| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
CLINICAL CASE SEMINAR |
Department of Endocrinology and Medical Sciences and Center of Excellence for Biomedical Research (E.R., F.B., A.R., F.M., D.F.), and Departments of Pathology (P.D., J.-L.R.) and Neurosurgery (G.Z., R.S.), San Martino Hospital University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; Interactions Cellulaires Neuroendocriniennes (A.S., P.J.), Unité Mixte de Recherche, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Faculté de Médecine Nord, Institut Fédératif Jean Roche, 13916 Marseille Cedex, France; and Biomeasure Inc./IPSEN (M.D.C.), Milford, Massachusetts 01757
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Diego Ferone, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Genova, Viale Benedetto XV, 6, 16132 Genova, Italy. E-mail: ferone{at}unige.it.
Context: Criteria to define the response to somatostatin (SS) analogs (SSA) in acromegaly are based on biochemical control of the disease. However, the mechanisms of action of SSAs in inhibiting tumor growth and hormonal secretion are only partially understood, and the two effects may occur independently.
Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the dissociation between antiproliferative and antisecretive effects of SSA in an octreotide-resistant patient displaying dramatic tumor shrinkage during primary therapy with octreotide LAR.
Design and Setting: We characterized somatostatin and dopamine D2 receptor expression by immunohistochemistry and real-time RT-PCR. The effects of different receptor-selective, bispecific analogs, and chimeric somatostatin/dopamine compounds on GH secretion and cell proliferation in primary cell cultures of the tumor were assessed.
Results: The expression of SS receptor subtypes (sst)5 and D2 receptor was higher, compared with the other receptor subtypes. GH inhibition by SS-14 and the two chimeric somatostatin/dopamine compounds was scant but greater than subtype-selective and sst2/sst5 bispecific agonists. Conversely, cell growth was potently inhibited by all test substances. However, SS-14, sst2/sst5 bispecific agonist, and chimeric molecules were more potent than the other compounds.
Conclusions: The significant antiproliferative effect of octreotide seems to be related to the higher expression of sst5 and the negligible antihormonal effect to the lower expression of sst2. However, activation of multiple receptors by new analogs may produce better control of tumor cell activities. The dissociation between antisecretive and antiproliferative effects observed in vivo and in vitro confirms that SSAs may induce tumor shrinkage despite the lack of effect on GH secretion.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Grant, H. Alturaihi, P. Jaquet, B. Collier, and U. Kumar Cell Growth Inhibition and Functioning of Human Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 Are Modulated by Receptor Heterodimerization Mol. Endocrinol., October 1, 2008; 22(10): 2278 - 2292. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Grozinsky-Glasberg, I. Shimon, M. Korbonits, and A. B Grossman Somatostatin analogues in the control of neuroendocrine tumours: efficacy and mechanisms Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2008; 15(3): 701 - 720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ferone, W. W. de Herder, R. Pivonello, J. M. Kros, P. M. van Koetsveld, T. de Jong, F. Minuto, A. Colao, S. W. J. Lamberts, and L. J. Hofland Correlation of in Vitro and in Vivo Somatotropic Adenoma Responsiveness to Somatostatin Analogs and Dopamine Agonists with Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptors and Electron Microscopy J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2008; 93(4): 1412 - 1417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. F Taboada, R. M Luque, L. V. Neto, E. d. O Machado, B. C Sbaffi, R. C Domingues, J. B Marcondes, L. M C Chimelli, R. Fontes, P. Niemeyer, et al. Quantitative analysis of somatostatin receptor subtypes (1-5) gene expression levels in somatotropinomas and correlation to in vivo hormonal and tumor volume responses to treatment with octreotide LAR Eur. J. Endocrinol., March 1, 2008; 158(3): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |