help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotlar, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotlar, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 4 1020-1026
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Reproductive Endocrinology

A Mutation in the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Occurs Frequently in Human Ovarian Sex Cord Tumors1

T. J. Kotlar, R. H. Young, C. Albanese, W. F. Crowley, Jr., R. E. Scully and J. L. Jameson

Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine (T.J.K., C.A., J.L.J.), Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611; the Departments of Medicine (W.F.C.) and Pathology (R.H.Y., R.E.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: J. Larry Jameson, M.D., Ph.D., Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Tarry 15–709, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60611. E-mail: ljameson{at}nwu.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A subset of ovarian tumors, referred to as sex cord-stromal tumors, produce endocrine manifestations due to the secretion of estrogens or androgens. Because gonadotropins induce the growth, differentiation, and function of the steroid-producing cells of the ovary, we hypothesized that mutations in the FSH receptor (FSH-R) might occur in this group of tumors. Ovarian sex cord tumors (n = 13), small cell carcinomas of the ovary (n = 3), and control DNA specimens (n = 116) were screened for mutations in the transmembrane domains of the FSH-R. A heterozygous T->C mutation was found at nucleotide 1777 that converts codon 591 from phenylalanine to serine (F591S). This sixth transmembrane domain mutation was found in 9 of 13 (69%) sex cord tumors and 2 of 3 ovarian small cell carcinomas, but it was not present in control specimens, including 5 normal ovaries, 5 nonsex cord ovarian tumors, 16 thyroid tumors, or 90 specimens of peripheral blood leukocyte DNA, suggesting that this nucleotide change is not a polymorphism. The functional effects of identified mutations were assessed by expression of the wild-type or the F591S mutant FSH-R in COS-7 cells. The F591S mutation eliminated FSH-stimulated cAMP production, and a similar effect was observed when this mutation was introduced into the homologous location of the LH receptor. The high prevalence of the F591S mutation in the FSH-R suggests that it plays a role in the development of ovarian sex cord tumors.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SEX CORD stromal tumors are notable for their endocrine activity and account for 5–10% of all ovarian tumors (for review, see Ref.1). Major subtypes of sex cord stromal tumors include granulosa cell tumors, thecomas, Sertoli cell tumors, Leydig cell tumors, and others in which varying combinations of these cell types and stromal tissue are seen. Granulosa cells and Sertoli cells appear to be derived from the sex cords, whereas thecal cells, Leydig cells, and stromal components develop from the ovarian mesenchyme (2).

Granulosa cell tumors are the most common sex cord tumor and are usually seen in adults, with a peak incidence between 50–55 yr. Granulosa cell tumors are estrogenic, but also produce a variety of other hormones, including the peptides, inhibin (3, 4), and Mullerian inhibiting substance (5). Thecomas occur about one third as often as granulosa cell tumors, typically in postmenopausal women. Thecomas produce androgens as well as estrogens, particularly when they exhibit luteinization. Sertoli and Leydig cell tumors of the ovary are relatively rare, are usually seen in younger women, and often present with virilization.

The functionally differentiated nature of sex cord-stromal tumors makes them an attractive model for attempting to identify candidate oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. In a mouse model in which the inhibin {alpha}-subunit gene was disrupted, sex cord tumors developed with nearly complete penetrance (6). Because the inhibin-deficient mice overexpress activin (homodimer of inhibin ß-subunits), the uninhibited autocrine secretion of activin has been postulated to stimulate proliferation and to predispose to sex cord tumors (6, 7). There is evidence that gonadotropin stimulation enhances the penetrance of these tumors (8). Ovarian granulosa cell tumors have also been induced in neonatally estrogenized mice treated with 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (9). Bilateral granulosa cell tumors were identified in a patient with leprechaunism (insulin receptor mutation), and it was proposed that chronic hyperinsulinism may have increased mitogenesis of granulosa cells by acting via the insulin-like growth factor I receptor (10). Molecular defects in sex cord tumors have not been well defined. Flow cytometry indicates that about 38% of granulosa cell tumors are aneuploid (11), and trisomy 12 is seen commonly in thecoma-fibromas (90%), but infrequently in granulosa cell tumors (16%) (12). Binding sites for LH and FSH have also been identified in sex cord-stromal tumors, suggesting that these tumors might retain responsiveness to gonadotropins (13). Whether ovarian stimulation by gonadotropins predisposes to granulosa cell tumors is controversial (14, 15, 16).

The LH and FSH receptors are members of the seven-transmembrane (TM) domain, G protein-coupled superfamily. Recent studies have identified mutations in this family of receptors that can activate or inactivate receptor function (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25). For example, inactivating mutations in the FSH receptor (FSH-R) cause autosomal recessive primary ovarian failure (21), and inactivating mutations of the LH receptor (LH-R) cause pseudohermaphroditism in males and ovarian failure in females (22, 23). Activating mutations of the LH-R cause gonadotropin-independent production of testosterone and precocious puberty in males (17). A case report of an activating mutation in the FSH-R was described in a man with preserved spermatogenesis despite hypopituitarism (25). Activating mutations in this family of receptors have been localized within the TM domain, with a particularly high prevalence in a putative G protein coupling region that includes the fifth TM domain, third intracytoplasmic loop, and sixth TM domain (19, 20). As many sex cord-stromal tumors are estrogenic, we hypothesized that the FSH-R was a candidate for mutations that could alter the growth and function of this group of tumors. We examined a group of archival tumor specimens for mutations within the TM domain and tested the functional effects of a mutation that was identified with high frequency in these specimens.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Isolation of DNA

DNA was isolated from paraffin-embedded ovarian specimens as described previously (26, 27). Tissue blocks were cut into 5-µm sections and extracted with xylene followed by washing in absolute ethanol. The dewaxed tissue was suspended in 300 µL lysis buffer [10 mmol/L Tris (pH 7.5), 10 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L Na2-ethylenediamine tetraacetate, and 0.5% SDS] containing 20 µg/mL proteinase K and incubated at 37 C for 4 days. The solution was then extracted with phenol-chloroform-isoamylalcohol (25:24:1), and DNA was precipitated with ethanol. Leukocyte DNA samples from 90 unrelated individuals were provided by Andrew Arnold (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) and Samuel Refetoff (University of Chicago, Chicago, IL).

Analysis of FSH-R DNA sequence

Extracted DNA was subjected to two-stage PCR using nested sets of sense and antisense primers. The primers for first stage PCR were: FSH-R-TM5, 5'-TGA AGG TGA GCA TCT GCC-3' (sense); and FSH-R-TM6, 5'-AAC AGA ACC AGC AGA ATC-3' (antisense). PCR reactions (50 µl) included 300 ng DNA, 10 pmol of each primer, 50 µmol/L deoxynucleoside triphosphates (deoxy-NTPs), and 2 mmol/L MgCl2, in PCR buffer [10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 50 mmol/L KCl, and 0.1% Triton X-100] containing 2.5 U Taq DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI). Cycle conditions were 1-min hot start at 96 C followed by 12 cycles of 5 s at 96 C, 60 s at 92 C, 45 s at 58 C, 45 s at 72 C, and extension at 72 C for 10 min. An aliquot (2 µl) of this reaction product was used as template for the second stage PCR using two internal primers: FSH-R-TM5I-M13rev, 5'-CAG GAA ACA GCT ATG ACC CAT CTG CCT GCC CAT GGA-3' (sense with 5' M13 sequencing site); and FSH-R-TM6I, 5'-GCA GAA TCT TTG CTT TGG-3'. PCR conditions were the same as described above and were carried out for 25 cycles. Control reactions without the addition of DNA were used to detect contamination of reagents.

The secondary PCR product was prepared for DNA sequencing by treatment with exonuclease (10 U/5 µl PCR product; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL) and shrimp alkaline phosphatase (2 U/5 µl product; Amersham) for 15 min at 37 C followed by 15 min at 65 C. DNA was purified using Centricon-100 spin columns (Amicon, Beverly, MA). Direct DNA sequencing was performed using the ABI Prism Dye Terminator or Dye Primer Cycle sequencing kits with AmpliTaq DNA Polymerase FS (Perkin-Elmer, Foster City, CA). In some cases, the secondary PCR products were resolved on 1.2% agarose gels, purified with the GeneClean II kit (BIO 101, Vista, CA), and ligated into the TA Cloning Kit PCR 2.1 vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). Plasmid inserts were sequenced as described above.

Screening for the F591S mutation

Two methods (oligonucleotide-specific hybridization and primer-specific PCR) were used to screen DNA specimens for the F591S mutation. For oligonucleotide-specific hybridization, PCR products were attached to membranes and hybridized to 32P-labeled oligonucleotides (26, 27). The sequences of the oligonucleotides were: wild type, 5'-TTC TTT CTT TGC CAT TT-3'; or mutant, SD 5'-TTC TTT CTC TGC CAT TT-3' (mutant base in italics). PCR products from second stage PCR (see above) were fixed to nitrocellulose by baking at 80 C in a vacuum oven for 2 h. Hybridization was carried out at 50 C for 3.5 h in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 3.0 mol/L tetramethylammonium chloride, 5 x Denhardt’s solution, 0.1% SDS, 33 µg/mL salmon sperm DNA, and 106 cpm/mL labeled oligonucleotide. Membranes were washed twice, for 10 min at room temperature in 2 x SSPE and 0.1% SDS and for 20 min at 50 C in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 3 mol/L tetramethylammonium chloride, 2 mmol/L ethylenediamine tetraacetate, and 0.1% SDS, before exposure to x-ray film. The stringency of hybridization and washing conditions was verified by the inclusion of control samples with known wild-type or mutant sequence at codon 591 of the FSH-R.

Primer-specific detection of the T to C mutation was based upon the ability to generate a new restriction enzyme site (PstI) by modifying the DNA sequence adjacent to the mutation. The sense primer was the same as FSH-R TM 5I, except that a fluorescent label was attached (5'-Fam-CAT CTG CCT GCC CAT GGA-3'). The antisense primer (5'-ACA CAG TGA TGA GGG GCA CCT TGA GGG AGG CAG AAA CTG CA-3') included two nucleotide substitutions (in italics), which, in conjunction with the T to C mutation, created a new PstI site. After restriction digestion with PstI, samples were analyzed on a 377 DNA Sequencer using GeneScan 2.0.2 software (Perkin-Elmer).

Functional analyses of FSH-R

A full-length complementary DNA (cDNA) construct of the human FSH-R in pSVK3 (28) was used for site-directed mutagenesis to create the T to C mutation in nucleotide 1777 (codon 591, Phe to Ser). The sequence of the PCR product was verified, including the presence of the mutation. An expression construct was prepared by inserting the mutation-containing NcoI-XhoI fragment into the corresponding site of the pSVK3-FSH-R. The wild-type and mutant FSH-R cDNAs were subsequently transferred into the pSVL vector, which resulted in higher levels of expression (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden).

FSH binding to expressed receptors was examined in transfected COS-7 cells (28). Human FSH (AFP 5720) was labeled with Na125I (New England Nuclear, Boston, MA) using lactoperoxidase and purified by gel electrophoresis (provided by P. Sluss, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) (29). Cells were transfected at 50% confluency in 10-cm plates with 60 µg plasmid using a lipid-mediated (DDAB:PtdEtn, 1.0:0.6 mg) protocol (30). After 24 h, cells were split into six-well plates (2 x 105 cells/well) and allowed to recover for 24 h. After rinsing in binding buffer [50 mmol/L HEPES (pH 7.4), 100 mmol/L sucrose, 5 mmol/L MgCl2, and 0.1% ovalbumin], the transfected cells were incubated for 4 h at room temperature in 0.5 mL binding buffer containing 50,000 cpm (34 pmol/L) 125I-labeled FSH with or without excess unlabeled FSH. Cells were rinsed twice in 1.0 mL binding buffer, incubated for 60 min in 0.5 mL 1 mol/L NaOH, and collected for determination of radioactivity.

The function of the expressed FSH-Rs was assessed by measuring the production of cAMP. COS-7 cells (3 x 105 cells/well) were transfected as described above. After 48 h, cells were treated for 60 min with FSH (200 mIU/mL; 23.5 ng/mL) and 200 µmol/L 3-isobutyl-1-methyl-xanthine (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO), and the extracellular medium was harvested for cAMP determination by RIA (Biomedical Technologies, Stoughton, MA). Where applicable, empty pSVL expression vector was used to balance the transfection reactions such that the total amount of expression vector was kept constant.

An LH-R mutation (F588S) that is homologous to the FSH-R mutant (F591S) was also created by site-directed mutagenesis. A human LH-R expression vector (pCMX-HLHR; provided by A. Hsueh, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA) was used as a template. The sequence of the mutant cDNA was verified, and it was subcloned as a BstXI/Bpu1102I fragment into the expression plasmid. The functional properties of the wild-type and mutant LH-R were examined using the same protocol as that used for the FSH-R, except that transfected cells were treated with 500 ng/mL hCG (Serono, Randolph, MA).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Analysis of sex cord tumors for mutations in the FSH-R

A series of 16 archival sex cord and other ovarian tumors were selected for study by one of the pathologists (R.H.Y.). The pathological diagnoses were not revealed until after DNA sequence analyses were completed. Later, an additional 10 ovarian control specimens, 16 thyroid tumors, and 90 peripheral blood specimens were examined. DNA was extracted from the paraffin blocks, and PCR was used to amplify a portion of the FSH-R TM domain, including the fifth TM domain, the third intracellular loop, and the sixth TM domain (amino acids 515–611). The DNA sequence was determined by direct cycle sequencing. A heterozygous mutation (T to C, nucleotide 1777) that converts Phe591 to Ser (F591S) was found in several of the specimens (Fig. 1Go). No other sequence alterations were found in this region of the receptor. The sequencing results for various types of sex cord tumors are summarized in Table 1Go. The identical mutation was found in 7 of 9 juvenile granulosa cell tumors and 2 of 3 adult granulosa cell tumors. The mutation was not present in a luteinized thecoma with sclerosing peritonitis (31). The mutation was present, however, in 2 of 3 ovarian small cell tumors of the hypercalcemic type (32). Overall, this mutation was found in 9 of 13 (69%) sex cord tumors and with similar prevalence in small cell carcinomas.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Heterozygous mutation at codon 591 in the FSH-R. Direct DNA sequence analysis is shown from a normal specimen and a tumor (no. 15) that is heterozygous (both T and C are present) at nucleotide 1777. The mutation results in codons for either Phe (wild-type) or Ser (mutant).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of FSH receptor mutations in sex cord tumors

 
The DNA sequence of each of the specimens was confirmed using several independent methods. Clones of the PCR products yielded both mutant and wild-type sequences, as expected for heterozygous mutations. A PCR reaction was also designed to create a new PstI restriction site if the mutation was present (Fig. 2Go). This assay confirmed the mutations in all samples tested and excluded the mutation in the controls.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Screening for the F591S mutation using an altered restriction enzyme site. The strategy for PCR amplification is shown at the top of the figure. The antisense primer contains two nucleotide substitutions (shaded TC) that result in the creation of a PstI site only when the FSH-R mutation (T->C) is present. Gene scan analysis of the fluorescently labeled PCR products is shown before and after digestion with PstI. The peak at 268 bp corresponds to the full-length product, and the mutation creates a PstI site that results in a peak of 231 bp (the 37-bp product is not seen because the fluorescent tag is removed).

 
The presence of an identical nucleotide substitution in several of the tumor samples raised the possibility that it was a common polymorphism in the FSH-R. Several different types of controls were used to address this possibility. Paraffin blocks of four other ovarian carcinomas (no. 17–21) and five specimens of normal ovary (no. 22–26) were processed in parallel with the sex cord tumors, and none of these contained the mutation. DNA isolated previously from a series of 16 thyroid tumors did not have the F591S mutation, nor was it found in 90 samples of DNA isolated from peripheral blood leukocytes (Table 1Go). These results suggest that if this is a polymorphism, it occurs in less than 1 in 232 (0.4%) alleles. Normal tissue was available from only 2 patients (no. 5 and 11), but the sex cord tumors in each of these cases contained normal FSH-R sequence. Consequently, it was not possible to ascertain in this study whether the mutation was inherited or somatic in origin.

Functional properties of the F591S mutant

The wild-type and F591S mutant FSH-R were expressed in COS-7 cells to assess the effect of the mutation on basal and FSH-induced function. Initially, FSH binding studies were performed to determine whether the F591S mutation altered receptor expression or ligand binding. Receptor expression vectors were transfected alone or together, and FSH binding was determined 48 h later. The specific binding of [125I]FSH was consistently 2- to 5-fold greater to the wild-type receptor than to the F591S mutant (Fig. 3Go). An intermediate level of binding was seen when equal amounts of the receptors were coexpressed. There was no alteration in the affinity of FSH binding to the F591S mutant (data not shown) consistent with its location in the TM domain rather than the extracellular ligand-binding domain.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Binding of FSH to the wild-type and F591S mutant of the FSH-R. COS-7 cells were transfected with empty pSVL expression vector, wild-type FSH-R, the F591S mutant FSH-R, or equal amounts of wild-type and mutant receptors. 125I-Labeled hFSH was bound in the absence or presence of a 600-fold excess of unlabeled FSH. Results represent the mean ± SEM of three determinations, and similar results were obtained in three other experiments.

 
Basal and FSH-induced activities of the mutant receptor were assessed by measuring cAMP, the predominant second messenger for the FSH-R (33, 34). Because of apparent differences in receptor expression, responses were determined using a range of transfected receptor DNA (Fig. 4Go). The mutant receptor in the antisense orientation was included as a negative control. Basal cAMP levels were unaffected by transfecting increasing doses of either the wild-type or the F591S mutant. Using the wild-type receptor, the addition of FSH induced progressively greater responses with increasing amounts of receptor. Maximal responsiveness was ~15-fold. In contrast to the wild-type receptor, no FSH response was detected using the F591S mutant even at the highest dose of transfected DNA. These results suggest that the F591S mutation impairs FSH responsiveness, probably by altering coupling to the signal transduction apparatus.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The F591S mutation eliminates FSH-induced cAMP stimulation. Varying amounts of wild type (WT), antisense, or mutant (F591S) FSH-Rs were transfected into COS-7 cells and treated for 60 min in the absence or presence of human FSH (200 mIU/mL; 23.5 ng/mL). cAMP levels (mean ± SEM) were determined from triplicate reactions. Similar results were obtained in more than five other experiments.

 
Because FSH-R and LH-R are highly homologous within the region surrounding the F591S mutation, the analogous mutation (F588S) was also created in the LH-R, which has been shown previously to be subject to both activating and inactivating mutations (17, 19, 22, 24). There was no apparent effect of the LH-R F588S mutation on basal activity (Fig. 5Go). However, this substitution reduced LH-induced stimulation of cAMP from 21- to 6-fold. Thus, the effect of this mutation is similar to that of the F591S mutation in the FSH-R.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Insertion of the F->S mutation into the LH-R impairs hormone-induced cAMP stimulation. Wild-type (WT) and mutant (F588S) LH-Rs were transfected into COS-7 cells and treated for 60 min in the absence or presence of hCG (500 ng/mL). cAMP levels (mean ± SEM) were determined from triplicate reactions.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The fact that many ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are hormonally active led us to consider whether alterations in the gonadotropin receptor signaling pathway might play a role in the development or the progression of these tumors. Mutations were first sought in the FSH-R in granulosa cell tumors because the great majority of these tumors produce estradiol, mimicking the effects of FSH stimulation. A mutation was identified in the sixth TM domain, converting the hydrophobic residue, phenylalanine, to a polar amino acid, serine.

Because detection of heterozygous mutations from small amounts of DNA is technically challenging, several techniques were used to analyze mutations in the sex cord tumors. All specimens were analyzed by direct DNA sequencing, and mutations were confirmed either using oligonucleotide-specific hybridization or by showing the presence of a new PstI restriction site as a result of the mutation. Surprisingly, the same nucleotide substitution was subsequently identified in the majority of the sex cord-stromal tumors that were available for study. The prevalence of this particular mutation, without identification of other mutations, raised the possibility that it might be a polymorphism. Therefore, we examined a series of control samples for the presence of this mutation. DNA from thyroid tumors was used to control for possible contamination as well as to screen for a polymorphism. Using oligonucleotide-specific hybridization, two of the thyroid tumors were initially suspected of having the mutation. However, restriction analysis excluded a mutation in these cases. In general, mutation detection by hybridization is less reliable because the technique is sensitive to the stringency of hybridization and washing. A large number of specimens of leukocyte DNA (n = 90) also did not contain the F591S mutation, providing further evidence that it is not a common polymorphism. Finally, a series of other ovary specimens was examined without evidence for the mutation. Based upon these results, we conclude that the F591S substitution is a mutation rather than a polymorphism. This concept is supported by the fact that the nonconservative amino acid substitution also alters the function of the receptor.

It is of great interest to consider whether this mutation is acquired somatically, or whether it is a germ-line mutation that somehow predisposes to sex cord tumors. It remains possible that the F591S mutation occurs at a low gene frequency and represents a risk factor for sex cord tumors. For example, a "second hit" may actually cause the tumor, but this mutation may predispose it toward the sex cord phenotype. Unfortunately, we were not able to address this question because no normal tissue was available from this group of patients. These archival specimens were accumulated by referral of specific blocks of tumors over several decades for confirmation of difficult histological diagnoses. We were able to procure only two additional tissue specimens from referring physicians, and both were from patients without a mutation. It should be possible to address this interesting issue in future prospective studies of sex cord tumors.

We initially hypothesized that the F591S mutation might constitutively activate the cAMP pathway, analogous to mutations that have been reported in the structurally related TSH-R (20) and LH-R (19). The activating mutations in TSH-R and LH-R increase the basal activity of adenylyl cyclase and preserve further responsiveness after the addition of hormone. However, rather than exhibit increased basal activity, the F591S mutation caused an apparent loss of receptor function. cAMP production was measured using two different approaches. A RIA was used to measure cAMP production directly, and a cAMP-responsive reporter gene was used as an independent means of detecting the second messenger (data not shown). Basal cAMP levels in the presence of wild-type and mutant receptors were indistinguishable. However, because the basal levels of cAMP are very low, we cannot absolutely exclude the possibility of a low degree of basal activation in these assays. The fact that no cAMP response was seen with the mutant receptor, even after the addition of FSH, provides further evidence that the mutation alters receptor coupling to the cAMP pathway. The homologous mutation was also introduced into the human LH-R. Consistent with the results using the FSH-R, there were no alterations in basal cAMP levels, and responses to LH were blunted. In view of these findings, we conclude that the F591S substitution is a loss of function mutation, at least with respect to the cAMP pathway. It is possible, however, that the mutation alters other signaling pathways. FSH minimally altered the production of phosphoinositides in the transient expression model (data not shown), and previous studies have shown that this response requires relatively high doses of FSH (35).

A number of mutations have now been reported within the third cytoplasmic loop and sixth TM domain of the glycoprotein hormone receptors (19, 20). This region is postulated to represent a G protein interaction domain (36, 37). As depicted in Fig. 6Go, a variety of activating mutations have been described in the TSH-R and the LH-R, and a single activating mutation was reported recently in the FSH-R (25) (Fig. 6Go). For the most part, these mutations are clustered near the end of the third cytoplasmic loop and along one of the predicted surfaces of the sixth TM domain. On the other hand, the F591S mutation is located in close proximity to an inactivating mutation in the LH-R. Ultimately, structural information in combination with further functional studies will be required to assess the implications of these mutations. In the interim, these results suggest that mutations within closely spaced domains can result in divergent effects on receptor function.



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Summary of activating and inactivating mutations in the TM domain of the glycoprotein hormone receptors. The structure of the FSH-R is illustrated schematically. The amino acid sequences of homologous regions of the TSHR, LHR, and FSH-R are shown for a region that includes portions of the third intracytoplasmic loop and sixth TM domain. The locations of activating mutations are shaded, and an inactivating mutation is depicted by a dark circle. The F591S mutation in the FSH-R is denoted by an arrow.

 
At present, it is unclear how this FSH-R mutation might play a causal role in the development of sex cord tumors. It seems likely that this FSH-R mutation is only one of several genetic abnormalities in these tumors. For example, it is possible that other mutations might involve the inhibin or activin pathways. Loss of the inhibin {alpha}-subunit gene has been shown in transgenic mice to strongly predispose to granulosa cell tumors (6), and mating with p53-deficient mice increased the penetrance of the inhibin {alpha} mutation (7). In this model, unopposed production of activin has been proposed to lead to granulosa cell tumors. Expression of the FSH-R mutation in transgenic mice or, ideally, the use of homologous recombination to create the mutation may ultimately be required to assess its functional role. Although these mechanistic questions remain unresolved at present, the recognition of this mutation provides an important first step toward understanding the genetic basis of this subset of ovarian tumors.

It is interesting to speculate about the prevalence of this, or similar mutations in other ovarian disorders. Already it seems that the F591S mutation is found in several different types of sex cord stromal tumors that exhibit distinct histological and functional characteristics. For example, the mutation was found with similar prevalence in juvenile and adult granulosa cell tumors and in a group that we have classified as ovarian small cell carcinomas of the hypercalcemic type (1). The cellular origin of the small cell carcinomas is unclear, but these results suggest that they may fit into the sex cord-stromal tumor category. These observations also raise the possibility that this mutation may occur in other gonadal disorders, including ovarian cysts, polycystic ovarian disease, and Sertoli cell tumors. Further studies will be of interest to address these issues.


    Acknowledgments
 
We are grateful to many members of the laboratory for helpful technical suggestions. We thank Andrea Winquist for providing control ovarian specimens, and Samuel Refetoff and Andrew Arnold for providing advice and DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes. The human LH-R expression plasmid was kindly provided by Aaron Hseuh. We are grateful to Patrick Sluss for providing iodinated FSH and for advice regarding binding assays.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by USPHS Grant U54-HD-29164 conducted by the National Cooperative Program on Infertility Research. Back

Received August 26, 1996.

Revised November 8, 1996.

Accepted December 5, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Young RH, Scully RE. 1992 Endocrine tumors of the ovary. Curr Top Pathol. 85:114–164.
  2. Scully RE. 1995 Ovarian tumors with endocrine manifestations. In: DeGroot LJ (ed) Endocrinology. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2113–2139.
  3. Healy DL, Burger HG, Mamers P, et al. 1993 Elevated serum inhibin concentrations in postmenopausal women with ovarian tumors. N Engl J Med. 329:1539–1542.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Jobling T, Mamers P, Healy DL, et al. 1994 A prospective study of inhibin in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol. 55:285–289.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Gustafson ML, Lee MM, Scully RE, et al. 1992 Mullerian inhibiting substance as a marker for ovarian sex-cord tumor. N Engl J Med. 326:466–471.[Medline]
  6. Matzuk MM, Finegold MJ, Su JG, Hsueh AJ, Bradley A. 1992 Alpha-inhibin is a tumour-suppressor gene with gonadal specificity in mice. Nature. 360:313–319.[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Shikone T, Matzuk MM, Perlas E, et al. 1994 Characterization of gonadal sex cord-stromal tumor cell lines from inhibin-alpha and p53-deficient mice: the role of activin as an autocrine growth factor. Mol Endocrinol. 8:983–995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Matzuk MM, Kumar R, Shou W, et al. 1996 Transgenic models to study the roles of inhibins and activins in reproduction, oncogenesis, and development. Recent Prog Horm Res. 51:123–157.
  9. Taguchi O, Michael SD, Nishizuka Y. 1988 Rapid induction of ovarian granulosa cell tumors by 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene in neonatally estrogenized mice. Cancer Res. 48:425–429.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Brisigotti M, Fabbretti G, Pesce F, et al. 1993 Congenital bilateral juvenile granulosa cell tumor of the ovary in leprechaunism: a case report. Pediatr Pathol. 13:549–558.[Medline]
  11. Roush GR, el-Naggar AK, Abdul-Karim FW. 1995 Granulosa cell tumor of ovary: a clinicopathologic and flow cytometric DNA analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 56:430–434.[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Shashi V, Golden WL, von Kap-Herr C, Andersen WA, Gaffey MJ. 1994 Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization for trisomy 12 on archival ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. Gynecol Oncol. 55:349–354.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Nakano R, Kitayama S, Yamoto M, Shima K, Ooshima A. 1989 Localization of gonadotropin binding sites in human ovarian neoplasms. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 161:905–910.[Medline]
  14. Willemsen W, Kruitwagen R, Bastiaans B, Hanselaar T, Rolland R. 1993 Ovarian stimulation and granulosa-cell tumour. Lancet. 341:986–988.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Gocze PM, Freeman DA, Arany A, Garadnay B. 1993 Ovarian stimulation and granulosa-cell tumour. Lancet. 341:1346.
  16. Jansen R. 1993 Ovarian stimulation and granulosa-cell tumour. Lancet. 341:1345.
  17. Shenker A, Laue L, Kosugi S, Merendino Jr JJ, Minegishi T, Cutler Jr GB. 1993 A constitutively activating mutation of the luteinizing hormone receptor in familial male precocious puberty. Nature. 365:652–654.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Parma J, Duprez L, Van Sande J, et al. 1993 Somatic mutations in the thyrotropin receptor gene cause hyperfunctioning thyroid adenomas. Nature. 365:649–651.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Shenker A. 1995 G protein-coupled receptor structure and function: the impact of disease-causing mutations. Bailliere Clin Endocrinol Metab. 9:427–451.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Van Sande J, Parma J, Tonacchera M, Swillens S, Dumont J, Vassart G. 1995 Somatic and germline mutations of the TSH receptor gene in thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:2577–2585.[CrossRef][Medline]
  21. Aittomaki K, Lucena JL, Pakarinen P, et al. 1995 Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene causes hereditary hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. Cell. 82:959–968.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Kremer H, Kraaij R, Toledo SP, et al. 1995 Male pseudohermaphroditism due to a homozygous missense mutation of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene. Nat Genet. 9:160–164.[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Latronico AC, Anasti J, Arnhold IJ, et al. 1995 A novel mutation of the luteinizing hormone receptor gene causing male gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:2490–2494.[Abstract]
  24. Latronico AC, Anasti J, Arnhold IJ, et al. 1996 Brief report: testicular and ovarian resistance to luteinizing hormone caused by inactivating mutations of the luteinizing hormone-receptor gene. N Engl J Med. 334:507–512.[Free Full Text]
  25. Gromoll J, Simoni M, Nieschlag E. 1996 An activating mutation of the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor autonomously sustains spermatogenesis in a hypophysectomized man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 81:1367–1370.[Abstract]
  26. Goelz SE, Hamilton SR, Vogelstein B. 1985 Purification of DNA from formaldehyde fixed and paraffin embedded human tissue. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 130:118–126.[CrossRef][Medline]
  27. Karga H, Lee JK, Vickery Jr AL, Thor A, Gaz RD, Jameson JL. 1991 ras oncogene mutations in benign and malignant thyroid neoplasms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 73:832–836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Albanese C, Christin-Maitre S, Sluss PM, Crowley WF, Jameson JL. 1994 Development of a bioassay for FSH using a recombinant human FSH receptor and a cAMP responsive luciferase reporter gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 101:211–219.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Schneyer AL, Sluss PM, Bosukonda D, Reichert Jr LE. 1986 Electrophoretic purification of radioiodinated follicle-stimulating hormone for radioligand receptor assay, and radioimmunoassay. Endocrinology. 119:1446–1453.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Rose JK, Buonocore L, Whitt MA. 1991 A new cationic liposome reagent mediating nearly quantitative transfection of animal cells. Biotechniques. 10:520–525.[Medline]
  31. Clement PB, Young RH, Hanna W, Scully RE. 1994 Sclerosing peritonitis associated with luteinized thecomas of the ovary. Am J Surg Pathol. 18:1–13.[Medline]
  32. Young RH, Oliva E, Scully RE. 1994 Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type. A clinicopathological analysis of 150 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 18:1102–1116.[Medline]
  33. Means AR, Dedman JR, Tash JS, Tindall DJ, van Sickle M, Welsh MJ. 1980 Regulation of the testis sertoli cell by follicle stimulating hormone. Annu Rev Physiol. 42:59–70.[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Knecht M, Amsterdam A, Catt K. 1981 The regulatory role of cyclic AMP in hormone-induced granulosa cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 256:10628–10633.[Free Full Text]
  35. Hipkin RW, Liu X, Ascoli M. 1995 Truncation of the C-terminal tail of the follitropin receptor does not impair the agonist- or phorbol ester-induced receptor phosphorylation and uncoupling. J Biol Chem. 270:26683–26689.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Inglese J, Freedman NJ, Koch WJ, Lefkowitz RJ. 1993 Structure and mechanism of the G protein-coupled receptor kinases. J Biol Chem. 268:23735–23738.[Free Full Text]
  37. Kosugi S, Okajima F, Ban T, Hidaka A, Shenker A, Kohn LD. 1993 Substitutions of different regions of the third cytoplasmic loop of the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor have selective effects on constitutive, TSH-, and TSH receptor autoantibody-stimulated phosphoinositide and 3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate signal generation. Mol Endocrinol. 7:1009–1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M.-N. Lague, M. Paquet, H.-Y. Fan, M. J. Kaartinen, S. Chu, S. P. Jamin, R. R. Behringer, P. J. Fuller, A. Mitchell, M. Dore, et al.
Synergistic effects of Pten loss and WNT/CTNNB1 signaling pathway activation in ovarian granulosa cell tumor development and progression
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 2062 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
N. Kalfa, A. Ecochard, C. Patte, P. Duvillard, F. Audran, C. Pienkowski, E. Thibaud, R. Brauner, C. Lecointre, D. Plantaz, et al.
Activating Mutations of the Stimulatory G Protein in Juvenile Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors: A New Prognostic Factor?
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2006; 91(5): 1842 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
R. Steinmetz, H. A. Wagoner, P. Zeng, J. R. Hammond, T. S. Hannon, J. L. Meyers, and O. H. Pescovitz
Mechanisms Regulating the Constitutive Activation of the Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase (ERK) Signaling Pathway in Ovarian Cancer and the Effect of Ribonucleic Acid Interference for ERK1/2 on Cancer Cell Proliferation
Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2004; 18(10): 2570 - 2582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
W. Xing and M. R. Sairam
Retinoic Acid Mediates Transcriptional Repression of Ovine Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Gene via a Pleiotropic Nuclear Receptor Response Element
Biol Reprod, July 1, 2002; 67(1): 204 - 211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. P. N. Themmen and I. T. Huhtaniemi
Mutations of Gonadotropins and Gonadotropin Receptors: Elucidating the Physiology and Pathophysiology of Pituitary-Gonadal Function
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2000; 21(5): 551 - 583.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Hussein, S. Chu, and P. J. Fuller
Comment on Analysis of Mutations in Genes of the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 1999; 84(10): 3852 - 3853.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. J. Ligtenberg, M. Siers, A. P. N. Themmen, T. G. Hanselaar, W. Willemsen, and H. G. Brunner
Analysis of Mutations in Genes of the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor Signaling Pathway in Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1999; 84(6): 2233 - 2234.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Y. Adashi and J. D. Hennebold
Single-Gene Mutations Resulting in Reproductive Dysfunction in Women
N. Engl. J. Med., March 4, 1999; 340(9): 709 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. C. B. Villares Fragoso, A. C. Latronico, F. M. Carvalho, M. C. N. Zerbini, J. A. M. Marcondes, L. M. B. Araujo, V. S. Lando, E. T. Frazzatto, B. B. Mendonca, and S. M. F. Villares
Activating Mutation of the Stimulatory G Protein (gsp) as a Putative Cause of Ovarian and Testicular Human Stromal Leydig Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 1998; 83(6): 2074 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
P. J. Fuller, K. Verity, Y. Shen, P. Mamers, T. Jobling, and H. G. Burger
No Evidence of a Role for Mutations or Polymorphisms of the Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Receptor in Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 1998; 83(1): 274 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotlar, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotlar, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Jameson, J. L.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals