| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unit 690 (T.M., S.D., C.L.-M.), and Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (P.A., C.A.), Hôpital Robert Debré, Unité dEpidémiologie Clinique, Paris FR-75019, France; and Université Paris 7 Denis Diderot (T.M., C.L.-M.), Paris FR-75205 Cedex 13, France
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Taly Meas, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité 690, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48, Boulevard Sérurier, 75019 Paris, France. E-mail: talyphilip{at}free.fr.
Context: Increased fat mass has been reported in children and adults born small for gestational age (SGA). However, the progression of anthropometric parameters have been poorly documented in SGA adults.
Objective: We hypothesized that SGA individuals would remain susceptible to gain more fat when adults beyond the period of postnatal catch-up growth.
Study Population and Design: From a community-based cohort, 389 subjects born full-term SGA (body weight < 10th percentile) were compared with 462 subjects born appropriate for gestational age (25th < body weight < 75th percentile). Anthropometric parameters were measured at 22 and 30 yr as well as body composition (by multifrequency bioelectrical impedancometry and skinfold thickness) at 30 yr.
Results: Both groups gained weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. Progression of BMI was significantly greater in SGA (1.8 ± 2.6 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6 kg/m2; P = 0.03). At 30 yr, the proportion of obese individuals was significantly increased in SGA (12.1 vs. 6.5%; P = 0.02), and percent body fat was significantly higher (23.5 ± 8.7 vs. 21.9 ± 8.0%; P = 0.01), the observation of which was confirmed by skinfold measures. Similarly, waist circumference gain was significantly greater in SGA (6.4 ± 7.6 vs. 5.5 ± 7.9, P = 0.04 when adjusted for gender and age).
Conclusion: Over 8-yr follow-up, adults born SGA gained more BMI than appropriate for gestational age, resulting in greater fat mass with more abdominal fat. These data suggest that the consequences of fetal growth restriction on body composition are evolving beyond the period of early postnatal catch-up.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. F. Kerkhof, R. W. J. Leunissen, R. H. Willemsen, F. H. de Jong, T. Stijnen, and A. C. S. Hokken-Koelega Influence of Preterm Birth and Birth Size on Gonadal Function in Young Men J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4243 - 4250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M L Gianni, P Roggero, F Taroni, N Liotto, P Piemontese, and F Mosca Adiposity in small for gestational age preterm infants assessed at term equivalent age Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., September 1, 2009; 94(5): F368 - F372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Dulloo Adipose Tissue Plasticity in Catch-Up-Growth Trajectories to Metabolic Syndrome: Hyperplastic Versus Hypertrophic Catch-Up Fat Diabetes, May 1, 2009; 58(5): 1037 - 1039. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |