help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ohsawa, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ohsawa, N.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 2 616-619
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Clinical Studies

Incomplete Thyrotroph Suppression Determined by Third Generation Thyrotropin Assay in Subacute Thyroiditis Compared to Silent Thyroiditis or Hyperthyroid Graves’ Disease

Mitsuru Ito, Junta Takamatsu, Shigeru Yoshida, Yasuhiro Murakami, Sadaki Sakane, Kanji Kuma and Nakaaki Ohsawa

First Department of Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, (M.I., J.T., S.Y., Y.M., S.S., N.O.); and the Kuma Hospital, Kobe, (K.K.), Japan

Address correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Junta Takamatsu, Associate Professor of First Department of Medicine, Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigakumachi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569, Japan.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Serum TSH concentrations were determined by both second and third generation assays in three types of thyrotoxicosis associated with subacute thyroiditis, silent thyroiditis, and hyperthyroid Graves’ disease at the time of each patient’s initial visit to the clinic. Serum TSH concentrations as measured by the second generation assay with an analytical sensitivity of 0.04 mU/L were below the detection limit in every patient. In contrast, serum TSH concentrations as measured by the third generation assay with an analytical sensitivity of 0.009 mU/L were below the detection limit in 18 of 21 (86%) patients with Graves’ disease, 18 of 20 (90%) with silent thyroiditis, but only 4 of 18 (22%) with subacute thyroiditis. Changes in serum TSH concentrations were studied in healthy volunteers given daily 75 µg of T3; their serum TSH concentrations on the second generation assay fell below the detection limit within 3 days in every subject. However, the TSH concentration measured by the third generation assay remained above the detection limit in 6 of 8 normal subjects even on the 14th day of therapy.

The reason for incomplete TSH suppression in most subacute thyroiditis patients may be that these patients had notable neck pain, and their initial visit to the clinic may have occurred earlier after the onset of disease than with patients who have had silent thyroiditis or Graves’ disease. Thus, the serum TSH concentration had not decreased sufficiently below the detection limit at the time blood was drawn. The data suggest also that the highly sensitive TSH assay, if the level is above the detection limit, can be used to suppose that the short duration of the initiation of thyrotoxicosis indicates a case of subacute thyroiditis. .


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
THE NEW chemiluminescence assay of serum TSH concentrations, designated the ultrasensitive assay or third generation assay, helps distinguish partial from more complete thyrotropic suppression (1, 2, 3, 4). For example, most patients with Graves’ disease have been reported to have serum TSH concentrations below the detection limit as measured by third generation assays (1, 4), while in patients receiving thyroxine as replacement therapy or suppressive therapy, serum TSH concentrations are occasionally below the detection limit with the second generation assay but above the detection limit with the third generation assay (1, 2, 4).

In the present study, we determined serum TSH concentrations using the third generation assay in three types of thyrotoxicosis including subacute thyroiditis, silent thyroiditis, and hyperthyroid Graves’ disease. In addition, a protocol of triiodothyronine (T3) administration to healthy volunteers was performed to help clarify the pathogenesis of incomplete TSH suppression in subacute thyroiditis.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients

Three groups of patients with untreated thyrotoxicosis were studied. They included 21 with hyperthyroid Graves’ disease (2 men and 19 women), 20 with silent thyroiditis (1 man and 19 women), and 18 with subacute thyroiditis (1 man and 17 women). The diagnosis of Graves’ disease was established on the basis of thyrotoxic symptoms with diffuse goiter, elevated serum thyroid hormone levels, increased radioactive iodine uptake, and positive serum TSH receptor antibody activity. The diagnosis of silent thyroiditis was made by elevated serum thyroid hormone levels and very low radioactive iodine uptake, together with painless goiter, on the basis of chronic thyroiditis. The diagnosis of subacute thyroiditis was established by elevated serum thyroid hormone levels, positive C-reactive protein, and very low radioactive iodine uptake, together with the typical symptoms of thyroid gland tenderness. Table 1Go summarizes the thyroid function of patients from three groups of thyrotoxicosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Thyroid function tests in three groups of thyrotoxic patients

 
Administration of T3 to healthy volunteers

Eight normal subjects (6 men and 2 women) with no clinical, historical, or biochemical evidence of thyroid disease were studied after each provided written informed consent. Each subject received 25 µg of T3 orally three times per day for two weeks.

TSH assays

Serum was collected at the time of each patient’s initial visit to our clinic. The third generation assay for serum TSH was performed using a chemiluminescence immunometric assay (Amerlite TSH-30: Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics K.K. (Tokyo, Japan) (4). The normal range was 0.30 ~ 3.90 mU/L, and the limit of analytical sensitivity (5), defined as the value 2 SD above the zero standard determined from a mean of 20 replicates, was 0.009 mU/L. The intrassay precisions (CV) were 4.4% at 0.12 mU/L, 2.5% at 6.5 mU/L, and 4.2% at 32.5 mU/L. The interassay precisions (CV) were 6.3% at 0.12 mU/L, 2.5% at 6.5 mU/L, and 3.3% at 32.5 mU/L. Every serum sample was measured simultaneously for TSH using a second generation chemiluminometric assay (Amerlite TSH-60: Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics K.K.), in which the analytical sensitivity was 0.04 mU/L.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Serum TSH concentrations determined by second and third generation assays

As shown Fig. 1AGo, serum TSH concentrations determined by the second generation assay were below the detection limit in every patient from the three groups. As shown in Fig. 1BGo, the serum TSH concentrations, as measured by the third generation assay, differed from those measured by the second generation assay. By the third generation assay, 18 of the 21 (86%) patients with Graves’ disease and 18 of the 20 (90%) patients with silent thyroiditis had serum TSH concentrations below the detection limit. In contrast, only 4 of the 18 (22%) patients with subacute thyroiditis had serum TSH concentration below the detection limit, and the remaining patients (78%) had a serum TSH above the detection limit.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Serum TSH concentrations in three types of thyrotoxicosis as determined by second (A) and third (B) generation assays. Shaded areas represent the normal range. The broken lines correspond to the detection limit of the assay. Open circles correspond to patients with a serum TSH below the detection limit, while the closed dots correspond to those with a serum TSH above the detection limit.

 
Serum TSH concentrations in relation to serum free T4 concentrations

Figure 2Go demonstrates the relationship between serum free T4 and TSH concentrations in three groups of thyrotoxic patients. Two of three patients with Graves’ disease with detectable serum TSH had a relatively mild increase in serum free T4. In patients with silent thyroiditis, the increase of the serum free T4 concentrations was not remarkable compared with that of the other two groups; however, most of these subjects had undetectable serum TSH concentrations.



View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. The relationship between serum free T4 and TSH concentration in patients with subacute thyroiditis (•), silent thyroiditis ({blacksquare}), and Graves’ disease ({blacktriangleup}). Open symbols ({circ}, {square}, and {triangleup}) correspond to patients with a serum TSH below the detection limit. The shaded area represents the normal range of serum free T4 or TSH concentration. The broken line corresponds to the detection limit of sensitivity of the third generation assay.

 
In subacute thyroiditis, serum TSH concentrations were not suppressed completely even in three patients whose serum free T4 was remarkably high.

Serum TSH concentrations in relation to duration of subacute thyroiditis

When patients with subacute thyroiditis were classified into four subgroups according to the time after the initial appearance of thyroid pain, as shown in Fig. 3Go, the serum TSH concentrations tended to decrease with time after the onset of pain. The mean serum TSH concentration within one week after the onset of pain was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than when measured at 2, 3, or 4 weeks after the onset of pain.



View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Serum TSH concentrations in patients with subacute thyroiditis classified according to the duration from the onset of thyroidal pain to the time of blood sampling. The broken line indicates the detection limit of sensitivity. The bars indicate the mean value of each group. *indicates significant difference (P < 0.05) from the data at 0–1 weeks of disease duration.

 
T3 administration in healthy volunteers

As shown in Fig. 4Go, serum TSH concentrations, as measured by the second generation assay, were decreased below the detection limit in every subject within three days. Serum TSH concentrations, as measured by the third generation assay fell rapidly within a day. However, the decrease in serum TSH became gradual after the second day and could be detected in 6 of 8 subjects even on day 14.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Changes in serum TSH concentrations as measured by second and third generation assays (A and B, respectively) during the course of daily T3 administration (75 µg) for two weeks to healthy volunteers (• or {circ}). Open symbols represent the TSH value below the detection limit. The broken lines indicate the detection limit of each TSH assay.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The major finding of the present study was that many subacute thyroiditis patients (78%) had serum TSH concentrations above the detection limit on the third generation assay, while such incomplete TSH suppression was not observed in most patients with silent thyroiditis and Graves’ disease. One explanation might be that the rate of increase of serum thyroid hormone concentration was not as great in the subacute thyroiditis as in the other two groups. However, the serum free T4 concentration in patients with subacute thyroiditis was not lower and was, in fact, higher than in those with silent thyroiditis (Fig. 2Go), indicating that the incomplete TSH suppression in subacute thyroiditis may have other causes.

The duration of subacute thyroiditis revealed that serum TSH concentrations declined with disease duration (Fig. 3Go). When T3 was administered to healthy volunteers, serum TSH declined gradually in a nonlinear manner, and the serum TSH remained above the detection limit until the 14th day in 6 of 8 subjects (Fig. 4Go). Indeed, it was previously reported that suppression of TSH by thyroid hormone therapy is a biphasic and nonlinear process (6). These facts suggest that serum TSH is not suppressed completely in short-term thyrotoxicosis. Thus, subacute thyroiditis patients may have incomplete TSH suppression as they present earlier to the clinic because of neck pain than do those patients with silent thyroiditis or Graves’ disease. In contrast, patients with silent thyroiditis or Graves’ disease seek medical assistance for thyrotoxic symptoms, such as palpitation and weight loss, which developed later in the course of the disease, and at the time of initial examination may have their serum TSH concentration suppressed below the limit of detection.

It is also possible that the differences in serum TSH levels between two types of transient thyrotoxicosis of subacute thyroiditis and silent thyroiditis may be explained by a difference in how thyrotoxicosis develops. Although thyrotoxicosis of these two disorders is thought to be a result of destruction of thyroid follicles followed by a release of thyroid hormone into the circulation, the development of silent thyroiditis is probably more gradual than that of subacute thyroiditis, because the manner of thyroid destruction in the two disorders may differ. Although not completely understood, silent thyroiditis is an autoimmune process (7, 8, 9), and subacute thyroiditis may relate to viral infection (10). The data herein may lend support to different methods of developing thyrotoxicosis between these two forms of thyroiditis. Determination by sensitive TSH assay in the other, relatively unique types of thyrotoxicosis, including transient thyrotoxicosis with thyroid gland pain in the setting of chronic thyroiditis (11) or Graves’ disease associated with thyroidal pain (12), may merit further investigation, because it has been reported that in painful thyrotoxicosis with chronic thyroiditis, the duration of pain at the initial visit does not differ from that of the usual patients with subacute thyroiditis (11).

Finally, it may be difficult to diagnose subacute thyroiditis by the TSH measurement alone because approximately 20% of patients with this disorder had a serum TSH level below the detection limit. Its characteristic symptoms and physical signs, very low 123I thyroidal uptake and positive inflammatory reaction, together will help make the correct diagnosis. The third generation TSH assay will help provide some additional information to care for patients with subacute thyroiditis. The highly sensitive serum TSH determination may be used to determine the onset of thyrotoxicosis; a subnormal but detectable TSH indicates that the period of thyrotoxicosis is relatively short, as in the case of subacute thyroiditis, while an extremely low TSH level indicates a longer duration of thyrotoxicosis, as in the case of silent thyroiditis or hyperthyroid Graves’ disease.

Received April 11, 1996.

Revised September 12, 1996.

Accepted October 14, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Ross DS, Ardisson LJ, Meskell MJ. 1989 Measurement of thyrotropin in clinical and subclinical hyperthyroidisum using a chemiluminescent assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 69:684–688.[Abstract]
  2. Wilkinson E, Rae PW, Thomson KJT, Toft AD, Spencer CA, Beckett GJ. 1993 Chemiluminescent third-generation assay (Amerlite TSH-30) of thyroid-stimulating hormone in serum or plasma assessed. Clin Chem. 39:2166–2173.
  3. Spencer CA, Lopresti JS, Patel A, et al. 1990 Applications of a new chemiluminometric thyrotropin assay to subnormal measurement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:453–460.[Abstract]
  4. Franklyn JA, Black EG, Betteridge J, Sheppard MC. 1994 Comparison of second and third generation method for measurement of serum thyrotropin in patients with overt hyperthyroidism, patients receiving thyroxine therapy, and those with nonthyroidal illness. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:1368–1371.[Abstract]
  5. Rodbard D. 1978 Statistical estimation of the minimal detectable concentration ("sensitivity") for radioligand assays. Anal Biochem. 90:1–12.[CrossRef][Medline]
  6. Spencer CA, Lopresti JS, Nicoloff JT, Dlott R, Schwarzbein R. 1995 Multiphasic thyrotropin responses to thyroid hormone administration in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:854–859.[Abstract]
  7. Nikolai TF, Brosseau J, Kettrick MA, Roberts R, Beltaos E. 1980 Lymphocytic thyroiditis with spontaneously resolving hyperthyroidism (silent thyroiditis). Arch Intern Med. 140:478–482.[Abstract]
  8. Farid NR, Hawe BS, Walfish PG. 1983 Increased frequency of HLA-DR3 and 5 in the syndromes of painless thyroiditis with transient thyrotoxicosis: evidence for an autoimmune aetiology. Clin Endocrinol. 19:699–704.[Medline]
  9. Elliot I, Gupta M, Hostetter A, Sheeler L, Skillern P, Tubbs R. 1984 Immunologic studies in two patients with persistent lymphocytic thyroiditis, thyrotoxicosis, and low radioactive iodine uptake. Am J Med. 77:347–354.[Medline]
  10. Volpe R, Row VV, Ezrin C. 1967 Circulating viral and thyroid antibodies in subacute thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 27:1275–1284.[Medline]
  11. Shigemasa C, Ueta Y, Mitani Y, et al. 1989 Chronic thyroiditis with painful tender thyroid enlargement and transient thyrotoxicosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:385–390.[Abstract]
  12. Fukata S, Matsuzuka F, Hara T, Mukuta T, Kuma K, Sugawara M. 1993 Rapidly progressive thyroid failure in Graves’ disease after painful attack in the thyroid gland. Arch Intern Med. 153(18):2157–2161.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ito, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ohsawa, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ito, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ohsawa, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals