments.

Received October 14, 1996.

Revised January 3, 1997.

Accepted February 7, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Vale W, Rivier C, Brown MR, et al. 1983 Chemical and biological characterisation of corticotrophin releasing factor. Recent Prog Horm Res. 39:245–270.
  2. Sasaki A, Liotta AS, Luckey MM, Margions AN, Suda T, Krieger D. 1984 Immunoreactive corticotropin-releasing hormone is present in human maternal plasma during the third trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 59:812–814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Campbell EA, Linton EA, Wolfe CDA, Scraggs PR, Jones MT, Lowry PJ. 1987 Plasma corticotropin-releasing hormone concentrations during pregnancy and parturition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 64:1054–1059.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Plotsky PM, Vale WW. 1984 Hemorrhage-induced secretion of corticotropin-releasing factor-like immunoreactivity into the rat hypophysial portal circulation and its inhibition by glucocorticoids. Endocrinology. 114:164–169.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Linton EA, Wolfe CDA, Behan DP, Lowry PJ. 1988 A specific carrier substance for human corticotrophin releasing factor in late gestational maternal plasma which could mask the ACTH-releasing activity. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 28:315–324.[Medline]
  6. Rees LH, Burke CW, Chard T, Evans SE, Letworth AT. 1975 Possible placental origin of ACTH in normal pregnancy. Nature. 254:620–622.[Medline]
  7. Linton EA, Behan DP, Saphier PW, Lowry PJ. 1990 Corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH)-binding protein: reduction in the adrenocorticotropin-releasing activity of placental but not hypothalamic CRH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1574–1580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Potter E, Behan DP, Fischer WH, Linton EA, Lowry PJ, Vale WW. 1991 Cloning and characterization of the cDNAs for human and rat corticotropin releasing factor-binding proteins. Nature. 349:423–426.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Woods RJ, Kennedy KM, Gibbins JM, Behan D, Vale W, Lowry PJ. 1994 Corticotropin-releasing factor binding protein dimerizes after association with ligand. Endocrinology. 135:768–773.[Abstract]
  10. Ryan GB. Hein SJ, Karnorsky MJ. 1976 Glomerular permeability to proteins: effects of hemodynamic factors on the distribution of endogenous immunoglobulin G and exogenous catalase in the rat flomerulus. Lab Invest. 34:415–427.[Medline]
  11. Woods RJ, Grossman A, Saphier P, et al. 1994 Association of human corticotropin-releasing hormone to its binding protein in blood may trigger clearance of the complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:73–76.[Abstract]
  12. Lowry PJ, Koerber SC, Woods RJ, et al. 1996 Nature of ligand affinity and dimerisation of corticotropin-releasing factor binding protein may be detected by circular dichroism. J Mol Endocrinol. 16:39–44.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Linton EA, Perkins A, Woods RJ, et al. 1993 Corticotropin releasing hormone-binding protein (CRH-BP): plasma levels decrease during third trimester of normal human pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:260–262.[Abstract]
  14. Clapp C, Martial JA, Guzman RC, Rentier-Delrue F, Weiner RI. 1993 The 16-kilodalton N-terminal fragment of human prolactin is a potent inhibitor of angiogensis. Endocrinology. 133:1292–1299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Myers SE, Cheung PT, Handwerger S, Chernausek SD. 1993 Insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) enhanced proteolysis of IGF-binding protein-4 in conditioned medium from primary culture of human decidua: independence from IGF receptor binding. Endocrinology. 133:1525–1531.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Grimes RW, Hammond JM. 1994 Proteolytic degradation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein 3 by porcine granulosa cells in culture: regulation by IGF-1. Endocrinology. 134:337–343.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gargowsky SE, Moyse KJ, Walton PE, et al. 1990 Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors increase and molecular forms of their serum binding proteins change with human pregnancy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 170:1157–163.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Linton EA, Perkins AV, Hagan P, et al. 1995 Corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) binding protein interference with CRH antibody binding implications for direct CRH immunoassay. J Endocrinol. 146:45–53.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Behan DP, Khongsaly O, Liu X-J, et al. 1996 Measurement of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), CRF-binding protein (CRF-BP), and CRF/CRF-BP complex in human plasma by two-site enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2579–2586.[Abstract]
  20. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, et al. 1988 The American classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 31:315–324.[Medline]
  21. Behan DP, Potter E, Lewis KA, et al. 1993 Cloning and structure of the human corticotrophin releasing factor-binding protein gene (CRF-BP). Genomics. 16:63–68.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Schagger H, von Jagow G. 1987 Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal Biochem. 166:368–379.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Jaenicke R. 1987 Folding and association of proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 49:117–237.[CrossRef][Medline]
  24. Winther JR, Sorensen P, Kielland-Brandt MC. 1994 Refolding of a carboxypeptidase Y folding intermediate in vitro by low affinity binding of the pro region. J Biol Chem. 269:22007–22013.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Fox RO, Evans PA, Dobson CM. 1986 Multiple conformations of a protein demonstrated by magnetization transfer NMR spectroscopy. Nature. 320:192–194.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Teschner W, Rudolph R, Garel JR. 1987 Intermediates on the folding pathway of octopamine dehydrogenase from Pecten jacobaeus. Biochemistry. 26:2791–2796.[CrossRef]
  27. Hutnik CM, Szabo AG. 1989 Confirmation that multiexponential fluorescence decay behaviour of holocinium originates from conformational heterogeneity. Biochemistry. 28:3923–3934.[CrossRef][Medline]
  28. Zettlmeissl G, Rudolph R, Jaenicke R. 1979 Reconstitution of lactic dehydrogenase. Noncovalent aggregation vs. reactivation. I. Physical properties and kinetics of aggregation. Biochemistry. 18:5567–5571.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Woods RJ, David J, Baigent S, Gibbins J, Lowry PJ. 1996 Elevated levels of corticotrophin-releasing factor binding protein in the blood of patients suffering from arthritis and septicaemia and the presence of novel ligands in synovial fluid. Br J Rheumatol. 35:120–124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Singh VK, Fudenberg HH. 1988 Binding of [125I]corticotropin-releasing factor to blood immunocytes and its reduction in Alzheimer’s disease. Imunol Lett. 18:5–8.
  31. Webster EL, Tracey DE, Jutila MA, Wolfe SA, de Souza EB. 1990 Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors in mouse spleen: identification of receptor-bearing cells as resident macrophages. Endocrinology. 127:440–452.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kemp CF, Woods RJ, Totty N, Lowry PJ. Proteolytic cleavage of recombinant corticotrophin releasing factor binding protein. Proc of the British Neuroendocrine Group. 1996; PC34.
  33. Behan DP, De Souza EB, Lowry PJ, Potter E, Sawchenko P, Vale WW. 1995 Corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) binding protein: a novel regulator of CRF and related peptides. Front Neuroendocrinol. 16:362–382.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. J. Woods, C. F. Kemp, J. David, I. G. Sumner, and P. J. Lowry
Cleavage of Recombinant Human Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF)-Binding Protein Produces a 27-Kilodalton Fragment Capable of Binding CRF
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2788 - 2794.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woods, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lowry, P. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals