help button home button Endocrine Society JCEM
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0920
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
91/11/4593    most recent
Author Manuscript (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a related Letter to the Editor
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Copyright Permission
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollard, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollard, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Maher, E. R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Head and Neck Cancer
*Pheochromocytoma
Related Collections
Right arrow Adrenal and Hypertension
Right arrow Endocrine Oncology
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism Vol. 91, No. 11 4593-4598
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society

Expression of HIF-1{alpha}, HIF-2{alpha} (EPAS1), and Their Target Genes in Paraganglioma and Pheochromocytoma with VHL and SDH Mutations

Patrick J. Pollard, Mona El-Bahrawy, Richard Poulsom, George Elia, Pip Killick, Gavin Kelly, Toby Hunt, Rosemary Jeffery, Pooja Seedhar, Julian Barwell, Farida Latif, Michael J. Gleeson, Shirley V. Hodgson, Gordon W. Stamp, Ian P. M. Tomlinson and Eamonn R. Maher

Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory (P.J.P., I.P.M.T.), Histopathology Service (G.E.), In Situ Hybridisation Service (R.P., T.H., R.J., P.S.), and Bioinformatics & Biostatistics Service (G.K.), London Research Institute, Cancer Research UK, 44 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PX, United Kingdom; Imperial College Department of Histopathology (M.E.-B., G.W.S.), Division of Investigative Science, Hammersmith Hospital, DuCane Road, London W12 0NN, United Kingdom; Department of Otolaryngology (M.J.G.), Guy’s Hospital, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom; Department of Clinical Genetics (J.B., S.V.H.), St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom; and Cancer Research UK Renal Molecular Oncology Group (P.K., F.L., E.R.M.), Section of Medical and Molecular Genetics, University of Birmingham School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Research, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Eamonn R. Maher, Cancer Research UK Renal Molecular Oncology Group, Section of Medical and Molecular Genetics, University of Birmingham School of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Research, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. E-mail: e.r.maher{at}bham.ac.uk.

Context: Activation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF-1 and HIF-2 and a HIF-independent defect in developmental apoptosis have been implicated in the pathogenesis of pheochromocytoma (PCC) associated with VHL, SDHB, and SDHD mutations.

Objective: Our objective was to compare protein (HIF-1{alpha}, EPAS1, SDHB, JunB, CCND1, CD34, CLU) and gene (VEGF, BNIP3) expression patterns in VHL and SDHB/D associated tumors.

Results: Overexpression of HIF-2 was relatively more common in VHL than SDHB/D PCC (12 of 13 vs. 14 of 20, P = 0.02), whereas nuclear HIF-1 staining was relatively more frequent in SDHB/D PCC (19 of 20 vs. 13 of 16, P = 0.04). In addition, CCND1 and VEGF expression (HIF-2 target genes) was significantly higher in VHL than in SDHB/D PCC. These findings suggest that VHL inactivation leads to preferential HIF-2 activation and CCND1 expression as described previously in VHL-defective renal cell carcinoma cell lines but not in other cell types. These similarities between the downstream consequences of VHL inactivation and HIF dysregulation in renal cell carcinoma and PCC may explain how inactivation of the ubiquitously expressed VHL protein results in susceptibility to specific tumor types. Both VHL and SDHB/D PCC demonstrated reduced CLU and SDHB expression. SDHB PCC are associated with a high risk of malignancy, and expression of (proapototic) BNIP3 was significantly lower in SDHB than VHL PCC.

Conclusion: Although inactivation of VHL and SDHB/D may disrupt similar HIF-dependent and HIF-independent signaling pathways, their effects on target gene expression are not identical, and this may explain the observed clinical differences in PCC and associated tumors seen with germline VHL and SDHB/D mutations.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. Ricketts, E. R. Woodward, P. Killick, M. R. Morris, D. Astuti, F. Latif, and E. R. Maher
Germline SDHB Mutations and Familial Renal Cell Carcinoma
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 3, 2008; 100(17): 1260 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Endocrinology Endocrine Reviews J. Clin. End. & Metab.
Molecular Endocrinology Recent Prog. Horm. Res. All Endocrine Journals
Copyright © 2006 by The Endocrine Society