This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Janicka, A. Articles by Gilsanz, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Janicka, A. Articles by Gilsanz, V. Related Collections Pediatric Endocrinology Calcium and Bone Metabolism Metabolism

Fat Mass Is Not Beneficial to Bone in Adolescents and Young Adults

Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90027

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Vicente Gilsanz, M.D., Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Department of Radiology, MS #81, 4650 Sunset Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90027. E-mail: vgilsanz{at}chla.usc.edu.

Context: Although muscle mass is beneficial to bone, studies on the effect of fat mass on bone have yielded conflicting results.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the relations between lean and fat mass and bone structure.

Design: This study was cross-sectional.

Setting: The study was conducted in a general community.

Subjects: Subjects included 300 healthy sexually mature adolescents and young adults (150 males and 150 females) between the ages of 13 and 21 yr.

Main Outcome Measure: We investigated the relation between dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures of total body fat and lean mass and bone values obtained with DXA (legs and lumbar spine bone mineral density and bone mineral content) and computed tomography (CT) (cross-sectional and cortical bone areas of the femurs and cross-sectional area and cancellous bone density of the vertebrae).

Results: Simple and multiple linear regression analyses showed significant positive relations between DXA lean mass and all CT and DXA measures of bone in the axial and appendicular skeletons (all P < 0.005). In contrast, whereas Pearson correlations between DXA measures of fat mass and bone parameters were generally positive, multiple regression analyses showed that fat mass, after accounting for lean mass, trunk height/leg length, had a negative, or no, correlation with CT and DXA values for bone.

Conclusions: Our findings provide compelling evidence that, despite increased mechanical loading and independent of lean mass, adipose tissue is not beneficial to bone structure.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Di Iorgi, M. Rosol, S. D. Mittelman, and V. Gilsanz Reciprocal Relation between Marrow Adiposity and the Amount of Bone in the Axial and Appendicular Skeleton of Young Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2008; 93(6): 2281 - 2286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J Waugh, J. Polivy, R. Ridout, and G. A Hawker A prospective investigation of the relations among cognitive dietary restraint, subclinical ovulatory disturbances, physical activity, and bone mass in healthy young women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2007; 86(6): 1791 - 1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]