| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INSERM Research Unit 403 (S.B., F.M., P.D.D.), and Claude Bernard University of Lyon, 69437 Lyon, France; and Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory (M.L.B.), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Prof. Pierre D. Delmas, INSERM Unit 403, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Pavillon F, 69437 Lyon Cedex 03, France. E-mail: delmas{at}lyon.inserm.fr.
Context: Assessment of trabecular microarchitecture may enhance the prediction of fracture risk and improve monitoring of treatment response. A new high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) system permits in vivo assessment of trabecular architecture and volumetric bone mineral density (BMD) at the distal radius and tibia with a voxel size of 82 µm3.
Objective and Patients: We determined the short-term reproducibility of this device by measuring 15 healthy volunteers three times each. We compared HR-pQCT measurements in 108 healthy premenopausal, 113 postmenopausal osteopenic, and 35 postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Furthermore, we compared values in postmenopausal osteopenic women with (n = 35) and without previous fracture history (n = 78).
Design and Setting: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a private clinical research center.
Intervention and Main Outcome Measure: We took HR-pQCT measurements of the radius and tibia. Femoral neck and spine BMD were measured in postmenopausal women by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
Results: Precision of HR-pQCT measurements was 0.71.5% for total, trabecular, and cortical densities and 2.54.4% for trabecular architecture. Postmenopausal women had lower density, trabecular number, and cortical thickness than premenopausal women (P < 0.001) at both radius and tibia. Osteoporotic women had lower density, cortical thickness, and increased trabecular separation than osteopenic women (P < 0.01) at both sites. Furthermore, although spine and hip BMD were similar, fractured osteopenic women had lower trabecular density and more heterogeneous trabecular distribution (P < 0.02) at the radius compared with unfractured osteopenic women.
Conclusion: HR-pQCT appears promising to assess bone density and microarchitecture at peripheral sites in terms of reproducibility and ability to detect age- and disease-related changes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Cohen, X. S. Liu, E. M. Stein, D. J. McMahon, H. F. Rogers, J. LeMaster, R. R. Recker, J. M. Lappe, X. E. Guo, and E. Shane Bone Microarchitecture and Stiffness in Premenopausal Women with Idiopathic Osteoporosis J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2009; 94(11): 4351 - 4360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bacchetta, S. Boutroy, F. Guebre-Egziabher, L. Juillard, J. Drai, S. Pelletier, M. Richard, A. Charrie, M. C. Carlier, R. Chapurlat, et al. The relationship between adipokines, osteocalcin and bone quality in chronic kidney disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2009; 24(10): 3120 - 3125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Bredella, M. Misra, K. K. Miller, I. Madisch, A. Sarwar, A. Cheung, A. Klibanski, and R. Gupta Distal Radius in Adolescent Girls with Anorexia Nervosa: Trabecular Structure Analysis with High-Resolution Flat-Panel Volume CT Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 938 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. H. van Lenthe and R. Muller CT-Based Visualization and Quantification of Bone Microstructure In Vivo IBMS BoneKEy, November 1, 2008; 5(11): 410 - 425. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chevalley, J.-P. Bonjour, S. Ferrari, and R. Rizzoli Influence of Age at Menarche on Forearm Bone Microstructure in Healthy Young Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2594 - 2601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. K. Genant, K. Engelke, and S. Prevrhal Advanced CT bone imaging in osteoporosis Rheumatology, July 1, 2008; 47(suppl_4): iv9 - iv16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. B. Kalpakcioglu, S. Morshed, K. Engelke, and H. K. Genant Advanced Imaging of Bone Macrostructure and Microstructure in Bone Fragility and Fracture Repair J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., February 1, 2008; 90(Supplement_1): 68 - 78. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Lee, V. Gilsanz, and T. A. L. Wren Limitations of Peripheral Quantitative Computed Tomography Metaphyseal Bone Density Measurements J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., November 1, 2007; 92(11): 4248 - 4253. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Lentle and D. Worsley Osteoporosis Redux J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 1945 - 1959. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Seeman and P. D. Delmas Bone quality--the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N. Engl. J. Med., May 25, 2006; 354(21): 2250 - 2261. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Endocrinology | Endocrine Reviews | J. Clin. End. & Metab. |
| Molecular Endocrinology | Recent Prog. Horm. Res. | All Endocrine Journals |