| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Departments of Internal Medicine (H.R., P.S., E.F.C.v.R., E.L.T.v.d.A., F.H.d.J., J.W.K., S.W.J.L.) and Reproduction and Development (A.O.B.), Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and Department of Internal Medicine (L.J.M.d.H.), Medical Center Leeuwarden, 8901 BR Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Jan W. Koper, Erasmus MC, Department of Internal Medicine, Room Ee585b, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: f.koper{at}erasmusmc.nl.
Context: The clinical presentation of abnormalities in glucocorticoid (GC) sensitivity is diverse, and therefore it is difficult to diagnose this condition.
Objective and Design: The objective of the study was to develop strategies for the characterization of GC sensitivity disorders.
Setting: The study was conducted in an outpatient clinic.
Patients: Nine patients with GC sensitivity disorders participated.
Interventions: Sequence analysis of the GC receptor (GR), determination of GR number per cell, GR ligand-binding affinity, and GR splice regulation were performed in freshly prepared peripheral blood mononuclear lymphocytes and Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblasts. Cellular GC sensitivity was determined ex vivo by measuring the effect of dexamethasone on GC-induced leucine-zipper and IL-2 mRNA levels and on cell proliferation.
Results: Differences in GR number per cell, GR affinity, GR splice variants, and effects on transactivation or transrepression of GC-sensitive genes were observed between patients and controls. Epstein-Barr virus transformation of lymphoblasts had no influence on GR affinity but increased the GR number 5-fold in healthy controls. In patients diagnosed as cortisol resistant, however, GR number after transformation was increased significantly less than 5-fold, whereas a higher GR number was observed in a patient suspected of cortisol hypersensitivity.
Conclusion: This study illustrates several strategies to define abnormalities in GC sensitivity by describing nine patients with affected GC sensitivity, all with a unique clinical course and background.
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |