help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soh, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, O. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soh, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, O. H.
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 82, No. 11 3741-3747
Copyright © 1997 by The Endocrine Society


Original Studies

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression Is Higher in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer than in Normal or Benign Thyroid1

Euy Y. Soh, Quan-Yang Duh, Saif A. Sobhi, Dave M. Young, Howard D. Epstein, Mariwil G. Wong, Y. Kit Garcia, Young D. Min, Richard F. Grossman, Allan E. Siperstein and Orlo H. Clark

Surgery (E.Y.S., Q-Y.D., S.A.B., D.M.Y., M.G.W., Y.D.M., R.F.G., A.E.S., O.H.C.) and Pathology (H.D.E.) Service, University of California San Francisco/Mount Zion Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Q-Y.D.), San Francisco, California, 94115; Genentech (K.G.), South San Francisco, California 94080-4990

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Quan-Yang Duh, Surgery Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, California 94121–11598.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an angiogenic factor, and its expression has been rarely demonstrated in thyroid tumors. We, therefore, investigated the expression of VEGF messenger RNA (mRNA) and production of VEGF protein in cell lines from human primary and metastatic follicular (FTC-133, FTC-236, and FTC-238), papillary (TPC-1), Hürthle cell (XTC-1), and medullary thyroid cancers (MTC-1.1 and MTC-2.2), and in human thyroid tissues (papillary, follicular, medullary, and Hürthle cell cancers, follicular adenomas, and Graves’ thyroid tissue) by Northern blot, immunohistochemistry, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) studies. All thyroid cell lines expressed a 4.2-kilobase VEGF mRNA. The VEGF mRNA levels were higher in the thyroid cancer cell lines than in primary cultures of normal thyroid cells, and higher in thyroid cancers of follicular than those of parafollicular cell origin. The VEGF mRNA levels were similar in primary and metastatic thyroid tumors. Immunohistochemical staining and Northern blot analysis of the cell lines correlated positively, thus thyroid cancer cell lines stained more intensely than normal thyroid cells and follicular tumor cells more intensely than parafollicular tumor cells. Again, no difference was noted in VEGF staining between primary and metastatic thyroid tumors. Deparafinized sections of papillary, follicular, and Hürthle cell cancers also stained much stronger than those of medullary thyroid cancers, benign, or hyperplastic (Graves’ disease) thyroid tissue. Thyroid cancer cell lines (XTC-1 > TPC-1 > FTC-133 > MTC-1.1) also secreted more VEGF protein as measured by ELISA than did normal thyroid cells. VEGF secretion of cell lines derived from primary and metastatic thyroid tumors were similar. VEGF mRNA is therefore expressed, and VEGF protein is secreted by normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic thyroid tissues. The higher levels of VEGF expression in differentiated thyroid cancers of follicular cell origin suggests a role in oncogenesis.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ANGIOGENESIS is required for normal embryologic development and also appears to be involved in the abnormal growth of many tumors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6). Although tumors 1–2 mm in size can be sustained by diffusion, further growth depends on angiogenesis.

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is unique among angiogenic factors because it is both mitogenic for vascular endothelial cells and is secreted by the cancer cells (7, 8, 9, 10). The cancer cells, therefore, can stimulate the development of host blood vessels to bring more nutrients to support growth. VEGF is a 34- to 42-kilodalton heat- and acid-stable, dimeric, heparin-binding glycoprotein (11, 12). VEGF binds to membrane receptor tyrosine kinase (flt-1, KDR), and increases the proliferation of endothelial cells (13). VEGF also increases vascular permeability, causing extravasation of plasma proteins and deposition of fibrin. This extravascular fibrin gel matrix then supports the ingrowth of new blood vessels (11, 14). Systemic administration of anti-VEGF antibody has been found to inhibit the growth of xenografted tumor cells in nude mice (15, 16).

While investigating an in vivo invasion model, we observed extensive angiogenesis surrounding the human thyroid cancer cells xenografted in nude mice. Because thyroid cancers are vascular tumors, and follicular cancer metastasizes via the blood vessel, we postulated that thyroid cancer cells produce and secrete VEGF, and that VEGF may stimulate thyroid cancer growth, invasion, and metastasis.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Cell lines and tissue preparation

We used human thyroid cell lines derived from follicular cancers (FTC-133, FTC-236, and FTC-238), kindly provided by Peter Goretzki, M.D., Düsseldorf, Germany, papillary cancer (TPC-1), kindly provided by Nobuo Satoh, Japan, Hürthle cell cancer (XTC-1) developed in our laboratory, primary cultures of medullary thyroid cancer (MTC-1.1 and MTC-2.2), and normal thyroid tissue (NT 1.0). FTC-133, FTC-236, and FTC-238 were derived from primary tumor, metastatic lymph node, and pulmonary metastases from the same patient. MTC-1.1 was derived from the thyroid tumor and MTC-2.2 from a lymph node metastasis. The cells were obtained in accordance with approved human experimentation protocols and maintained in standard incubating conditions (5% CO2, 95% humidity, 37 C) in DMEM/F12 (Mediatech, Herndon, VA) supplemented with 10% FCS (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA), insulin (0.25 IU/mL; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), TSH (10 mIU/mL, Sigma), and antibiotics. A cell line from a patient with colon cancer (Colo-201 cell line), was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and grown in RPMI 1640 containing 20% FCS.

RNA extraction and Northern analysis

Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells using the RNA stat-60 (Tel-Test B, Friendswood, TX). For Northern analysis, RNA samples (15 µg) were size fractionated on 1% agarose gels containing 6% formaldehyde and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Hybond-N; Amersham Life Sciences, Arlington Heights, IL) with low-vacuum (785 vacuum blotter; Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA), cross-linked with ultraviolet (UV) (UV cross-linker; Fisher Scientific) and then dried in a vacuum oven (80 C) for 2 h. The RNA was hybridized for 12–36 h at 42 C in 50% deionized formamide, 4.7x SSPE, 0.47x Denhart’s solution, 0.1% SDS, and 10% dextran sulfate (17). The DNA probes (kindly provided by Dr. Robert B. Jaffe, University of California, San Francisco, CA) were labeled using random primers labeling method with [{alpha}-32P]deoxycytidine triphosphate (Amersham) to a SA of 2–3 x 108 cpm/mg DNA. Typically, 2–3 x 107 cpm of 32P-labeled probe was used for 70 cm2 filter in 10 mL hybridization room temperature, 0.1x SSC/0.1% SDS for 20 min at 50–55 C, and exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY) at -80 C with intensifying screens for 2–3 days. To control for the integrity and amount of messenger RNA (mRNA), the membranes were stripped in 0.1% SDS/0.01x SSC for 10 min and reprobed for ß-actin mRNA.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry studies were done both in cell lines and in the paraffin-embedded tissues. The thyroid cell lines were cultured on chamber slides (Nunc, Naperville, IL) for 2–3 days and fixed with cold acetone. The human thyroid tissues used for immunohistochemistry were initially fixed by 10% buffered formalin phosphate and embedded in paraffin. Tissues studied included Graves’ thyroid tissue, follicular adenomas, papillary cancers, follicular cancers, medullary cancers, and anaplastic cancers. Five-micrometer thick tissue sections were deparafinized and hydrated in PBS, incubated for 30 min in 1% hydrogen peroxide to inhibit endogenous peroxidase, and incubated in 2% goat serum in PBS for 20 min to block nonspecific binding. The sections were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature with a rabbit anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) at 1:200 dilution (0.5 µg/mL) using PBS and 1% BSA, and washed three times in PBS. The secondary antibody was biotinylated goat antirabbit IgG (1:300 dilution; Vector Labs., Burlingame, CA). The secondary antibody was then detected using the avidin-peroxidase complex (Vector Labs.) for 30 min. The sections were stained by diaminobenzidine solution (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) for 5 min and counterstained with hematoxylene. For negative controls, we used all reagents except the primary anti-VEGF antibody.

Western blot

Cell lysates from the cell lines [XTC-1, TPC-1, FTC-133, FTC-236, FTC-238, and control human umbilical cord cells (HUV-EC-C cell lines)] were prepared by washing cells once with PBS. Cell pellet(s) were obtained by centrifugation. PBS buffer was aspirated off, and 1 mL 6 M Urea + ß-mercaptoethanol was added. The cell lysate was sonicated for 1 min. Proteins were quantified using the Lowry protein assay method. Two SDS-PAGE Gels (Biorad Ready-made 4–15% gel) were prepared (one gel for transfer and the other for Coomassie blue staining). Ten to fifty micrograms of proteins were loaded onto each well using a 1:1 mix of protein volume and a 2x loading buffer (Novex, San Diego, CA). Samples were denatured at 90 C for 5 min and were quickly cooled on ice. Electrophoresis was carried out at 70 V for 3 h. One gel was stained with Coomassie brilliant solution (50% methanol, 0.05% Coomassie brilliant blue R, 10% acetic acid, 40% water) for 4 h. It was destained with destaining solution (5% methanol, 7% acetic acid, 88% water) overnight. The second gel was transferred onto a Hybond-N membrane (Amersham) for 3 h at 50 V using a Biorad transblot apparatus containing transfer buffer (39 mM glycine, 50 mM Tris base, 20% methanol). After the overnight transfer, the membrane was dried for 5 min. The membrane was blocked using 3% BSA/TBST for 1 h. The blocking reagent was replaced with the primary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, 1:100 in TBST buffer) and incubated for 2 h. The membrane was washed three times with TBST buffer for 5 min/wash. The TBST buffer was removed, and the membrane was incubated with secondary antibody (biotinylated antibody and/or HRP-labeled second antibody diluted in 3% goat serum/TBST) for 1 h. The membrane was then washed three times with TBST for 5 min/wash. The buffer was removed, and the membrane was incubated with streptavidin/HRP complex diluted in TBST for 1 h. The membrane was washed three times with TBST. The last TBST buffer wash was removed, and the membrane was incubated for 1 min in detection solution (1:1 vol of detection reagent 1 and detection reagent 2 from Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). The detection solution was removed, and the membrane was wrapped in plastic wrap. The membrane was exposed for 15–60 sec on Hyperfilm-ECL and developed.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Cells (105) were cultured in 200 µL MEM + 10% FCS for 7 days. Aliquots of culture media were collected and assayed in ELISA. ELISA plates were coated with 2.5 µg/mL monoclonal antibody (mAb) to VEGF (mAb 3.5F8; Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) in 50 mM carbonate buffer, pH 9.6, at 4 C overnight and blocked with 0.5% BSA in PBS. Standards (0.03–2 ng/mL recombinant V165, Genentech) and 3-fold serially diluted samples (initial dilution 1:5) in PBS contain-ing 0.5% BSA, 0.05% polysorbate 20, 0.25% 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)-dimethyl ammoniol]-1-propane sulfate (Sigma), 0.2% bovine {gamma}-globulin (Sigma), 5 mM EDTA, and additional 0.35 N NaCl were incubated on the plate for 2 h. Bound VEGF was detected using biotinylated mAb to VEGF (mAb 4.6.1, Genentech), followed by streptavidin peroxidase (Sigma) and 3,3',5'5'-tetramethyl benzidine (Kirgaard & Perry Labs.) as the substrate. Plates were washed between steps. Absorbance was read at 450 nm on Vmax plate reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA). The standard curve was fitted using a four-parameter nonlinear regression curve-fitting program (developed at Genentech). Data points that fell in the linear range of the standard curve were used for calculating the VEGF concentration in samples.

Statistical method

Statistical significance of ELISA data was determined by Student’s t test.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Northern blots of thyroid cell lines

Cultured human thyroid cell lines expressed a 4.2-kilobase VEGF mRNA. The VEGF mRNA levels were higher in thyroid cancer cell lines than in normal thyroid cells. Thyroid cancer cell lines of follicular cell origin (FTC-133, TPC-1, and XTC-1) expressed more VEGF mRNA than did thyroid cell lines of parafollicular cell line (MTC-1.1) (Fig. 1AGo). There were no differences in the VEGF mRNA signals between the cells derived from the primary thyroid tumors and metastases (FTC-133 vs. FTC-236 or FTC-238, MTC-1.1 vs. MTC-2.2, Fig. 1BGo).



View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Northern blot analysis of VEGF mRNA in thyroid cancer cell lines. Transcripts of approximately 4.2 kilobases are present. Thyroid cancer cell lines, except MTC-1.1 (medullary cancer), expressed more VEGF mRNA than NT 1.0 (normal thyroid). B, Cell lines derived from primary tumor and cell lines derived from metastatic site did not differ in VEGF mRNA expression. Colo-201 served as a positive control. FTC-133 (follicular cancer), TPC-1 (papillary cancer), XTC-1 (Hürthle cell cancer), FTC-236 (follicular cancer derived from lymph node metastasis), and FTC-238 (follicular cancer derived from lung metastasis). C, Western blot using polyclonal anti-VEGF antibody that was developed from amino terminal epitope (residue 1–20) of human VEGF (A-20, Santa Cruz Biotech.) It shows three bands corresponding to VEGF121, VEGF165, and VEGF189 splice variants for XTC-1 (Hürthle cell), TPC-1 (papillary thyroid cancer), and HUV-EC-C (control, human umbilical cord cells).

 
Western blots of thyroid cell lines

Western blots showed production of VEGF121, VEGF165, and VEGF189 splice variants by the XTC-1 (Hürthle cell) and TPC-1 (papillary cancer) cell lines (Fig. 1CGo).

Immunohistochemical studies in thyroid cell lines and human thyroid tissue

The findings of immunohistochemical staining of the cell lines parallels the findings of the Northern blots (Fig. 2Go). Thyroid cancer cell lines stained more positively than normal thyroid cells, and thyroid cancer cells of follicular cell origin stained stronger than thyroid cancer cells of parafollicular cell origin. Similar VEGF staining was again observed in primary and metastatic thyroid cancer cell lines. The deparafinized sections of human papillary thyroid cancer, follicular thyroid cancer, and Hürthle cell thyroid cancer also stained strongly. Adjacent normal thyroid tissues stained only weakly compared with the cancers (Fig. 3Go). Benign thyroid tumors (follicular adenoma), hyperplastic thyroid tissue (Graves’ thyroid), and medullary thyroid cancer also stained less strongly than did thyroid cancers of follicular cell origin.



View larger version (166K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Immunohistochemical staining of thyroid cancer cell lines and thyroid tissue specimen with an antihuman VEGF antibody. Staining was detected in cytoplasm. Thyroid cancer cell lines (C, D, and E), except MTC-1.1 (F), showed stronger staining than NT 1.0 (B). Cell lines derived from primary tumor and cell lines derived from metastases (C vs. G + H, and F vs. I) did not differ in staining density. Note stronger staining in follicular thyroid cancer (K), papillary thyroid cancer (L), and Hürthle cell cancer (M) compared with medullary thyroid cancer (N), adjacent normal thyroid tissue of follicular thyroid cancer (J), and benign thyroid disease such as follicular adenoma (O) and Graves’ thyroid (P). A, Control of TPC-1. C, FTC-133. D, TPC-1. E, XTC-1. G, FTC-236. H, FTC-238. I, MTC-2.2.

 


View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Immunohistochemical staining of deparafinized section of a follicular thyroid cancer using a rabbit anti-VEGF polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotech.) showing that cancer tissue stained more intensely than adjacent normal thyroid tissue.

 
Measurement of VEGF secretion by ELISA

All thyroid cells secreted VEGF in the conditioned medium as determined by ELISA (Fig. 4AGo). Thyroid cancer cell lines secreted more VEGF protein than did normal thyroid cells in primary culture. Among the cancer cell lines, XTC-1 secreted the most (39.1 ng/mL) and MTC-1.1 secreted the least (15.0 ng/mL) VEGF. There was no difference in VEGF secretion between the cell lines derived from the primary thyroid tumors and metastases (FTC-133 vs. FTC-236 or FTC-238, MTC-1.1, vs. MTC-2.2, Fig. 4BGo). Under the conditions in which these cells were grown, there was no appreciable cell proliferation during this period as measured by the MTT assay. Correction for cell proliferation was therefore not necessary.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. ELISA showing concentration of VEGF in conditioned media of thyroid cancer cell lines. A, All thyroid cancer cell lines secreted more VEGF than normal thyroid cell. B, Cell lines derived from primary tumor and cell lines derived from metastatic site did not differ in concentration of VEGF. Values are mean ± SD.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Many embryologic tissues and some cancers produce and secrete VEGF (6). Because VEGF is required for the growth of other solid tumors (18, 19), it is likely that it is also important for the growth of thyroid cancers. We found that human thyroid cancers express more VEGF mRNA and produce more VEGF protein than normal thyroid tissues.

Immunohistochemical studies also demonstrated that cancer tissues stained more intensely than benign thyroid tumors and more intensely than adjacent normal tissues. The patterns of mRNA expression as well as immunohistochemical staining were not different between the primary thyroid tumors (FTC-133 and MTC-1.1) and respective metastases in lymph nodes (FTC-236 and MTC-2.2) or lung (FTC-238).

Our findings are consistent with other studies that found higher levels of VEGF mRNA in colon cancer and renal cell carcinoma than adjacent normal tissues and higher levels in tumorigenic cell lines (HT 1080 fibrosarcoma, MNNG HOS osteosarcoma) than in nontumorigenic cell lines.

Viglietto et al. (20) showed that thyroid tumors expressed more VEGF mRNA and stained stronger with anti-VEGF antibody than normal thyroid tissue. Ours is the first study, however, to show that Hürthle cell thyroid cancer and medullary thyroid cancer cells also express VEGF mRNA. Viglietto and co-workers found that the expression of VEGF seems to correlate with the aggressiveness of the tumors in vivo and their tumorigenic ability, and they showed that TPC-1 did not express VEGF. In contrast, we found TPC-1 cell line to express VEGF mRNA, to stain strongly with anti-VEGF antibody, and to secrete more VEGF into the condition media than the follicular thyroid cell lines FTC-133, FTC-236, and FTC-238. One may also have expected that the cell lines derived from metastases (FTC-236 and FTC-238) would have expressed more VEGF than the cell line derived from the primary thyroid cancer (FTC-133) if VEGF expression correlates with the ability of the cells to metastasize, but we did not find any difference among these three cell lines derived from the same patient.

The concentrations of VEGF in the conditioned media from the thyroid cell lines were significantly higher (15.8–39.1 ng/mL) than the concentration in the ocular fluid (3.6 ng/mL) obtained from patients with active proliferative diabetic retinopathy (21) and similar to the concentration in the conditioned media of G55 glioblastoma multiforme (41 ng/mL) and SK-LMS-1 leiomyosarcoma (14 ng/mL) cell lines (15). It should be pointed out, however, that our results were obtained from a closed culture system in which the VEGF can accumulate. The ocular fluid samples, in contrast, were isolated and quantitated in vivo from a open system with associated transport, clearance, metabolism, etc., which may account for lower values of VEGF. The high concentration of VEGF in the conditioned media suggests that VEGF may be more important for the growth and invasion of thyroid cancers than in other cancers.

Follicular thyroid cancers are vascular tumors and metastasize hematogenously. The effect of VEGF in increasing vascular permeability may facilitate this tendency for hematological dissemination (23, 24). Small papillary thyroid cancers are relatively common tumors but are rarely clinically significant because they usually do not grow appreciably or metastasize (25). Although it is possible that VEGF expression may be increased in the more metastatic phenotype (20, 26), we observed no appreciable differences among cell lines derived from primary tumors and cell lines from metastatic sites from the same patient, or among tumors of differentiated histological types.

It is intriguing, however, that the only medullary cancer we studied produced less VEGF than the other thyroid cancers. Medullary thyroid cancers are derived from the parafollicular cells and are generally more aggressive than cancers derived from the follicular thyroid cells. It appears that other angiogenic factors are more important in supporting the growth and invasion of medullary thyroid cancers.

We have also recently found that VEGF expression is stimulated by TSH in thyroid cancer cell lines (27). In this study, the cell line that had the highest basal secretion of VEGF (XTC-1, Hürthle cell cancer) was least stimulated by TSH, whereas the FTC lines (follicular cancer) and the TPC-1 (papillary cancer) were significantly stimulated by TSH and increased their VEGF production by 2- to 5-fold.

In conclusion, we demonstrated increased VEGF expression and secretion in differentiated thyroid cancers of follicular cell origin. It is likely that VEGF is important for thyroid tumor growth and invasion. Antiangiogenic agents may thus be useful in treating patients with papillary and follicular thyroid cancers.


    Acknowledgments
 
We thank K. Jin Kim, PhD and Gloria Meng, PhD for helpful discussions about ELISA.


    Footnotes
 
1 This work was supported in part by the Leonard Rosenman, M.D. Fund, the Edwin H. Zeller Fund, and the Medical Research Service of the Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Back

Received March 22, 1996.

Revised January 8, 1997.

Revised May 18, 1997.

Accepted July 10, 1997.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Folkman J. 1990 What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst. 82:4–6.[Free Full Text]
  2. Risau W. 1990 Angiogenic growth factors. Prog Growth Factor Res. 2:71–79.[CrossRef][Medline]
  3. Bouck N. 1990 Tumor angiogenesis: the role of oncogenesis and tumor suppressor genes. Cancer Cells. 2:179–185.[Medline]
  4. Folkman J, Watson K, Ingber D, Hanahan D. 1989 Induction of angiogenesis during the transition from hyperplasia to neoplasia. Nature. 339:58–61.[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Folkman J, Shing Y. 1992 Angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 267:10931–10934.[Free Full Text]
  6. Shifren JL, Doldi N, Ferrara N, Nesiano S, Jaffe RB. 1994 In the human fetus, vascular endothelial growth factor is expressed in epithelial cells and monocytes, but not vascular endothelium: Implications for mode of action. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 79:316–322.[Abstract]
  7. Conn G, Soderman DD, Schaeffer MT, Wile M, et al. 1990 Purification of a glycoprotein vascular endothelial cell mitogen from a rat glioma-derived cell line. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 87:1323–1327.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Leung DW, Cachianes G, Kuang W-J, Goeddel DV, Ferrara N. 1989 Vascular endothelial factor is a secreted angiogenic mitogen. Science. 246:1306–1309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Jakeman LB, Altar CA, Winer J, Bennett GL, Ferrara N. 1992 Binding sites for vascular endothelial growth factor are localized on endothelial cells in adult rat tissues. J Clin Invest. 89:244–253.
  10. Weinder K, Marme D, Weich H. 1992 AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma cells in culture express vascular endothelial growth factor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 183:1167–1174.[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Senger DR, Connolly DT, Van De Water L, Feder J, Dvorak HF. 1990 Purification and NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of guinea pig tumor-secreted vascular permeability factor. Cancer Res. 50:1774–1778.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Yeo T-K, Senger DR, Dvorak HK, Freter L, Yeo K-T. 1991 Glycosylation is essential for efficient secretion but not for permeability enhancing activity of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor): Biochem Biophys Res Commu. 179:1568–1575.[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Brock TA, Dvorak HF, Senger DK. 1991 Tumor-secreted vascular permeability factor increases cytosolic Ca2+ and von Willebrand factor release in human endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 138:213–221.[Abstract]
  14. Nagy JA, Brown LF, Senger DR, et al. 1988 Pathogenesis of tumor stroma generation: a critical role of for leaky blood vessels and fibrin deposition. Biochem Biophys Acta. 948:305–326.
  15. Kim KJ Li B, Winer J, Armanini M, Gillett N, Philips HS, Ferrara N. 1993 Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor-induced angiogenesis suppresses tumor growth in vivo. Nature. 362:841–844.[CrossRef][Medline]
  16. Warren RS, Yuan H, Matli MR, Gillett NA, Ferrara N. 1995 Regulation by vascular endothelial growth factor of human colon cancer tumorigenesis in a mouse model of experimental liver metastasis. J Clin Invest. 95:1789–1797.
  17. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual, 2nd ed, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
  18. Dvorak HF, Rosen S. 1992 Vascular permeability factor mRNA and protein expression in human kidney. Kid Int. 42:1457–1461.[Medline]
  19. Plate KH Breier G, Weich HA, Risau W. 1992 Vascular endothelial growth factor is a potential tumor angiogenesis factor in human gliomas in vivo. Nature. 359:845–848.[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Viglietto G, Maglione D, Rambaldi M, et al. 1995 Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and down regulation of placental growth factor (PLGF) associated with malignancy in human thyroid tumors and cell lines. Oncogene. 11:1569–1579.[Medline]
  21. Berse B, Brown LF, De Water LV, Dvorak HF, Senger DR. 1992 Vascular permeability factor (Vascular endothelial growth factor) gene is expressed differentially in normal tissues, macrophage, and tumors. Mol Bio Cell. 3:211–220.[Abstract]
  22. Aiello II, Avery RL, Arrigg PG, et al. 1994 Vascular endothelial growth factor in ocular fluid of the patients with diabetic retinopathy and other retinal disease. N Eng J Med. 331:1480–1510.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Asano M, Yukita A, Matsumoto T, Kondo S, Suzuki H. 1995 Inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis by an immunonutralizing monoclonal antibody to human vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor121. Cancer Res. 55:5296–5301.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Takahashi Y, Kitadai Y, Bucana CD, Cleary KR, Ellis LM. 1995 Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptor, KDR, correlate with vascularity, metastasis, and proliferation of human colon cancer. Cancer Res. 55:3964–3968.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Cady B, Rossi R. 1991 Surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid gland. In: Silverman ML, ed. Pathology of the thyroid and parathyroid gland. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 31–44.
  26. Folkman J, Hanahan D. 1991 Switch to the angiogenic phenotype during tumorigenesis. Princess Takamatsu Symposia. 22:337–347.
  27. Soh EY, Al-Sobhi S, Wong M, et al. 1996 Thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) promotes the secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in thyroid cancer cell lines. Surgery. 120:944–947.[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
J. Klubo-Gwiezdzinska, R. Junik, E. Kopczynska, O. Juraniec, and H. Kardymowicz
The comparison of serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels between patients with metastatic and non-metastatic thyroid cancer, and patients with nontoxic multinodular goiter
Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2007; 157(4): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. N. Younes, O. G. Yigitbasi, Y. W. Park, S.-J. Kim, S. A. Jasser, V. S. Hawthorne, Y. D. Yazici, M. Mandal, B. N. Bekele, C. D. Bucana, et al.
Antivascular Therapy of Human Follicular Thyroid Cancer Experimental Bone Metastasis by Blockade of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Vascular Growth Factor Receptor Phosphorylation
Cancer Res., June 1, 2005; 65(11): 4716 - 4727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Hoffmann, L. C. Hofbauer, V. Scharrenbach, A. Wunderlich, I. Hassan, S. Lingelbach, and A. Zielke
Thyrotropin (TSH)-Induced Production of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Thyroid Cancer Cells in Vitro: Evaluation of TSH Signal Transduction and of Angiogenesis-Stimulating Growth Factors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 2004; 89(12): 6139 - 6145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
N. Ferrara
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor: Basic Science and Clinical Progress
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 581 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
V. Poulaki, C. S. Mitsiades, C. McMullan, D. Sykoutri, G. Fanourakis, V. Kotoula, S. Tseleni-Balafouta, D. A. Koutras, and N. Mitsiades
Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression by Insulin-Like Growth Factor I in Thyroid Carcinomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2003; 88(11): 5392 - 5398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
H. E. Turner, A. L. Harris, S. Melmed, and J. A. H. Wass
Angiogenesis in Endocrine Tumors
Endocr. Rev., October 1, 2003; 24(5): 600 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Sorvillo, G. Mazziotti, A. Carbone, M. Piscopo, M. Rotondi, M. Cioffi, P. Musto, B. Biondi, S. Iorio, G. Amato, et al.
Recombinant Human Thyrotropin Reduces Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels in Patients Monitored for Thyroid Carcinoma Even in the Absence of Thyroid Tissue
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4818 - 4822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A.-C. Gerard, C. Daumerie, C. Mestdagh, S. Gohy, C. de Burbure, S. Costagliola, F. Miot, M.-C. Nollevaux, J.-F. Denef, J. Rahier, et al.
Correlation between the Loss of Thyroglobulin Iodination and the Expression of Thyroid-Specific Proteins Involved in Iodine Metabolism in Thyroid Carcinomas
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2003; 88(10): 4977 - 4983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Vivaldi, F. Pacini, F. Martini, L. Iaccheri, F. Pezzetti, R. Elisei, A. Pinchera, P. Faviana, F. Basolo, and M. Tognon
Simian Virus 40-Like Sequences from Early and Late Regions in Human Thyroid Tumors of Different Histotypes
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 892 - 899.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. M. Tuttle, M. Fleisher, G. L. Francis, and R. J. Robbins
Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels Are Elevated in Metastatic Differentiated Thyroid Cancer but Not Increased by Short-Term TSH Stimulation
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2002; 87(4): 1737 - 1742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Klein, J.-M. Vignaud, V. Hennequin, B. Toussaint, L. Bresler, F. Plénat, J. Leclère, A. Duprez, and G. Weryha
Increased Expression of the Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Is a Pejorative Prognosis Marker in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2001; 86(2): 656 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
K. Suzuki, A. Mori, J. Saito, E. Moriyama, L. Ullianich, and L. D. Kohn
Follicular Thyroglobulin Suppresses Iodide Uptake by Suppressing Expression of the Sodium/Iodide Symporter Gene
Endocrinology, November 1, 1999; 140(11): 5422 - 5430.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Kebebew, M. G. Wong, A. E. Siperstein, Q.-Y. Duh, and O. H. Clark
Phenylacetate Inhibits Growth and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Secretion in Human Thyroid Carcinoma Cells and Modulates Their Differentiated Function
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 1999; 84(8): 2840 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. Iitaka, S. Miura, K. Yamanaka, S. Kawasaki, S. Kitahama, Y. Kawakami, S. Kakinuma, I. Oosuga, S. Wada, and S. Katayama
Increased Serum Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Levels and Intrathyroidal Vascular Area in Patients with Graves' Disease and Hashimoto's Thyroiditis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 1998; 83(11): 3908 - 3912.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soh, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, O. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soh, E. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, O. H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals