| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Endocrinological Oncology |
Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology (N.J.S.) and Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology Branch (F.B-D., M.C.S.), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), and Department of Radiology (J.L.D.), Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Nicholas J. Sarlis, MD, PhD, Steroid Hormones Section, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology (LMCB), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bldg 8/Rm B2 A11, 8 Center Drive, MSC 0805, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-0805; E-mail: njsarlis{at}box-n.nih.gov
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 26-yr-old woman underwent 131I ablation 11 yr before admission. Intermittent poor compliance to levothyroxine (LT4) therapy led to inappropriately high serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) for her triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels. The patient was investigated to rule out TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma or resistance to TH. On admission, the patients clinical features and thyroid function tests, as well as thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and acute T3 suppression tests, were in favor of profound primary hypothyroidism. MRI revealed symmetrical enlargement of the pituitary gland with distinct morphological characteristics of a macroadenoma. The patient began high-dose TH therapy and was rescannned six days later. The follow-up scan revealed a dramatic shrinkage of the pituitary gland. Four weeks later, serum T4 and TSH were within the normal range, and repeat MRI scan of the pituitary at that time showed a normal gland.
This case is the first to document dramatic shrinkage of pituitary hyperplasia in long-standing primary hypothyroidism within one week of acute TH therapy. MRI alone is unable to reliably differentiate between a TSH-secreting pituitary adenoma and hypothyroidism-induced pituitary hyperplasia. Dynamic endocrine testing as well as repeat pituitary MRI after a brief TH trial may provide a firm diagnosis in similar cases.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We hereby report a patient with profound hypothyroidism and MRI findings of a pituitary macroadenoma, which regressed after six days of high dose TH therapy. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which MRI-demonstrable pituitary thyrotroph hyperplasia has responded in such an acute and dramatic way to short-term TH administration.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 26-yr-old woman was admitted for investigation of inappropriate secretion of TSH. The patient presented for the first time 11 yr before our evaluation with weight gain, dry skin, fatigue, left-sided periorbital enlargement, left eye proptosis, and a small nonnodular goiter. Thyroid function tests were borderline, in favor of mild hyperthyroidism, with a serum T3 level of 3.0 nmol/L (normal range: 1.12.9 nmol/L) and TSH of 0.5 mU/L (normal range: 0.54.9 mU/L), and with a 123I thyroid uptake that was normal. The patient was given the presumptive diagnosis of unilateral Graves ophthalmopathy. Tapazole (60 mg daily) and prednisone (60 mg daily) administration did not lead to significant changes in her thyroid function tests. The tapazole was discontinued, but generalized fatigue persisted. At that time, and because of an abnormally high 123I thyroid uptake of 74.6% at 24 h, the patient underwent ablation of the thyroid gland with 15.3 mCi (566 MBq) of 131I. Levothyroxine (LT4) replacement was started at a dose of 150 µg/day. The patient did well for the next 41/2 yr, with appropriate thyroid function tests on a LT4 dose between 150 and 200 µg/day (range of serum TSH of 0.11.7 with normal T4 and T3 levels). Subsequently, however, thyroid function tests fluctuated widely (TSH range between 3.5 and 563 mU/L for high or normal levels of T4 and T3), raising the question of inappropriate TSH secretion. The possibility of malabsorption of TH was entertained, as the patient was on oral iron supplementation (11), but the abnormal hormonal profile persisted even after discontinuation of this therapy.
The patient was studied at the Clinical Center at the National Institutes of Health, after having discontinued LT4 therapy for three months, for better assessment of her underlying pathophysiology. The patient did not complain of headaches, visual acuity changes, visual field changes, amenorrhea, galactorrhea, polydipsia, polyuria, or pretibial edema. She also repeatedly denied a history of noncompliance in LT4 therapy in the past. Physical examination revealed nongoitrous hypothyroidism. A left-sided periorbital tissue edema without chemosis or exophthalmos and normal visual fields by Goldmann perimetry were noted. Initial biochemical profile, repeated twice, was indicative of primary hypothyroidism, with extremely high levels of serum TSH: T4: 60.5 nmol/L (normal range: 62140 nmol/L), T3: 1.4 nmol/L (normal range: 1.12.4 nmol/L), free T4: 5.15 pmol/L (normal range: 12.524 pmol/L), free T3: 1.89 pmol/L (normal range: 3.56.45 pmol/L) and TSH: 563.3 mU/L (normal range: 0.44.4 mU/L), while thyroxine binding globulin was 27.2 mg/L (normal range: 1228 mU/L). Antithyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies were present at a significant titer (3'900 U/L; normal range: 01'900 U/L).
Dynamic tests of thyroid function included a TRH stimulation test and
an acute T3 suppression test (12). Administration of TRH led to strong
stimulation of TSH from a baseline value of 573.5 mU/L to a peak
response of 2536.5 mU/L at 30 mins post-TRH. Pituitary glycoprotein
-subunit plasma level was 155 ng/L at 0 mins and 418 ng/L at 30 mins
post-TRH, while the
-subunit/TSH molar ratio was 4.58 at 0 mins and
6.28 at 30 mins post-TRH. Baseline serum prolactin was moderately
elevated at 95.4 µg/L (normal range: 124 µg/L) and rose to 397.6
µg/L 30 mins post-TRH. The acute T3 suppression test showed a sharp
decline in TSH levels from 352.7 mU/L at baseline to 35.1 mU/L, 48
h after T3 administration (suppression of TSH to levels <10% of those
at baseline; normal range: 0.44.4 mU/L); concomitant serum T3 was 1.8
nmol/L at 0 h and 4.3 nmol/L at 48 h (normal range: 1.12.4
nmol/L), while serum free T4 was 8.24 pmol/L at 0 h and 9.88
pmol/L at 48 h (normal range: 12.524 pmol/L). Both the above
dynamic tests were consistent with profound primary hypothyroidism and
not with inappropriate secretion of TSH.
A pituitary MRI revealed symmetrical enlargement of the pituitary
gland, measuring 12 mm in height, with a bright gadolinium-enhancing
rim of tissue at the superior aspect of the gland, compatible with
compressed normal pituitary tissue (Fig. 1
-A1 and 1-B1).
These morphological characteristics suggested a pituitary
macroadenoma.
|
Four weeks later, the patient was reassessed with the following
findings: TSH: 4.89 mU/L, T4: 175.1 nmol/L, T3: 2.59 nmol/L, free T4:
20.6 pmol/L, free T3: 4.77 pmol/L, while PRL serum levels were normal
(10.1 µg/L). Repeat MRI scan of the pituitary showed a further
shrinkage of the pituitary gland now measuring 5.5 mm in height. The
pituitary actually presented with a slightly concave superior margin
and the insertion of the stalk was visualized quite adequately (Fig. 1
-A3 and 1-B3). LT4 dose was decreased over the next four months to
within the range of physiologic replacement (150 µg/day).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With the advent of CT, direct visualization of the pituitary gland provided nonsurgical confirmation of pituitary enlargement in hypothyroidism and regression thereof after replacement with TH (14, 15, 16). The traditional CT criteria for pituitary macroadenoma include homogeneous enlargement of the gland to a height of greater than 10 mm, with or without erosion of the floor of the sella and deviation of the stalk (17). The CT findings of macroadenoma overlap considerably with those of a diffusely enlarged pituitary gland. CT demonstration of a presumed macroadenoma has led to inadvertent transsphenoidal surgery and discovery of pituitary thyrotroph and lactotroph hyperplasia in an otherwise normal gland (5).
MRI alone has also proven unable to reliably differentiate between tumor and hyperplasia. Increased use of MRI in the evaluation of patients with amenorrhea, galactorrhea, and hyperprolactinemia, as well as inappropriate secretion of TSH, may increase the detection of pituitary hyperplasia, thus leading to the need to differentiate between pituitary adenoma and hyperplasia. Different pituitary enhancement patterns between tumor and hyperplasia by MRI have been described in some cases (18), while a midline prominence of a pituitary mass with smooth contours (the "nipple sign") has been proposed as suggestive of pituitary hyperplasia (19). Despite the above theoretical considerations, MRI findings suggestive of a TSH-secreting adenoma, i.e. central enhancing mass with a rim of normal compressed pituitary tissue, may also be seen in hypothyroidism-induced pituitary hyperplasia (10), as well as in the rare entity of hypophysitis (20). Indeed, the most frequent radiologic finding in primary hypothyroidism both by CT and MRI is a pituitary mass with suprasellar extension (21).
Therefore, the diagnosis must rely heavily on the patients past
history (especially in regards to the level of serum TSH at initial
presentation, co-existence of disorders or medications that could
affect LT4 absorption, and the level of patients compliance) and on
detailed endocrine work-up. The laboratory parameters classically used
to distinguish cases of non-compliance to TH replacement from
TSH-producing pituitary tumors and resistance to TH in patients with
iatrogenic hypothyroidism have been: a) serum TSH levels before and
after 123I therapy; b) the responses of serum TSH to TRH
administration; and c) baseline serum
-subunit levels and the
-subunit/TSH molar ratio (22).
Nevertheless, the interpretation of a TRH stimulation test may be
particularly problematic in patients with history of hyperthyroidism
and subsequent iatrogenic hypothyroidism, especially when the initial
TSH level on presentation was not measured. The correct interpretation
of this test is also based on the assumption that the
hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid axis is in "steady state". Lapses in
compliance of hypothyroid patients to TH therapy disrupt this "steady
state" and make the results of a TRH stimulation test virtually
uninterpretable (22). Indeed, similar interpretation problems often
arise in cases of TSH-producing pituitary tumors or resistance to TH
that are mistaken for primary hyperthyroidism and especially following
erroneous treatment of these patients with 131I (23). An
acute T3 suppression test has recently been proposed (12) and may be of
considerable help in cases similar to the ones described above. This
test has been shown to produce a highly predictable serum TSH
suppression response pattern (suppression of TSH to levels
10% of
those at baseline) in normal individuals and patients with primary
hypothyroidism. Acute administration of a high dose of T3 should be
considered as safe in young, otherwise healthy adults; however, in the
setting of advanced age and/or the presence of atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease, this acute test should be avoided, as the
precipitation or exacerbation of angina, arrthythmias, and congestive
heart failure may ensue (24). Finally, a therapeutic trial of TH may
lead to normalization of pituitary MRI characteristics in patients with
primary hypothyroidism, sparing them unnecessary surgery (21).
The kinetics of the regression of pituitary thyrotroph/lactotroph hyperplasia has not been studied in detail, although no cases of this phenomenon have been reported to occur sooner than 4 weeks following the initiation of TH therapy (6, 9, 10, 14, 25). The present case is the first one to document dramatic shrinkage of pituitary hyperplasia in long-standing primary hypothyroidism within six days of acute TH therapy. Thus, the combination of dynamic endocrine testing, including TRH stimulation and acute T3 suppression tests, and repeat pituitary MRI after an acute TH trial, confirmed the diagnosis within a week.
The rapidity of the TH-induced effect observed in our case may be partly caused by the initiation of LT4 therapy after the administration of a large single dose of T3, given as part of an acute T3 suppression test. The cellular mechanism of TH-induced acute regression of thyrotroph hyperplasia may be similar to that of bromocriptine-induced reduction in pituitary volume in macroprolactinomas (26). The molecular mechanism(s) underlying this effect of TH remains speculative.
The clinical evolution of the response of pituitary hyperplasia to TH should be monitored closely, because of the rare possibility of acute neurologic manifestations, such as the development of pseudotumor cerebri and "paradoxical" TH therapy-induced visual failure, or the possibility of an incidental nonthyrotropic pituitary tumor that will not regress on TH therapy (27, 28). In the case of marked regression of pituitary enlargement, without complete normalization in pituitary morphology, the clinical significance of a persistent minimal abnormality detectable by either CT or MRI remains unclear. Pituitary surgery in primary hypothyroidism should be indicated only for decompression of the optic chiasm or to obtain tissue diagnosis in the case of a pituitary mass not responding or worsening on TH therapy (10, 22).
In conclusion, in patients with iatrogenic hypothyroidism and noncompliance to TH therapy, baseline and post-TRH thyroid function tests and pituitary imaging may be unable to reliably differentiate between pituitary tumor and hyperplasia. In similar cases, as well as in other cases of primary hypothyroidism complicated by pituitary hyperplasia, an acute T3 suppression test and a repeat pituitary MRI after an acute trial of high-dose TH therapy (in the absence of advanced age or known cardiovascular disease) may provide a final diagnosis quickly, safely and reliably.
Received July 23, 1996.
Revised October 2, 1996.
Accepted November 12, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. J. Sarlis, L. Gourgiotis, C. A. Koch, M. C. Skarulis, F. Brucker-Davis, J. L. Doppman, E. H. Oldfield, and N. J. Patronas MR Imaging Features of Thyrotropin-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas at Initial Presentation Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 577 - 582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Brinkmeier, J. H. Stahl, D. F. Gordon, B. D. Ross, V. D. Sarapura, J. M. Dowding, S. K. Kendall, R. V. Lloyd, E. C. Ridgway, and S. A. Camper Thyroid Hormone-Responsive Pituitary Hyperplasia Independent of Somatostatin Receptor 2 Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2001; 15(12): 2129 - 2136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brändle and C. Schmid Galactorrhoea and pituitary mass: a typical prolactinoma? Postgrad. Med. J., April 1, 2000; 76(894): 232 - 234. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Shimono, H. Hatabu, K. Kasagi, Y. Miki, S. Nishizawa, T. Misaki, A. Hiraga, and J. Konishi Rapid Progression of Pituitary Hyperplasia in Humans with Primary Hypothyroidism: Demonstration with MR Imaging Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 383 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
F W F Hanna, J H Lazarus, and M F Scanlon Fortnightly review: Controversial aspects of thyroid disease BMJ, October 2, 1999; 319(7214): 894 - 899. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |