| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Studies |
Laboratoire dAnatomie Pathologique (S.G., M.-C.R., J.-P.S.-A.) and LHEA-Laboratoire dHistologie-Embryologie (D.C.), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers; Laboratoire dAnatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré (M.D.), Garches; Laboratoire dAnatomie Pathologique, Hôpital Ambroise Paré (B.F.), Boulogne; and Centre Paul Papin, Centre Régional de Lutte contre le Cancer (O.G.), Angers, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Jean-Paul Saint-André, Laboratoire dAnatomie Pathologique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, 49033 Angers Cedex 01, France.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Despite important molecular biology advances, routine assessment of normal C cell density and CCH is still a problem. As most studies have focused on preneoplastic or "reactive" CCH, the existence and frequency of CCH in normal subjects are uncertain. In a previous study, we could not rely on a satisfactory series of normal subjects for comparison with a pathological series of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis-associated CCH (14). Obviously, others have also encountered difficulty in assessing the normal C cell range (19). Thus, in an attempt to clarify this subject, we have undertaken a prospective quantitative image analysis study of C cells in the normal human thyroid.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Morphometric study
Image analysis was performed using a Quantimet 570 Image Analysis System (LEICA, Rueil Malmaison, France), and image acquisition was achieved with a tri-CCD camera (Sony 930P, Sony, Japan), either from an x-ray light box or from a light microscope, equipped with an x-y motorized stage. First, the slides were examined on the x-ray light box to measure the thyroid parenchyma surface area (noted a according to international morphometric parameters nomenclature). Then, the positive slides (i.e. C cell-containing slides) were examined under the microscope at x100 magnification (field area, 0.596 mm2) to measure the marked C cell surface area (noted A). The motorized stage allowed the examination of successive microscopic fields without overlapping. The best discrimination between the signal (the brown-red pigment of the chromogen) and the hematein counterstain was achieved by an image acquisition in the blue channel of the camera. On the first positive field, a threshold was interactively determined by the operator, allowing detection of the immunostained C cells. This threshold was used to automatically measure the C cell surface area on the next fields.
Statistical analysis
Parameters were submitted to statistical analysis through a statistic software (Statview SE+ Graphics, Abacus Concept, Berkeley, CA). Either Students t test or, when necessary, a nonparametric test (Mann-Whitney) was applied. Correlations between paired variables was analyzed through linear regression. In the statistical analysis results, r is the correlation coefficient, and p represents the error threshold. The studied parameters were patients age and sex, thyroid gland height and weight, section number and thickness, number and location of positive slides in thyroid lobes, thyroid tissue and C cell surface area (by slide, lobe, and gland), and maximum C cell surface area (by lobe and thyroid).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the 57 initial thyroid glands, 10 cases were excluded (4
chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis, 4 thyroid glands showing autolysis on
histological examination, and 2 incomplete glands) leading to a final
series of 47 cases, in which no patient had any evidence of
thyroid-related disease. Clinical and morphometric data are summarized
in Table 1
.
|
Pathological findings
Histological examination of routine stained slides disclosed no
abnormality, except for a 3-mm micropapillary carcinoma (case 38). C
cell immunostaining was a granular brown-red cytoplasmic stain of quite
constant intensity. When C cell density was low, positive cells were
found alone or in small perifollicular groups and were usually present
on few sections. When density grew, C cells were identified in an
increasing number of sections, partially replacing the follicular
epithelial border and sometimes the colloid lumen (Fig. 1
). In 16 cases, at least 3 low power fields containing
more than 50 C cells were found (Table 1
). A pseudonodular pattern was
observed in two cases (Fig. 2
). No C cell was found in
an obviously interstitial location. Negative control sections, obtained
after incubation in normal rabbit serum, showed no staining.
|
|
The mean surface area of thyroid tissue examined was 35.2
cm2 in the adult group (range, 9.387.0) and 3.6
cm2 in the infant group (range, 2.74.5). Detailed results
are presented in Table 1
. Morphometric analysis produced gross surface
area and densities. C Cell surface area, measured under the microscope
at x100 magnification, was expressed in square microns, parenchymatous
surface area was expressed in square millimeters. Density had no unit
(area/area). The reproducibility of parenchymatous surface area
macrophotographic measures was tested on 60 sections: intra- and
interobserver reproducibilities were nearly the same, i.e.
95.9% intraobserver and 95.8% interobserver. For C cell surface area,
reproducibility was tested on 270 fields and gave a 78% intraobserver
reproducibility.
C Cell distribution. No C cell was ever observed on the isthmus sections. Morphometric data (number of sections, parenchymatous surface area examined, and C cell surface area, whatever the above-mentioned unit, i.e. density or gross surface area) were very similar between thyroid lobes (P < 0.0005). On the contrary, the C cell vertical distribution was not homogeneous. Only 42% (2063%) of the sections contained C cells, which were mainly observed in the middle third of each lobe; the peak density (Amax section) was observed at 44% of the height of the lobe, from the top. C Cells could be observed up to each extremity of the lobes, but only 3% of the thyroid lobes contained C cells in their inferior 10%, and Amax was never observed in the inferior quarter of a lobe.
C Cell quantification. Our methodology allowed us to
appreciate the extent of the C cell population in two ways: gross
surface area (A and Amax) and density (Aa and
Aamax). In the adult group, the mean Amax
(which represents the maximum C cell surface area in a section for the
concerned thyroid gland) was 167 x 103
µm2 (median, 149 x 103
µm2), with an important variability (range, 28470
x 103 µm2; SD, 105 x
103 µm2). This variability was explained in
part by an important difference according to sex; C cell density in men
was more than twice (Amax = 201 x 103
µm2) that in women (Amax = 91 x
103 µm2; Fig. 3
). In the
infant group, Amax was much lower, with a mean value of
62 x 103 µm2 (median, 57 x
103 µm2; range, 1892 x
103 µm2). Despite the small size of this
group, the difference between children under 1 yr of age and adults was
evident and statistically significant (P < 0.01). The
other morphometric parameters (A, Aa, and Aamax) shared the
distribution described for Amax.
|
A highly significant difference (P = 0.0009) existed between sexes for Amax. No other significant correlation was observed between men and women or between Amax and the other studied clinical and morphological parameters (P > 0.2).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As the extent of sampling has a direct bearing on the C cell density measurement, any relevant comparison among the various studies is difficult. Moreover, results are variably expressed. C Cell density was measured as the number of cells per follicle, per cluster, per low power field, per mm2, or mm3 and in many other ways (19). The choice between C cell counting and a measure of stained C cell surface area is linked to the image analysis approach of the problem, and it does not seem to us that this approach modifies anything other than the way results are expressed. In addition, in our experience, cell by cell counting is difficult when C cell density increases to form pseudonodular areas. In our opinion, a more interesting question is whether C cell quantification should be expressed by surface unit (density) or in gross units. At first sight, density might be more accurate. However, the thyroid volume (and then the area examined) is subject to great variations in normal and pathological conditions, and this may distort a density measure. Thus, a gross unit may be more valid, although imperfect, because any pathological examination of a wholly embedded surgical specimen leads to a study of less than 1% of the specimen volume.
In our series, the C cell surface area is statistically highly different between boys under 1 yr of age and adult men. Nevertheless, this is a controversial subject with no definitive conclusion; some researchers observed no difference (11), whereas others observed a more important C cell population in quite small pediatric series (15, 23). These differences might be either fortuitous or related to the very different size and volume of the glands (leading to differences in the number of sections studied and in the ratio between thyroid parenchyma and C cells) or might represent some real physiological differences that will deserve specific studies.
We unexpectedly found a great difference in C cell densities between sexes, and this, to our knowledge, has not been reported in normal subjects. This difference is statistically highly significant and strongly suggests that sex must be taken into account in C cell quantification and assessment of CCH. This sex difference in C cell density could explain the usually higher plasma CT concentration observed in men, basally and/or after a pentagastrin infusion test (26, 27). Some researchers have proposed that testosterone might influence the poststimulatory level of CT in men (28), thus suggesting a possible role of androgens in C cell growth regulation. Two studies recently described a tumor-associated CCH, which, interestingly, also appears to be sex associated. Albores-Saavedra et al. (10) showed tumor-associated CCH in 7 of 11 men (64.6%) and 10 of 38 women (26.3%), and Scopsi et al. (11) observed tumor-associated CCH in 9 of 15 men (60%) and 2 of 22 women (9%).
On the other hand, we did not find any difference according to age among adults. There again, controversial data exist; in 1985, OToole et al. (16) were also unable to demonstrate any age-related variation in C cell density in a series of 60 adults ranging from 1689 yr of age, although a tendency for an increase in C cell density was suggested in the elderly. Because our series only presents 4 subjects over 60 yr of age, it cannot really explore C cell variations in the elderly. In 1982, Gibson et al. (15) reported a positive correlation between age and C cell density in males in a series of 26 subjects ranging from 255 yr of age. However, this result may be biased by the presence in the series of 10 children under 10 yr of age. Thus, at least in the age range of 2060 yr, C cell density may not be submitted to significant age-related variations.
Our study corroborates previous results on C cell distribution heterogeneity (19). Actually, even if sexes are separately considered, and whatever the way in which results are expressed (units), the C cell range remains wide. This heterogeneity cannot be attributed to a methodological artifact; reproducibility is good, and an excellent correlation exists between results in the two thyroid lobes (P < 0.0005). These arguments favor a real variability of C cell density in the normal adult population, as previously described but not explained in subjects with a normal phosphocalcic metabolism (15, 16, 17, 19). This has a direct implication for understanding the CCH concept, because a substantial minority of the "normal" population appears to fulfill CCH definition criteria. First, if about 30% of normal adults may have CCH, then one should perhaps reconsider the previous reports of cronic lymphocytic thyroiditis- or tumor-associated CCH (10, 11, 12, 13, 14) as being nonspecific associations. Obviously, some confusion remains about the best definition and units to be used to quantify C cells and about the delineation between what can be considered as normal and hyperplastic C cell populations (19): the presence of clusters of 20 or more cells in 1or several follicles (29), at least 4 clusters of more than 6 and usually more than 20 C cells (30), more than 50 C cells per field at x100 magnification in at least 3 fields and more than 40 C cells/cm2 (14), and more than 50 C cells/field at x100 magnification (10, 31, 32), which currently seems to be the most accepted histological criteria. The microscopic study of our cases revealed that at least 2 infants and 14 adults (33.3% of adults, 2 women and 12 men) presented CCH according to our criteria. Then the question is: are actual histopathological criteria of CCH inaccurate, or does more than 30% of the normal adult population have CCH? Moreover, those histopathological criteria have never been systematically compared to serum CT levels in normal subjects (such a confrontation being obviously impossible in autopsy series). CT assessment using immunoradiometric assay, especially after pentagastrin stimulation, is of particular interest in kindreds of familial MTC and MEN2 (33). Nonetheless, false positive results have been reported, leading to thyroidectomy in cases in which further genomic DNA analysis proved that the subjects did not carry the RET familial mutation (34, 35, 36, 37). Interestingly, pathological analysis of these glands frequently disclosed a mild or moderate CCH. This underscores the capacity of the pentagastrin test to discover nongenetically determined CCH cases. Most reports of pentagastrin tests in normal subjects disclosed about 5% positive responses (26, 27), in contrast with our 30% for histological CCH. Obviously, most CCH defined by histopathological criteria may not be accompanied by CT hypersecretion and, thus, may only reflect C cell number heterogeneity among normal individuals. Fundamental data are needed for C cell growth and CT secretion regulation to elucidate the surprising C cell density heterogeneity in normal subjects.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 26, 1996.
Revised September 9, 1996.
Accepted September 13, 1996.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Doyle, C. Duren, K. Nerlich, F. A. Verburg, I. Grelle, H. Jahn, M. Fassnacht, U. Mader, C. Reiners, and M. Luster Potency and Tolerance of Calcitonin Stimulation with High-Dose Calcium Versus Pentagastrin in Normal Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2009; 94(8): 2970 - 2974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H Sakorafas, H. Friess, and G. Peros The genetic basis of hereditary medullary thyroid cancer: clinical implications for the surgeon, with a particular emphasis on the role of prophylactic thyroidectomy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2008; 15(4): 871 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Foppiani, F Forzano, I Ceccherini, W Bruno, P Ghiorzo, F Caroli, P Quilici, R Bandelloni, A Arlandini, G Sartini, et al. Uncommon association of germline mutations of RET proto-oncogene and CDKN2A gene Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 417 - 422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. d'Herbomez, P. Caron, C. Bauters, C. Do Cao, J.-L. Schlienger, R. Sapin, L. Baldet, B. Carnaille, J.-L. Wemeau, and the French Group GTE (Groupe des Tumeurs Endocrine Reference range of serum calcitonin levels in humans: influence of calcitonin assays, sex, age, and cigarette smoking Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2007; 157(6): 749 - 755. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Verga, S. Ferrero, L. Vicentini, T. Brambilla, V. Cirello, M. Muzza, P. Beck-Peccoz, and L. Fugazzola Histopathological and molecular studies in patients with goiter and hypercalcitoninemia: reactive or neoplastic C-cell hyperplasia? Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 393 - 403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Costante, D. Meringolo, C. Durante, D. Bianchi, M. Nocera, S. Tumino, U. Crocetti, M. Attard, M. Maranghi, M. Torlontano, et al. Predictive Value of Serum Calcitonin Levels for Preoperative Diagnosis of Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Cohort of 5817 Consecutive Patients with Thyroid Nodules J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2007; 92(2): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Cascon, A. Cebrian, M. Pollan, S. Ruiz-Llorente, C. Montero-Conde, R. Leton, R. Gutierrez, F. Lesueur, R. L. Milne, O. Gonzalez-Albarran, et al. Succinate Dehydrogenase D Variants Do Not Constitute a Risk Factor for Developing C Cell Hyperplasia or Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2005; 90(4): 2127 - 2130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Elisei, B. Cosci, C. Romei, V. Bottici, M. Sculli, R. Lari, R. Barale, F. Pacini, and A. Pinchera RET Exon 11 (G691S) Polymorphism Is Significantly More Frequent in Sporadic Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Than in the General Population J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2004; 89(7): 3579 - 3584. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Karanikas, A. Moameni, C. Poetzi, G. Zettinig, K. Kaserer, C. Bieglmayer, B. Niederle, R. Dudczak, and C. Pirich Frequency and Relevance of Elevated Calcitonin Levels in Patients with Neoplastic and Nonneoplastic Thyroid Disease and in Healthy Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2004; 89(2): 515 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Niccoli-Sire, A. Murat, V. Rohmer, S. Franc, G. Chabrier, L. Baldet, B. Maes, F. Savagner, S. Giraud, S. Bezieau, et al. Familial Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma with Noncysteine RET Mutations: Phenotype-Genotype Relationship in a Large Series of Patients J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2001; 86(8): 3746 - 3753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. Harach Age, Sex and C Cells: What About the Human Thyroid Follicle with Acid Mucin and Solid Cell Nests?a J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., December 1, 1997; 82(12): 4274 - 4274. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |