help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirschbaum, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hellhammer, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirschbaum, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hellhammer, D. H.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 4 1101-1105
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Clinical Studies

Effects of Fasting and Glucose Load on Free Cortisol Responses to Stress and Nicotine1

Clemens Kirschbaum, Esperanza Gonzalez Bono, Nicolas Rohleder, Claudius Gessner, Karl Martin Pirke, Alicia Salvador and Dirk Helmut Hellhammer

Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research University of Trier (C.K., N.R., C.G., K.M.P., D.H.H.), Trier, Germany; and Area of Psychobiology, Department of Psychology, University of Valencia (E.G.B., A.S.), Valencia, Spain

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Clemens Kirschbaum, Center for Psychobiological and Psychosomatic Research, University of Trier, Universitaetsring 15, D-54286 Trier, Germany. E-mail: kirschba{at}uni-trier.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The availability of energy appears to exert important regulatory functions in pituitary-adrenal stress responses. In two studies, the effects of short-term fasting and subsequent glucose administration on the free cortisol response to psychological stress and nicotine consumption were investigated. Study 1: After fasting for 8–11 h, healthy young men ingested either 100 g glucose (n = 13) or water (n = 12). One hour later they were exposed to a psychosocial stress task (Trier Social Stress Test). A third group also ingested 100 g glucose, but they were not exposed to any additional treatment (n = 10). Capillary blood glucose levels were in the lower euglycemic range before and significantly elevated after the glucose load (64.9 ± 9.8 vs. 162.5 ± 43.5 mg/dL; F = 149.04, P < 0.001). Although glucose load per se did not affect free cortisol levels, psychosocial stress induced a large cortisol response in glucose-treated subjects. In contrast, fasted subjects who received tap water did not respond to the Trier Social Stress Test with significant changes in cortisol levels (F = 6.27, P < 0.001). Both groups responded with a similar increase in heart rates (F = 33.53, P < 0.001) with no statistically significant difference between glucose and water-treated subjects. Study 2: Twelve habitual smokers received 100 g glucose or tap water after fasting for at least 8 h on two separate sessions (cross-over, random sequence). Forty-five min after glucose/water ingestion, they smoked two cigarettes with a nicotine content of 1.0 mg/cigarette. Subjects were euglycemic before smoking, with a significant rise of glucose levels after consumption of 100 g glucose (64.4 ± 8.3 vs. 143.5 ± 40.0 mg/dL; F = 40.25, P < 0.001). As in Exp 1, subjects showed a substantially larger free cortisol response to nicotine under glucose load compared with water load (F = 4.91, P < 0.001).

From these data we conclude that the free cortisol response to stimulation is under significant control of centers responsible for monitoring energy availability. Low glucose levels appear to inhibit adrenocortical responsiveness in healthy subjects. In agreement with results from animal studies, the present results suggest that ready access to energy is a prerequisite for hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal stress responses.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ADAPTATION to psychological and physical stress frequently involves activation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Increases of CRH, ACTH, and cortisol levels in anticipation of or during stressful stimulation are interpreted as allostatic (1, 2) and/or homeostatic responses of the body (3). It is widely believed that in times of increased metabolic demands, such as stress, cortisol is required for energy mobilization (e.g. higher blood glucose concentrations) to fuel fight or flight reactions (e.g. see Ref.4).

Although the insulin-antagonistic and gluconeogenetic actions of cortisol appear to favor such interpretation, there is only little experimental evidence available to date to support this idea. In a study of HPA responses to prolonged low-intensity physical exercise, Tabata and co-workers (5) could prevent the increase of ACTH and cortisol after 2.5 h of exercise by maintaining blood glucose concentrations at preexercise levels. No comparable data are available on the role of glucose levels on more acute HPA responses in humans. In our first experiment we thus manipulated blood glucose levels to study the impact of glucose levels and caloric load on free cortisol levels in acutely stressed adults. A second experiment was performed to investigate whether similar effects of caloric load on free cortisol responses can be observed with pharmacological stimulation of the HPA axis.


    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study 1

Subjects. Thirty-five healthy, male, medication-free nonsmokers were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups: 1) glucose load + stress (n = 13); 2) water load + stress (n = 12); or 3) glucose load, no treatment (n = 10). The groups were matched for age and body mass index (mean age 24.3 ± 3.4 yr SD; mean body mass index 23.7 ± 3.0 SD). Participants were required to fast for at least 8 h before the experiment; however, they were free to fast for a longer time interval. Subjects fasted for 9.3 ± 4.5 SD h before the experiment with no statistically significant group differences (one-way ANOVA). Written informed consent was obtained from the volunteers and, a compensation of 40,- DM was paid for participation.

Procedure. All tests were performed between 1600–2900 h. Upon arrival in the laboratory, baseline glucose levels were measured in capillary blood (puncture of finger tip; Reflolux S, Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Five min later, subjects either ingested 100 g glucose dissolved in a total volume of 400 mL (Dextro OGTT, Boehringer Mannheim) or 400 ml water. One hour later, a second blood glucose reading was obtained. Then subjects of groups 1 and 2 were exposed to the psychosocial stressor (see below) for 15 min followed by a final glucose measurement and a resting period (50 min). Subjects of group 3 rested for 65 min after the second glucose measurement. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) treatment was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Trier.

Psychosocial stress protocol. Subjects of groups 1 and 2 were challenged with the TSST, which is described in detail elsewhere (6). The TSST mainly consists of a 5-min speech task and a 5-min mental arithmetic task in front of an audience. This stress protocol has been repeatedly shown to induce significant activation of the pituitary-adrenal axis, with 2- to 3-fold increases of free cortisol in healthy male nonsmokers.

Heart rate monitoring. Heart rate was continuously monitored before and after the TSST using wireless transmission with electrocardiogram precision at 1-min intervals (Sport Tester Profi, Polar Instruments, Groß-Gerau, Germany).

Study 2

Subjects and protocol. Twelve male habitual smokers (age: 25.7 ± 3.8 yr; body mass index: 24.4 ± 3.7) who smoked for 7.6 ± 4.6 yr, were studied in a cross-over protocol on 2 different days. Subjects smoked at least 15 cigarettes a day at the time of study. The mean nicotine content of the cigarettes was 0.87 ± 0.28 mg.

Before reporting to the laboratory, subjects had to fast for at least 8 h. As in Study 1, they were free to fast for a longer period. After a first assessment of blood glucose levels, subjects drank 100 g glucose (day 1) or water (day 2) as in study 1. The sequence of glucose/water load was randomized. A second blood glucose level reading was obtained 45 min later. Then subjects smoked two cigarettes with a nicotine content of 1 mg nicotine/cigarette, deeply inhaling the smoke. Subjects were asked to consume the two cigarettes within 10–15 min. Written informed consent was obtained from the volunteers, and a compensation of 70,- DM was paid for participation. Except for glucose or water load, the experimental setup was identical for each subject on the 2 days. The stimulation protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Munich Medical School.

Studies 1 and 2

Saliva sampling and biochemical analysis. Using the Salivette (Sarstedt, Rommelsdorf, Germany) device, the subjects collected 10 (study 1) and 12 (study 2) saliva samples before and after the TSST or smoking, respectively. The exact timing of saliva samples were: 70, 50, 35, 20, and 5 min before the TSST and 2, 10, 20, 35, and 50 min after the TSST, respectively (study 1). In study 2, samples were obtained 40, 30, 20, 10, and 1 min before and 1, 10, 20, 30, 45, and 60 min after smoking. After collection, samples were stored at -20 C before analysis. Briefly before assaying, samples were thawed and spun at 3000 rpm for 5 min to obtain samples with low viscosity. One hundred microliters clear saliva was removed for duplicate analysis of cortisol levels using a time-resolved immunoassay with fluorescence detection (7). The lower detection limit of this assay is 0.43 nmol/L with inter- and intraassay coefficients of variance of <10% across the expected range of cortisol levels (3–25 nmol/L).

Data analysis

ANOVAs for repeated measures were performed for glucose levels, cortisol concentrations, and heart rates. Degrees of freedom were adjusted with Greenhouse-Geisser correction where appropriate. Post hoc analyses were computed using Newman-Keuls tests. A response index following glucose load was obtained by deducting the baseline blood glucose level from the blood glucose level measured immediately before the TSST. The individual’s area under the cortisol response curve (AUC) was computed using the trapezoid formula, aggregating the five poststress cortisol levels (samples 6–10) relative to the individual baseline concentration (sample 5). Heart rates were aggregated into 5-min segments for a total of 40 min.

Spearman rank correlations were computed between glucose levels and cortisol responses. In study 2, one subject was removed from all statistical analyses because he showed cortisol levels that differed more than 3 SD from the group means under both glucose and water conditions for unknown reasons.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study 1

Before glucose or water load, blood glucose levels were in the low euglycemic range in all three experimental groups. Although glucose levels remained unchanged in subjects who drank water, both glucose groups showed the expected rise after ingestion of 100 g glucose (F = 29.05, P < 0.001; Fig. 1Go). Post hoc tests revealed no differences in baseline glucose levels between the three groups. Furthermore, no significant changes in glucose levels were observed in response to the TSST.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Blood glucose levels (means ± SE; mg/dL) in three experimental groups: before water/glucose load (A), 60 min after water/glucose load (B), and immediately following psychosocial stress task (C); the nonstress group was measured after same time interval following second glucose measurement.

 
As shown in Fig. 2Go, free cortisol levels differed significantly between glucose and water-loaded subjects (F = 6.27, P < 0.001). With no differences between the three groups before stress, fasted treated with 100 g glucose showed a clear-cut increase of cortisol in response to the TSST (P < 0.001). However, stressed subjects preloaded with water after fasting failed to respond to the psychosocial stressor with a significant cortisol rise (P > 0.1). As indicated by continuously decreasing cortisol levels in the unstressed group, glucose load per se did not elevate cortisol levels. Post hoc tests revealed significantly enhanced cortisol levels at 10, 20, and 30 min after stress in the glucose-loaded subjects compared with the other two groups (all P < 0.001).



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Salivary cortisol levels (means ± SE; nmol/L) before and after water/glucose load and after exposure to psychosocial stressor (TSST; indicated by shadowed bar; **, P < 0.001, glucose/stress vs. water/stress and vs. glucose/no treatment).

 
No differences in cortisol levels between water-loaded stressed subjects and glucose-loaded unstressed controls were observed at any time point.

Neither body mass index nor duration of fasting correlated with the individual’s cortisol response (r = -0.24, P = 0.25; r = 0.20, P = 0.33). Likewise, glucose levels before glucose/water load showed only weak association with the cortisol response to the TSST (r = -0.34, P = 0.10). In contrast, both the absolute glucose levels before and after TSST as well as the change in glucose levels after glucose/water load yielded very high correlation coefficients (r = 0.85, r = 0.89, r = 0.93; all P < 0.001). Figure 3Go depicts the scattergram for the correlation between changes in glucose levels and the cortisol responses (AUC) for all subjects exposed to the TSST.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Scattergram of cortisol responses (AUC) plotted against increase ({triangleup}) in blood glucose levels after water/glucose load (r = 0.93, P < 0.001; Spearman rank correlation).

 
Heart rates were significantly elevated during TSST in both groups (F = 33.53, P < 0.001). In contrast to cortisol levels, glucose and water-loaded subjects showed similar response patterns and magnitude (Fig. 4Go). Differences in heart rate responses between the two groups were not statistically significant (F < 1).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Heart rates (means ± SE; bpm) before, during, and following psychosocial stress task in water- and glucose-loaded subjects. Heart rates sampled every minute were collapsed over 5-min intervals.

 
Study 2

Fasting and glucose/water load led to similar blood glucose levels as in study 1. Glucose consumption raised blood glucose levels significantly, whereas they remained unchanged after water load (F = 40.25, P < 0.001; Fig. 5Go). The cortisol response pattern was also similar to study 1, with a significant difference between the glucose and the water-loaded subjects (F = 4.91, P < 0.001; Fig. 6Go). Although baseline cortisol levels did not differ between conditions, smoking two cigarettes with a nicotine content of 1 mg/cigarette led to a significant rise only when subjects ingested glucose before smoking (all P < 0.003); consumption of water before smoking resulted in a nonsignificant change in cortisol levels (all P > 0.2). Unlike in study 1, there were no statistically significant correlations between the rise in glucose levels and the individual cortisol response.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Blood glucose levels (means ± SE) before and after water/glucose load (*, P < 0.01; **, P < 0.001).

 


View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Salivary cortisol levels (means ± SE; nmol/L) before and after water/glucose load and following smoking of two cigarettes with a nicotine content of 1 mg each (indicated by shadowed bar). Note different scale for y-axis compared with Fig. 2Go.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The present studies support the view that the HPA axis is closely associated with systems responsible for caloric flow in the body (8, 9). Although a rather brief period of fasting (8–10 h) did not alter baseline cortisol levels, it abolished adrenocortical stress responses in healthy normal weight men.

Only recently have animal studies revealed evidence for fasting-induced attenuation of pituitary-adrenal responses to stress. A prolonged fast of 4 days decreased cortisol responses to stress in sheep isolated from the flock compared with stressed sheep fed ad libitum (10). Interestingly, administration of synthetic ACTH in 4-day fasted sheep resulted in an overshooting cortisol response (11), suggesting differential effects of fasting on central vs. peripheral sites of the HPA axis. Also, shorter periods of fasting have been shown to reduce HPA responsiveness. Rats fasted for 14–24 h showed a blunted corticosterone response to novelty (12) and reduced ACTH levels following restraint stress compared with controls (13, 14). However, despite lower ACTH levels, restraint stress after fasting was associated with an increased corticosterone response in the latter experiments (14). As these authors note, a fast of 14–24 h in young, quickly growing rats is a major metabolic insult. Besides its metabolic consequences, removal of food (i.e. fasting) will inevitably induce an acute ACTH and corticosterone stress response in laboratory animals raised on a standard feeding schedule (ad libitum access to food). In humans, only one study reported fasting-induced changes in adrenocortical responsiveness (15). Fasting for 3 days led to reduced cortisol increases following insulin-induced hypoglycemia; a 24-h fast was without effect.

In light of these findings, the results of the present experiments were rather surprising. After a brief fast of 8–10 h, healthy young nonsmokers with blood glucose levels in the low euglycemic range no longer respond to psychosocial stress (study 1) or smoking (study 2) with an increase in cortisol levels. This elimination of the adrenocortical stress response in the fasted, water-loaded subjects is noteworthy.

Having employed the TSST protocol for induction of psychosocial stress in more than 20 studies in our laboratory, we have never observed a comparable cortisol nonresponse in an unselected group of male nonsmokers. The fact that these subjects showed similar increases in heart rates as glucose-loaded individuals is suggestive of a comparable stress level in both experimental groups. No subjective stress ratings were obtained from the subjects in the present study, because in previous experiments with manipulations of endocrine or physiological parameters subjective ratings could not explain the observed changes in hormonal responsiveness (16).

Caloric load with glucose 45–60 min before stress or smoking was able to reverse the effect of fasting. Subjects with high blood glucose levels showed the well-established response pattern of a 2-fold increase in free cortisol levels following the TSST (17, 18). Choosing nicotine as a stimulus for the HPA axis in study 2 not only extended the findings to alteration of adrenocortical responses to pharmacological agents, it also enabled us to investigate the effect of fasting and caloric load in the same individuals, which essentially rules out the possibility that the different cortisol levels after smoking merely reflect interindividual differences in adrenocortical response dispositions.

Which mechanisms could be responsible for the observed effects of fasting and glucose load on the adrenocortical responsiveness? Glucose load leads to a rapid rise in insulin levels in nondiabetics, and thereby to an increased transport of tryptophan into the central nervous system. This is followed by an increased synthesis of serotonin, which is known to have a stimulatory influence on the HPA axis at the hypothalamic level (19). Although this mechanism might explain a normal or even an exaggerated cortisol stress response, it can hardly account for the nonresponse in fasted, water-loaded subjects. An alternative interpretation of the present findings includes the Krebs cycle and its prime role for energy generation. An increased demand for ATP in the acutely stressed organism can usually be well met by increasing the oxidation of food components, such as sugars, lipids, and protein. The citric acid cycle provides a rapid and highly energy efficient way to generate the fuel needed for cellular processes such as synthesis and secretion of hormones. Thus, one consequence of increased availability of rapidly oxidizable substrates could be a permissive effect on endocrine responses to external stimulation with enhanced responses at times of increased substrates availability. If this hypothesis is true, then the observed effects of glucose load in restoring a normal cortisol response after fasting are not specific to glucose. Rather, fat or protein-rich diets would exert similar effects. Current studies in our laboratory investigate this hypothesis, and the physiological and psychological consequences of lowered/abolished HPA stress responses following fasting. In conclusion, the present data are in agreement with animal studies (10, 13, 14) suggesting that ready availability of energy is a prerequisite for significant acute stress responses of the HPA axis.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was in part supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Ki 537/3–1) and by a grant from the Interministerial Commission of Science and Technology (CICYT), Spain, SAF 92–692. Back

Received October 15, 1996.

Revised December 20, 1996.

Accepted January 9, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Schulkin J, McEwen BS, Gold PW. 1994 Allostasis, amygdala, and anticipatory angst. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 18:385–396.[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. McEwen BS, Stellar E. 1993 Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease [see comments]. Arch Intern Med. 153:2093–2101.[Abstract]
  3. Munck A, Guyre PM, Holbrook NJ. 1984 Physiological functions of glucocorticoids in stress and their relation to pharmacological actions. Endocr Rev. 5:25–44.[Abstract]
  4. Bamberger CM, Schulte HM, Chrousos GP. 1996 Molecular determinants of glucocorticoid receptor function and tissue sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Endocr Rev. 17:245–261.[Abstract]
  5. Tabata I, Ogita F, Miyachi M, Shibayama H. 1991 Effects of low blood glucose on plasma CRF, ACTH, and cortisol during prolonged physical exercise. Applied J Physiol. 71:1807–1812.
  6. Kirschbaum C, Hellhammer DH. 1993 The ‘Trier Social Stress Test’- a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology. 28:76–81.[Medline]
  7. Dressendörfer RA, Kirschbaum C, Rohde W, Stahl F, Strasburger CJ. 1992 Synthesis of a cortisol-biotin conjugate and evaluation as tracer in an immunoassay for salivary cortisol measurement. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 43:683–692.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Dallman MF, Strack AM, Akana SF, et al. 1993 Feast and famine: critical role of glucocorticoids with insulin in daily energy flow. Front Neuroendocrinol. 14:303–347.[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Tempel DL, Leibowitz SF. 1993 Glucocorticoid receptors in PVN: interactions with NE, NPY, and Gal in relation to feeding. Am J Physiol. 265:E794–E800.
  10. Wronska D, Niezgoda J, Sechman A, Bobek S. 1990 Food deprivation suppresses stress-induced rise in catabolic hormones with a concomitant tendency to potentiate the increment of blood glucose. Physiol Behav. 48:531–537.[Medline]
  11. Wronska-Fortuna D, Sechman A, Niezgoda J, Bobek S. 1993 Modified responses of circulating cortisol, thyroid hormones, and glucose to exogenous corticotropin and thyrotropin-releasing hormone in food-deprived sheep. Pharmcol Biochem Behav. 45:601–606.[Medline]
  12. De Boer SF, Koopmans SJ, Slangen JL, van der Gugten J. 1989 Effects of fasting on plasma catecholamine, corticosterone and glucose concentrations under basal and stress conditions in individual rats. Physiol Behav. 45:989–994.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Hanson ES, Bradbury MJ, Akana SF, Scribner KS, Strack AM, Dallman MF. 1994 The diurnal rhythm in adrenocorticotropin responses to restraint in adrenalectomized rats is determined by caloric intake. Endocrinology. 134:2214–2220.[Abstract]
  14. Akana SF, Strack AM, Hanson ES, Dallman MF. 1994 Regulation of activity in the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis is integral to a larger hypothalamic system that determines caloric flow. Endocrinology. 135:1125–1134.[Abstract]
  15. Adamson U, Lins P-E, Grill V. 1989 Fasting for 72 h decreases the response of counterregulatory hormones to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia in normal man. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 49:751–756.[Medline]
  16. Kirschbaum C, Schommer N, Federenko I, et al. 1997 Short term estradiol treatment enhances pituitary-adrenal axis and sympathetic responses to psychosocial stress in healthy young men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:3639–3643.[Abstract]
  17. Kirschbaum C, Wüst S, Faig H-G, Hellhammer DH. 1992 Heritability of cortisol responses to h-CRH, ergometry, and psychological stress in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 75:1526–1530.[Abstract]
  18. Kirschbaum C, Pirke K-M, Hellhammer DH. 1995 Preliminary evidence for reduced cortisol responsivity to psychological stress in women using oral contraceptive medication. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 20:509–514.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Spinedi E, Gaillard RC. 1991 Stimulation of the hypothalamo- pituitary-adrenocortical axis by the central serotonergic pathway: involvement of endogenous corticotropin-releasing hormone but not vasopressin. J Endocrinol Invest. 14:551–557.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
P. Wiesli, C. Schmid, O. Kerwer, C. Nigg-Koch, R. Klaghofer, B. Seifert, G. A. Spinas, and K. Schwegler
Acute Psychological Stress Affects Glucose Concentrations in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Following Food Intake but not in the Fasting State
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2005; 28(8): 1910 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Vicennati, L. Ceroni, L. Gagliardi, A. Gambineri, and R. Pasquali
Response of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Axis to High-Protein/Fat and High-Carbohydrate Meals in Women with Different Obesity Phenotypes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2002; 87(8): 3984 - 3988.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Heinrichs, G. Meinlschmidt, I. Neumann, S. Wagner, C. Kirschbaum, U. Ehlert, and D. H. Hellhammer
Effects of Suckling on Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis Responses to Psychosocial Stress in Postpartum Lactating Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2001; 86(10): 4798 - 4804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. M. Reynolds, B. R. Walker, H. E. Syddall, C. B. Whorwood, P. J. Wood, and D. I. W. Phillips
Elevated Plasma Cortisol in Glucose-Intolerant Men: Differences in Responses to Glucose and Habituation to Venepuncture
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2001; 86(3): 1149 - 1153.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
K. D. CLARK, N. WARDROBE-WONG, and P. D. SNASHALL
Endogenous Cortisol and Lung Damage in a Predominantly Smoking Population
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., March 1, 1999; 159(3): 755 - 759.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
E. L. Gibson, S. Checkley, A. Papadopoulos, L. Poon, S. Daley, and J. Wardle
Increased Salivary Cortisol Reliably Induced by a Protein-Rich Midday Meal
Psychosom Med, March 1, 1999; 61(2): 214 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kirschbaum, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hellhammer, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kirschbaum, C.
Right arrow Articles by Hellhammer, D. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals