This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Engeli, S. Articles by Jordan, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Engeli, S. Articles by Jordan, J. Related Collections Metabolism Obesity

Dissociation between Adipose Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression and Tissue Metabolism

Franz-Volhard Clinical Research Center, Medical Faculty of the Charité and Helios Klinikum, D-13125 Berlin, Germany

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jens Jordan, M.D., Franz-Volhard Clinical Research Center, Charité Campus Buch, Wiltbergstrasse 50, 13125 Berlin, Germany. E-mail: jens.jordan{at}charite.de.

Context: Nitric oxide synthase (NOS) expression in adipose tissue is increased in obese subjects. The functional relevance is not known.

Objective: The objective was to compare adipose tissue metabolism between obese men with greater or lower adipose endothelial NOS (eNOS) or inducible NOS (iNOS) expression.

Design: The design was an open-labeled prospective study.

Setting: The study took place at an academic clinical research center.

Patients: The patients included 14 obese (32 ± 0.6 kg/m²) and eight normal-weight (23 ± 2 kg/m²) healthy men.

Intervention: Microdialysis catheters in abdominal sc adipose tissue and in vastus lateralis were perfused with N--nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) or N--nitro-D-arginine methyl ester (D-NAME). Then, incremental isoproterenol concentrations were added to the perfusate.

Main Outcome Measures: Microdialysate glycerol was the main outcome measure.

Results: Tissue perfusion and microdialysate glycerol concentrations at baseline and during isoproterenol stimulation were similar in obese men with high or low eNOS or iNOS expression during both L-NAME and D-NAME. During D-NAME, basal and maximal isoproterenol stimulated glycerol were similar in lean and in obese men. However, in lean men, the dose-response relationship between isoproterenol and glycerol was shifted towards the left (P < 0.0001). NOS inhibition with L-NAME had no effect on basal or isoproterenol-stimulated glycerol in the obese group in skeletal muscle or in adipose tissue. In contrast, L-NAME augmented the lipolytic response in lean subjects in both tissues.

Conclusions: Differences in eNOS and iNOS mRNA expression at the adipose tissue level may have a limited effect on lipolysis and tissue perfusion. The lower resting lipolysis in adipose tissue of obese compared with nonobese subjects cannot be explained by a tonic nitric oxide effect.