This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 90/8/4525    most recent Author Manuscript (PDF) Submit a related Letter to the Editor Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Copyright Permission Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Attanasio, A. F. Articles by Shalet, S. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Attanasio, A. F. Articles by Shalet, S. M. Related Collections Neuroendocrinology and Pituitary Pediatric Endocrinology

Quality of Life in Childhood Onset Growth Hormone-Deficient Patients in the Transition Phase from Childhood to Adulthood

Cascina del Rosone (A.F.A.), 14041 Agliano Terme, Italy; Pharma Support, Inc. (E.P.S.), 191119 St. Petersburg, Russia; Eli Lilly & Company (W.F.B.), 61350 Bad Homburg, Germany; and Christie Hospital (S.M.S.), Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom

Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Dr. Stephen M. Shalet, Department of Endocrinology, Christie Hospital NHS Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, United Kingdom. E-mail: stephen.m.shalet{at}man.ac.uk.

Background: Quality of life (QoL) has not been specifically assessed in GH-deficient (GHD) transition patients.

Methods: We assessed QoL at baseline and after 1 and 2 yr of GH treatment in severely GHD patients, using an adult GHD-specific questionnaire, QLS^M-H. Subjects were randomized to GH, 25.0 µg/kg·d (n = 25) or 12.5 µg/kg·d (n = 28), or no treatment (n = 13). SD scores for QLS-H were calculated from normative data, specific to country of origin, gender, and age range of the patients.

Results: Baseline QLS-H SD scores were –0.35 ± 1.17 in females and –0.70 ± 1.05 in males (P = 0.280). SD scores for individual dimensions of ability to become sexually aroused, ability to tolerate stress, body shape, concentration, initiative/drive, physical stamina, and self-confidence were significantly lower than the normal average. Particularly affected were body shape (SD score, –0.80 ± 0.99; quartile (Q)1:Q3, –1.52:–0.29) and sexual arousal (SD score, –0.41 ± 0.88; Q1:Q3, –1.15:–0.13). Total QLS-H SD score increased slightly but not significantly for combined GH treatment groups compared with control at yr 1 (0.047 ± 1.51 vs. –0.32 ± 1.66; P = 0.845) but not after yr 2 (–0.00 ± 0.80 vs. 0.12 ± 0.89; P = 0.385); no dose effect of GH was observed. GH treatment significantly increased SD score from baseline to yr 2 for sexual arousal and body shape (0.23 ± 0.78, P = 0.038; and 0.46 ± 1.26, P = 0.035, respectively).

Conclusion: Although overall baseline QoL was not compromised in severely GHD patients during the transition period, dimensions related to age-specific psychological problems were significantly worse than healthy subjects and appeared to positively respond to GH treatment.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Radovick and S. DiVall Approach to the Growth Hormone-Deficient Child during Transition to Adulthood J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 1195 - 1200. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]