help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on June 30, 2009
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2008-2406
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/9/3251    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khera, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Lemos, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khera, A.
Right arrow Articles by de Lemos, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiovascular Endocrinology
Right arrow Metabolism

Submitted on November 4, 2008
Accepted on June 19, 2009

Sex Differences in the Relationship Between C-Reactive Protein and Body Fat

Amit Khera MD, MSc*, Gloria L. Vega PhD, Sandeep R. Das MD, MPH, Colby Ayers MS, Darren K. McGuire MD, MHSc, Scott M. Grundy MD, PhD, and James A. de Lemos MD

From the Donald W. Reynolds Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center; Division of Cardiology; and Center for Human Nutrition, the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas TX

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: amit.khera{at}utsouthwestern.edu.

Background: C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are significantly influenced by adiposity and are higher in women compared with men. We postulated that there may be sex differences in the relationship between CRP and body fat.

Methods: We measured CRP and body fat parameters in 1166 men and 1413 women ages 30–65 in the population-based Dallas Heart Study. Total fat mass (TFM) was measured using DEXA scanning, and was sub-divided into truncal (TrF) and lower body fat (LBF). TrF/LBF ratio was used to measure fat distribution. Abdominal fat compartments [intraperitoneal (IP) and subcutaneous (SC)] were measured using MRI. Log transformed CRP was used as the outcome variable in sex-combined models with interaction tests.

Results: Median BMI was higher in women than in men (29.9 vs. 28.2kg/m2), as was TFM (29.7 vs. 20.5kg) (p<0.001 each). TFM was linearly associated with log CRP in both sexes, with a steeper slope of association in women (p-interaction=0.003). CRP increased to a greater degree with increasing TrF (p-interaction=0.0004) in women compared with men, even after adjustment for TFM; values were similar across sexes for LBF. Fat distribution (TrF/LBF ratio) was more strongly associated with CRP levels in women vs. men (R2 adjusted for TFM =0.04 vs. 0.008). Greater increases in CRP were also observed with increasing IP and SC fat in women compared with men.

Conclusions: The quantity and distribution of body fat influence CRP to a greater extent in women compared with men. Adiposity as a contributor to subclinical inflammation may be particularly relevant in women.


Key words: Obesity • Sex • CRP







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society