This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Samander, E. H. Articles by Arnold, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Samander, E. H. Articles by Arnold, A. Related Collections Calcium and Bone Metabolism Endocrine Oncology

Mutational Analysis of the Vitamin D Receptor Does Not Support Its Candidacy as a Tumor Suppressor Gene in Parathyroid Adenomas

Center for Molecular Medicine and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3101

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Andrew Arnold, M.D., Center for Molecular Medicine, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-3101. E-mail: molecularmedicine{at}uchc.edu.

Context: The vitamin D receptor gene (VDR) is a compelling candidate tumor suppressor gene for parathyroid adenomas based on existing evidence of the vitamin D system’s antiproliferative actions in parathyroid and other tissues, its reported inhibition of PTH gene transcription, and the decreased expression of VDR mRNA and VDR protein observed in parathyroid adenomas.

Objective: Because demonstration of intragenic mutations is required to establish the authenticity and primary role in pathogenesis for any candidate tumor suppressor gene, we examined the VDR gene in parathyroid adenomas for the presence of such mutations and other loss-of-function abnormalities.

Methods and Results: Genomic DNA samples from 37 sporadic parathyroid adenomas and matched normal control DNA from the same individuals were subjected to direct sequencing of the entire VDR coding region and all intron-exon boundaries. No VDR coding region or junctional mutations were identified. The tumors were also analyzed for loss of heterozygosity, a frequent mechanism of tumor suppressor gene inactivation, by molecular allelotyping at three microsatellite markers located near the VDR gene, D12S85, D12S96, and D12S368, and a polymorphism within VDR itself. In all 37 cases, at least one marker was informative and no tumor-specific loss of heterozygosity was observed.

Conclusion: We found no evidence of allelic loss within or near the VDR locus and no mutations within the splice junctions and coding regions of the VDR gene in 37 typical sporadic parathyroid adenomas. Thus, VDR is most unlikely to commonly serve as a classical tumor suppressor gene in sporadic parathyroid adenomas.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Z. Saidak, R. Mentaverri, and E. M. Brown The Role of the Calcium-Sensing Receptor in the Development and Progression of Cancer Endocr. Rev., April 1, 2009; 30(2): 178 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]