| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Reproductive Endocrinology |
Clinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Clinic for Internal Medicine III, A-1090 Wien, Austria
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: H. Vierhapper, M.D., Clinical Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Clinic for Internal Medicine III, Wahringer Gurtel 1820, A-1090 Wien, Austria.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Twelve healthy nonobese men, aged 2234 yr, and 10 healthy nonobese women, aged 1932 yr (in the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle), who had been carefully informed about the aims and the possible risks of the study gave their written consent to participate in 1 or several parts of this investigation. On the day of the experiments, an indwelling catheter was inserted into an antecubital vein, and 1,2-d-testosterone (in 500 mL 0.9% saline also containing 2 mL of the individuals own blood) was infused iv and continuously (Infusomat, Braun-Melsungen, Germany) until the end of the respective experimental protocol. At the beginning and end of each infusion, a sample of the infusate was obtained from the end of the infusion line to permit for correction of losses by adsorption and determination of actual infusion rates by GC/MS analysis. After an equilibration period of 12 h (Exp 1 and 2) or 6 h (Exp 3), a second indwelling catheter was inserted into the contralateral arm, and blood samples (5 mL) were obtained at 20-min intervals until the end of the respective experimental protocol. Blood samples were subsequently pooled for periods of 4 h. In addition, one sample was pooled for the entire period of blood sampling (24, 12, or 4 h, respectively).
Exp 1
Six healthy men and five healthy women participated in this protocol. The infusion of 1,2-d-testosterone was started at 0800 h (13 mL/h) to provide a theoretical infusion rate of 0.2 mg/h (men) or 0.04 mg/h (women), respectively. However, due to losses by adsorption, mean actual infusion rates during this protocol were only 0.07 mg/h (men) and 0.01 mg/h (women). Starting at 2000 h, blood samples (5.0 mL) were obtained at 20-min intervals for the next 24 h.
Exp 2
Seven healthy men and seven healthy women participated in this protocol. The infusion of 1,2-d-testosterone (20 mL/h) was started at 2000 h to provide a theoretical infusion rate of 0.02 mg/h (men) or 0.0004 mg/h (women). However, due to losses by adsorption, mean actual infusion rates during this protocol were only 0.015 mg/h in six of the seven men. The seventh male volunteer received only one tenth of this dose, i.e. 0.0015 mg/h. In five of the seven healthy women, the mean actual infusion rate was 0.0001 mg/h. The remaining two women received an approximately 7-fold smaller dose (17 and 14 ng/h, respectively). Starting at 0800 h on the following morning, blood samples were obtained at 20-min intervals for the next 12 h.
Exp 3
The five healthy men and five healthy women participating in this protocol had been part of Exp 2. The infusion of 1,2-d-testosterone (40 mL/h) was started at 0800 h with the attempted infusion rates as in Exp 2 (men, 0.02 mg/h; women, 0.0004 mg/h). Starting at 1400 h, blood samples were obtained at 20-min intervals for one 4-h period.
Materials
All organic solvents were of high performance liquid chromatography grade and purchased from Baker Chemicals (Phillipsburg, NJ). Nonactive testosterone (17ß-hydroxy-4-androsten-3-one) was obtained from Steraloids (Wilton, NH). Radioactive [3H]1,2,6,7-testosterone (SA, 100 Ci/mmol) and stable labeled 1,2-d-testosterone (isotopic enrichment, 99.0%) were purchased from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA) and CIL (Andover, MA), respectively.
Sample preparation and analysis by GC-MS
Plasma samples (5.0 mL) supplemented with 20,000 dpm [3H]testosterone for later control of recovery and with 20 mL 0.5% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) were applied to Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (500 mg; Waters/Millipore, Milford, MA) pretreated with successive application of 5.0 mL methanol, 5.0 mL ethyl acetate, 20 mL water, and 5.0 mL TFA (0.5%, wt/vol). After sample application, the cartridges were first treated with three doses of 5.0 mL TFA (0.5%, wt/vol). Testosterone was subsequently eluted by ethyl acetate (two doses, 1.0 mL), dried under a stream of nitrogen at 37 C, reconstituted in 100 µl CH2Cl2, and further prepurified by thin layer chromatography (chloroform-acetone, 70:30). The zone containing testosterone was eluted (twice, 2.5 mL methanol) and supplemented with 10 ng dehydrotestosterone (1,4-androstadien-17ß-ol-3-one) as an internal standard for GC/MS analysis. Derivatization was subsequently performed with heptafluorobutyric anhydride-acetone (1:4; 60 min) at room temperature. Recovery of [3H]testosterone from the derivatized samples was 38.5 ± 5.0% (n = 40). Analysis by GC-MS (Finnigan MAT95 equipped with a 25-m CB5 fused silica column, San Jose, CA) was then performed using the selected ion monitoring mode and electric ionization (resolution, 6000). The tracer ions were [m/e 678 (dehydrotestosterone; internal standard), m/e 680 (native testosterone), and m/e 682 (1,2-d-testosterone)]. The sensitivity at a peak to noise ratio of 10:1 was less than 100 fg.
Calculation of testosterone production rate
Production rates of testosterone (PR[T]) were calculated from the product of the known infusion rate (Rt) and the ratio of tracer infusate enrichment (Et) to tracer dilution in the plasma (Es): (PR[T] = Rt x (Et/Es - 1) (8).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
By reducing the dose of infused 1,2-d-testosterone by a
factor of 5 to 0.015 mg/h in men and by a factor of 100 to 0.0001 mg/h
in women (Exp 2), we ascertained the total infused amount of
1,2-d-testosterone to be far below the expected production
rate of the hormone, thus excluding any potential interference by
exogenous testosterone with its endogenous production. In this setting,
the calculated mean production rates of testosterone were 155 ±
94 µg/h (3.7 ± 2.2 mg/day in men; Table 1B
) and 1.8 ± 0.6
µg/h (0.4 ± 0.1 mg/day in women; Table 2B
). Similar mean
production rates of testosterone were found using an identical infusion
rate of 1,2-d-testosterone, but reducing the equilibration
period from 12 to 6 h (Exp 3; men, 166 ± 103 µg/h; women,
3.9 ± 1.6 µg/h; Tables 1C
and 2C
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The advantages of stable labeled radioactive tracers compared to radioactive materials include (13) the ability of long term infusions to achieve steady state conditions, the avoidance of incomplete recovery of the tracer and the tracee from biological materials, and the fact that both labeled and endogenous materials are simultaneously analyzed using an identical technology. In addition, ethical considerations preclude infusions of radioactive materials causing some countries, including Austria, to prohibit by law the use of radioactive tracers in healthy volunteers.
The aim of this study was first to determine the production rates of testosterone in healthy men and women throughout 24 h for 4-h periods using a stable labeled compound and GC/MS analysis under steady state conditions, i.e. after a 12-h preequilibration period. The analytical precision of the method used is demonstrated by the fact that average testosterone production rates throughout 24 h, mathematically calculated as the mean value of these six individual samples, were similar to an analytically obtained value obtained from an additional plasma sample pooled for 24 h.
During 1,2-d-testosterone infusions of 0.07 and 0.01 mg/h in men and women, respectively, mean estimated production rates were 77 µg/h (1.8 mg/day) in men and 4.6 µg/h (0.1 mg/day) in women. For both sexes, these values are below those previously reported by others (10, 11, 12) and uncomfortably close to the testosterone infusion rates employed. The question, therefore, arose whether such a comparatively large amount of exogenous testosterone could have suppressed its endogenous production rate.
Therefore, in a second series of experiments the infused tracer dose was reduced to 0.015 mg/h in men and 0.0001 mg/h in women, amounts equivalent to about 10% (men) or 5% (women) of the potential testosterone production rates. Mean production rates of testosterone during this second series of experiments were 147 µg/h in men and 1.8 µg/h in women. One man (no. 7) and two women (no. 5 and 6) received even smaller tracer doses (1.5 and 0.015 µg/h, respectively), stretching the currently available limits of detection to their extreme. Nevertheless, production rates of testosterone in these three individuals were in the same range as those in the remaining subjects. Based on these results, it is unlikely that the smaller doses of testosterone employed have some impact on its endogenous production rate, although we cannot exclude this possibility with certainty. Rather, we feel justified to conclude that the mean production rates of testosterone determined during this second series of experiments (men, 3.7 ± 2.2 mg/day; women, 0.43 ± 0.14 mg/day) represent accurate endogenous testosterone production rates, in line with estimates in young healthy men reported by researchers using radioactive tracers (10, 11), whereas those in healthy women were slightly lower than rates previously reported (12). Additional intraindividually conducted experiments, described below, led us to suggest that testosterone production rates in females up to at least 0.3 ± 0.4 mg/day must be regarded as normal, as previously described by Samoljik et al. (12) for healthy nonobese women. Production rates of cortisol obtained by GC/MS analysis appear to be lower than hitherto assumed (13). In regard to testosterone production rates, however, results obtained using this more advanced technology are in keeping with data obtained by means of the radiotracer technique.
Production rates of testosterone in men failed to show any diurnal variation during either series 1 (24-h observation period) or series 2 (12-h observation period). In women, however, testosterone production was higher after 0400 h. As both male and female volunteers were studied under the same experimental conditions in the largely stress-free setting of a metabolic ward, it is unlikely that methodological differences should account for these sex-specific differences. Apparently, the diurnal rhythm of ACTH is of inadequate importance in healthy men, in whom the main share of testosterone is of testicular origin, but influences adrenal testosterone secretion in women.
The results discussed above were supposed to provide the basis for future studies in patients with disorders of androgen secretion. Thus, to permit routine estimation of testosterone production rates 1,2-d-testosterone infusion was reduced to 6 h and subsequent blood sampling to 4 h, as a 36-h or even a 24-h experimental protocol represents a logistical challenge for any semiroutine investigation and de facto precludes its use on an out-patient basis. This also reduced the number of samples to be analyzed by GC/MS to one per individual. To demonstrate the validity of this approach, experiments were performed in the same group of volunteers who had taken part in protocol 2, employing identical 1,2-d-testosterone infusion rates (men, 0.015 mg/h; women, 0.0001 mg/h). Using this approach in healthy men, both plasma concentrations of endogenous testosterone and its estimated production rates were in the same range as those determined after a more prolonged tracer infusion. In regard to healthy women, the production rates of testosterone during this series were higher, although in a comparable range. This protocol, therefore, provides a comparatively simple way to evaluate testosterone secretion rates in various pathological situations.
|
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received November 19, 1996.
Revised January 30, 1997.
Accepted February 13, 1997.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-androstanediol
during/after i.v. administration of 13C-labelled
testosterone in man. J Steroid Biochem. 29:105109.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. T. Page, J. K. Amory, and W. J. Bremner Advances in Male Contraception Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2008; 29(4): 465 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Handelsman The Rationale for Banning Human Chorionic Gonadotropin and Estrogen Blockers in Sport J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1646 - 1653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Davison, J. Thipphawong, J. Blanchard, K. Liu, R. Morishige, I. Gonda, J. Okikawa, J. Adams, A. Evans, B. Otulana, et al. Pharmacokinetics and Acute Safety of Inhaled Testosterone in Postmenopausal Women J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2005; 45(2): 177 - 184. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.M. Rivera-Woll, M. Papalia, S.R. Davis, and H.G. Burger Androgen insufficiency in women: diagnostic and therapeutic implications Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2004; 10(5): 421 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Somboonporn and S. R. Davis Testosterone Effects on the Breast: Implications for Testosterone Therapy for Women Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2004; 25(3): 374 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Wang, D. H. Catlin, B. Starcevic, A. Leung, E. DiStefano, G. Lucas, L. Hull, and R. S. Swerdloff Testosterone Metabolic Clearance and Production Rates Determined by Stable Isotope Dilution/Tandem Mass Spectrometry in Normal Men: Influence of Ethnicity and Age J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2936 - 2941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Anderson and D. T. Baird Male Contraception Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2002; 23(6): 735 - 762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Anderson, D. Kinniburgh, and D. T. Baird Suppression of Spermatogenesis by Etonogestrel Implants with Depot Testosterone: Potential for Long-Acting Male Contraception J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3640 - 3649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Kinniburgh, H. Zhu, L. Cheng, A.T. Kicman, D.T. Baird, and R.A. Anderson Oral desogestrel with testosterone pellets induces consistent suppression of spermatogenesis to azoospermia in both Caucasian and Chinese men Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2002; 17(6): 1490 - 1501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vierhapper, P. Nowotny, H. Maier, and W. Waldhausl Production Rates of Dihydrotestosterone in Healthy Men and Women and in Men with Male Pattern Baldness: Determination by Stable Isotope/Dilution and Mass Spectrometry J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2001; 86(12): 5762 - 5764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W. Martin, S. C. Riley, D. Everington, N. P. Groome, R. A. Riemersma, D. T. Baird, and R. A. Anderson Dose-finding study of oral desogestrel with testosterone pellets for suppression of the pituitary-testicular axis in normal men Hum. Reprod., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1515 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. C. W. Wu, R. Balasubramanian, T. M. T. Mulders, and H. J. T. Coelingh-Bennink Oral Progestogen Combined with Testosterone as a Potential Male Contraceptive: Additive Effects between Desogestrel and Testosterone Enanthate in Suppression of Spermatogenesis, Pituitary-Testicular Axis, and Lipid Metabolism J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1999; 84(1): 112 - 122. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vierhapper, P. Nowotny, and W. Waldhäusl Unchanged Testosterone Production Rates in Growth Hormone-Treated Healthy Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1998; 83(10): 3735 - 3736. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |