help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on October 30, 2009
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1238
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dekkers, O. M.
Right arrow Articles by Pereira, A. M.

Submitted on June 11, 2009
Accepted on October 13, 2009

Recurrence of Hyperprolactinemia after Withdrawal of Dopamine Agonists: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Olaf M. Dekkers*, Joep Lagro, Pia Burman, Jens Otto Jørgensen, Johannes A. Romijn, and Alberto M. Pereira

Departments of Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases (O.M.D., J.L., J.A.R., A.M.P.), and Clinical Epidemiology (O.M.D.), Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Endocrinology (P.B.), University Hospital, 205 02 Malmö, Sweden; and Medical Department M (J.O.J.), Aarhus University Hospital, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: o.m.dekkers{at}lumc.nl.

Context: Dopamine agonists are the treatment of choice for prolactinomas and symptomatic idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. However, the optimal treatment strategy and treatment duration is not clear in all details.

Objective: The aim of the study was to assess the effect of dopamine agonist withdrawal in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia and prolactinomas.

Data Sources: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched electronically. No restriction was made with respect to language.

Study Selection: Studies reporting the proportion of normoprolactinemic patients after withdrawal of dopamine agonist or studies in which this proportion could be calculated were eligible. Both observational studies and clinical trials were eligible. Nineteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 743 patients.

Data Extraction: Data extraction was performed by two reviewers independently.

Data Synthesis: The pooled proportion of patients with persisting normoprolactinemia after dopamine agonist withdrawal was 21% in a random effects model [95% confidence interval (CI), 14–30%; I2 81%). Stratified analysis showed higher proportions of treatment success in idiopathic hyperprolactinemia (32%; 95% CI, 5–80%), compared with both microprolactinomas (21%; 95% CI, 10–37%), and macroprolactinomas (16%; 95% CI, 6–36%). In a random effects meta-regression adjusting for cause of hyperprolactinemia, a longer treatment duration was associated with treatment success (P = 0.015), whereas the use of cabergoline showed a trend of effect (P = 0.07).

Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that hyperprolactinemia will recur after dopamine agonist withdrawal in a considerable proportion of patients. The probability of treatment success was highest when cabergoline was used for at least 2 yr.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society