| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Reproductive Endocrinology |
Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Microbiology/Immunology, Medical College of Virginia/Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Scott Kauma, Departments of Obstetrics/Gynecology and Microbiology/Immunology, Medical College of Virginia, Box 980034, Richmond, Virginia 23298.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A potential role for HGF during pregnancy was first suggested in studies demonstrating high levels of HGF messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) expression and extractable HGF protein in human placentas (7). The importance of HGF in mammalian pregnancy was best demonstrated in recent studies using HGF knock-out mice (8). Mice that are heterozygote for the HGF knock-out gene appear normal. Homozygote HGF knock-outs, however, are lethal to the developing mouse embryos at 1315 days gestation. These embryos have small placentas, with a lack of trophoblast growth and embryonic vessel development in the labyrinth area of the placenta. In addition, HGF stimulated the growth of both normal and HGF knock-out murine placental explants in vitro. These studies demonstrate a critical role for HGF in normal murine placental growth and development.
To determine whether HGF/Met has the potential to play a similar role in human placental growth and development, we determined the source of placental HGF during pregnancy and the regulation of HGF production by trophoblast cells and IL-1ß. In addition, we examined the potential for HGF action in the placenta by determining the expression of placental Met by Western analysis and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) and by immunohistochemically localizing cells in the placenta that expressed Met.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To determine the production of HGF in early second trimester and term placenta, 500 mg wet weight placental villi were cultured in duplicate in 5 mL DMEM with 10 mmol L-glutamine, 100 mIU/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin, pH 7.4 (DMEM; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 48 h, and the medium was sampled over this time period and stored at -20 C until assayed for HGF. To determine whether IL-1ß regulates the production of HGF, term placental explants were treated with 0.1100 ng/mL IL-1ß (generous gift from the Immunex Corp., Seattle, WA) for 24 h, and the medium was sampled and stored at -20 C until assayed for HGF production. Statistical analysis comparing the different levels of HGF in the conditioned medium was performed using two-way ANOVA for repeated measures and the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test.
To determine the production of HGF in the different placental villous compartments, villous core tissue and trophoblast cells were separated as previously described from term placental villi (10). Briefly, up to 15 g coarsely minced placental villi were digested in 15 mL CR-Dispase (Collaborative Research, Bedford, MA) for 15 min at 37 C. The trophoblast and villous core were then separated by gravity sedimentation. The trophoblast compartment was further purified by Percol equilibrium gradient centrifugation. Greater than 95% of the isolated trophoblast cells were cytokeratin positive by immunohistochemical staining. Isolated trophoblast (57 x 106 cells) or villous core (350 mg wet weight tissue) were placed on Millicell-HA platforms (Millipore Products Division, Bedford, MA) and cultured in 5 mL DMEM at 37 C in 5% CO2-air. The medium was sampled at 48 h of culture and stored at -20 C until assayed for HGF production. To standardize HGF protein production, cells and tissues were transferred to a Ten-Broeck homogenizer and ground with 20 strokes. The protein concentration in each specimen was determined by the method of Bradford, using a Coomassie protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) and albumin as the standard. Statistical analysis comparing the different levels of HGF in the conditioned medium was performed using one-way ANOVA and the Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test.
Villous core fibroblasts were isolated as previously described (10) by
further enzymatic digestion of second trimester villous core with 2
mg/mL collagenase (Sigma Chemical Co.) in
MEM (Life Technologies,
Grand Island, NY) for 20 min at 37 C. Primary cell cultures were
established in
MEM containing 20% FCS (Sigma Chemical Co.) in
25-cm2 culture flasks (Becton Dickinson Co., Oxnard, CA),
grown to confluence (710 days), and passed into 75-cm2
flasks (Becton Dickinson Co.) in MEM
with 10% FCS.
Immunohistochemical staining of confluent cell cultures was performed
as previously described (10) and showed greater than 95%
vimentin-positive cells, with little to no cytokeratin-positive cells,
thereby indicating a negligible amount of trophoblast contamination of
the cultures. Staining with CD-45 revealed a small proportion (<5%)
of positive cells.
Experiments were performed to determine whether trophoblast cells
stimulate the production of HGF by isolated villous core fibroblasts.
Isolated villous core fibroblasts (500,00 cells, second passage) were
plated into 4.5-cm2 culture dishes in 5 mL
MEM with 10%
FCS. This gives an initial plating density of cells that is
semiconfluent to confluent. Approximately 6 h later, the medium
was replaced with fresh medium, and isolated trophoblast cells
(500,000) were added on top of the fibroblasts. In addition, villous
core fibroblasts and isolated trophoblast cells (500,000/well) were
cultured separately. The cells were cultured for 72 h, and the
medium was then recovered and stored at -20 C until assayed for HGF.
Statistical analysis comparing the different levels of HGF in the
conditioned medium was performed using one-way ANOVA and the
Student-Newman-Keuls post-hoc test.
A sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for human HGF was developed in our laboratory using commercially available reagents. Polystyrene 96-well plates (Costar Corp., Cambridge, MA) were coated with mouse monoclonal antibody to human HGF (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) at a concentration of 2 µg/mL in 0.2 mol/L Na2CO3 buffer, pH 9.6, for 1822 h at 4 C. The plates were washed with phosphate-buffered saline with 0.5% Tween-20 (PBST) and blocked with 1% BSA (Sigma Chemical Co.) in phosphate-buffered saline for 1 h at 37 C. After washing the plates with PBST, 100 µL of the conditioned medium samples in duplicate or human recombinant HGF standard in triplicate (R&D Systems) were added to the plates and incubated at room temperature for 2 h. The plates were then washed with PBST and incubated with 100 µL goat anti-HGF antibody (R&D Systems) at a concentration of 2 µg/mL in PBST for 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed with PBST and then incubated with 100 µL of a 1:7500 dilution of peroxidase-conjugated mouse antigoat IgG (Pierce Chemical Co.) for 1 h at room temperature. The wells were washed with PBST and developed with a 0.1% O-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride substrate (Sigma Chemical Co.) in 0.1 mol/L citric acid buffer, pH 4.5, with 0.02% H2O2 for 30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped by the addition of an equal volume of 2 mol/L H2SO4, and the plates were read at 490 nm in a V-max Kinetic Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices Corp., Palo Alto, CA). The assay sensitivity and range was 240 pg/mL to 60 ng/mL. To validate the assay, samples that were either serially diluted or to which known amounts of the HGF standard were added were compared to the standard curve to demonstrate appropriate parallelism. The within-assay coefficient of variation was 4% at 20 ng/mL, 7% at 4 ng/mL, and 15% at 0.8 ng/mL. All sample comparisons were run in the same assay to eliminate between-assay variability. Medium samples from the IL-1ß dose-response experiments were also assayed for IL-6 using an IL-6 ELISA developed in our laboratory, as previously described (11).
RT-PCR was performed on early (n = 3) and term (n = 3) placental samples by first isolating total RNA from placental villi using the acid guanidinium isothiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction method. First strand synthesis was performed on 1 µg total RNA using the specific human c-met or HGF 3'-primers and SuperScript II ribonuclease H- reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). Yeast RNA (Sigma Chemical Co.) was used as a negative control. The complementary DNA was amplified using the GeneAmp system of DNA amplification (Perkin-Elmer/Cetus, Norwalk, CT). Samples were incubated in a thermocycler (Coy Laboratory Products, Ann Arbor, MI) with oligonucleotide primers and Taq polymerase. Denaturing was carried out at 94 C for 1 min, followed by primer annealing at 58 C (c-met) or 53 C (HGF) for 1 min and primer extension at 72 C for 2 min. After 30 cycles, the amplified product was fractionated in a 1.5% agarose gel by electrophoresis and stained with ethidium bromide for visualization under UV illumination.
The primers were synthesized in the Nucleic Acid Core Facility at Virginia Commonwealth University using an Applied Biosystems 380A DNA synthesizer (Foster City, CA). The sequences of the HGF primers were 5'-191 ggacaaaggaaaagaag 208 and 3'-681 gattgcttgtgaaacacc 664. The sequences of the c-met primers were 5'-226 tcctcgtgctcctgtttacc 245 and 3'-865 tctttcgtttcctttagccttc 844.
To perform Western blot analysis for Met, intact placental villi or isolated trophoblast were homogenized in RIPA buffer (5 mmol Tris, 150 mmol NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% Na deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS, pH 7.5). The homogenate was clarified by centrifugation, and the total protein content of the supernate was determined by a Coomassie protein assay using albumin as the standard (Pierce Chemical Co.). For Met Western analysis, 50 µg total cellular protein were fractionated in a denaturing 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel by electrophoresis. The fractionated protein samples were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and nonspecific binding was blocked for 2 h in 5% nonfat dry milk in TBS. The membranes were incubated with 2 µg/mL rabbit IgG antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) developed against a synthetic Met peptide. Development of the Western blots was performed using the Amersham ECL system (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL).
Immunohistochemical staining for HGF was performed on 10-µm frozen sections of placenta postfixed in acetone at 4 C for 10 min. The primary antibody that was used for HGF detection was a goat antihuman HGF antibody (2 µg/mL; R&D Systems). Immunohistochemical staining for Met was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, 5-µm sections of placenta using the rabbit IgG anti-Met antibody (0.5 µg/mL; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Localization of the primary antibody was performed using the Vectastain Elite kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) and diaminobenzadine as the color substrate. Negative controls included preabsorption of the primary antibody with excess Met peptide (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) or substituting the specific primary antibody with nonspecific antibody of the same type and concentration.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
ß heterodimeric Met protein. An additional band of approximately
100110 kDa was seen in intact placental villous tissues, but not in
trophoblast. This probably represents an alternate transmembrane Met
protein, which is known to have tyrosine kinase activity and is encoded
by a 7-kilobase mRNA transcript (12).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to placental HGF expression, Met is mainly expressed in cytotrophoblast and, to a lesser degree, in syncytiotrophoblast and isolated cells in the villous core. These findings suggest that HGF/Met may play a role in trophoblast proliferation. Support for this hypothesis can be found in a study that demonstrated increased [3H]thymidine incorporation in trophoblast cultured with HGF, although actual cell proliferation was not shown (13). Finally, the decreased expression of Met seen in differentiated syncytiotrophoblast compared to cytotrophoblast stem cells suggests that down-regulation of Met in cytotrophoblast may play a role in trophoblast differentiation. The localization of Met to cells in the villous core also suggests the possibility of a local autocrine/paracrine action of villous core HGF production. One possible role could be in the regulation of placental fibroblast proliferation, as HGF can regulate the proliferation of 3T3 fibroblasts that express Met (16).
Factors that regulate placental HGF production remain unclear. An interesting finding in this study was intact placental villi produced 24-fold more HGF than did isolated villous core. This would suggest that removing trophoblast from the villous core also removes factors produced by trophoblast that stimulate villous core HGF production. Unfortunately, coculture experiments of isolated trophoblast with villous core fibroblasts in this study did not demonstrate stimulation of HGF production in villous core fibroblasts. One possible explanation for this finding is that the isolation of cytotrophoblast cells from the placental villi initiates a process in these cells resulting in their differentiation into syncytotrophoblast (17). If nondifferentiating cytotrophoblast stem cells in intact placental villi are responsible for regulating villous core fibroblast HGF production, these studies would not be able to demonstrate this effect.
IL-1 is known to stimulate both HGF and IL-6 production in fibroblasts from different tissues (4, 18). We have previously shown that IL-1 plays a role in stimulating the production of colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1), granulocyte CSF, and IL-6 in isolated placental villous core mesenchymal cells (19, 20, 21). In this study, IL-1ß stimulated IL-6 production in intact placental villi. However, no effect by IL-1ß on placental villous HGF production was found. Similar results were found with isolated villous core fibroblasts (data not shown). One possible explanation for the lack of IL-1 stimulation of HGF production is that the placenta produces transforming growth factor-ß1, which is known to inhibit IL-1 induction of HGF production (5). Inhibition of transforming growth factor-ß using neutralizing antibodies would be one approach to test this hypothesis. It is evident that the regulation of HGF production in the placenta may not be identical to that in previously described systems and warrants further investigation.
This study and previous reports demonstrate that the placental villous core is an important endocrine tissue during pregnancy. In addition to HGF, the placental villous core is the main site of CSF-1, granulocyte CSF, IL-6, and stem cell factor production in the placenta (19, 20, 21, 22). Given the fact that Met is primarily expressed on trophoblast cells, as are other hematopoietic growth factor receptors, the placental villous core probably plays an important role in the regulation of trophoblast growth and function.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 2, 1996.
Revised November 8, 1996.
Accepted November 22, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
stimulate granulocyte
colony-stimulating factor production by placental villous core
mesenchymal cells. J Soc Gynecol Invest. 3:172.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Ferretti, L. Bruni, V. Dangles-Marie, A.P. Pecking, and D. Bellet Molecular circuits shared by placental and cancer cells, and their implications in the proliferative, invasive and migratory capacities of trophoblasts Hum. Reprod. Update, March 1, 2007; 13(2): 121 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Murthi, V. Doherty, J. Said, S. Donath, S. P. Brennecke, and B. Kalionis Homeobox Gene HLX1Expression Is Decreased in Idiopathic Human Fetal Growth Restriction Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 168(2): 511 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Hayashi, M. Sakata, T. Takeda, M. Tahara, T. Yamamoto, Y. Okamoto, R. Minekawa, A. Isobe, M. Ohmichi, K. Tasaka, et al. Up-Regulation of c-met Protooncogene Product Expression through Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1{alpha} Is Involved in Trophoblast Invasion under Low-Oxygen Tension Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4682 - 4689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lecuit, D. M. Nelson, S. D. Smith, H. Khun, M. Huerre, M.-C. Vacher-Lavenu, J. I. Gordon, and P. Cossart Targeting and crossing of the human maternofetal barrier by Listeria monocytogenes: Role of internalin interaction with trophoblast E-cadherin PNAS, April 20, 2004; 101(16): 6152 - 6157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Iida, K. Johkura, R. Teng, S. Kubota, L. Cui, X. Zhao, N. Ogiwara, Y. Okouchi, K. Asanuma, J. Nakayama, et al. Immunohistochemical Localization of Hepatocyte Growth Factor Activator (HGFA) in Developing Mouse Liver Tissues: Heterogeneous Distribution of HGFA Protein J. Histochem. Cytochem., September 1, 2003; 51(9): 1139 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dokras, L. M.G. Gardner, E. A. Seftor, and M. J.C. Hendrix Regulation of Human Cytotrophoblast Morphogenesis by Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Scatter Factor Biol Reprod, October 1, 2001; 65(4): 1278 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Nasu, T. Sugano, N. Matsui, H. Narahara, Y. Kawano, and I. Miyakawa Expression of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in Cultured Human Endometrial Stromal Cells Is Induced through a Protein Kinase C-Dependent Pathway Biol Reprod, May 1, 1999; 60(5): 1183 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Somerset, X.-F. Li, S. Afford, A. J. Strain, A. Ahmed, R. K. Sangha, M. J. Whittle, and M. D. Kilby Ontogeny of Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF) and Its Receptor (c-met) in Human Placenta : Reduced HGF Expression in Intrauterine Growth Restriction Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 1998; 153(4): 1139 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lail-Trecker, R. Gulati, and J. J. Peluso A Role for Hepatocyte Growth Factors/Scatter Factor in Regulating Normal and Neoplastic Cells of Reproductive Tissues Reproductive Sciences, May 1, 1998; 5(3): 114 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Somerset, M. D. Kilby, A. J. Strain, and S. Afford Differential Expression of HGF and Met in Human Placentai J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 1998; 83(4): 1400a - 1401. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |