help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM JCEM Call for Nominations for EIC
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0690
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/9/3411    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frates, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frates, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Alexander, E. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
Right arrow Thyroid
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 9 3411-3417
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Prevalence and Distribution of Carcinoma in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Thyroid Nodules on Sonography

Mary C. Frates, Carol B. Benson, Peter M. Doubilet, Elizabeth Kunreuther, Maricela Contreras, Edmund S. Cibas, Joseph Orcutt, Francis D. Moore, Jr., P. Reed Larsen, Ellen Marqusee and Erik K. Alexander

Department of Radiology (M.C.F., C.B.B., P.M.D., M.C.); Thyroid Section, Division of Endocrinology, Hypertension and Diabetes, Department of Medicine (E.K., J.O., P.R.L., E.M., E.K.A.); Department of Pathology (E.S.C.); and Department of Surgery (F.D.M), Brigham & Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Erik K. Alexander, M.D., Thyroid Section, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, PBB-B4, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail: ekalexander{at}partners.org.

Context: Controversy remains as to the optimal management of patients with multiple thyroid nodules.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, distribution, and sonographic features of thyroid cancer in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules.

Design: We describe a retrospective observational cohort study that was carried out from 1995 to 2003.

Setting: The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital.

Patients: Patients with one or more thyroid nodules larger than 10 mm in diameter who had ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) were included in the study.

Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures were prevalence and distribution of thyroid cancer and the predictive value of demographic and sonographic features.

Results: A total of 1985 patients underwent FNA of 3483 nodules. The prevalence of thyroid cancer was similar between patients with a solitary nodule (175 of 1181 patients, 14.8%) and patients with multiple nodules (120 of 804, 14.9%) (P = 0.95, {chi}2). A solitary nodule had a higher likelihood of malignancy than a nonsolitary nodule (P < 0.01). In patients with multiple nodules larger than 10 mm, cancer was multifocal in 46%, and 72% of cancers occurred in the largest nodule. Multiple logistic regression analysis of statistically significant features demonstrates that the combination of patient gender (P < 0.02), whether a nodule is solitary vs. one of multiple (P < 0.002), nodule composition (P < 0.01), and presence of calcifications (P < 0.001) can be used to assign risk of cancer to each individual nodule. Risk ranges from a 48% likelihood of malignancy in a solitary solid nodule with punctate calcifications in a man to less than 3% in a noncalcified predominantly cystic nodule in a woman.

Conclusions: In a patient with one or more thyroid nodules larger than 10 mm in diameter, the likelihood of thyroid cancer per patient is independent of the number of nodules, whereas the likelihood per nodule decreases as the number of nodules increases. For exclusion of cancer in a thyroid with multiple nodules larger than 10 mm, up to four nodules should be considered for FNA. Sonographic characteristics can be used to prioritize nodules for FNA based on their individual risk of cancer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
W.-J. Moon, S. L. Jung, J. H. Lee, D. G. Na, J.-H. Baek, Y. H. Lee, J. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. S. Byun, and D. H. Lee
Benign and Malignant Thyroid Nodules: US Differentiation--Multicenter Retrospective Study
Radiology, April 10, 2008; (2008) 2473070944.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
M. C. Frates and C. B. Benson
Thyroid Calcifications
J. Ultrasound Med., February 1, 2008; 27(2): 312 - 312.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. J. Yeung and J. W. Serpell
Management of the Solitary Thyroid Nodule
Oncologist, February 1, 2008; 13(2): 105 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
J. E. Langer, J. K. Hoang, W. K. Lee, and S. Farrell
Invited Commentary * Authors' Response
RadioGraphics, May 1, 2007; 27(3): 861 - 865.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ImagingHome page
R Jones, R Spendiff, S Fareedi, and P S Richards
The role of ultrasound in the management of nodular thyroid disease
Imaging, March 1, 2007; 19(1): 28 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. S. Ross
Predicting thyroid malignancy.
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2006; 91(11): 4253 - 4255.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society