This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hernández, M. I. Articles by Mericq, V. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hernández, M. I. Articles by Mericq, V. Related Collections Pediatric Endocrinology Female Endocrinology

Comparison of Clinical, Ultrasonographic, and Biochemical Differences at the Beginning of Puberty in Healthy Girls Born Either Small for Gestational Age or Appropriate for Gestational Age: Preliminary Results

Institute of Maternal and Child Research (M.I.H., A.M., T.C., V.P., L.T., A.A., T.S., G.I., V.M.), Faculty of Medicine, University of Chile, 226-3, Santiago, Chile; and Department of Pediatric Endocrinology (S.A.), University of Concepción, Concepción, Chile

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Verónica Mericq, M.D., Institute of Maternal and Child Research, University of Chile, Casilla 226-3, Santiago, Chile. E-mail: vmericq{at}med.uchile.cl.

Context: There are limited and controversial data concerning puberty characteristics in girls born small for gestational age (SGA).

Objective: The objective of the study was to document clinical, ultrasonographic, and biochemical characteristics at the beginning of puberty in matched healthy girls born either SGA or appropriate for gestational age (AGA) recruited from the community.

Patients: Inclusion criteria were breast Tanner stage II and a body mass index between the 10th and 95th percentiles.

Interventions: Recruited subjects underwent a complete physical exam, bone age, and ultrasound measurements of the internal genitalia. Hormonal assessment included fasting early morning dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, androstenedione, SHBG, inhibin-B, FSH, LH, estradiol (E2), 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OH Prog), and testosterone. Thereafter, a GnRH agonist test (leuprolide 500 µg, sc) was performed with FSH and LH at time 3 and 24 h for E2, 17OH Prog, and testosterone.

Results: Sixty-five girls (35 AGA, 30 SGA) with a mean age of 9.9 ± 1.03 (7.8–12.5) yr, similar bone age/chronological age (1.02 ± 0.8 in AGA and 1 ± 0.76 in SGA), median height of 1.35 ± 0.06 cm, and similar waist to hip ratio were included. No differences in the presence of pubic hair, axillary hair, apocrine odor, or ultrasound measurements were found. SGA girls had increased baseline E2 as well as stimulated E2 and 17OH Prog.

Conclusions: In a preliminary sample of lean, healthy girls recruited from the community born either SGA or AGA, we observed slight hormonal differences at the beginning of puberty. Longitudinal follow-up of this cohort will allow us to understand whether these differences are maintained and have a clinical impact in their pubertal development.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Saenger, P. Czernichow, I. Hughes, and E. O. Reiter Small for Gestational Age: Short Stature and Beyond Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2007; 28(2): 219 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]