help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaidarun, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaidarun, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. M.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 4 1058-1065
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Endocrinological Oncology

Tumor-Specific Expression of Alternatively Spliced Estrogen Receptor Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Variants in Human Pituitary Adenomas1

Sushela S. Chaidarun2, Anne Klibanski and Joseph M. Alexander

Neuroendocrine Unit, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Sushela S Chaidarun, Neuroendocrine Unit, Bulfinch 457, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The well documented mitogenic and hormone regulatory effects of estrogen (E2) on pituitary cells are mediated via its nuclear receptor (ER), a cellular homolog of v-erbA oncogene. ER isoforms generated by alternative exon splicing, termed ER variants {Delta}2ER to {Delta}7ER, have been identified in breast cancer and have been postulated to have important pathogenetic and clinical implications in tumorigenesis and/or development of hormone resistance. Because pituitary tumors, particularly prolactinomas, are known to be E2-dependent, we investigated alternatively spliced ER variant messenger ribonucleic acid expression in 40 human pituitary tumors of various phenotypes and normal pituitary tissues, using reverse transcription-PCR and Southern blot analyses. Nine of 11 prolactinomas readily expressed multiple ER variants ({Delta}2ER, {Delta}4ER, {Delta}5ER, and {Delta}7ER), whereas 6 of 11 tumors showed faint expression of {Delta}3ER. Four of 7 glycoprotein hormone-producing tumors that synthesized FSHß expressed {Delta}2ER, {Delta}5ER, and {Delta}7ER. In 9 GH- and 10 ACTH-secreting tumors examined, the expression of normal and variant ER was restricted to tumors that also exhibited scattered PRL immunoreactivity. Variant and normal ER were not found in three null cell tumors (oncocytomas) that showed negative immunoreactivity for all pituitary hormones or their subunits. In contrast, only {Delta}4ER and {Delta}7ER were uniformly detected in normal pituitaries. {Delta}6ER was not detected in any normal or neoplastic pituitary specimen studied. We conclude that multiple alternatively spliced ER variants are coexpressed with normal ER in a tumor phenotype-specific manner. In addition, ER variants {Delta}2ER and {Delta}5ER were found to be tumor specific. Future functional studies will be required to determine whether coexpression of multiple ER variants along with normal ER confers a pathophysiological role in pituitary hormone regulation and/or tumor cell proliferation.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE GONADAL steroid estrogen (E2) has been demonstrated to regulate the biosynthesis and secretion of all anterior pituitary hormones and to selectively stimulate the proliferation of both normal and transformed lactotrophs and gonadotrophs (1, 2, 3). Elevated E2 levels during pregnancy are associated with symptomatic pituitary tumor enlargement in up to 30% of women with macroadenomas (>1 cm) (4). Studies in experimental animals have shown that prolonged administration of E2 induces pituitary tumors, particularly prolactinomas (5, 6). E2, therefore, appears to be a potent mitogen of a specific subset of pituitary cells.

The mitogenic and regulatory effects of E2 are mediated through its nuclear receptor (ER), a ligand-activated transcriptional factor of the steroid receptor superfamily. ER is encoded by eight exons and is composed of several functional domains important for transcriptional activation function as well as DNA and ligand binding (7, 8). Sequence analysis of the ER gene reveals strong homology to the viral v-erbA oncogene, suggesting that ER is a cellular homolog of this oncogene (9). In addition to its well characterized role as an E2-activated transcription factor, ER has recently been shown to interact directly with peptide growth factors, independent of E2 (10, 11). Therefore, ER may mediate cellular proliferation through a number of intracellular mitogenic signaling pathways.

In other hormone-dependent tumors such as breast cancer, several altered ER isoforms generated by alternative messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) splicing (termed ER variants) have recently been identified (12, 13, 14). Some of these ER variants have been shown to have differential effects on E2-responsive gene expression. For example, an exon 5 ER spliced variant ({Delta}5ER) that lacks most of the hormone-binding domain of the receptor has been shown to constitutively activate E2-responsive genes (15). Coexpression of this variant with the wild-type ER in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells confers resistance to the estrogen antagonist tamoxifen (12, 13). Furthermore, an ER isoform lacking most of the hormone-binding domain that is structurally similar to {Delta}5ER has been shown to activate c-fos promoter independent of E2 administration (16). Therefore, this variant may stimulate cell proliferation independent of E2 and may also contribute to clinical antiestrogen resistance. In contrast, an exon 3 ER spliced variant ({Delta}3ER) that lacks a portion of the DNA-binding domain has been shown to have a dominant negative effect on wild-type receptor transcriptional activation when cotransfected with wild-type receptor in HeLa cells (17). This variant may, therefore, be able to modulate E2 sensitivity in the tumor cells. Differential exon alternative splicing of the ER gene, therefore, can give rise to a variety of variant receptor isoforms that may potentiate the diverse actions of E2 through a single receptor gene.

In the pituitary, wild-type ER mRNA has been recently demonstrated in normal and adenomatous lactotrophs and gonadotrophs (18, 19). However, the expression of ER variants in normal and neoplastic pituitary cells has never been studied. Altered ER gene expression in E2-sensitive pituitary adenomas may modulate normal ER function affecting both neoplastic cell proliferation and hormone secretion. Therefore, we investigated the expression of all potential exon alternate splice variant mRNAs, designated {Delta}2ER to {Delta}7ER, in 40 human pituitary adenomas of different phenotypes and normal pituitary tissues, using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), dideoxy sequencing, and Southern blot analyses.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patient data

Pituitary adenomas were obtained from 40 patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery. Patients with clinically nonfunctioning adenomas (n = 10) ranged in age from 37–79 yr (median, 54 yr), and all had normal serum glycoprotein hormone (GPH) and free {alpha}-subunit levels with serum PRL levels of less than 100 µg/L. Immunocytochemical staining using specific antibodies against GPH subunits (common {alpha}, FSHß, LHß, and TSHß) was positive in 7 of 10 tumors (i.e. GPH tumors), whereas antibodies against GH, PRL, and ACTH were negative. The other three tumors were negative for all specific pituitary hormone antibodies (i.e. null cell tumors). Patients with macroprolactinomas (n = 11) ranged in age from 17–60 (median, 27 yr), and all had elevated PRL levels (210 to >8000 µg/L) and immunostaining consistent with the diagnosis. Patients (n = 9) with GH-secreting adenomas ranged in age from 27–78 yr (median, 38 yr), and all had clinical and biochemical evidence of acromegaly, with elevated serum levels of GH (9–90 µg/L) and insulin-like growth factor I (699–1233 µg/L). All somatotroph adenomas showed strong immunostaining for GH, and 4 tumors also showed rare to scattered PRL staining (GH/PRL tumors). Patients with corticotroph tumors [n = 10; 5 microadenomas (diameter, <1 cm) and 5 macroadenomas] ranged in age from 20–59 yr (median, 48 yr), and all microadenomas had dexamethasone suppression testing and petrosal catheterization results consistent with Cushing’s disease. All corticotroph adenomas exhibited positive immunostaining for ACTH, whereas only one tumor also showed scattered staining for PRL (ACTH/PRL tumor).

To ensure that surgical specimens were not contaminated with a significant number of normal pituitary cells, all PRL-, GH-, and ACTH-secreting as well as null cell tumors studied were negative for LHß mRNA expression in RT-PCR assay (data not shown). All GPH-producing tumors were negative for Pit-1 mRNA, a member of the POU domain of transcription factors that is specifically expressed in GH, PRL, and TSH cells.

The control normal pituitary tissues used in these studies were obtained within 3–6 h postmortem and snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen (National Disease Research Interchange, Philadelphia, PA). The normal human pituitary complementary DNA (cDNA) library (Clontech, San Diego CA) represents pooled mRNA from nine men and women, aged 15–83 yr, from tissue obtained 1–3 h postmortem.

RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis of mRNA

Pituitary adenomas were obtained in phosphate-buffered saline after transsphenoidal surgery and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Total RNA was extracted using a single step, acid guanidinium isothiocyanate phenol/chloroform technique (20), followed by enzymatic digestion of genomic DNA with 1 U RQ1 deoxyribonuclease/µg total nucleic acid at 37 C for 1 h (Promega, Madison, WI) and quantitated by UV spectrophotometry. To prepare cDNA, 1 µg total RNA was reversed transcribed in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 5 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 0.25 mmol/L spermidine, 200 µmol/L deoxy-NTPs (dNTPs), and 12 U AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega), with random hexamers (1 µg) as first strand cDNA primers. RT reactions were carried out at 25C for 10 min, followed by a 10-min elongation step at 42 C and heat inactivation at 99 C for 5 min.

To screen the entire ER gene for all possible single exon-spliced variants, we used six sets of specific primers covering each exon region that would detect both normal and variant ER (Fig. 1Go and Table 1Go). Oligonucleotide primers were designed using Oligo software (National Biosciences, Minneapolis, MN) and compared to GenBank sequence libraries to assure specific amplification of human ER cDNA. Reactions without AMV reverse transcriptase were also carried out with each RNA sample to exclude genomic DNA contamination as a source of amplified signal. All tumors were negative for receptor signal in minus RT reactions (data not shown). To control for potential nonspecific RNA degradation in pituitary tumor RNA preparations, samples were tested for the presence of GAPDH mRNA by PCR, and all were positive. Oligonucleotide primers for control PCR of human glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), Pit-1, and LHß were (5'-3'): GAPDH-U, gag cca gat cgc tga gac; GAPDH-L, ttc tcc atg gtg gtg aag; Pit-1U, cat tta ctt cgg ctg ata; Pit-1L, agg ttg atg gct ggt ttc; LHß-U, gct cca ggg gct gct gct; and LHß-L, cga cag ctg aga gcc aca ggg.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Positions of PCR primers for screening exon alternatively spliced ER variant mRNA. A, Schematic representation of human ER gene consisting of eight exons (open boxes) with a coding sequence from nucleotide 233-2020. Exon 1 encodes for the hormone-independent transcriptional activation function (TAF-1), whereas exons 2–3 encode for the DNA-binding domain, and exons 4–8 encode for the hormone-binding domain of the receptor. B, Six coding regions of the ER gene were amplified by RTPCR, using six sets of specific primers (arrows) designed to detect both normal and alternatively spliced ER. C, The expected size of the entire and exon spliced ER, {Delta}2ER to {Delta}7ER, amplified by each relevant primer pairs.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Oligonucleotides used for PCR and sequence analysis

 
All PCR amplifications used 40 ng first strand cDNA from a single RT reaction. For each variant receptor studied, all pituitary tumor samples were amplified simultaneously using a common PCR reaction mixture to ensure that any differences in receptor amplification between samples were not due to variability in PCR reaction conditions. PCR was carried out in 50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 3.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1% Triton X-100, 40 µmol/L dNTPs, and 0.125 U TaqI polymerase (Promega) in a final volume of 25 µL. To control for extraneous contaminating genomic DNA or cDNA in experiment reagents, a tube containing the PCR reaction mixture with no template was included in each variant receptor amplification experiment and was negative for all experiments. PCR products were visualized by incorporation of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP (100 nCi/reaction) in the PCR reactions. PCR primers (12.5 pmol) were used for each reaction, and amplifications were carried out in an MJ thermocycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA). All reactions were amplified for 35 cycles (1 min at 94 C, 1 min at the optimal annealing temperature, and 1 min and 15 s at 72 C). All amplified products were fractionated by 6% nondenaturing Tris/borate/EDTA PAGE (Protogel, National Diagnostics, Atlanta, GA) and exposed to Kodak X-Omat film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) for 1–12 h.

Sequence analysis of ER variants

To confirm the identity of each ER splice variants, specific PCR products of the appropriate sizes were isolated from a 1% agarose gel using GlasPac/GS purification kit (National Scientific, San Rafael, CA) and cloned into pGEM-T plasmid vectors (Promega). Nucleotide dideoxy sequencing was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions using either a universal 40 primer or specific ER primers and Sequenase version 2.0 (U.S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland, OH).

Southern blot analysis

To determine whether pituitary tumors express ER isoforms with multiple exon deletions, we performed Southern blot analysis of ER PCR products encompassing exons 1–6 and exons 4–8 using specific ER primers U1n/L6c and U4n/L8c, respectively (Table 1Go). PCR reaction was performed without radioactive labeled nucleotides, and the products were fractionated by TAE-1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and transferred to a nylon membrane. Southern blot hybridization was performed as previously described (21). ER cDNA probes appropriate for each ER fragment were prepared by random hexamer labeling with [{alpha}-32P]dCTP.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ER splice variant mRNA expression in neoplastic human pituitary cells

RT-PCR analysis of normal and alternatively spliced ER variant mRNAs in 40 human pituitary tumors is summarized in Table 2Go. Full-length ER mRNA was detected in all lactotroph adenomas and 57% of the GPH-producing adenomas. Normal ER mRNA was also found in four mammosomatotroph adenomas with mixed GH/PRL immuno-staining and in a single corticotroph tumor with scattered PRL immunoreactivity, but was not detected in pure somatotroph tumors or corticotroph tumors, which exhibited positive immunostaining for only GH or ACTH, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Expression of wild-type and alternatively spliced variant ER mRNAs in human pituitary tumors

 
Figure 2Go shows RT-PCR data for {Delta}2ER mRNA expression in lactotroph and GPH-producing pituitary tumors. {Delta}2ER and the expected wild-type ER mRNA were detected in the majority of lactotroph and GPH-producing tumors (82% and 57%, respectively). Of the 7 GPH-producing tumors, only adenomas that immunostained for FSHß (tumors 1, 2, 5, and 7) expressed both normal and {Delta}2ER mRNA (Fig. 2BGo). In contrast to the high prevalence of {Delta}2ER expression found in these pituitary subtypes, {Delta}2ER was not detected in somatotroph, corticotroph, or null cell tumors (Table 2Go). {Delta}3ER was barely detected in only 6 of 11 prolactinomas and a single mammosomatotroph adenoma. Control RT-PCR of GAPDH mRNA was positive in all tumors (data not shown).



View larger version (84K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Expression of ER and exon 2 alternatively spliced variant mRNA in human pituitary tumors. Total RNA obtained from 40 pituitary tumors of various types were amplified using ER primers U1/L3, as shown in Fig. 1Go and Table 1Go. Amplified PCR products were visualized by incorporation of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP in the reaction and were size-fractionated on 6% polyacrylamide gels. The results for prolactinomas and GPH tumors are shown. The arrows represent the expected 554-bp PCR product of normal ER and the 365-bp product of the exon 2 spliced variant ({Delta}2ER).

 
Figure 3Go shows RT-PCR data for normal ER as well as {Delta}4ER through {Delta}7ER mRNA expression in 11 lactotroph tumors. {Delta}4ER mRNA (Fig. 3AGo) was detected in the majority of lactotroph adenomas (82%). {Delta}4ER mRNA was also detected in 50% of mammosomatotroph adenomas with mixed GH/PRL immunostaining, 1 GPH-producing tumor, and 1 corticotroph adenoma with mixed ACTH/PRL immunostaining. It was not detected in any of the pure somatotroph tumors or corticotroph tumors, which exhibited positive immunostaining for only GH or ACTH, respectively. {Delta}4ER was not detected in any null cell tumor studied (Table 2Go). {Delta}5ER mRNA (Fig. 3BGo) was abundantly expressed in 82% of the prolactinomas studied and was also found in 57% and 50% of GPH-producing and mixed GH/PRL tumors, respectively. However, {Delta}5ER mRNA was not observed in any of the other pituitary tumor subtypes examined. RT-PCR analysis using specific primers to detect {Delta}6ER mRNA expression in lactotroph adenomas exhibited only a single band representing normal ER mRNA (Fig. 3CGo). Furthermore, no {Delta}6ER mRNA was detected in any pituitary tumor sample studied (Table 2Go). {Delta}7ER mRNA expression was detected in all lactotroph adenomas (Fig. 3DGo) as well as in 57% of GPH-producing and all mixed GH/PRL adenomas (Table 2Go). However, {Delta}7ER mRNA could not be amplified from any other human pituitary tumor subtype.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Expression of {Delta}4ER, {Delta}5ER, {Delta}6ER, and {Delta}7ER variants in human prolactinomas. Total RNA obtained from 40 pituitary tumors of various types were amplified using ER primers to detect each ER spliced variant as shown in Fig. 1Go and Table 1Go. Amplified PCR products were visualized by incorporation of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP in the reaction and were size-fractionated on 6% polyacrylamide gels. The results for {Delta}4ER, {Delta}5ER, {Delta}6ER, and {Delta}7ER expression in prolactinomas are shown. The arrows represent the expected PCR products of normal and exon alternatively spliced ER.

 
Apart from tumor secretory phenotype, no correlation was found between the expression of ER variants and patients’ clinical characteristics or preoperative serum hormone profiles.

ER spliced variant expression in normal human pituitaries

The expression of alternatively spliced ER variant mRNAs in four normal human pituitary specimens and a normal human pituitary cDNA library pooled from nine normal men and women is shown in Fig. 4Go. In contrast to the observed expression of {Delta}2ER in lactotroph and GPH-producing tumors, {Delta}2ER mRNA was undetectable in all normal pituitaries studied (Fig. 4AGo). All normal pituitaries except normal sample 1 expressed {Delta}4ER mRNA at levels comparable to those found in lactotroph and GPH-producing tumors (Fig. 4BGo). However, {Delta}5ER mRNA was not detected in the pooled normal human pituitary cDNA library and was only barely detected in two normal pituitary samples (Fig. 4CGo). This low level of expression in normal pituitaries was in contrast to the readily detectable expression of {Delta}5ER variant mRNA in lactotroph and GPH-producing tumors. {Delta}7ER mRNA was expressed in all normal pituitary specimens studied at levels comparable to those of the tumors (Fig. 4DGo). {Delta}3ER and {Delta}6ER mRNA were not detected in any normal pituitary specimens studied (data not shown).



View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Expression of ER and alternatively spliced variant mRNA in normal human pituitary. Total RNA obtained from four normal pituitary samples (lanes 1–4) and a normal human pituitary cDNA library pooled from nine men and women (lane 5) were amplified by using ER primers to detect each alternatively spliced ER variant mRNA. Amplified PCR products were visualized by incorporation of [{alpha}-32P]dCTP in the reaction and were size-fractionated on 6% polyacrylamide gels. The results for a GPH-producing tumor are shown as a positive control for the expression of {Delta}2, {Delta}4, {Delta}5ER, and {Delta}7ER mRNA. The arrows represent the expected PCR products of normal and exon alternatively spliced ER.

 
Sequence analysis

Representative sequence data of the truncated ER variants, {Delta}2ER and {Delta}5ER, are shown in Fig. 5Go. These data confirm that exons 2 and 5 are excluded from the ER mRNA. Both exon 1–3 and exon 4–6 alternative splice events introduce novel nonsense mutations, interrupting the open reading frame. This observed alternate splicing of the ER mRNA results in truncated ER protein isoforms due to a premature stop codon introduced by frame-shifting of the wild-type open reading frame. {Delta}2ER encodes a severely truncated ER protein that retains only the A/B domain of the hormone-independent transcription activation region, whereas {Delta}5ER protein possesses the A/B domain and the DNA-binding region, but lacks most of the hormone-binding domain. In contrast, {Delta}3ER and {Delta}4ER sequence were joined in-frame and encoded for full-length ER proteins that lack the second zinc finger DNA-binding and hinge regions, respectively, whereas {Delta}7ER lacks only the carboxyl-terminal portion of the hormone-binding domain (data not shown).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Sequence analysis of alternatively spliced variant mRNAs in pituitary tumors. Representative nucleotide sequence at exon boundaries of {Delta}2 (left) and {Delta}5ER (right) are shown. The arrows demarcate the exon 1/3 and exon 4/6 junctions, demonstrating exclusion of ER exons 2 and 5, respectively. The protein products generated by {Delta}2 or {Delta}5ER variant are truncated due to a premature stop codon introduced by a frame shift of the wild-type open reading frame.

 
Southern blot analysis of ER PCR products

To determine whether pituitary tumors express unique ER isoforms with multiple exon deletions, we performed Southern blot analysis of ER PCR products encompassing exons 1–6 and exons 4–8 using specific ER cDNA probes appropriate for each fragment, as shown in Fig. 6AGo. Hybridization of a specific ER cDNA probe to Southern blots containing ER exon 1–6 PCR products from 11 prolactinomas (Fig. 6BGo) revealed the variant bands of the expected size for each single exon splicing ({Delta}2ER, {Delta}4ER, and {Delta}5ER) along with the wild-type ER mRNA. No larger deletion bands compatible with specific ER isoforms with multiple exon deletions were identified by either the product size or sequence analysis. Southern blot analysis of ER exon 4–8 PCR products (Fig. 6CGo) also confirmed the presence of only single exon-spliced variants ({Delta}5ER and {Delta}7ER). These data confirm the presence of multiple ER isoforms generated by a single exon splicing mechanism in human pituitary adenomas and suggest that an alternative mRNA-splicing event resulting in ER isoforms with multiple exon deletions is rare in pituitary tumors.



View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Southern blot analysis of PCR products containing ER exons 1–6 and exons 4–8 in human pituitary tumors. A, Schematic representation of ER exon 1 through 8 showing the amplified regions covering ER exons 1–6 and exons 4–8 (white bars) and the corresponding ER cDNA probes (black bars) for Southern blot analysis. Representative Southern blot analyses of ER exon 1–6 (B) and ER exon 4–8 (C) RT-PCR products in human prolactinomas are also shown. Arrows represent the expected sizes of the normal ER and single exon spliced variant mRNAs. No larger deletion compatible with a splicing event of more than a single exon was detected, either by the product size or sequence analysis.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have identified differential ER isoform expression in human pituitary tumors of various phenotypes and found that multiple forms of alternatively spliced ER mRNA, except {Delta}6ER, were coexpressed with wild-type ER mRNA in a tumor phenotype-specific manner. Prolactinomas displayed the greatest diversity of variant ER mRNA expression, including {Delta}2, {Delta}3, {Delta}4, {Delta}5, and {Delta}7ER, although {Delta}3ER mRNA was expressed at much lower levels. GPH-producing tumors that synthesized FSH also expressed multiple ER spliced variants ({Delta}2ER, {Delta}5ER, and {Delta}7ER), particularly {Delta}2ER, which expressed at levels comparable to those of the wild-type ER mRNA. Variant and normal ER were not found in any other tumor phenotype, except for mixed GH/PRL and ACTH/PRL tumors, in which low levels of both normal and variant ER were also detected. Interestingly, only {Delta}4ER and {Delta}7ER were uniformly expressed in normal pituitaries at levels comparable to those in the tumors. {Delta}2ER and {Delta}5ER, which were abundantly expressed in lactotroph and gonadotroph tumors, were nearly undetectable in normal tissues. Using Southern blot analysis, no multiple exon deletion of more than a single exon was identified. These data demonstrate that the expression of certain alternatively spliced ER variants in human pituitary tumors is both tumor specific and tumor phenotype specific, and that a wide array of ER isoforms can be detected in the majority of PRL- and GPH-producing tumors.

Although multiple isoforms of ER variants are coexpressed with wild-type ER in human pituitary tumors of lactotroph and gonadotroph origins, their functional consequences are unknown. Because full-length ER is comprised of several functional domains important for DNA binding, hormone binding, and maximal transcription activation, deletion of a specific domain due to alternative mRNA splicing may give rise to a variant receptor with altered receptor activity. ER variants may have differential biological effects at several levels 1) by competing the ability of wild-type ER to bind with high affinity to E2, 2) by affecting the formation of stable ER homodimers after E2 binding, or 3) by altering the trans-activation of ER at E2-responsive gene promoters. Therefore, differential exon alternative splicing of the ER gene can give rise to a variety of variant receptor isoforms that may potentiate the diverse actions of E2 through a single receptor gene.

Little is known about the {Delta}2ER variant that encodes only the A/B domain of hormone-independent transcriptional activation function. Sequence analysis indicates that the protein product encoded by this variant is severely truncated and lacks domains critical for binding estrogen response elements or E2. However, the A/B domain of the receptor has been shown to be important for stimulating transcription from certain E2-responsive genes such as pS2 (7), c-fos (22), and C3 (23) and is also critical for growth factor interactions (cross-talk) with ER signaling pathways (10). Moreover, functional analysis of an ER mutant containing only the A/B domain similar to {Delta}2ER has been shown to be highly effective in repressing Fos-mediated transcription in HeLa cells. Fos protein is known to antagonize transcription of the c-fos gene promoter induced by ER (22). Therefore, the {Delta}2ER truncated receptor may retain selective transcriptional activity and act as a coactivator or repressor of wild-type ER and may also play a role in cross-coupling between the nuclear receptor and other growth signal transduction pathways.

{Delta}5ER was also found to be expressed in PRL- and GPH-producing tumors and was not readily detected in most normal pituitary tissues studied, including a normal pituitary cDNA library obtained from nine men and women. This variant has been shown to have constitutive transcriptional activity on E2 response elements and confer tamoxifen-resistant growth in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells (13, 15). A mutagenesis-generated ER isoform lacking most of the hormone-binding domain structurally similar to the {Delta}5ER-encoded protein has also been shown to activate c-fos promoter independent of E2 administration (16). Therefore, {Delta}5ER might also have constitutive activity and function to up-regulate the growth factor-induced transcriptional response in human pituitary tumors. However, whether this ER variant possesses similar transcriptional activity in pituitary cells remained to be determined.

Two ER variants ({Delta}3ER and {Delta}6ER) were not readily detectable in any pituitary specimens. {Delta}3ER, which lacks a portion of the DNA-binding domain, has been shown to have a dominant negative effect on wild-type receptor transactivation function in HeLa cells (17). However, the absence of {Delta}3ER in human pituitary suggests that this dominant negative isoform may not have a significant pathophysiological role in human pituitary tumorigenesis. {Delta}6ER, which lacks a portion of the hormone-binding domain, has never been observed in any normal or neoplastic human tissue type (14, 24, 25). Our results, which failed to detect {Delta}6ER mRNA in normal and adenomatous human pituitary specimens, are consistent with these studies.

Two ER variants ({Delta}4ER and {Delta}7ER) were found in both normal and neoplastic pituitary, similar to those in other tissues. A {Delta}4ER variant has been shown to be expressed in both normal and tumor cells of breast, uterus, and brain (25). This ER variant lacking the hinge region and a small fraction of the hormone-binding domain of the receptor was unable to bind E2 or a synthetic E2-responsive element and was transcriptionally inactive in transfection assays using human embryonic carcinoma P19EC and chorionic carcinoma JEG3 cell lines (25). In contrast, {Delta}7ER has been shown to have a dominant negative effect on wild-type ER in a yeast expression vector system (26). However, {Delta}7ER was detected in both normal and adenomatous pituitary specimens in our studies and has also been found in both normal and neoplastic breast tissues (14) as well as human meningioma (25).

Our data demonstrate the following. 1) Multiple, alternatively spliced ER variant mRNAs lacking a single exon were coexpressed with wild-type ER in a tumor phenotype-specific manner. 2) The majority of prolactinomas as well as a subset of GPH-producing adenomas that synthesized FSH expressed {Delta}2ER, {Delta}4ER, {Delta}5ER, and {Delta}7ER. No ER variants were found in somatotroph, corticotroph, or null cell tumors, and {Delta}6ER was not detected in any tumor studied. 3) Normal pituitaries uniformly expressed only {Delta}4ER and {Delta}7ER in addition to normal ER, whereas {Delta}2ER and {Delta}5ER mRNA appeared to be pituitary tumor specific. Coexpression of variant and wild-type receptors is compatible with potential interactions between ER and its variant isoforms in estrogen-sensitive pituitary cell types. Specific ER variants may have a role in modulating E2 sensitivity in normal and adenomatous cells, whereas others may be involved in promoting aberrant cell growth and abnormal hormone production in the tumors. Therefore, the identification of ER variant mRNAs in human pituitary tumors is a first step in investigating their functional significance in the pituitary as well as their potential role in modulating pituitary neoplastic cell growth and hormone biosynthesis.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by NIH Grant DK-40947 and an American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant Award. Portions of this work were presented at the 10th International Congress of Endocrinology, San Francisco, CA, June 1996. Back

2 Recipient of the Massachusetts General Hospital Medical Discovery Award. Back

Received November 7, 1996.

Revised December 13, 1996.

Accepted December 26, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Lieberman ME, Maurer RA, Claude P, Wiklund J, Wertz N, Gorski J. 1980 Regulation of pituitary growth and prolactin gene expression by estrogen, hormones and cancer. In Leavitt WW, ed. Hormones and cancer. New York: Plenum Press; 151–163.
  2. Shupnik MA, Gharib SD, Chin WW. 1989 Divergent effects of estradiol on gonadotropin gene transcription in pituitary fragments. Mol Endocrinol. 3:474–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Chaidarun SS, Eggo MC, Stewart PM, Barber PC, Sheppard MC. 1994 Role of growth factors and estrogen as modulators and growth, differentiation and expression of gonadotropin subunit genes in primary cultured sheep pituitary cells. Endocrinology. 134:935–944.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Holmgren U, Bergstrand G, Hagenfeldt K, Werner S. 1986 Women with prolactinoma-effect of pregnancy and lactation on serum prolactin and on tumor growth. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 111:452–459.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Furth J. 1955 Experimental pituitary tumors. Recent Prog Horm Res. 11:221–249.
  6. Lloyd RV. 1983 Estrogen-induced hyperplasia and neoplasia in the rat anterior pituitary gland. Am J Pathol. 113:198–206.[Abstract]
  7. Kumar V, Green S, Stack G, Berry M, Jin JR, Chambon P. 1987 Functional domains of the human estrogen receptor. Cell. 51:941–951.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Ponglikitmongkol M, Green S, Chambon P. 1988 Genomic organization of the human estrogen receptor gene. EMBO J. 7:3385–3388.[Medline]
  9. Green S, Walter P, Kumar V, et al. 1986 Human estrogen receptor cDNA: sequence, expression and homology to v-erbA. Nature. 320:134–139.[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Ignar-Trowbridge DM, Pimentel M, Parker MG, McLachlan JA, Korach KS. 1996 Peptide growth factor cross-talk with estrogen receptor requires the A/B domain and occurs independently of protein kinase C or estradiol. Endocrinology. 137:1735–1744.[Abstract]
  11. Newton CJ, Buric R, Trapp T, Brockmeier S, Pagotto U, Stalla GK. 1994 The unliganded estrogen receptor (ER) transduces growth factor signals. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 48:481–486.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Fuqua SAW, Allred DC, Auchus RJ. 1993 Expression of estrogen receptor variants. J Cell Biochem. 17G:194–197.
  13. Fuqua SAW. 1994 Estrogen receptor mutagenesis and hormone resistance. Cancer. 74:1026–1029.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Gotteland M, Desauty G, Delarue JC, Liu L, May E. 1995 Human estrogen receptor messenger RNA variants in both normal and tumor breast tissues. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 112:1–13.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Fuqua SAW, Fitzgerald SD, Chamness GC, et al. 1991 Variant human breast tumor estrogen receptor with constitutive transcriptional activity. Cancer Res. 51:105–109.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Weisz A, Rosales R. 1990 Identification of an estrogen response element upstream of the human c-fos gene that binds the estrogen receptor and the AP-1 transcription factor. Nucleic Acids Res. 18:5097–5105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Wang Y, Miksicek RJ. 1991 Identification of a dominant negative form of the human estrogen receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 5:1707–1715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Friend KE, Chiou YK, Lopes MBS, Laws ER, Hughes KM, Shupnik MA. 1994 Estrogen receptor expression in human pituitary: correlation with immunohistochemistry in normal tissue, and immunohistochemistry and morphology in macroadenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:1497–1504.[Abstract]
  19. Zafar M, Ezzat S, Ramyar L, Pan N, Smyth HS, Asa SL. 1995 Cell-specific expression of estrogen receptor in the human pituitary and its adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:3621–3627.[Abstract]
  20. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. 1987 Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem. 162:156–159.[Medline]
  21. Alexander JM, Klibanski A. 1994 Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor mRNA expression by human pituitary tumors in vitro. J Clin Invest. 93:2332–2339.
  22. Ambrosino C, Cicatiello L, Cobellis G, et al. 1993 Functional antagonism between the estrogen receptor and Fos on the regulation of c-fos protooncogene transcription. Mol Endocrinol. 7:1472–1483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. McDonnell DP, Lieberman BA, Norris J. 1995 Development of tissue-selective estrogen receptor modulators. In Organ-selective actions of steroid hormones. Baird DT, Schutz G, Krattenmacher R, ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1–28.
  24. Pfeffer U, Fecarotta E, Vidali G. 1995 Coexpression of multiple estrogen receptor variant messenger RNAs in normal and neoplastic breast tissues and in MCF-7 cells. Cancer Res. 55:2158–2165.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Koehorst SGA, Cox JJ, Donker GH, et al. 1994 Functional analysis of an alternatively spliced estrogen receptor lacking exon 4 isolated from MCF-7 breast cancer cells and meningioma tissue. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 101:237–245.[CrossRef][Medline]
  26. Fuqua SA, Fitzgerald SD, Allred DC, et al. 1992 Inhibition of estrogen receptor action by a naturally occurring variant in human breast tumors. Cancer Res. 52:483–486.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ben-Jonathan, C. R. LaPensee, and E. W. LaPensee
What Can We Learn from Rodents about Prolactin in Humans?
Endocr. Rev., February 1, 2008; 29(1): 1 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. P. Gillam, M. E. Molitch, G. Lombardi, and A. Colao
Advances in the Treatment of Prolactinomas
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2006; 27(5): 485 - 534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
M. H. Herynk and S. A. W. Fuqua
Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 2004; 25(6): 869 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. F. Palter, A. B. Tavares, A. Hourvitz, J. D. Veldhuis, and E. Y. Adashi
Are Estrogens of Import to Primate/Human Ovarian Folliculogenesis?
Endocr. Rev., June 1, 2001; 22(3): 389 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. Pasquali, V. Rossi, D. Esposito, C. Abbondanza, G. A. Puca, A. Bellastella, and A. A. Sinisi
Loss of Estrogen Receptor {beta} Expression in Malignant Human Prostate Cells in Primary Cultures and in Prostate Cancer Tissues
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 2051 - 2055.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
S. L. Asa and S. Ezzat
The Cytogenesis and Pathogenesis of Pituitary Adenomas
Endocr. Rev., December 1, 1998; 19(6): 798 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. A. Shupnik, L. K. Pitt, A. Y. Soh, A. Anderson, M. B. Lopes, and E. R. Laws Jr.
Selective Expression of Estrogen Receptor {alpha} and {beta} Isoforms in Human Pituitary Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1998; 83(11): 3965 - 3972.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. S. Chaidarun, B. Swearingen, and J. M. Alexander
Differential Expression of Estrogen Receptor-{beta} (ER{beta}) in Human Pituitary Tumors: Functional Interactions with ER{alpha} and a Tumor-Specific Splice Variant
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 1998; 83(9): 3308 - 3315.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. S. Chaidarun and J. M. Alexander
A Tumor-Specific Truncated Estrogen Receptor Splice Variant Enhances Estrogen-Stimulated Gene Expression
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 1998; 12(9): 1355 - 1366.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chaidarun, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chaidarun, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, J. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals