help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-1451
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/2/491    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bajuk Studen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Barkan, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bajuk Studen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Barkan, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 93, No. 2 491-496
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society

Assessment of the Magnitude of Growth Hormone Hypersecretion in Active Acromegaly: Reliability of Different Sampling Models

Katica Bajuk Studen and Ariel Barkan

Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes and Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5354

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Ariel Barkan, M.D., Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Diabetes, 3920 Taubman, SPC 5354, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-5354. E-mail: abarkan{at}umich.edu.

Context: The pulsatility of GH secretion in acromegaly poses difficulty in ascertaining true daily GH milieu in patients with this disease. Intensive GH sampling [every 10–20 (Q10–20) min for 24 h] is not practical in clinical practice.

Objective: Our objective was to ascertain reliability of abbreviated sampling protocols to reflect true 24-h mean GH concentrations in patients with acromegaly.

Design: An analysis of previously obtained plasma GH profiles was performed.

Setting: The analysis was performed at the General Clinical Research Center at the University of Michigan.

Patients: A total of 115 GH profiles obtained in 94 patients with active acromegaly were examined.

Intervention: Frequent blood sampling, i.e. Q10–20 min for 24 h, was performed.

Main Outcome Measures: Concordance of 24-h mean GH concentrations derived from Q10- to 20-min samplings with abbreviated GH sampling schedules was performed. The study was planned after data collection.

Results: All abbreviated schedules of GH sampling correlated well with the true 24-h plasma GH means (i.e. Q10- to 20-min sampling) (R = 0.93–0.98; P < 0.0001 for all). In the GH range more than 20 µg/liter, only 5 and 9-h means had R values more than 0.9. Single GH concentrations less than 1 µg/liter had a positive predictive value of only 0.29, and those with less than 2.5 µg/liter had a positive predictive value of 0.67 vs. their corresponding 24-h mean GH values of the same magnitude.

Conclusions: The intensity of GH sampling in patients with acromegaly may vary depending on the nature of the required information. Investigators and clinicians should be aware of the limitations of the abbreviated GH sampling protocols in acromegaly.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society