help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Aronin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Aronin, N.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 2 486-492
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Endocrinological Oncology

A Kindred with a Variant of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Demonstrating Frequent Expression of Pituitary Tumors but Not Linked to the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 Locus at Chromosome Region 11q131

John L. Stock, Maria R. Warth, Bin Tean Teh, James A. Coderre, Judith H. Overdorf, Gerhard Baumann, Raymond L. Hintz, Mark L. Hartman, Bernd R. Seizinger2, Catharina Larsson and Neil Aronin

Endocrinology Laboratory and Department of Medicine, Memorial Health Care (J.L.S., J.A.C., J.H.O.), and the Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School (J.L.S., N.A.), Worcester, Massachusetts 01605; Faulkner Hospital and Tufts University School of Medicine (M.R.W.), Boston, Massachusetts 02130; the Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Hospital (C.L., B.T.T.), Stockholm, Sweden; the Center for Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School (G.B.), Chicago, Illinois 60611; the Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine (R.L.H.), Stanford, California 94305; the Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center (M.L.H.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; and the Molecular Neuro-Oncology Laboratory, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School (B.S.), Boston, Massachusetts 02114

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: John L. Stock, M.D., Memorial Health Care, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Acromegaly is uncommon in kindreds with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), whereas primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) has the highest penetrance of any endocrinopathy. We report an unusual MEN1 kindred with frequent expression of pituitary tumors and a low penetrance of PHP. Four members were found to have disease: PHP in generation I, acromegaly (2 cases) in generation II, and hyperprolactinemia associated with a pituitary tumor in generation III. There was no evidence for PHP in 1 patient with acromegaly (age 60 yr), the patient with hyperprolactinemia and the pituitary tumor (age 22 yr), and 1 asymptomatic obligate carrier (age 50 yr). Screening of 26 members revealed the possible diagnosis of PHP in 1 family member in generation II and possible early acromegaly in 2 members of generation III with elevated serum concentrations of insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 but normal patterns of pulsatile GH release. Although the predisposing genetic defect in typical MEN1 families has previously been mapped to chromosome location 11q13 without evidence of heterogeneity among the 87 families analyzed, linkage of disease in this family to the MEN1 region is unlikely based on haplotype analysis.

Localization of the gene(s) responsible for disease in such atypical families may aid in the understanding of the pathogenesis of MEN1. In addition, further study of the earliest changes in patterns of pulsatile GH release in familial acromegaly may allow more insight into the pathogenesis and natural history of this disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
MULTIPLE ENDOCRINE neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by multiglandular parathyroid disease, neuroendocrine pancreatic and duodenal tumors, and pituitary tumors (1). Deletion mapping and genetic linkage analyses have localized the gene responsible to chromosome region 11q13 near the PYGM locus (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7). Allelic losses in parathyroid, pancreatic, and pituitary tumors at this locus suggest inactivation of a tumor suppressor gene in the pathophysiology of MEN1 and sporadic tumors (8). Acromegaly is uncommon in MEN1, whereas primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) has the highest penetrance of any endocrinopathy and is usually evident by age 40 yr (9). Based on linkage analysis in 87 MEN1 families, no evidence of heterogeneity has been identified (7).

We report an MEN1 kindred in which four members have clinically apparent disease: one patient with PHP in generation I, two patients with acromegaly in generation II, and a patient with a pituitary tumor and hyperprolactinemia in generation III (Fig. 1Go). This family is unusual in the preponderance of pituitary tumors and the low penetrance of PHP. In addition, two of six clinically normal children of a family member with acromegaly have biochemical and/or anatomical evidence of early acromegaly. Linkage analysis suggests that the gene responsible for the endocrine disorders in this unusual family is not the same as the gene responsible for more typical MEN1 syndrome.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pedigree of the MEN1 kindred obtained by history. Affected males are indicated by solid squares, and affected females are indicated by solid circles. Slashes denote deceased family members. The diagnoses of affected members are: I-7, PHP; II-7, acromegaly; II-8, acromegaly and possible mild PHP; and III-16, pituitary tumor and hyperprolactinemia. All family members participated in biochemical screening, except I-1 through I-6 and II-7 (deceased), III-20 and III-21 (under age 14 yr), and III-6 (not available for screening). A plus indicates that the MEN1 region of chromosome 11 (markers at locus PYGM and flanking markers at loci CD20 and D11S913) are shared with affected members I-7 and II-8. A minus indicates that this region is not shared with these affected members. No symbol is shown for members not fully haplotyped. The haplotype for deceased subject II-7 was deduced from other family members. Subject III-14 shared a portion of chromosome 11 (PYGM-INT2) with the affected members, due to recombination.

 

    Subjects and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Patients (Fig. 1Go)

Family member I-7 was an 84-yr-old woman with a 10-yr history of mild asymptomatic PHP. Her physical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory studies revealed elevated serum calcium (10.9 mg/dL), intact PTH (76 pg/mL; normal, 10–65), and fasting serum gastrin (472 pg/mL; normal, 0–200) concentrations, but she displayed no symptoms or signs of gastrointestinal disease. The serum concentrations of GH, insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), and PRL were normal.

Family member II-7 presented at age 60 yr with clinical signs of acromegaly during an evaluation for recurrent colon carcinoma. Laboratory studies revealed elevated serum GH (12.6 ng/mL) and IGF-I (14 U/mL; normal, <1.4) concentrations. The serum GH level increased further after TRH stimulation. The serum calcium concentration was 8.9 mg/dL, with an albumin level of 3.4 g/dL. The serum PRL concentration was 7.2 ng/mL. The patient died 10 months later of metastatic colon carcinoma.

Family member II-8 presented at age 58 yr with a 10-yr history of gradually increasing hand and foot size as well as increased sweating. The physical examination was significant for a prominent chin and large hands and feet. Laboratory studies revealed elevated serum GH (55.4 ng/mL; not suppressible with glucose), IGF-I (295 ng/mL; normal, 43–178), calcium (10.4 mg/dL), and C-terminal PTH (343 pg/mL; normal, 50–340) concentrations. A 1.8-cm pituitary tumor extending to the chiasm was treated with transsphenoidal resection. Pathological examination revealed a discrete adenoma with uniform cytomorphology. Half the cells contained acidophilic cytoplasm, and dense granules varying in size from 200–800 nm were seen by electron microscopy. The tumor showed diffusely uniform immunolabeling for GH, but not PRL.

Family member III-16 was evaluated at age 22 yr for amenorrhea after discontinuation of an oral contraceptive. Laboratory studies revealed an elevated serum PRL concentration of 46.8 ng/mL, normal serum concentrations of GH (0.22 ng/mL) and calcium (9.4 mg/dL), and a 1-cm pituitary adenoma. The patient was treated with bromocriptine, with resumption of menses, normalization of the serum PRL concentration, and resolution of the pituitary tumor on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.

Family screening

Twenty-six members of the kindred were screened after informed consent was obtained. Fasting venous blood was obtained for determination of serum chemistries, PTH, gastrin, PRL, GH, and IGF-I concentrations. All members over age 14 yr were invited for endocrine evaluation, and only one did not participate. In addition, leukocytes for DNA isolation were obtained from the three living members with known disease as well as other family members and spouses. Subjects living in the local area were screened at Memorial Hospital and blood samples from the others were drawn by their local physicians and shipped either frozen or at room temperature by overnight mail.

GH studies in offspring of subject II-7 with acromegaly

Additional studies were performed in the six offspring of subject II-7 who were admitted to Memorial Hospital. After a complete history and physical examination and dinner at 1700 h, subjects remained in bed and fasted, but were allowed water ad libitum. An iv catheter was placed, and blood was sampled at 20-min intervals for GH determinations from 2000–0800 h. The lights were extinguished at 2300 h, and sleep records were obtained through the night by observation. At 0800 h, the subjects were given 500 µg TRH. iv, over 1 min, and blood samples were obtained at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min for determination of serum levels of GH and PRL. The iv catheter was removed, and the subjects were discharged and allowed to resume their normal diet. A MRI scan of the pituitary (Signa 1.5 tesla, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI) was obtained that afternoon, and a glucose tolerance test was performed the following morning after a 10-h fast. Samples for determination of GH levels were obtained at baseline and 30, 60, 120, and 180 min after the administration of 75 g oral glucose. The baseline sample was also analyzed for IGF-I, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), and GH-binding protein (GHBP).

Assays

Serum chemistries were determined by automatic analyzer. PTH was measured in the samples obtained during family screening by a midregion-specific RIA [midregion immunoreactive PTH (iPTH)] using an antiserum generated in a goat against crude native human PTH (generously supplied by Dr. Lawrence Mallette) and 125I-labeled Tyr43-(44–68)-human PTH as radioligand, as previously described (10). Subsequently, PTH was also measured in selected family members using an immunoradiometric assay for intact PTH (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA). Gastrin and PRL were measured by RIA. GH in the family screening samples was determined using a rabbit antiserum to human GH and 125I-labeled human GH (Smith Kline Bio-Science Laboratories, personal communication). GH in the frequent samples obtained from the offspring of subject II-7 was measured by immunoradiometric assay (Nichols Institute Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA). The sensitivity of this assay was 0.02 ng/mL. The interassay coefficient of variation ranged from 3.5–7.2% over a concentration range of 1.4–13.0 ng/mL. The intraassay coefficient of variation ranged from 2.8–4.2% over a concentration range of 1.4–12.2 ng/mL. IGF-I in the family screening samples was determined by RIA after acid extraction by the method of Furlanetto (11) (Smith Kline Bio-Science Laboratories, personal communication). IGF-I was also measured by similar methods in separate samples from the offspring of subject II-7 by two independent laboratories (Smith Kline Bio-Science Laboratories) (12). IGFBP-3 was determined in serum by Western ligand blotting (13). GHBP in plasma was measured in living member II-8 with acromegaly and in the offspring of family member II-7 by an assay previously described (14). GHRH in serum was measured by RIA in the same subjects, courtesy of Dr. Wylie Vale (15).

Pulse analysis of frequent GH sampling

An objective, statistically based pulse detection algorithm (Cluster) was used to define significant pulses in the serum GH concentrations obtained at 20-min intervals for 12 h (16, 17). The following parameters were used: 1 x 1 test sample nadir and peak, t statistic of 1, minimum peak height of 0.7 ng/mL. Specifically identified properties of pulsatile GH release included pulse frequency (number of significant GH peaks per 12 h), mean interpulse interval (time in minutes separating consecutive peak maxima), mean pulse duration in minutes, mean pulse height (maximal GH concentration in a peak), mean incremental pulse height (difference between peak maximum and preceding nadir), interpulse valley mean (a valley was defined as a region embracing nadirs without significant intervening peaks), integrated GH concentration (IGHC; area under curve), and mean pulse area (integrated concentration under a peak in excess of the mean pre- and postpeak nadirs).

Attributes of the pulsatile GH release in the family members were compared with results in a group of normal healthy volunteers studied at the University of Virginia. Twelve men (aged 27–28 yr) and eight women (aged 23–24 yr) were sampled every 5 min for 24 h as previously described (17). To create a time series of serum GH concentrations comparable to those of family members, only every 20 min samples between 2000–0800 h were included in the analysis. GH was measured in the control samples by the same assay used to analyze GH in family members, except for the use of equine serum as the matrix instead of human serum. To correct for the matrix effect caused by the use of equine serum, GH concentrations in control subjects were divided by 2, as previously described (17), and the assay sensitivity was set at 0.25 ng/mL for all samples.

Linkage analysis

Blood samples were obtained from consenting family members, and high mol wt DNA was isolated from Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines. Southern blot hybridization using restriction fragment length polymorphism/variable number tandem repeat markers and the PCR-based detection of microsatellite repeat polymorphisms (i.e. CA repeats) were performed according to standard procedures (18). Nine polymorphic markers at seven loci close to and flanking the MEN1 locus at 11q13 were analyzed: D11S149/pTHH26, D11S288/p3C7, CD20/pB1-21, PYGM/(CA)(GA), PYGM/pMCMP1, PYGM/cCL15, D11S913/AFM164zf12, D11S97/pms51, and INT2/SS6.

Family and genotype data were typed into the linkage data managing computer database LINKSYS. Two-point linkage between "the disease" and different markers was calculated with the LIPED computer program. The scoring of affected status was conservative to avoid incorrect diagnosis. Individuals I-7, II-7, II-8, and III-16 were scored as affected, whereas all other individuals at risk were scored as unknown. The allele frequencies of the two microsatellite markers, (PYGM/(CA)(GA) and D11S913), were assumed to be equal.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Family screening

The serum calcium and albumin concentrations were normal in all family members except subject II-1. This subject, a healthy asymptomatic 47-yr-old man, was found to have a mildly elevated serum calcium concentration of 10.4 mg/dL. The screening serum midregion iPTH was 900 pg/mL (normal, 160-1000). Repeat sampling in this subject 20 months later revealed a serum calcium concentration of 10.6 mg/dL and an intact PTH concentration of 45 pg/mL (normal, 10–65). The screening serum gastrin concentration was 156 pg/mL (normal, 0–100 pg/mL), and it was 111 pg/mL in the repeat sample.

Despite normal serum calcium concentrations, levels of serum midregion iPTH were mildly elevated in 4 subjects screened: II-3, 1030 pg/mL; III-7, 1300 pg/mL; III-9, 1070 pg/mL; and III-10, 1060 pg/mL (normal, 160-1000). Subject III-7 was nursing at the time of screening. The serum gastrin concentration was mildly elevated in subject III-3 (117 pg/mL), and serum PRL levels were normal in all subjects screened. The serum GH concentration in subject III-19 was 6.3 ng/mL, and the serum IGF-I concentration was 230 ng/mL (normal, 116–270). The serum GH concentrations were less than the detection limit of 1.5 ng/mL in 15 other family members and were detectable, but 3.6 ng/mL or less, in the other members screened. Elevated levels of serum IGF-I were found in 7 subjects. Five of these were offspring of deceased subject II-7 with acromegaly (III-9, III-10, III-12, III-13, and III-14; Table 1Go). The serum IGF-I concentration in subject III-15 was 290 ng/mL, and that in subject III-8 was 370 ng/mL, with a repeat test level of 238 ng/mL (normal, 116–270).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Serum concentrations of IGF-I, IGFBP-3, GH, GHBP, and GHRH in children of family member II-7 with acromegaly

 
Clinical evaluation of the offspring of subject II-7 with acromegaly (Table 1Go)

There were no symptoms or physical findings of acromegaly or any other endocrinopathy in any of these six family members. Of the five subjects with elevated levels of serum IGF-I at screening, serum IGF-I concentrations were still elevated in four upon repeat testing using the same assay, serum IGF-I concentrations were elevated in three using the other IGF-I assay, and serum IGFBP-3 concentrations were elevated in three. The family member with the initially normal serum IGF-I level was found to have elevated levels by both assays upon repeat testing. Serum GH concentrations 1 h after glucose administration were less than 1 ng/mL, and GHBP and plasma GHRH levels were normal in all subjects.

The serum GH concentrations obtained at 20-min intervals for 12 h were analyzed by the Cluster algorithm; the results are shown in Fig. 2Go. Family member III-12 had a mean GH concentration of 5.6 µg/L, almost 2 SD above the mean value for normal young women (3.7 ± 1.2 µg/L). She had mean absolute (13.3 µg/L) and incremental (12.1 µg/L) GH pulse heights that were more than 2 SD above the mean values for normal young women (6.9 ± 2.8 and 5.2 ± 2.9 µg/L, respectively). Family member III-13 had a mean GH pulse height of 12.6 µg/L, which was also 2 SD above the mean for normal women; the valley mean, total IGHC, and mean GH concentration in this subject were at the upper limits of normal. The remaining family members had normal patterns of pulsatile GH release (data not shown).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Twelve-hour serum GH profiles in the six offspring of subject II-7 with acromegaly. Blood samples were obtained via an iv catheter at 20-min intervals from 2000–0800 h.

 
TSH and PRL responded normally to TRH infusion in all six subjects. GH concentrations were unchanged after TRH infusions, except in subject III-13, in whom GH concentrations were less than 2 ng/mL at baseline, 15 min, and 30 min and increased to 4.2, 9.8, and 11.5 ng/mL 45, 60, and 90 min after TRH infusion, respectively.

The pituitary MRI scan in subject III-14 revealed an enlarged pituitary measuring 11 mm in all dimensions, with a convex upper border and suprasellar extension. The scans were normal in the other five family members studied.

Linkage analysis

To ascertain whether the abnormalities in this family represent a variant of MEN1, members were genotyped for 9 markers at 7 polymorphic loci (D11S149, D11S288, CD20, PYGM, D11S913, D11S97, and INT2) within the MEN1 region at 11q13. Figure 1Go illustrates how linkage to MEN1 was excluded based on haplotype analysis. The MEN1 gene was previously assigned very close to the PYGM locus and flanked by CD20 and D11S913. This MEN1 region of chromosome 11, which was inherited from the affected mother (I-7) by the affected daughter (II-8), was not transferred to the affected granddaughter (III-16). In addition, three markers located in the MEN1 region resulted in lod scores (log10 of the odds ratio favoring linkage) of less than -3 (Table 2Go). For 1 of these, PYGM, no meiotic recombinants have been found to date in more than 80 MEN1 families studied. From these data it is unlikely that the endocrine abnormalities in this family are linked to the MEN1 region.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Lod scores for linkage of endocrine abnormalities to different microsatellite and Southern based markers at loci in the 11q11-13 region (I-7, II-7, II-8, and III-16 as affected and the rest unknown)

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Four members of a MEN1 kindred were found to have clinically apparent disease: PHP in generation I, acromegaly (two subjects) in generation II, and a pituitary tumor with hyperprolactinemia in generation III. Serum concentrations of calcium and PTH were normal in one of the patients with acromegaly (age 60 yr), the patient with the pituitary tumor and hyperprolactinemia (age 22 yr), and her father (age 50 yr). In addition, the diagnosis of PHP is likely in one member of generation II, and the diagnosis of acromegaly is likely in members III-13 and III-14, although their disease status was considered unknown for the linkage analysis. This family is an unusual variant of MEN1, given the frequency of acromegaly and the low penetrance of PHP. In typical MEN1, PHP has the highest penetrance of any endocrinopathy and is clinically evident in nearly 100% of affected members by age 40 yr (9). Affected member II-7 and obligate carrier II-10 showed no manifestations of PHP, although members of generation III were less than 40 yr old when studied. The incidence of PHP may increase in the affected members in this generation in the future. The prevalence of gastrinomas (32%) and prolactinomas (16%) is also higher in typical MEN1 kindreds (1, 9).

The predisposing genetic defect in typical MEN1 families has been mapped to chromosome region 11q13, close to the PYGM locus, with no evidence of heterogeneity between 87 families analyzed until this report (7). Genetic linkage analysis demonstrated that the putative disease-associated haplotype of the 11q13 region is present in 9 and absent in 14 family members at risk. In several of these cases, the clinical status is different from that expected from the genetic analysis. Four subjects (II-10, II-11, III-17, and III-18) carry the same haplotype as the affected cases but have no clinical evidence of being affected. The ages of subjects II-10 (60 yr) and II-11 (59 yr) are well above the usual age of onset for MEN1. Furthermore, family member III-16, who does not carry the disease-associated haplotype, is affected, and member II-1 also does not carry this haplotype and may be affected. Hence, for the family to be linked to the typical MEN1 locus at 11q13 would require that III-16 be a sporadic case of a pituitary tumor and hyperprolactinemia, and that subject II-1 either not be affected by PHP or be a sporadic case of male PHP. The possibility that the pituitary tumor in member III-16 is sporadic cannot be ruled out, but the probability is low considering its low incidence in the general population and its established occurrence in familial pituitary tumor syndromes. From our previous experience, we have encountered one case of sporadic PHP in the largest family known, which resides in Tasmania (19).

Clinical GH excess is unusual in MEN1 (20); it was noted in only one member of Marx’s kindred (9) and was not present in Ballard’s kindred (21). However, a number of patients with acromegaly are described in Ballard’s historical literature review of MEN1 (21), and in one series of pituitary adenomas resected in subjects with MEN1, 44% of the tumors were immunoreactive for GH (22). There have been several families reported with clustering of acromegaly, either with (23) or without (23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31) other associated endocrinopathies of MEN1. To date, no linkage data are available for these families.

Variants of typical MEN1 have been described. Four Canadian families (32, 33) and a family from the Pacific Northwest (34) have a high incidence of PHP and prolactinomas, and a lower incidence of carcinoid tumors and pancreatic islet cell disease (32, 33). Several members of these families did not have hypercalcemia at the time of pituitary diagnosis. Linkage analysis showed that this disorder mapped to the same region on chromosome 11 as typical MEN1 (35). The Tasman kindred has frequent PRL-secreting pituitary tumors and/or insulinomas, presenting in adolescence often before clinical evidence of PHP (36), but no cases of acromegaly (37). The 11q13 genetic defect has also been demonstrated in affected members of this kindred (38).

Screening of the family presented here revealed one member (II-1) with possible mild asymptomatic PHP. Several other members had mildly increased serum iPTH concentrations measured in a midregion-sensitive assay, but all had normal measurements of serum calcium and intact PTH, making PHP unlikely. The intact PTH assay is more sensitive and specific than the midregion assay (39), but was unavailable to us at the time of the initial screening. Fasting serum gastrin levels were mildly increased in two family members with no clinical evidence of ulcer disease. Other islet cell hormones were not measured, and it is possible that pancreatic involvement was present in some asymptomatic individuals (40).

Several asymptomatic family members were found to have laboratory findings consistent with early acromegaly. Screening revealed increased serum IGF-I levels in five of the six offspring of subject II-7 with acromegaly. Two other independent measures of IGF-I revealed increased levels as well (Table 1Go). The serum IGF-I concentrations in subjects III-13 and III-14 were elevated in all three determinations. Serum IGF-I concentrations peak during puberty and then gradually decline throughout adulthood (41). Subjects III-13 and III-14 were the youngest family members screened, but their serum IGF-I concentrations were above the normal range for normal 21- and 20-yr-old subjects (41). Serum IGFBP-3 concentrations were also elevated in these two family members. IGFBP-3 is the major GH-dependent IGFBP in serum, where it acts as a carrier for IGF-I and IGF-II (42), and its level is elevated in acromegaly (43) and decreased in GH deficiency (44). The elevated serum levels of IGF-I and IGFBP-3 suggest that these offspring, particularly III-13 and III-14, might be affected with acromegaly in an early and asymptomatic phase. Further testing supports this. The pituitary gland was abnormal in subject III-14, measuring 11 mm in all dimensions, with a convex upper border and suprasellar extension. The GH response to TRH was abnormal in subject III-13, although the rise in GH in this subject was later than that usually seen in acromegaly (45) and may have represented a coincidental random GH pulse.

In acromegaly, pulsatile GH release is disorderly, with higher rates of basal secretion than occur in normal subjects (46). In this study, blood samples were obtained at 20-min intervals for 12 h overnight in six offspring of family member II-7 with acromegaly to compare with data previously collected in normal men and women of similar ages (17). Although retrospective, the subjects had similar ages and were studied under similar conditions with the same GH assay (except for serum matrix differences). Two of the female offspring (subjects III-12 and III-13) had high normal mean GH concentrations and elevated mean GH pulse heights compared to normal young women. However, the indexes that correspond to elevated basal secretion (valley mean concentration, nonpulsatile IGHC) were not elevated in these subjects or in any of the other offspring, contrary to what has been described in acromegaly (17). The number of pulses and all other attributes of pulsatile release determined by Cluster were within the range of the normal subjects. Thus, the nocturnal patterns of GH release in these subjects did not resemble those previously described in patients with somatotroph adenomas (17, 46). However, the pattern of GH release in very early acromegaly, before clinical presentation, is not known. Alternatively, the high amplitude GH peaks and elevated IGF-I concentrations in subjects III-14 (aged 20 yr), III-13 (aged 21 yr), and III-12 (aged 23 yr), could reflect a delayed resolution of the changes in the GH-IGF axis during puberty (41, 47).

The high affinity GHBP is structurally related to the GH receptor, and plasma levels of GHBP may reflect the GH receptor concentration in tissue and possibly tissue responsiveness to GH (48). It is possible that abnormalities in GHBP may relate to syndromes of GH excess, but it is unlikely in this family given the normal plasma GHBP concentrations in patient II-8 with acromegaly and the possibly affected offspring of patient II-7 with acromegaly. In typical pituitary acromegaly, GHBP concentrations are in the low normal range (49), and GHBP does not significantly affect the GH immunoassay (50). Other possible explanations for the discrepancy between IGF-I and GH levels in these subjects include increased sensitivity to GH (51), abnormal GH structure (52), anti-GH receptor antibodies (53), simultaneous increased secretion of somatostatin (54), or abnormal clearance of IGF-I. An ectopic GHRH-secreting tumor is an unusual cause of acromegaly, may be clinically indistinguishable from pituitary acromegaly (55), and may be associated with the MEN syndrome (22). The lack of diffuse somatotroph hyperplasia in patient II-8 and the normal serum levels of GHRH in patient II-8 with acromegaly and the possibly affected offspring of patient II-7 with acromegaly suggest that ectopic GHRH is an unlikely cause of acromegaly in this family. A subgroup of GH-secreting pituitary tumors has been described (56) in which a point mutation in the {alpha}-subunit of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein Gs leads to constitutive activation of adenylyl cyclase and increased GH secretion (gsp mutation) similar to the activating mutations described in tissues from patients with the McCune-Albright syndrome (57, 58). This mutation has been described in the pituitary from a patient with MEN1 and a mixed GH cell-PRL cell adenoma (59) and in a non-MEN1 somatotropinoma that also revealed allele loss of chromosome 11 (60). The recent demonstration of McCune-Albright syndrome in a MEN1 kindred (61) suggests a link between the MEN1 gene and the G protein-coupled transduction system in the plasma membrane.

Genetic testing for MEN1 may be complicated by the heterogeneous nature of the germinal mutation, particularly in variant families (38). Localization of the gene(s) responsible for disease in such atypical families may aid in the understanding of the pathogenesis of MEN1. In addition, further study of the very earliest changes in the pulsatile GH secretion in possibly affected family members may allow more insight into the pathogenesis and natural history of acromegaly.


    Acknowledgments
 
The cooperation of family members; the helpful suggestions of Drs. Phillip Gorden, Stephen Marx, and Michael Thorner; and the assistance of Drs. James Lingley, Alan Rogol, Mary Lee Vance, Marian DiFiglia, Jonathan Haines, Magnus Nordenskjold, Christine Albini, David Smith, Howard Lang, Michelle Roberts, Francisco Nieves-Rivera, Norma Davila, Jayant Khettry, Ms. Joan Vaughan, Carolyn Douglas, Mary Ann Kristan, and Carol Ann Frazier are appreciated.


    Footnotes
 
1 Presented in part at the 73rd Annual Meeting of The Endocrine Society, Washington, D.C., June 1991. This work was supported in part by The Roger Robinson Fund at Memorial Health Care and NIH Grant DK-38128. Back

2 Present address: Department of Molecular Genetics and Oncology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Princeton, New Jersey 08543. Back

Received May 30, 1996.

Revised September 26, 1996.

Accepted October 10, 1996.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Subjects and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Brandi ML, Marx SJ, Aurbach GD, Fitzpatrick LA. 1987 Familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type I: a new look at pathophysiology. Endocr Rev. 8:391–405.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Larsson C, Skogseid B, Oberg K, Nakamura Y, Nordenskjold M. 1988 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene maps to chromosome 11 and is lost in insulinoma. Nature. 332:85–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Bystrom C, Larsson C, Blomberg C, et al. 1990 Localization of the MEN1 gene to a small region within chromosome 11q13 by deletion mapping in tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:1968–1972.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Thakker RV, Wooding C, Pang JT, et al. 1993 Linkage analysis of 7 polymorphic markers at chromosome 11p11.2-11q13 in 27 multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 families. Ann Hum Genet. 57:17–25.[Medline]
  5. Larsson C, Friedman E. 1994 Localization and identification of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 disease gene. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 23:67–79.[Medline]
  6. Weber G, Friedman E, Grimmond S, et al. 1994 The phospholipase Cß3 gene located in the MEN1 region shows loss of expression in endocrine tumors. Hum Mol Genet. 3:1775–1781.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Larsson C, Calender A, Grimmond S, et al. 1995 Molecular tools for presymptomatic testing in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Intern Med. 238:239–244.[Medline]
  8. Friedman E, Larsson C, Amorosi A, et al. 1994 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: pathology, pathophysiology, molecular genetics, and differential diagnosis. In: Bilezikian JP, Marcus R, Levine MA, eds. The parathyroids: basic and clinical concepts. New York: Raven Press; 647–680.
  9. Marx SJ, Vinik AI, Santen RJ, Floyd Jr JC, Mills JL, Green III J. 1986 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type I: assessment of laboratory tests to screen for the gene in a large kindred. Medicine. 65:226–241.[Medline]
  10. Stock JL, Coderre JA, Mallette LE. 1985 Effects of a short course of estrogen on mineral metabolism in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 61:595–600.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Furlanetto RW, Underwood LE, Van Wyk JJ, D’Ercole AJ. 1977 Estimation of somatomedin-C levels in normals and patients with pituitary disease by radioimmunoassay. J Clin Invest. 60:648–657.
  12. Liu F, Powell DR, Styne DM, Hintz RL. 1991 Insulin-like growth factor and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the developing rhesus monkey. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:905–911.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Giudice LC, Farrell EM, Pham H, Lamson G, Rosenfeld RG. 1990 Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in maternal serum throughout gestation and in the peurperium: effects of a pregnancy-associated serum protease activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 71:806–816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Baumann G, Shaw MA, Amburn K. 1989 Regulation of plasma growth hormone-binding proteins in health and disease. Metabolism. 38:683–689.[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Vale W, Vaughan J, Jolley D, et al. 1986 Assay of growth hormone-releasing factor. Methods Enzymol. 124:389–401.[Medline]
  16. Veldhuis JD, Johnson ML. 1986 Cluster analysis: a simple, versatile, and robust algorithm for endocrine pulse detection. Am J Physiol. 250:E486–E493.
  17. Hartman ML, Veldhuis JD, Vance ML, Faria ACS, Furlanetto RW, Thorner MO. 1990 Somatotropin pulse frequency and basal concentrations are increased in acromegaly and are reduced by successful therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1375–1384.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Teh BT, Cardinal J, Shepherd J, et al. 1995 Genetic mapping of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 locus at 11q13. J Intern Med. 238:249–253.[Medline]
  19. Teh BT, McArdle J, Parameswaran V, et al. Sporadic hyperparathyroidism in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Surg. 131:1230–1232.
  20. Metz DC, Jensen RT, Bale AE, et al. 1994 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type I: clinical features and management. In: Bilezekian JP, Marcus R, Levine MA, eds. The parathyroids: basic and clinical concepts. New York: Raven Press; 591–646.
  21. Ballard HS, Frame B, Hartsock LJ. 1964 Familial multiple endocrine adenoma-peptic ulcer complex. Medicine. 43:481–516.[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Scheithauer BW, Laws Jr ER, Kovacs K, Horvath E, Randall RV, Carney JA. 1987 Pituitary adenomas of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type I syndrome. Semin Diag Pathol. 4:205–211.
  23. McCarthy MI, Noonan K, Wass JAH, Monson JP. 1990 Familial acromegaly: studies in three families. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 32:719–728.[Medline]
  24. Yuasa H, Tokito S, Nakagaki H, Kitamura K. 1990 Familial pituitary adenoma: report of four cases from two unrelated families. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 30:1016–1019.[Medline]
  25. Matsuno A, Teramoto A, Yamada S, et al. 1994 Gigantism in sibling unrelated to multiple endocrine neoplasia: case report. Neurosurgery. 35:952–956.[Medline]
  26. Tamburrano G, Jaffrain-Rea M-L, Grossi A, Lise A, Bulletta C. 1992 L’acromegalie familiale. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 53:201–207.[Medline]
  27. Pestell RG, Alford FP, Best JD. 1989 Familial acromegaly. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 121:286–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Abbassioun K, Fatourehchi V, Amirjamshidi A, Meibodi NA. 1986 Familial acromegaly with pituitary adenoma. J Neurosurg. 64:510–512.[Medline]
  29. Jones MK, Evans PJ, Jones IR, Thomas JP. 1984 Familial acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 20:355–358.[Medline]
  30. Kurisaka M, Takei Y, Tsubokawa T, Moriyasu N. 1981 Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in uniovular twin brothers: case report. Neurosurgery. 8:226–230.[Medline]
  31. Levin SR, Hofeldt FD, Becker N, Wilson CB, Seymour R, Forsham PH. 1974 Hypersomatotropism and acanthosis nigricans in two brothers. Arch Intern Med. 134:365–367.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Farid NR, Buehler S, Russell NA, Maroun FB, Allerdice P, Smyth HS. 1980 Prolactinomas in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type I. Am J Med. 69:874–880.[Medline]
  33. Bear JC, Briones-Urbina R, Fahey JF, Farid NR. 1985 Variant multiple endocrine neoplasia I (MEN IBurin): further studies and non-linkage to HLA. Hum Hered. 35:15–20.[Medline]
  34. Hershon KS, Kelly WA, Shaw CM, Schwartz R, Bierman EL. 1983 Prolactionomas as part of the multiple endocrine neoplastic syndrome type 1. Am J Med. 74:713–720.[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Petty EM, Green JS, Marx SJ, Taggart JT, Farid N, Bale AE. 1994 Mapping the gene for hereditary hyperparathyroidism and prolactinoma (MEN 1Burin) to chromosome 11q: evidence for a founder effect in patients from Newfoundland. Am J Hum Genet. 54:1060–1066.[Medline]
  36. Shepherd JJ. 1991 The natural history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1:highly uncommon or highly unrecognized? Arch Surg. 126:935–952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Burgess JR, Shepherd JJ, Parameswaran V, Hoffman L, Greenaway TM. 1996 Somatotrophinomas in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a review of clinical phenotype and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in a large multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 kindred. Am J Med. 100:544–547.[CrossRef][Medline]
  38. Larsson C, Shepherd J, Nakamura, et al. 1992 Predictive testing for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 using DNA polymorphisms. J Clin Invest 89:1344–1349.
  39. Blind E, Schmidt-Gayk H, Scharla S, et al. 1988 Two-site assay of intact parathyroid hormone in the investigation of primary hyperparathyroidism and other disorders of calcium metabolism compared with a midregion assay. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 67:353–360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Skogseid B, Eriksson B, Lundqvist G, et al. 1991 Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a 10-year prospective screening study in four kindreds. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 73:281–287.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Juul A, Bang P, Hertel NT, et al. 1994 Serum insulin-like growth factor-I in 1030 healthy children, adolescents, and adults: relation to age, sex, stage of puberty, testicular size, and body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:744–752.[Abstract]
  42. Blum WF, Ranke MB, Kietzmann K, Gauggel E, Zeisel HJ, Bierich JR. 1990 A specific radioimmunoassay for the growth hormone (GH)-dependent somatomedin-binding protein: its use for diagnosis of GH deficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1292–1298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Grinspoon S, Clemmons D, Swearlingen B, Klibanski A. 1995 Serum insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 levels in the diagnosis of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 80:927–932.[Abstract]
  44. Baxter RC. 1990 Circulating levels and molecular distribution of the acid-labile (alpha) subunit of the high molecular weight insulin-like growth factor-binding protein complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 70:1347–1353.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Irie M, Tsushima T. 1972 Increase of serum growth hormone concentration following thyrotropin-releasing hormone injection in patients with acromegaly or gigantism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 35:97–98.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Hartman ML, Pincus SM, Johnson ML, et al. 1994 Enhanced basal and disorderly growth hormone (GH) secretion distinguish acromegalic from normal pulsatile GH release. J Clin Invest. 94:1277–1288.
  47. Martha PM, Gorman KM, Blizzard RM, Rogol AD, Veldhuis JD. 1992 Endogenous growth hormone secretion and clearance rates in normal boys, as determined by deconvolution analysis: relationship to age, pubertal status, and body mass. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 74:336–344.[Abstract]
  48. Leung DW, Spencer SA, Cachianes G, et al. 1987 Growth hormone receptor and serum binding protein: purification, cloning and expression. Nature. 330:537–543.[CrossRef][Medline]
  49. Mercado M, Carlsson L, Vitangcol R, Baumann G. 1993 Growth hormone-binding protein determination in plasma: a comparison of immunofunctional and growth hormone-binding assays. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 76:1291–1294.[Abstract]
  50. Jan T, Shaw MA, Baumann G. 1991 Effects of growth hormone-binding proteins on serum growth hormone measurements. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 72:387–391.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Daughaday WH, Starkey RH, Saltman S, Gavin III JR, Mills-Dunlap B, Heath-Monnig E. 1987 Characterization of serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I in active acromegaly with minimal elevation of serum GH. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 65:617–623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Bistritzer T, Lovchik JC, Chalew SA, Kowarski AA. 1988 Growth without growth hormone: the "invisible" GH syndrome. Lancet. 1:321–323.[CrossRef][Medline]
  53. Campino C, Szecowka J, Lopez JM, Mulchahey J, Seron-Ferre M. 1992 Growth hormone (GH) receptor antibodies with GH-like activity occur spontaneously in acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 74:751–756.[Abstract]
  54. Pagesy P, Li JY, Rentier-Delrue F, et al. 1990 Growth hormone and somatostatin gene expresson in pituitary adenomas with active acromegaly and minimal plasma growth hormone elevation. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh). 122:745–752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Thorner MO, Perryman RL, Cronin MJ, et al. 1982 Somatotroph hyperplasia. J Clin Invest. 70:965–977.
  56. Landis CA, Masters SB, Spada A, Pace AM, Bourne HR, Vallar L. 1989 GTPase inhibiting mutations activate the alpha chain of Gs and stimulate adenylyl cyclase in human pituitary tumours. Nature. 340:692–696.[CrossRef][Medline]
  57. Weinstein LS, Shenker A, Gejman PV, Merino MJ, Friedman E, Spiegel AM. 1991 Activating mutations of the stimulatory G protein in the McCune-Albright syndrome. N Engl J Med. 325:1688–1695.[Abstract]
  58. Levine MA. 1991 The McCune-Albright syndrome: the whys and wherefores of abnormal signal transduction. N Engl J Med. 324:1738–1740.
  59. Hosoi E, Yokogoshi Y, Hosoi E, Yokoi K, Sano T, Saito S. 1992 A pituitary specific point mutation of codon 201 of the Gs{alpha} gene in a pituitary adenoma of a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) type 1. Endocrinol Jpn. 39:319–324.[Medline]
  60. Thakker RV, Pook MA, Wooding C, Boscaro M, Scanarini M, Clayton RN. 1993 Association of somatotrophinomas with loss of alleles on chromosome 11 and with gsp mutations. J Clin Invest. 91:2815–2821.
  61. O’Halloran DJ, Shalet SM. 1994 A family pedigree exhibiting features of both multiple endocrine neoplasia type I and McCune-Albright syndromes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 78:523–525.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
B. T. Teh, S. Kytölä, F. Farnebo, L. Bergman, F. K. Wong, G. Weber, N. Hayward, C. Larsson, B. Skogseid, A. Beckers, et al.
Mutation Analysis of the MEN1 Gene in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1, Familial Acromegaly and Familial Isolated Hyperparathyroidism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1998; 83(8): 2621 - 2626.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Aronin, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stock, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Aronin, N.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals