help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism , doi:10.1210/jc.2008-2474
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thodberg, H. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thodberg, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pediatric Endocrinology
Right arrow Calcium and Bone Metabolism
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 94, No. 7 2239-2244
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society


CLINICAL REVIEW

An Automated Method for Determination of Bone Age

Hans Henrik Thodberg

Visiana, DK 2840 Holte, Denmark

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Hans Henrik Thodberg, Visiana, Søllerødvej 57 C, DK 2840 Holte, Denmark. E-mail: thodberg{at}gmail.com.

Context: Bone age rating is associated with a considerable rater variability, which limits its usefulness in modern pediatric endocrinology. An automated computerized method would theoretically solve this problem but has been surprisingly difficult to establish.

Evidence Acquisition: We review the development of automated bone age assessment and describe how the conceptual understanding of bone age rating shifted from a rule-based theory to a more intuitive and experience-based approach. The role of the CASAS system from 1992 is described. The BoneXpert system from 2008 employs deformable models of each bone to locate the bones and extracts the component of the bone appearance related to maturity in a holistic, statistical manner. Two clinical studies have been published on its accuracy, defined as the root mean square deviation from manual rating. Other studies addressed the precision of the method, defined as its ability to give the same result on a repeated x-ray, expressed as the SD on a single measurement.

Evidence Synthesis: The accuracy of the automated bone age determination was 0.71–0.72 yr, and the precision was 0.17–0.18 yr. More than 98.6% of the images could be analyzed. The system was validated on children with various diagnoses of short stature in the bone age range 2.5–17 yr for boys and 2–15 yr for girls.

Conclusion: The reviewed validation studies suggest that this automated bone age determination system has adequate accuracy, precision, and efficiency to be clinically useful.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2009 by The Endocrine Society