This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Google Scholar Articles by Veldhuis, J. D. Articles by Bowers, C. Y. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Veldhuis, J. D. Articles by Bowers, C. Y. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Hazardous Substances DB LEUPROLIDE TESTOSTERONE Related Collections Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary Male Endocrinology

Factors Other than Sex Steroids Modulate GHRH and GHRP-2 Efficacies in Men: Evaluation Using a GnRH Agonist/Testosterone Clamp

Department of Medicine (J.D.V.), Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Clinical Translational Science Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905; and Division of Endocrinology (C.Y.B.), Department of Internal Medicine, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Johannes D. Veldhuis, Department of Medicine, Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Clinical Translational Science Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905. E-mail: veldhuis.johannes{at}mayo.edu.

Background: Sex steroids are prominent regulators of pulsatile GH secretion.

Hypothesis: An experimentally controlled sex-steroid milieu will permit detection of nonsteroidal factors that determine GH secretion.

Subjects: Eleven young (age, 24 ± 0.99 yr) and 11 older (64 ± 2.4 yr) men participated in the study.

Location: The study was conducted at a tertiary medical center.

Methods: The study consisted of GnRH-agonist down-regulation of the gonadal axis followed by fixed-dose testosterone (T) replacement (leuprolide/T clamp) and consecutive infusion of L-arginine and GHRH or GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2) to quantify peptide-secretagogue efficacies.

Outcomes: The experimental leuprolide/T clamp yielded statistically age-comparable total, bioavailable, and free T and estradiol (E₂) concentrations. In this controlled milieu, sequential L-arginine/GHRH infusion stimulated 1.4-fold more (P = 0.021) and L-arginine/GHRP-2 1.3-fold more (P = 0.045) GH release in young than older men. Abdominal visceral fat (AVF) correlated negatively with both GHRH (P = 0.0006; R² = 0.39) and GHRP-2 (R² = 0.29) efficacy, whereas IGF-I positively predicted the same endpoints (R² = 0.25 to 0.30). In multivariate analysis, AVF emerged as a dominant negative determinant of GHRH efficacy (P = 0.002; R² = 0.41) and IGF-I as a primary positive determinant of GHRP-2 efficacy (P = 0.007; R² = 0.31).

Conclusion: During fixed T/E₂ availability, AVF contributes 41% of the GH-response variability to maximal GHRH drive, whereas IGF-I accounts for 31% of that for GHRP-2. Accordingly, a statistically equalized sex-steroid milieu permits dissection of age-independent and T/E₂-independent modulators of GHRH and GHRP efficacy in men.