| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on December 20, 2007
Accepted on April 9, 2008
Division of Adolescent Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Clinical Research Program, Biotics Research Corporation, Rosenberg, TX; General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston Massachusetts
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: catherine.gordon{at}childrens.harvard.edu.
Context: Hypovitaminosis D appears to be on the rise in young children, with implications for skeletal and overall health.
Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of vitamin D2 daily, vitamin D2 weekly, and vitamin D3 daily, combined with supplemental calcium, in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and lowering parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations.
Design: Six-week randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Urban pediatric clinic in Boston.
Subjects: Forty otherwise healthy infants and toddlers with hypovitaminosis D (25(OH)D < 20 ng/mL).
Interventions: Participants were assigned to one of three regimens: 2000 IU oral vitamin D2 daily, 50,000 IU vitamin D2 weekly, or 2000 IU vitamin D3 daily. Each was also prescribed elemental calcium (50 mg/kg/day). Infants received treatment for 6 weeks.
Main Outcome Measures: Before and after treatment, serum measurements of 25(OH)D, PTH, calcium, and alkaline phosphatase.
Results: All treatments approximately tripled the 25(OH)D concentration. Pre-planned comparisons were non-significant: daily vitamin D2 vs weekly vitamin D2 (12% difference in effect, p=0.66) and daily D2 vs daily D3 (7%, p=0.82). The mean serum calcium change was small and similar in the three groups. There was no significant difference in PTH suppression.
Conclusions: Short-term Vitamin D2 2000 IU daily, vitamin D2 50,000 IU weekly, or vitamin D3 2000 IU daily yield equivalent outcomes in the treatment of hypovitaminosis D among young children. Therefore, pediatric providers can individualize the treatment regimen for a given patient to ensure compliance, given that no difference in efficacy or safety was noted between these three common treatment regimens.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. B. Khazai, S. E. Judd, L. Jeng, L. L. Wolfenden, A. Stecenko, T. R. Ziegler, and V. Tangpricha Treatment and Prevention of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Cystic Fibrosis Patients: Comparative Efficacy of Ergocalciferol, Cholecalciferol, and UV Light J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2009; 94(6): 2037 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |