This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mizutori, Y. Articles by Rapoport, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mizutori, Y. Articles by Rapoport, B. Related Collections Thyroid Autoimmunity

Evidence that Shed Thyrotropin Receptor A Subunits Drive Affinity Maturation of Autoantibodies Causing Graves’ Disease

Autoimmune Disease Unit, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute and David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90048

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Basil Rapoport, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Boulevard, Suite B-131, Los Angeles, California 90048. E-mail: rapoportb{at}cshs.org.

Context: In Graves’ disease, thyroid-stimulating antibodies (TSAb) activate the TSH receptor (TSHR) causing hyperthyroidism. Serum polyclonal TSAb are difficult to study because of their extremely low serum levels.

Objective: Our objective was to determine whether monoclonal TSAb possess characteristics previously reported for polyclonal autoantibodies in Graves’ sera.

Design: We studied monoclonal TSAb from three laboratories: six generated from mice with induced hyperthyroidism; and one, M22, a human autoantibody obtained from Graves’ B cells.

Results: All TSAb with one exception were potent activators of TSHR-mediated cAMP generation, with relatively similar half-maximal stimulatory concentrations. Like polyclonal autoantibodies, monoclonal TSAb were largely neutralized by conformationally "active" (but not "inactive") recombinant TSHR A subunits (the N-terminal cleavage product of the TSHR). Chimeric substitutions of TSHR amino acids 25–30 (the extreme N terminus after removal of the 21 residue signal peptide) abrogated the binding and function of all monoclonal TSAb but with one antibody (TSAb4) revealing a nonidentical epitope. Remarkably, these residues are uninvolved in the M22 epitope determined by x-ray analysis. Finally, flow-cytometric dose-response analyses, not previously possible with polyclonal TSAb, revealed that all monoclonal TSAb, human and murine, bound with lower affinity to their in vivo target, the TSH-holoreceptor, than to the isolated TSHR ectodomain.

Conclusions: TSAb function does not require antibodies with identical epitopes, and human autoantibody M22 may, therefore, not represent the full epitopic repertoire of polyclonal TSAb in Graves’ disease. Most important, we provide strong evidence that the shed ectodomain (primarily the A subunit) is the primary antigen driving affinity maturation of TSAb producing B cells.