help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on October 6, 2009
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2008-2033
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/11/4258    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coker, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, W. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Coker, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Evans, W. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Obesity

Submitted on September 16, 2008
Accepted on July 29, 2009

The Impact of Exercise Training Compared to Caloric Restriction on Hepatic and Peripheral Insulin Resistance in Obesity

Robert H. Coker*, Rick H. Williams, Sophie E. Yeo, Patrick M. Kortebein, Don L. Bodenner, Philip A. Kern, and William J. Evans

Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (R.H.C.), and the Departments of Geriatrics (R.H.C., R.H.W., S.E.Y., D.L.B., W.J.E.) and Medicine (P.A.K.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas 72205

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cokerrobert{at}uams.edu.

Context: It has been difficult to distinguish the independent effects of caloric restriction versus exercise training on insulin resistance.

Objective: Utilizing metabolic feeding and supervised exercise training, we examined the influence of caloric restriction vs. exercise training with and without weight loss on hepatic and peripheral insulin resistance.

Design, Participants, and Intervention: Thirty-four obese, older subjects were randomized to: caloric restriction with weight loss (CR), exercise training with weight loss (EWL), exercise training without weight loss (EX), or controls. Based on an equivalent caloric deficit in EWL and CR, we induced matched weight loss. Subjects in the EX group received caloric compensation. Combined with [6,62H2]glucose, an octreotide, glucagon, multistage insulin infusion was performed to determine suppression of glucose production (SGP) and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal (ISGD). Computed tomography scans were performed to assess changes in fat distribution.

Results: Body weight decreased similarly in EWL and CR, and did not change in EX and controls. The reduction in visceral fat was significantly greater in EWL (-71 ± 15 cm2) compared to CR and EX. The increase in SGP was also almost 3-fold greater (27 ± 2%) in EWL. EWL and CR promoted similar improvements in ISGD [+2.5 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.9 mg · kg fat-free mass (FFM)-1 · min-1], respectively.

Conclusions: EWL promoted the most significant reduction in visceral fat and the greatest improvement in SGP. Equivalent increases in ISGD were noted in EWL and CR, whereas EX provided a modest improvement. Based on our results, EWL promoted the optimal intervention-based changes in body fat distribution and systemic insulin resistance.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society