| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Unité dExploration du Metabolisme de lOs et du Cartilage (J.-Y.R.), University of Liège, B-4020 Liège, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. (K.M.W., B.B., J.B.), Basel, CH-4070, Switzerland; and GlaxoSmithKline (E.D.), Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Professor Jean-Yves Reginster, Unité dExploration du Metabolisme de lOs et du Cartilage, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Centre Ville, B-4020 Liège, Belgium. E-mail: jyreginster{at}ulg.ac.be.
Context: Ibandronate, a potent, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate developed for intermittent administration in postmenopausal osteoporosis, aims to overcome current adherence issues with daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates through once-monthly oral dosing.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of once-monthly oral ibandronate.
Design: A randomized, 3-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study (Monthly Oral Pilot Study) was conducted.
Setting: The study was conducted at five clinical trial centers in the United Kingdom and Belgium.
Patients or Other Participants: Subjects were postmenopausal women (age, 5580 yr;
3 yr post menopause; n = 144).
Intervention(s): Once-monthly oral ibandronate 50, 100, or 150 mg or placebo was used. After the first cycle, the 50-mg arm was split, with participants continuing on either 50 or 100 mg.
Main Outcome Measure(s): Primary outcome measures were safety, serum and urinary C-telopeptide (CTX), and serum ibandronate AUC0-
.
Results: Once-monthly oral ibandronate was well tolerated, with a similar overall and upper gastrointestinal safety profile to placebo. Once-monthly ibandronate was also highly effective in decreasing bone turnover; substantial reductions from baseline in serum CTX (56.7% and 40.7% in the 150- and 100-mg arms, respectively; P < 0.001 vs. placebo) and urinary CTX (54.1% and 34.6%, respectively; P < 0.001 vs. placebo) were observed at d 91 (30 d after the final dose). Analysis of the area under the effect curve (d 191) for change from baseline (percent x days) in serum CTX and urinary CTX indicated a dose-response relationship. The AUC0-
for ibandronate increased with dose but not in a dose-proportional manner.
Conclusions: These findings indicate a potential role for once-monthly oral ibandronate in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S E Papapoulos and R C Schimmer Changes in bone remodelling and antifracture efficacy of intermittent bisphosphonate therapy: implications from clinical studies with ibandronate Ann Rheum Dis, July 1, 2007; 66(7): 853 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J-Y Reginster, S Adami, P Lakatos, M Greenwald, J J Stepan, S L Silverman, C Christiansen, L Rowell, N Mairon, B Bonvoisin, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of once-monthly oral ibandronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2 year results from the MOBILE study Ann Rheum Dis, May 1, 2006; 65(5): 654 - 661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. ZAIDI, S. EPSTEIN, and K. FRIEND Modeling of Serum C-Telopeptide Levels with Daily and Monthly Oral Ibandronate in Humans Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2006; 1068(1): 560 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |