help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH

This version published online on May 6, 2008
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2008-0267
This Article
Right arrow Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schrauwen-Hinderling, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schrauwen, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schrauwen-Hinderling, V. B.
Right arrow Articles by Schrauwen, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Diabetes and Insulin
Right arrow Metabolism

Submitted on February 5, 2008
Accepted on April 29, 2008

The insulin sensitizing effect of rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients does not require improved in vivo muscle mitochondrial function

Vera B. Schrauwen-Hinderling (PhD)*, Marco Mensink (MD, PhD), Matthijs K.C. Hesselink (PhD), Jean-Pierre Sels (MD, PhD), Marianne Eline Kooi (PhD), and Patrick Schrauwen (PhD)

Departments of Radiology, and Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Hospital, The Netherlands; Nutrition and Toxicology Research Institute Maastricht, NUTRIM, Maastricht University, The Netherlands; Departments of Human Biology, and Human Movement Sciences, Maastricht University, The Netherlands

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: v.schrauwen{at}hb.unimaas.nl.

Aims: To investigate whether improved in vivo mitochondrial function in skeletal muscle and intramyocellular lipids (IMCL) contribute to the insulin-sensitizing effect of rosiglitazone.

Methods: Eight overweight type 2 diabetic patients (BMI= 29.3 ± 1.1 kg/m2) were treated with rosiglitazone for 8 weeks. Before and after treatment, insulin sensitivity was determined by a hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp. Muscular mitochondrial function (half-time of phosphocreatine recovery after exercise) and IMCL content were measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Results: Insulin sensitivity improved after rosiglitazone (GIR: 19.9±2.8 to 24.8±2.1 µmol/kg/min (P<0.05)). In vivo mitochondrial function (PCr recovery half-time: 23.8±3.5 to 20.0±1.7 s (P=0.23)) and IMCL content (0.93±0.18% to 1.37±0.40%, p=0.34) did not change. Interestingly, the changes in PCr half-time correlated/tended to correlate with changes in fasting insulin (R2=0.50, P=0.05), and glucose (R2=0.43, p=0.08) levels. Changes in PCr half-time did not correlate with changes in GIR (R2=0.08, P=0.49).

Conclusion: The rosiglitazone-enhanced insulin sensitivity does not require improved muscular mitochondrial function.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society