| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Riley Hospital for Children (E.A.E.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202; University of Virginia (W.C.), Charlottesville, Virginia 22908; Seattle Childrens Hospital and Medical Center (G.B.K.), Seattle, Washington 98104; Pennsylvania State Childrens Hospital (P.A.L.), Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033; Stanford University Medical Center (E.K.N.), Stanford, California 94305; Baystate Childrens Hospital (E.O.R.), Springfield, Massachusetts 01199; Montefiore Medical Center (P.S.), Bronx, New York 10461; University of South Florida and All Childrens Hospital (D.S.), St. Petersburg, Florida 33701; Goryeb Childrens Hospital Atlantic Health System (L.S.), Morristown, New Jersey 07962; and Valera Pharmaceuticals (L.F., W.G., D.T.), Cranbury, New Jersey 08512
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Erica A. Eugster, M.D., Pediatric Endocrinology, Riley Hospital for Children, Room 5960, 702 Barnhill Drive, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202. E-mail: eeugster{at}iupui.edu.
Context: GnRH analog (GnRHa) therapy for central precocious puberty (CPP) typically involves im injections. The histrelin implant is a new treatment that provides a continuous slow release of the GnRHa histrelin.
Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the subdermal histrelin implant for the treatment of CPP in treatment naive and previously treated children.
Design: This was a phase III, open-label, prospective study of 1-yr duration.
Setting: The study was conducted at nine U.S. medical centers.
Patients: Girls ages 28 yr (naive) or 210 yr (previously treated) and boys 29 yr (naive) or 211 yr (previously treated) with clinical evidence of CPP and a pretreatment pubertal response to leuprolide stimulation were eligible.
Intervention: A 50-mg histrelin implant was inserted sc in the inner upper arm.
Main Outcome Measures: Peak LH after GnRHa stimulation testing and estradiol (girls) and testosterone (boys) were the main outcome measures.
Results: Thirty-six subjects (20 naive) were enrolled. By 1 month, peak LH fell from 28.2 ± 19.97 (naive) to 0.8 ± 0.39 mIU/ml (P < 0.0001) and from 2.1 ± 2.15 (previously treated) to 0.5 ± 0.32 mIU/ml (P < 0.0056). Estradiol suppressed from 24.5 ± 22.27 (naive) to 5.9 ± 2.37 pg/ml (P = 0.0016) and remained suppressed in previously treated subjects, as did testosterone. Suppression was maintained throughout the study. No significant adverse events occurred.
Conclusions: The subdermal histrelin implant achieves and maintains excellent suppression of peak LH and sex steroid levels for 1 yr in children with CPP. The treatment is well tolerated. Long-term studies are needed to confirm these results.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D Mul and I A Hughes The use of GnRH agonists in precocious puberty Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2008; 159(suppl_1): S3 - S8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |