help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Çelik, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Çelik, I.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 4 1307
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Letters to the Editor

More Than IL-6 in Graves’ Disease?1

Ismail Çelik

Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology Sihhiye-Ankara, Turkey 06100

We read with great interest the remarkable report by Salvi et al. (August 1996 JCEM) delineating the soluble interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor (sIL6-R) profile of Graves’ disease (GD) (1). By commenting to our trial (2) in their article, they confirmed the increased IL-6 concentrations in GD with an additional, novel finding of elevated sIL6-R in the hyperthyroid phase. sIL6-R returned to normal in the euthyroid state achieved by methimazole, but IL-6 levels did not. The latter finding seems paradoxical in that, according to their results, the median euthyroid IL-6 level (49.2 fmol/L), though low in comparison to the controls (55 fmol/L), did not reach a statistical significance when compared with the hyperthyroid level (69 fmol/L). If this was the case, it would be difficult to rationalize a steady state IL-6 level despite a lowered sIL6-R where the measured serum IL-6 is a total of free IL-6 plus the fraction bound to the soluble receptor. As a reasonable explanation, type II (ß) error, a limitation of nonparametric tests in smaller groups might be responsible for the undetectable significance.

In our trial, lowered IL-6 concentrations in the euthyroid state compared with the hyperthyroid levels were documented in both toxic multinodular goiter (TMNG) and in GD patients. Only GD subjects exhibited an elevated level of serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-{alpha}), which was not reversed by propylthiouracil, with TNF-{alpha} levels being normal in TMNG or simple diffuse goiter patients and in controls (2). Thus, being the first to hypothesize TNF-{alpha} to predict the autoimmune process of GD, we reconfirmed IL-6 to be a nonspecific but reversible marker of thyroid inflammation (3).

As currently described by Salvi et al., not only IL-6 but also sIL-6R failed to discriminate the state of remission or relapse in GD. Regarding the complex interactions of intrathyroidal cytokine network to initiate and/or perpetuate the autoimmune process, the serum cytokine profile of GD deserves further research, perhaps with a particular emphasis on the TNF-{alpha} receptor status.

Footnotes

1 Address correspondence to: Ismail Çelik, Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Institute of Oncology, Sihhiye-Ankara 06100. Back

Received November 13, 1996.

References

  1. Salvi M, Girasole G, Pedrazzoni M, et al. 1996 Increased serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and soluble IL-6 receptor in patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:2976–2979.[Abstract]
  2. Çelik I, Akalin S, Erbas T. 1995 Serum levels of interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} in hyperthyroid patients before and after propylthiouracil treatment. Eur J Endocrinol. 132:668–672.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bartalena L, Brogioni S, Grasso L, Martino E. 1993 Increased serum interleukin-6 concentration in patients with subacute thyroiditis: relationship with concomitant changes in serum T4-binding globulin concentration. J Endocrinol Invest. 16:213–218.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Çelik, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Çelik, I.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals