help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fery, F.
Right arrow Articles by Balasse, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fery, F.
Right arrow Articles by Balasse, E. O.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diets
Hazardous Substances DB
*GLUCOSE
*NITROGEN
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 3 825-830
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Experimental Studies

Inhibition of Lipolysis Stimulates Whole Body Glucose Production and Disposal in Normal Postabsorptive Subjects1

F. Fery, L. Plat, M. Baleriaux and E. O. Balasse

Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Department of Endocrinology, Hôpital Erasme, University of Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Françoise Féry, Laboratory of Experimental Medicine, University of Brussels, 808 route de Lennik, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The role played by circulating free fatty acids (FFA) and fat oxidation in the regulation of whole body glucose production and uptake in the basal state is still a matter of debate. This question was analyzed in nine normal overnight fasted volunteers in whom glucose kinetics ([3-3H]glucose infusion) and substrate oxidation rates (indirect calorimetry) were measured during 10.5 h both under placebo conditions and during experimental antilipolysis induced by Acipimox given orally during the last 8 h of the study. During the last 2 h of the tests, the following mean changes ({Delta}) from baseline were recorded in Acipimox vs. placebo studies: {Delta} FFA, -0.26 ± 0.08 vs. +0.29 ± 0.06 mmol/L (P < 0.001); {Delta} glucose, -12 ± 2 vs. -12 ± 1 mg/dL (P > 0.05); {Delta} glucose production, +16 ± 5 vs. -15 ± 3 mg/min (P < 0.001); {Delta} C peptide, -1.11 ± 0.10 vs. -0.66 ± 0.10 ng/mL (P < 0.001); {Delta} glucagon, +64 ± 25 vs. +21 ± 9 pg/mL (P < 0.05); {Delta} GH, +37 ± 9 vs. +4 ± 2 ng/mL (P < 0.007); {Delta} cortisol, +37 ± 25 vs. -30 ± 26 ng/mL (P < 0.04). Acipimox inhibited fat oxidation (-18 ± 4 vs. +19 ± 4 mg/min; P < 0.001) and enhanced carbohydrate oxidation (+18 ± 8 vs. - 24 ± 11 mg/min; P < 0.02). Protein catabolism calculated over the 8-h study period was significantly stimulated (+5.7 ± 2.5 vs. -1.9 ± 1.7 g/8 h; P < 0.02). During the Acipimox studies, the increased protein breakdown could theoretically account for about 75% of the increased glucose production. Thus, contrary to current opinion, FFA suppression stimulates glucose production and whole body glucose disposal in normal overnight fasted subjects.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
SINCE THE publication by Randle et al. (1) of studies demonstrating the existence of a competition between free fatty acids (FFA) and glucose as oxidative fuels in isolated heart muscle and diaphragm, numerous studies have been conducted in humans to determine whether experimental changes in circulating FFA levels alter glucose metabolism. These studies have consistently shown that insulin-mediated glucose uptake is inhibited after iv fat (plus heparin) administration (2, 3, 4, 5) and enhanced after a reduction of FFA levels induced by antilipolytic agents (6). On the other hand, the existence of a reciprocal relationship between experimental changes in FFA levels and whole body glucose uptake at low basal insulin levels remains questionable. We were able to demonstrate such a relationship more than 20 yr ago (7, 8), but these data were not confirmed in more recent studies performed by other groups in normal subjects (2, 3, 4, 9, 10) or diabetic patients (6, 11). Interestingly, the validity of our earlier results has been recently strengthened by studies using positron emission tomography scan methodology (12), which showed that in normal overnight fasted volunteers, a 60% decrease in circulating FFA induced by Acipimox administration significantly stimulates glucose uptake by heart (+200%) and forearm muscle (+50%).

Another point of controversy regarding the FFA-glucose interrelationships relates to the role played by circulating FFA in the regulation of gluconeogenesis and glucose production. With a few exceptions (13), most in vitro studies have shown that FFA stimulate hepatic gluconeogenesis from various precursors in the rat (14, 15, 16). However, important species differences exist, and FFA have no effect on gluconeogenesis in isolated hepatocytes from the newborn pig (17) and inhibit gluconeogenesis and glucose production in perfused liver from the dog (18), cat (19), and guinea pig (20). In human experiments, it has been observed that gluconeogenesis from lactate is stimulated by increased FFA levels (21) and inhibited by an acute antilipolytic treatment (22), but in these latter two studies, as in others (2, 3, 9, 10), the changes in FFA levels had no effect on basal hepatic glucose output. Recent data from our laboratory tend to contradict these observations. We have reported (23) that FFA suppression induces an increase, rather than a decrease, in gluconeogenesis and enhances liver glucose production in 4-day fasted subjects, but it is not known whether this applies to the overnight fasted state.

It is thus fair to admit that the role played by FFA availability in the regulation of whole body glucose metabolism in overnight-fasted subjects remains unclear. This question is examined in the present study, which analyzes the effect of a pharmacological suppression of FFA levels on glucose production, uptake, and oxidation measured with the combined use of radiolabeled glucose and indirect calorimetry. The effect of antilipolysis was studied over an extended period of 8 h, because there is evidence that FFA-glucose interactions in vivo proceed at a relatively slow rate (5, 23).


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nine normal subjects (seven men and two women; age, 27 ± 1 yr; body mass index, 25.1 ± 0.7 kg/m2) gave their informed consent before participation in the study. The protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Brussels.

For each test, the subject reported at the metabolic unit at 0700 h after an overnight fast of 12 h. A Teflon catheter was inserted into an antecubital vein for infusion, and another catheter was inserted in a dorsal vein of the hand opposite the site of infusion for sampling of arterialized blood. For this purpose, the hand was maintained in a heated electrical pad during the entire study. After insertion of the catheters, a primed constant infusion of [3-3H]glucose diluted in saline and sterilized through a 0.22 µm Millipore filter (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA) was administered for 10.5 h. The priming dose represented 125 times the amount infused per min. Total radioactivity administered amounted to approximately 300 µCi.

Each subject participated in two tests performed in a random order at a 2- to 3-week interval. In one test, after a basal period of 2.5 h, the subjects received Acipimox administered as one capsule of 250 mg at 0 and 2 h and two capsules at 4 and 6 h. In the other test, Acipimox was replaced by placebo.

Blood samples were obtained every 15 min during the last hour of the basal period, every hour for the following 6 h, and every 30 min thereafter. The subjects collected their urine during the night before the test and voided before the start of the study, and urine was collected again at the end of the experiment. Respiratory gas exchanges for indirect calorimetry were monitored during the basal period and thereafter for a 30-min period every hour using a Deltratrac Metabolic Monitor (Datex, Helsinki, Finland).

Analytical methods

Blood samples were collected in heparinized syringes and transferred to tubes kept on ice. Those intended for measuring unlabeled and labeled glucose and lactate contained NaF, and those used for measuring glucagon concentration contained aprotinin. After centrifugation at 4 C, plasma was stored at -20 C until assayed. The plasma concentrations of FFA, glucose, lactate, glycerol, urea, insulin, C peptide, glucagon, GH, and cortisol and urinary total nitrogen content were determined as recently described (23). Plasma [3H]glucose concentrations were determined by scintillation spectrometry on evaporated Somogyi filtrates reconstituted with water. All determinations were performed at least in duplicate.

Calculations

The rates of appearance (Ra) and disappearance (Rd) of glucose were determined by the nonsteady state equations of Steele (24) using a glucose distribution volume of 200 mL/kg and a pool fraction of 0.65. The MCR of glucose was calculated as the ratio between Rd and the plasma glucose concentration. Carbohydrate and lipid oxidation rates were determined from CO2 production, O2 consumption, and protein oxidation (25). The latter was estimated from urinary nitrogen excretion and changes in the urea nitrogen pool size (26). To avoid underestimation of carbohydrate oxidation related to gluconeogenesis from amino acids, it was assumed that the totality of the degraded proteins was converted to glucose with subsequent oxidation of the newly formed glucose (27). A factor of 0.57 for the conversion of proteins to glucose was used in this calculation. Finally, carbohydrate oxidation was further corrected by adding the equivalent of 10% by mass of net lipid oxidation to account for gluconeogenesis from glycerol (27).

Statistical analysis

Results obtained at the various time points of the studies were expressed as changes (±SE) from the mean basal values (Figs. 1Go and 2Go). Statistical analysis was performed using the Computer Program Superanova (Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA). Data were analyzed by a two-factor ANOVA (treatment and time) for repeated measures of both factors. Whenever the F ratio was less than 0.05, a pairwise comparison between the two treatments was performed at the various times using modified Student’s t test. The average values recorded during the last 2 h of the studies were compared by a paired t test (Table 2Go).



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plasma concentrations of metabolic substrates and hormones expressed as changes ({Delta}) from the mean basal value. Open circles, Studies with placebo; closed circles, studies with Acipimox. P values correspond to comparisons between curves.

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Ra, Rd, and MCR of glucose and rates of carbohydrate (CHO) and fat oxidation expressed as changes ({Delta}) from mean basal value. P values correspond to comparisons between curves.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Changes from baseline in plasma substrate and hormone concentrations, glucose kinetics, and fuel oxidation observed during the last 2 h (6–8 h) of the experiments

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
As shown in Table 1Go, the basal values of all parameters tested were similar for the two studies, thus allowing comparison between the effects of Acipimox and placebo on the basis of changes from mean baseline values. As shown in Figs. 1Go and 2Go, FFA levels were dramatically reduced after Acipimox. The average fall observed from the second to the sixth hour of treatment exceeded 90% of initial value, but levels rose slightly during the last 2 h. This tendency to escape the action of the drug was also observed for glycerol concentrations. Fat oxidation followed the same pattern; a maximal inhibition of about 40% was observed 5–6 h after starting the drug treatment. FFA and glycerol levels and fat oxidation rate rose significantly during the placebo studies.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Mean plasma substrate and hormone concentrations, glucose kinetics, and fuel oxidation rates in the basal state

 
Acipimox had no effect on glucose concentration, which decreased to the same extent (~13%) during the control and the active studies (Fig. 1Go and Table 2Go). However, the changes in glucose kinetics (Fig. 2Go and Table 2Go) were markedly different; glucose Ra and Rd rose by about 10% during the 8 h of the Acipimox experiments, but decreased by about 10% during the placebo studies; the difference between the two curves was highly significant (P < 0.001). The MCR of glucose was stimulated by about 20% during the antilipolytic treatment and remained essentially unchanged in the control experiments (P < 0.001). The changes in glucose oxidation were the mirror image of those of fat oxidation. Thus, the increase in glucose oxidation induced by Acipimox attained its highest value (~+30%) after about 5 h of treatment, but tended to be less marked thereafter. There was a highly significant difference between the {Delta} glucose oxidation curves observed during the two experimental conditions (P = 0.005).

Antilipolysis was associated with several hormonal changes (Fig. 1Go and Table 2Go). Insulin levels fell gradually under both experimental conditions. Suppression was slightly more marked during the last 4 h of the Acipimox vs. placebo treatments, but the difference was not statistically significant. The difference was, however, highly significant with regard to C peptide levels (P = 0.007). The glucagon concentrations were significantly increased (P < 0.01), and the insulin/glucagon ratios were significantly decreased (P = 0.015) during active vs. control experiments. Finally, antilipolysis induced a significant rise in GH (P = 0.005) and in cortisol levels during the last 2–3 h of active treatment, but the statistical significance was borderline (P = 0.049) for the latter hormone.

The changes in nitrogen metabolism are displayed in Table 3Go. Compared to placebo, Acipimox increased urinary nitrogen excretion, but not to a significant extent. The urea nitrogen pool size (P < 0.05) and total urea nitrogen production (P < 0.02) were significantly augmented. Thus, on the average, total protein breakdown increased by 5.7 ± 2.5 g during the 8 h following Acipimox treatment and decreased by 1.9 ± 1.7 g after placebo; the difference between the two treatment regimens was statistically significant (P < 0.02).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Integrated changes in nitrogen and glucose metabolism after placebo or Acipimox

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The changes in substrate and hormone concentrations and in glucose kinetics occurring under placebo conditions are those expected as a result of ongoing fasting.

During the active study, the administration of Acipimox markedly lowered the rates of lipolysis and whole body fat oxidation during the entire experimental period, but some escape from the action of the drug was noticed during the last 2 h despite an increase in the dosage of the drug. In agreement with other studies (8, 11, 28, 29), we observed that antilipolysis reduces insulin and C peptide levels and increases the concentrations of glucagon, cortisol, and GH. As these hormonal changes occur essentially at the end of the test, their lipolytic effect is probably responsible for the escape phenomenon.

The first consequence of FFA suppression is a stimulation of whole body glucose uptake. As glucose levels are not affected by the drug, the increased uptake is entirely related to stimulation of the MCR, which reflects an increased capacity of tissues to extract circulating glucose. As the increase in glucose oxidation exceeds (although not significantly) that in uptake, our data suggest that the augmented glucose disposal is entirely accounted for by increased oxidation. However, such an assertion should be made very cautiously, because glucose oxidation was measured by indirect calorimetry, and therefore, it includes oxidation of muscle glycogen, which could have been stimulated by the reduction in FFA availability (30). If this were to occur, the measured increase in carbohydrate oxidation would overestimate that in circulating glucose.

The observed increase in the rates of whole body glucose uptake, metabolic clearance, and oxidation cannot be explained by the hormonal changes. The increased uptake is probably mainly due to the operation of the glucose-fatty acid cycle at the level of skeletal and heart muscles, as documented by Nuutila et al. (12). If it is assumed that skeletal muscle glucose uptake represents about 20% of whole body glucose uptake under postabsorptive conditions (31) and that quantitatively tissues other than muscle play a negligible role in the process, it can be calculated that muscle glucose disposal must have been approximately doubled to account for the 25% increase in overall glucose consumption.

The reason why, in contrast with other studies (6, 9), we were able to demonstrate an increase in whole body glucose uptake after antilipolytic treatment in the postabsorptive state probably lies in the fact that lipolysis was more markedly reduced. Indeed, the average FFA concentration fell to as low as 0.03 mmol/L after 2 h of treatment and remained below 0.2 mmol/L until the end of the study. These levels are much lower than those obtained in comparable studies (6, 9, 12), possibly because our volunteers had fasted for only 12 h before the test and had low initial levels of FFA (~0.4 mmol/L). It has been shown (12) that the negative relationship between FFA levels and muscle glucose uptake is curvilinear, so that the stimulatory effect of a given fall in FFA levels on muscle glucose uptake is much larger in the low FFA range and should, therefore, more markedly influence whole body glucose uptake.

A second aspect of our data is that FFA lowering is associated with a stimulation of glucose Ra. It is possible that this phenomenon represents a direct consequence of FFA suppression on hepatic glucose output as observed in several other animal species (18, 19, 20). However, this is unlikely, because in humans, gluconeogenesis seems to be inhibited by an antilipolytic treatment, at least in type 2 diabetic patients (22). Therefore, the rise in Ra is probably an indirect consequence of antilipolysis mediated by the various hormonal changes, which are all able to stimulate hepatic glucose production.

The source of the extra glucose formed cannot be precisely determined from our experiments. It could involve a stimulation of hepatic glycogenolysis, as documented in mice after acute nicotinic acid treatment (30), and/or a stimulation of gluconeogenesis. As far as this latter possibility is concerned, our data indicate that antilipolysis induces an increase in protein breakdown that could account for about 75% of the rise in glucose Ra if it is assumed (27) that the carbon skeleton of the catabolized proteins was totally converted to glucose. Whether the increase in protein catabolism is mediated by the hormonal changes or by a direct effect of FFA shortage on muscle protein metabolism (32) remains unsettled.

The overall metabolic and hormonal adaptations occurring in response to acute antilipolysis can thus be viewed as follows. The reduction in FFA availability induced by Acipimox inhibits whole body and presumably muscle fat oxidation. By virtue of the operation of the glucose-fatty acid cycle, muscle carbohydrate oxidation is stimulated, inducing an increase in the extraction of circulating glucose. On the other hand, the lowering in FFA levels induces several hormonal changes that could be responsible for the increases in both protein breakdown and overall glucose production. This increase in production exactly compensates the increased uptake, so that the changes in glycemia are not different from those occurring in the placebo studies. The global effect of this regulation is to maintain adequate fuel supply to muscle and possibly other tissues despite the reduced FFA availability. Under our experimental conditions, there is no reason to suspect the occurrence of any change in brain metabolism that does not rely on FFA.

It is interesting to compare the present results with those of a recent study (23) in which we applied the same protocol to 4-day fasted subjects. Under these conditions, antilipolysis decreased not only the levels of FFA, but also those of ketone bodies, which were initially markedly elevated by the fast. The concentrations of the glucoregulatory hormones, the rate of protein breakdown, and the rates of glucose production and uptake were modified by the antilipolytic treatment in the same direction as that observed in the present study (Table 4Go). However, in contrast to the present results, the MCR of glucose remained unchanged, and the rise in the Rd was entirely mediated by the increase in the glucose concentration. Thus, it seems that the glycemic response to antilipolysis in normal subjects is critically dependent on the composition of brain energy supply; glucose levels rise only if antilipolysis induces a shortage of brain fuel supply as is the case in the hyperketonemia due to fasting, but not in the overnight fasted state. This is an argument in favor of an important role of the central nervous system in determining the glycemic set-point.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Influence of the degree of fasting on the metabolic and hormonal consequences of antilipolysis

 
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that contrary to a widely held opinion (2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11) and in agreement with earlier data from our laboratory (7, 8), FFA participate in the regulation of whole body glucose uptake and metabolic clearance even at low insulin levels, such as those observed in the overnight fasted state. In addition, the present data as well as those of previous experiments (23) suggest that both in the overnight fasted state and during starvation the role of FFA is not to stimulate gluconeogenesis but, on the contrary, to exert an inhibitory effect on glucose production, presumably through their influence on the level of the glucoregulatory hormones. From a global viewpoint, it should be taken into account that in the postabsorptive state and during fasting, FFA (and ketone bodies) derived from the lipid stores and glucose produced by the liver and the kidney represent alternate fuels for most tissues. It is, therefore, appropriate, as far as the body’s overall economy is concerned, that an inverse, rather than a direct, relationship should exist between the production of these two fuels.


    Acknowledgments
 
Thanks are due to M. A. Neef for expert technical help, and to C. Demesmaeker for excellent secretarial assistance.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported by Grant 3.4542.96 from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique Médicale Belge. Back

Received September 26, 1996.

Revised November 4, 1996.

Accepted November 19, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Randle PJ, Hales CN, Garland PB, Newsholme EA. 1963 The glucose fatty-acid cycle. Its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet. 1:785–789.[Medline]
  2. Vaag AA, Handberg A, Skøtt P, Richter EA, Beck-Nielsen H. 1994 Glucose-fatty acid cycle operates in humans at the levels of both whole body and skeletal muscle during low and high physiological plasma insulin concentrations. Eur J Endocrinol. 130:70–79.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Yki-Järvinen H, Puhakainen I, Koivisto VA. 1991 Effect of free fatty acids on glucose uptake and nonoxidative glycolysis across human forearm tissues in the basal state and during insulin stimulation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:1268–1277.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ferrannini E, Barrett EJ, Bevilacqua S, DeFronzo RA. 1983 Effect of fatty acids on glucose production and utilization in man. J Clin Invest. 72:1737–1747.
  5. Boden G, Jadali F, White J, Liang Y, Mozzoli M, Chen X, Coleman E, Smith C. 1991 Effect of fat on insulin-stimulated carbohydrate metabolism in normal men. J Clin Invest. 88:960–966.
  6. Vaag A, Skøtt P, Damsbo P, Gall MA, Richter EA, Beck-Nielsen H. 1991 Effect of antilipolytic nicotinic acid analogue Acipimox on whole-body and skeletal muscle glucose metabolism in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 88:1282–1290.
  7. Balasse EO, Neef MA. 1973 Influence of nicotinic acid on the rates of turnover and oxidation of plasma glucose in man. Metabolism. 22:1193–1204.[CrossRef][Medline]
  8. Balasse EO, Neef MA. 1974 Operation of the "glucose-fatty acid cycle" during experimental elevations of plasma free fatty acid levels in man. Eur J Clin Invest. 4:247–252.[Medline]
  9. Jahoor F, Klein S, Wolfe R. 1992 Mechanism of regulation of glucose production by lipolysis in humans. Am J Physiol. 262:E353–E358.
  10. Boden G, Jadali F. 1991 Effects of lipid on basal carbohydrate metabolism in normal men. Diabetes. 40:686–692.[Abstract]
  11. Fulcher GR, Walker M, Catalano C, Farrer M, Alberti KGMM. 1992 Acute metabolic and hormonal responses to the inhibition of lipolysis in non-obese patients with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus: effects of acipimox. Clin Sci. 82:565–571.[Medline]
  12. Nuutila P, Knuuti MJ, Raitakari M, Ruotsalainen U, Teräs M, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Haaparanta M, Solin O, Wegelius U, Yki-Järvinen H. 1994 Effect of antilipolysis on heart and skeletal muscle glucose uptake in overnight fasted humans. Am J Physiol. 267:E941–E946.
  13. Exton JH. 1972 Gluconeogenesis. Metabolism. 21:945–990.[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Williamson JR, Kreisberg RA, Felts PW. 1966 Mechanism for the stimulation of gluconeogenesis by fatty acids in perfused rat liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 56:247–254.[Free Full Text]
  15. Blumental SA. 1983 Stimulation of gluconeogenesis by palmitic acid in rat hepatocytes. Evidence that this effect can be dissociated from the provision of reducing equivalents. Metab Clin Exp. 32:971–976.
  16. Friedman B, Goodman Jr EH, Weinhouse S. 1967 Effects of insulin and fatty acids on gluconeogensis in the rat. J Biol Chem. 242:3620–3627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Lepine AJ, Watford M, Boyd RD, Ross DA, Whitehead DM. 1993 Relationship between hepatic fatty acid oxidation and gluconeogenesis in the fasting neonatal pig. Br J Nutr. 70:81–91.[CrossRef][Medline]
  18. Shaw JHF, Wolfe RR. 1984 Glucose production in the perfused dog liver: effect of free fatty acids and ketones. J Surg Res. 37:437–442.[CrossRef][Medline]
  19. Arinze IJ, Hanson RW. 1973 Mitochondrial redox state and the regulation of gluconeogenesis in the isolated perfused cat liver. FEBS Lett. 31:280–282.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Jomain-Baum M, Hanson RW. 1975 Regulation of hepatic gluconeogenesis in the guinea pig by fatty acids and ammonia. J Biol Chem. 250:8978–8985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Clore JN, Glickman PS, Nestler JE, Blackard WG. 1991 In vivo evidence for hepatic autoregulation during FFA-stimulated gluconeogenesis in normal humans. Am J Physiol. 261:E425–E429.
  22. Puhakainen I, Yki-Järvinen H. 1993 Inhibition of lipolysis decreases lipid oxidation and gluconeogenesis from lactate but not fasting hyperglycemia or total hepatic glucose production in NIDDM. Diabetes. 42:1694–1699.[Abstract]
  23. Féry F, Plat L, Melot C, Balasse EO. 1996 Role of fat-derived substrates in the regulation of gluconeogenesis during fasting. Am J Physiol. 270:E822–E830.
  24. Steele R. 1959 Influence of glucose loading and of injected insulin on hepatic glucose output. Ann NY Acad. Sci. 82:420–430.
  25. Frayn KN. 1983 Calculation of substrate oxidation rates in vivo from gazeous exchange. J Appl Physiol. 55:628–634.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Tappy L, Owen OE, Boden G. 1988 Effect of hyperinsulinemia on urea pool size and substrate oxidation rates. Diabetes. 37:1212–1216.[Abstract]
  27. Tappy L, Paquot N, Touniau P, Schneiter P, Jéquier E. 1995 Assessment of glucose metabolism in humans with the simultaneous use of indirect calorimetry and tracer techniques. Clin Physiol (Lond). 15:1–12.[Medline]
  28. Balasse EO, Ooms HA. 1973 Role of plasma free fatty acids in the control of insulin secretion in man. Diabetologia. 9:145–151.[CrossRef][Medline]
  29. Quabbe H, Ramek W, Luyckx AS. 1977 Growth hormone, glucagon and insulin response to depression of plasma free fatty acids and the effects of glucose infusion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 44:383–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ammon HPT, Estler CJ, Heim F. 1970 Alteration of carbohydrate metabolism in liver, skeletal muscle and brain by nicotinic acid in mice. In: Gey KF, Carlson LA, eds. Metabolic effects of nicotinic acid and its derivatives. Bern: Hans Huber; 799–810.
  31. DeFronzo RA, Jacot E, Jéquier E, Maeder E, Wahren J, Felber JP. 1981 The effect of insulin on the disposal of intravenous glucose: results from indirect calorimetry and hepatic and femoral venous catheterization. Diabetes. 30:1000–1007.[Medline]
  32. Lowell BB, Goodman MN. 1987 Protein sparing in skeletal muscle during prolonged starvation. Dependence on lipid fuel availability. Diabetes. 36:14–19.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. H. Vickers, P. L. Hofman, P. D. Gluckman, P. E. Lobie, and W. S. Cutfield
Combination therapy with acipimox enhances the effect of growth hormone treatment on linear body growth in the normal and small-for-gestational-age rat
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, December 1, 2006; 291(6): E1212 - E1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. van Thien, G. J. Weverling, M. T. Ackermans, N. canh Hung, E. Endert, P. A. Kager, and H. P. Sauerwein
FFAs are not involved in regulation of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis in adults with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, October 1, 2004; 287(4): E609 - E615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
H. Norrelund, K. S. Nair, S. Nielsen, J. Frystyk, P. Ivarsen, J. O. L. Jorgensen, J. S. Christiansen, and N. Moller
The Decisive Role of Free Fatty Acids for Protein Conservation during Fasting in Humans with and without Growth Hormone
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4371 - 4378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Nielsen, N. Moller, S. B. Pedersen, J. S. Christiansen, and J. O. L. Jorgensen
The Effect of Long-Term Pharmacological Antilipolysis on Substrate Metabolism in Growth Hormone (GH)-Substituted GH-Deficient Adults
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2002; 87(7): 3274 - 3278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
G. F. Lewis, A. Carpentier, K. Adeli, and A. Giacca
Disordered Fat Storage and Mobilization in the Pathogenesis of Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes
Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2002; 23(2): 201 - 229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S. Nielsen, N. Moller, J. S. Christiansen, and J. O.L. Jorgensen
Pharmacological Antilipolysis Restores Insulin Sensitivity During Growth Hormone Exposure
Diabetes, October 1, 2001; 50(10): 2301 - 2308.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. D. Mittelman and R. N. Bergman
Inhibition of lipolysis causes suppression of endogenous glucose production independent of changes in insulin
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, September 1, 2000; 279(3): E630 - E637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fery, F.
Right arrow Articles by Balasse, E. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fery, F.
Right arrow Articles by Balasse, E. O.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diets
Hazardous Substances DB
*GLUCOSE
*NITROGEN


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals