help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on November 4, 2009
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1369
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Misra, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stanley, T. L.
Right arrow Articles by Misra, M.

Submitted on June 29, 2009
Accepted on September 23, 2009

Effect of Body Mass Index on Peak Growth Hormone Response to Provocative Testing in Children with Short Stature

Takara L. Stanley*, Lynne L. Levitsky, Steven K. Grinspoon, and Madhusmita Misra

Pediatric Endocrine Unit (T.L.S., L.L.L., M.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital for Children and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; and the Neuroendocrine Unit (T.L.S., S.K.G., M.M.), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tstanley{at}partners.org.

Context: Obesity is associated with decreased spontaneous and stimulated GH secretion, but the effect of body mass index (BMI) on results of GH stimulation testing in children with short stature is not known.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the impact of BMI on peak GH to provocative testing in children with short stature.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective review of provocative GH testing performed in 116 children 2–18 yr old in the ambulatory clinic of the Pediatric Endocrinology Unit at the Massachusetts General Hospital from 2004–2008.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure was peak stimulated GH. Height, weight, IGF-I, and IGF-binding protein 3 were also measured.

Results: In univariate regression analysis, BMI SD score (BMI SDS) was inversely associated with natural log (ln) peak GH to provocative testing (P = 0.002), whereas height SDS, ln IGF-I, and IGF-binding protein 3 were not significantly associated with ln peak GH. After controlling for age, gender, BMI, and pubertal status, BMI (P = 0.002) remained independently associated with ln peak GH. BMI SDS significantly influenced the likelihood of diagnosis of GH deficiency using peak GH cutoffs of 10, 7, and 5 μg/liter.

Conclusion: In children with short stature, BMI affects peak stimulated GH and should be considered when interpreting GH testing. Higher BMI SDS, even within the normal range, may lead to overdiagnosis of GH deficiency.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society