help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2007-0153
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/7/2604    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brabant, G.
Right arrow Articles by Toogood, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brabant, G.
Right arrow Articles by Toogood, A.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Metabolism
Right arrow Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 92, No. 7 2604-2609
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society

Clinical Implications of Residual Growth Hormone (GH) Response to Provocative Testing in Adults with Severe GH Deficiency

Georg Brabant, Ase Krogh Rasmussen, Beverly M. K. Biller, Michael Buchfelder, Ulla Feldt-Rasmussen, Kristin Forssmann, Bjorn Jonsson, Maria Koltowska-Haggstrom, Dominique Maiter, Bernhard Saller and Andy Toogood

Department of Endocrinology (G.B.), Christie Hospital, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom; Department of Medical Endocrinology (A.K.R., U.F.-R), Rigshospitalet, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Neuroendocrine Unit (B.M.K.B.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114; Department of Neurosurgery (M.B.), University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, 91045 Erlangen, Germany; Medical Department (K.F.), Pfizer GmbH, 76139 Karlsruhe, Germany; Departments of Women’s and Children’s Health (B.J.), and of Pharmacy (M.K.-H.), Uppsala University, 751 05 Uppsala, Sweden; KIGS/KIMS/ACROSTUDY Medical Outcomes (M.K.-H.), Pfizer Health AB, 190 91 Sollentuna, Sweden; Department of Endocrinology (D.M.), University Hospital Saint-Luc, 1200 Bruxelles, Belgium; EndoScience (B.S.), 80337 Munich, Germany; and Department of Endocrinology (A.T.), University Hospital National Health Service Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Georg Brabant, Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. E-mail: georg.brabant{at}manchester.ac.uk.

Context: The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) in adults is based on provocative tests of GH release, all influenced by clinical factors. It is unknown whether the amount of residual GH reserve under the cutoff value has any physiological implication.

Objectives: We used a large pharmacoepidemiological database of adult GHD (KIMS) and tested the impact of confounding factors on GH release of no greater than 3 µg/liter after an insulin tolerance test (ITT) and evaluated its potential physiological role.

Design, Settings, and Patients: A total of 1098 patients fulfilled the criteria of having a GH peak of no greater than 3 µg/liter during ITT as well as documented IGF-I levels.

Outcomes: The impact of underlying hypothalamic-pituitary disease, age, gender, body weight, as well as treatment modalities such as irradiation on peak GH level to ITT was evaluated, and the correlations between GH peak and targets of GH action were analyzed.

Results: The GH response to ITT was regulated by gender, age, and the number of additional pituitary deficiencies. In a multivariate evaluation, the extent of hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction was the most important single predictor of GH peak in ITT. GH peaks in ITT were positively related to IGF-I levels and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, as well as inversely to triglycerides.

Conclusions: Even in adult severe GHD, GH release appears to be regulated by factors defined to play an important role in normal GH secretion. The impact of very low GH release on IGF-I and lipid parameters indicates a persistent physiological role of low GH concentrations in severely affected patients with GHD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2007 by The Endocrine Society